Weekly review 3 July 2022.

Well, after weeks of frenetic activity on the transfer front, there’s barely anything for me to report this week. City’s first team squad have been training up in Scotland for the past week and, with pre season fixtures not starting for another week yet, it’s been a very quiet seven days all of which makes for a short column this time.

In an interview which can be found on the club website, Steve Morison spoke about ex City winger Chris Burke turning up to watch the players training on Thursday I think it was (he was probably meeting up with his old captain Mark Hudson) and being particularly impressed by some of our new signings which, clearly, is a good sign.

However, our manager spoke as if his squad for the new season was almost in place now – there would be some more players coming in, but he talked of them being “sprinkles” to be added to what’s already in place. That struck me as a strange word to use, but, for me at least, the message it conveys is that July is going to be quieter on the transfer front than May and June were.

Adding nine to the squad is a lot, but fourteen have gone if you include returning loans, as well as a contracted player (Sam Bowen) and there are a few more who you feel are candidates to be leaving the club temporarily or permanently (e.g. Dillon Phillips, Gavin Whyte and one or both of James Collins and Max Watters).

The talk has been of City using up all of the five loan options they’re allowed and, like a lot of fans, it seems to me that that we could do with a couple of strikers, another centre back and a right sided attacking player, while although I think our central midfield doesn’t look bad now, it does seem short on creativity.

This story which appeared in Wales Online a couple of days ago contains a claim that City have lost out on two loan targets because of new rules regarding loans that will work against us and Swansea, but it seems to me that their impact will be pretty limited and I hope they’re not being used as an excuse for us not bringing in the players that are needed in forward positions if we are not going to seriously struggle to score goals this season.

With our aerial threat from set pieces not looking to be as potent as it has been in recent years, we really need more goals added to the squad in forward areas and, on the face of it, we’ve not brought in a single player who answers those requirements yet.

Finally, with the dust having settled regarding Gareth Bale, I must say I still don’t get why some are being so critical of him. Okay, I’m not sure that the line about the move having nothing to do with money stands up as well as it might, but there’s only one aspect of the whole thing that makes me mildly annoyed now and that’s him appearing in that promotional video regarding his transfer at the training ground used by City, that’s a bit disrespectful I’d say and something that could easily have been done elsewhere.

This entry was posted in Out on the pitch. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Weekly review 3 July 2022.

  1. DJ says:

    Regarding restrictions on loans, I can see that it will make it more difficult to get business done earlier and provides an extra hurdle but not many teams are loaning out players of 21 or over to over 6 FA’s at the moment (this could change – England is becoming center of football world due to Sky money and mass acceptance of sports-washing) and if City hadn’t ignored our own academy from Dave Jones’ last throws of dice at promotion til Steve Morison arrived at academy with Neil Harris, then we might have a better reputation for developing youth to make us a more attractive club to send players to. At the same time we might not need to rely on it so much because i) our budget would have been better having been able to sell on some more players and ii) we might already have in-house solutions.

    I want to give City credit for updating their approach in recent years but difficult when we haven’t seen any results from re-focus on developing our own yet. Indeed the most recent things we’ve seen are players we’ve longed hoped could make step-up either being released, sold on or overtaken by cast-offs from higher profile academies…I accept that will take some time to get to where we want it but being told that it’s the players from Championship relegation battle, Buderlisga 2 and EFL League 2 standing out rather than the ones we have been working with for several years is a bit disappointing.

    Regarding Bale, I never believed he was coming so maybe easier to take but some of the comments have been ridiculous. Some “fans” clearly want the attention.

  2. The other Bob Wilson says:

    Agree completely with your first paragraph DJ and I can’t argue with much in your second one. I think the way Sam Bowen and Keiron Evans in particular have been treated sends out a message that talent alone is not enough to impress this manager. I can understand that, but I don’t get why Bowen did not get a single chance under Morison to show what he could do in the first team after looking one of the better ones at adjusting to first team football out of the group given debuts by Mick McCarthy. In our manager’s defence, he has got the average age of the team down and, in the main, he has done so by recruiting in the 24 to 27 age range which was needed after we were too much of a mix between young havers and veterans last season.
    Knowing so little about players such as Collins and Tanner, I shouldn’t jump to instant conclusions about what sort of team we’ll be in 22/23, but I must say that the midfield recruitment so far seems to be very much about work rate, ball winning and stamina – that is, how we play without the ball rather than with it, on a personal level, I don’t see much evidence of the more entertaining approach that, to be frank, I’m pretty desperate for after all these years of boredom.

Comments are closed.