Seven decades of Cardiff City v Sheffield United matches.

Cardiff City may have killed two birds with one stone yesterday with the signing from West Brom of Polish international Krystian Bielik. Our new signing first made his reputation in this country by starring as a defensive midfielder for the likes of Derby and Birmingham, but has dropped back to play in central defence in recent years and, apparently, the plan is for him to be used as a central defender until our injury crisis in that area eases and then he will switch to playing as a number six.

So, it’s a clever signing in some ways for us and, with my memory of the early Bielik being considered one of the best midfielders in the Championship around five or six years ago, I’d definitely be claiming we’d got ourselves a tremendous signing if this was, say, the start of the 2019/20 season when he’d just signed for Derby.

Unfortunately, seven years on this is a signing which is a much more riskier one than it would have been back then and this is reflected in the price we are paying for him (something that I will come to again later). Some four months after signing for Derby, Bielik sustained an ACL injury in January 2020 which kept him out of acton until the following November, but, having regained his place in the first team, he picked up an identical injury early in 2021. Bielik returned a year to the day after this latest setback in January 2022 and scored for Derby who were now facing an inevitable relegation to the third tier following their massive points deduction.

Bielick moved to Birmingham on loan for the following season and then made the deal permanent. In three seasons at St. Andrews, Bielik was largely injury free as he clocked up around 120 first team appearances before moving to West Brom around this time last year.

Bielik’s time in a struggling Baggies team cannot be deemed a success. Having had shoulder surgery while on loan to Walsall from Arsenal early in his career, Bielik was absent for a long stretch of last season with a shoulder problem – although I must emphasise that I could not confirm whether these injuries were to the same shoulder.

Essentially, the messages I’ve seen from supporters of the clubs he played for early in his career (i.e. Derby and Birmingham) are of the good player if you can keep him fit variety, while West Brom fans seem more surprised, and delighted, by the size of the fee of £2.5 million we paid for him. They are very complimentary to their club for managing to get so much for someone who was just one year into a three year contract after they’d paid a reported £900,000 for him. However, I must admit to being baffled by what I saw in one Baggies podcast which talked about Bielik in terms of him being some washed up veteran in his mid 30s when, at 28, he is at an age where, traditionally, players are considered to be at their peak!

I should say here that there is no confirmation from City that £2.5 million is the correct fee we paid. Selling clubs have a tendency to release the maximum potential value of a deal, thereby including extra payments for all sorts of unlikely events that never end up happening and the one figure I’ve heard from the Cardiff end (albeit from a pretty unreliable podcast) is £1.5 million – it’s worth saying there that the Chat GPT report I asked for on Bielik’s signing concluded he was a good buy, but not on a three year deal (as we have done) for a fee over £2 million.

Whatever the fee we’re paying for Bielik, it’s some way short of the reported £10 million, including add ons, Derby were reported to have paid for him seven years ago and, in a market that I’d say has seen a slight rise in player valuations since then, that is suggestive of Bielik not being the player he once was even if you make an allowance for the fact that age plays a big part in these sort of things.

The fact that the last of Bielik’s eleven senior caps for Poland was won in 2023 at a time when that country is going through a decline in terms of qualification for major tournaments again suggests a player whose best days are behind him.

However, that need not mean that Bieleich cannot be a success at City. For a start, you would expect his experience of this division and his general know how to be invaluable at. a club with such a young squad. Furthermore, when you consider how good I can remember him being, I feel that even with a decline from those levels, he could still be a valuable member of the squad. Given that the plan seems to be to have Bielik as the eventual replacement for Ryan Wintle, I can definitely imagine that he would be a step up from our Player of the year from last season.

That said, my final thought on this deal is that it’s hard to see, or believe, that Bielik is a player we’ve been chasing for the four months since promotion was confirmed. Therefore, while “panic buy” is putting things too strongly I believe, this does have the feel of a transfer we’ve been somewhat forced into given our problems at centreback – would Bielik have been on our radar a month ago?

Anyway, on to what is the main point of this message – the quiz! As always I’ll post the answers on the morning after match day.

