
After four games against opposition where it could be considered that any points gained were bonuses, City return to “normal” fixtures tomorrow with a visit from a Burnley team that have put themselves in danger of becoming the third consecutive relegated side from the Premier League to slip into League One with a second successive relegation.
Burnley could be following the example of Luton and Leicester, but, personally, I think the bottom two have left themselves with a huge amount to do and Charlton look to be seriously rivaling Preston and Derby as the worst team in the Championship currently.
Burnley need wins though, just the one so far for them and the biggest indicator of how a losing culture can take hold at a club no matter how good their squad looks on paper is that it’s now over a year since Turf Moor has seen a league win for the Clarets.
Moving on to City, it’s a cause for serious concern that a side which, rightly, is picking up so much praise for their approach and the quality of their football has just the three wins from fourteen matches.
Of course, the freakish amount of injury/suspension absentees from centreback areas in particular partially explains this. However, City are now back playing opponents they should be beating based on their performances over the first fourteen matches and the reason I fear we won’t beat Burnley is that we’ve got ourselves into a position where we’re having to play individuals who would be given a rest to try and recover from injuries in bigger squads. However, we have no alternative, but to play the likes of Perry Ng, Will Fish and Alex Robertson at the moment.
Watching the highlights of Wednesday’s game again yesterday, one of the things that struck me was that the scorers of West Ham’s first two goals were not tracked as they made runs from around the halfway line to end up clean through on goal. Was tiredness caused by having to play a physically demanding style of football in a squad where, realistically, only four of the nine named substitutes are going to be used a factor in those goals?
BBM said that Krystian Bielik should be back tomorrow in his post West Ham interview and Gabe Osho has now served his suspension, so, maybe, we’re beginning to get some way towards a position whereby BBM is able to select what he considered to be his strongest eleven when the transfer window closed, but, if 26/27 runs true to form, we’ll be told of three new injury absentees today!
Here’s the quiz anyway. As usual, the answers will be posted on the morning following the match.
60s. Born in the north east of England in a place thats football team has won the FA Amateur Cup five times, this alliterative full back spent his whole Football League career playing in colours which I would categorize as unusual. Burnley were his first club and the one he played most matches for. His seven years at Turf Moor were all spent in the First Division, but when he moved a long way south, it was to play in the old Third Division. After two years down south, he returned north to play in Yorkshire for a season before dropping into non league football- who am I describing?
70s. Apart from a brief interlude in the Netherlands, this midfielder’s career was spent exclusively in the north west of England, with the large majority of his considerable number of appearances being made for clubs beginning with the letters Bu. Making his senior debut, for Burnley, early in this decade, he still had a playing contract for a current Championship club in 1996, can you name him?
80s. Ah, a winger who wore a slinky shoe! (6,6)
90s. To the amazement of many supporters of Cardiff City, the team he was with at the time, the PC game Premier Manager 97 rated this former Burnley player’s speed as 255 when the maximum marking should have been 99! Name the player concerned.
00s. Character played by Charlton Heston in 60s film meets moon walker!
10s. Way of saying you’re hungry in the UK capital meets club mascot!
20s. Great tactician in the midfield?