60s. As a left sided central defender, you would suspect that this Yorkshireman would be much in demand today. Sheffield United were his first club and he spent a decade with them with the last seven years of it as a pretty regular member of the first team. When he moved on, it was to play for another team which played in black shorts (back then at least) and a distinctive shirt. Here he was in competition with a well established centre back pairing and so he was more of a squad player than a regular and when his side were promoted to the top flight, he decided to move to the Midlands and get a full time job. Still playing in black shorts, but with a plainer shirt, the irony was that, as a part time player, he was turning out for a side that probably got more national media coverage at that time than either of his first two teams would have done. He was part of what has to be the most famous game in this club’s history and helped to establish the team in their new, more illustrious, setting, before a move to a club which played in the same colours and also had an animal as its nickname. Can you name the player being described here?

70s. A few years before this player was turning out for Sheffield United during this decade, Tina Turner was singing about a place that was almost, but not quite, his surname. Name the player!

80s. Beginning at Sheffield United during the 80s, his stay at Cardiff crossed two different decades and he ended up managing south Wales scapegoats as well as Gwent Cuckoos – who is he?

90s. Rebel rat doubling up as England international. (4,7)

00s. This Sheffield United player from this decade was a full international who shared his name with two other players who, between them, played international football in the three preceding decades. Who are they?

10s. Signify our bills? Sounds like it anyway!

20s. Which former Sheffield United player from this decade was sent off twice within three weeks earlier this year while playing for his current club, scored for his country in the World Cup and was part of a devastating defeat this week?

Posted in Memories, 1963 - 2023, Out on the pitch | Tagged , | Leave a comment

15 year old Anyadike and Robertson at centreback on Saturday? All getting a bit farcical now.

Cardiff City bowed out of the League Cup at the Second Round stage with a 2-1 defeat to Norwich at Cardiff City Stadium tonight and while i daresay most of the headlines will be taken up by our centreback woes, us fielding the competition’s youngest ever player and maybe the continuing failure to bring players in, I’d also highlight how little we’ve managed to test the goalkeeper of the two Championship teams we’ve faced at home.

A total of six efforts on target in games against Wrexham and Norwich is a disappointment and a surprise for a team that is reckoned to be always giving the opposition a chance because they’re so attacking in their outlook. We’ve had three on target efforts in both games and in another similarity with the Wrexham match, we only looked convincing in attack once we were past the ninety minute mark.

While we can make excuses for the goals we’re conceding because we’re currently playing full backs, 15 year olds and central midfielders who are well under six foot tall in central defence, we’ve only really attacked with fluency and menace in one of the six halves we’ve played against Championship sides so far.

It’s too early to conclude that we’re going to struggle to create much, but Saturday’s visit of a Sheffield United team yet to concede a goal in three competitive matches before their visit tonight to Blackburn will once again present a severe challenge to our creativity and shooting.

Noah Anyadike was certainly the pre game headline maker tonight because, at 15 years and 98 days old, he became the latest holder of the record for our youngest ever player and, as mentioned above, the youngest player to appear in the League Cup. Anyadike showed his inexperience at times, but generally did pretty well in a debut that lasted just over fifty minutes until he picked up an injury (BBM later described it as cramp which is entirely understandable under the circumstances) which forced us into, once again, playing without a specialist centreback.

For all I know, there might have been some sort of raffle/draw held among the rest of the team to decide who replaced Anyadike at centre half. Well, the unlucky, and unlikely, winner turned out to be Alex Robertson and, in the event, he didn’t do badly in a role you’d have thought he was totally unsuited for physically. Upon taking up his position alongside Joel Bagan, Robertson immediately brought about one of three on target efforts with a good long ball to pick out the run of David Turnbull whose volley was pretty well struck, but straight at goalkeeper Grimshaw.

Turnbull had what was probably our best goal attempt before we scored with a first half shot from what must have been close to thirty yards which flew no more than a foot over,However, with Chris Willock again looking more like the 24/25 version of himself than the 25/26 one and Isaak Davies having a fruitless evening, there was very little of quality coming from the flanks.

City dominated possession for the first fifteen minutes or so, but once Norwich settled into their game they carried more of a goal threat than us in the first half in particular.

 City weren’t great at defending set pieces when we had centrebacks, so it’s hardly surprising that with Anyadike possibly being our tallest outfield player at the time, we fell behind to a simple header from a corner as the unmarked Mathias Kvistgaarden nodded in from eight yards.

Trott did well to deny an unmarked Liam Gibbs shortly afterwards while all City had to offer in return was an under hit twenty yard daisy trimmer straight at the keeper by Callum Robinson which turned into the other one of our on target efforts.

The loss of Anyadike early in the second half saw Rubin Colwill introduced and he went on to show why he is fast becoming indispensable for us as he orchestrated our efforts from a deeper than normal position. I can’t remember Rubin giving the ball away once and there definitely was an increased fluency to our play, but it made little difference in terms of much of a threat on the Norwich goal – credit for that should, to a large degree, go to their defenders for a series of fine blocks that diverted what may have been goal bound efforts to safety.

Norwich sub Anis Ben Slimani headed against the crossbar as the visitors continued to look the more dangerous team. However, it was another sub Ante Crnac, making his first appearance in ten months following an ACL injury, who sewed up Norwich’s win as he turned in a cross from Andre Brooks from around ten yards.

For me, this goal shouldn’t have stood because of a foul on Joel Bagan by Brooks. However, referee Gavin Ward*, who I thought was poor overall, waved play on and within seconds, the ball was in our net.

Ward blundered again when he failed to give what was an obvious foul on Rubin out on the Ninian Stand touchline and so when he took out his anger on Norwich captain Matteson (who Ward took too long to book for persistent fouling of Joel Colwill.- Matteson committed six fouls in all) he was shown a yellow card for just about the worst foul I’ve seen from him – a foul he would never have committed if the official had been doing his job correctly.

Ward also turned down what appeared to be a more than reasonable shout for a penalty for an apparent foul on Jack Moylan two minutes into added time, but the ref’s ineptitude cannot be used to be the basis for any we wuz robbed stuff. If we have been “robbed” at all this season it’s because we have been so short of specialists in an important part of the pitch, but, even then, I’d argue we could have done more to address that situation given the nature of the injuries to three of the absentees.

Norwich looked comfortable winners after going two clear until a fine finish by Salech gave City a consolation goal with around three minutes of the added six played. The chance came via another fine ball from the back by Robertson which Salech moved on to as Grimshaw advanced. At first, it looked like the Danish striker had taken too long about getting his shot away and the chance had gone, but Yousef knew what he was doing as he took the opportunity to turn wind up merchant Harry Darling inside out before shooting left footed into the corner of the net from about sixteen yards.

Ronan Kpakio momentarily raised hopes of an unlikely equaliser as he burst past two or three defenders, but then took an extra touch when he should have shot and he was closed down by Norwich as a result. A minute or so later it was all over and City had suffered their first loss since their 6-0 beating by Midtjylland in their opening pre season game more than six weeks ago.

I’ve decided to leave any further comment on our transfer dealings until after the window has shut (whether that decision can survive Saturday’s game if we’ve not signed anyone by then has to be open to doubt though!) and so I’ll limit myself to a straightforward presenting of the facts as outlined in BBM’s post game interview.

Our Head Coach said the signing he thought we would have made by kick off time last night had been delayed by issues which he was confident could be sorted out quickly and when asked if he thought the player would be in by his next meeting with the media on Thursday, he crossed his fingers – I may be wrong here, but I got the impression that the player concerned was a centreback.

BBM also said he hoped to be very busy with transfers in what remained of the window, while adding that we had spent so little up to now in the window that money should not be a problem for the type of players we were after.

The under 21s had three or four players who might have been involved last night in their team for the lunchtime game at Wigan Athletic as they out the disappointing result and performance last week against Barnsley behind them with a 5-2 victory. There was a fourth goal in three matches for Troy Parrott and we built on a half time lead of 3-1 with further goals by Jake Davies and Herbie James. The other two first half goals were scored by forgotten man Kion Etete – wonder if he can play centreback?

*It’s been pointed out to me by a couple of readers that Gavin Ward was not the ref on Tuesday, James Bell was. I went by the BBC match report which is still showing Ward was in charger and I see that Soccerbase is saying that Bell has not taken charge of a game yet this season. Nevertheless, I now believe that it wasn’t Gavin Ward in charge and, in the very, very unlikely event he gets to read this, I apologise to him for my mistake. It turns out that both Mr Ward and Mr Bell have taken charge of quite a few of our games in the past and I don’t remember ever singling either of them out for the sort of criticism I gave whoever it was who was in charge on Tuesday – if it was you Mr Bell, I stick by what I said, you were hopeless!

Posted in Out on the pitch, The stiffs | Tagged , , | 2 Comments