2009-10 for Peter Ridsdale.

As supporters looked around for someone to blame after the great capitulation that was the last four matches of the 2008/09 season, Dave Jones and his players were firmly in the line of fire, but Peter Ridsdale and the group of businessmen who had taken over from Sam Hammam in January 2007 escaped scot free. After all, back in January, they had provided the funds to sign Chris Burke and bring in Micheal Chopra and Quincy on loan with Chopra’s transfer set to become a permanent one on 1 July – Ridsdale and co had done their bit, it was the players and those in charge of on field matters that had cocked up.

When Chopra’s signing in the summer was backed up by further new arrivals which, arguably, took the club’s close season spending above the amount they received from Roger Johnson’s sale to Birmingham, the local media were quick to label City as the Championship’s big spenders. With the 2009/10 campaign starting amid stories (which Mr Ridsdale was more than happy to put his name to) of significant new investment from Malaysia and the team playing some scintillating football in their shiny new stadium, the stock of our Chairman was as high as at any time since those heady days when Leeds United were “living the dream”.

It’s not completely with the benefit of hindsight though that I say that the clues regarding the financial hardship to come were there to be spotted if you looked hard enough – the season also started with a messy row with 08/09 top scorer Ross McCormack and while the player and his agent were certainly not blameless in the whole affair, you got the impression that the club weren’t exactly busting a gut to get him to stay. As the weeks went by and summer turned into autumn, those who had always felt that the club were looking to offload two not just the one big name player in the summer of 2009 were proved right – while the hamstring injury that McCormack suffered at Blackpool that ruled him out for weeks and scuppered a widely reported move to Hull was down to bad luck, the impasse in the contract negotiations with Joe Ledley was not.

A year earlier Stoke had bid £6 million for Ledley and Peter Ridsdale increased his popularity with supporters at that time by turning it down. Things were different now though and it later emerged that the plan had always been to sell one of Ledley or McCormack last summer, but with any potential suitors for Ledley seemingly happy to wait for his contract to run out in June 2010, the decision not to sell to Stoke and not to advance the contract negotiations with the player’s representative in the intervening period began to be seen in a different light.

As rumours of unpaid bills and staff not being paid on time continued through September and October, there were also the first rumblings of problems regarding the financing of the new stadium with contractors being owed money for the “fitting out” of the Cardiff City Stadium (it later emerged that the figures involved ran into seven figures with as much as £7 million being claimed to be the amount owed) – so, all the while, we had, in time honoured Ridsdale fashion, been spending money that we did not have on improving the team and paying wages.

Never mind though, there were always the Malaysians to bail us out and, although I don’t intend this to be a rehashing of endless Ridsdale quotes, I think there are three which should be mentioned because I believe they go right to the heart of why there will be very few who will be unhappy to see him leaving the club. Firstly, in the days when he seemed to be flying back and for to Malaysia every week to negotiate with Datuk Chan Tien Ghee  (TG) he said;

“The deal will almost certainly involve sponsorship and we are already talking about shirt sponsor, stadium naming rights and an investment. But I must stress, things don’t happen overnight. It’s a case of them trusting us and getting to know what we are about.”

Fast forward now four months or so and Peter Ridsdale is asked at a meeting with supporters why it was that TG had not been aware of the winding up order (more on this later) brought by HMRC in the High Court which the club had to face for unpaid taxes on 25 November (coincidentally, this was the very day TG was announced to have become a director of the club, although, in the event, formal confirmation of the appointment did not appear on Companies House’s records  for months)  and our Chairman replied “he didn’t ask”. How on earth can that statement be compatible with the one above? It can’t be, and at that moment many of us who had bought season tickets for 2010/11, a full ten months before that season started, knew what Mr Ridsdale was “about” – after all, we hadn’t asked either had we.

Mention of those season tickets takes me on to the golden ticket fiasco. The fact that Crystal Palace were the other Championship side besides us to be selling season tickets in October says it all about both clubs financial situation’s and, when the offer of a price freeze for those supporters who signed up by the turn of the year didn’t bring in enough cash, prospective buyers were told that their money would be refunded to them in the event of City getting promoted. However, it was only when it was stated as fact on the club’s official site that the money raised from season ticket sales would go towards bringing in new players in the January transfer window that things really began to take off as the target of 10,000 season ticket sales by the end of December was met and then exceeded. With the original winding up order dropped following a renegotiation of the tax debt with HMRC, everything in the garden seemed rosy for a short while until the club defaulted on their first payment under the scheme they had negotiated only a few weeks earlier. A farcical postponement of the home game with promotion rivals Leicester because the club could not afford to pay for the necessary engineering work to get the “state of the art” undersoil heating to work at their new ground was a wake up call to anyone who believed our financial woes were behind us and when the News of the World revealed early in the new year that the club had been issued with another winding up order, there were understandable doubts as to whether the season ticket money would be used for new signings after all.

It was now that Peter Ridsdale waded into action as he insisted to the Echo on 6 January that “we will be bringing in new players this month, I can guarantee that. I would go as far as to say that, come January 31, we will be holding a press conference to parade the players brought in during this month“. Well, there was a press conference at the end of January alright, but it was four days earlier than our Chairman thought it would be and consisted of him offering a, qualified, apology to supporters for the lack of new signings as he came under a barrage of hostile questioning from a usually compliant media. For the life of me, I still don’t understand why Mr Ridsdale made his “guarantee” comment – perhaps, he thought that, with the deadline for the golden ticket scheme being extended because of the inclement weather, a few more suck….. sorry supporters could be enticed into parting with their money, but, if he wasn’t being dishonest when he made those comments, it’s hard to see how he wasn’t being incredibly naive and/or displaying a degree of ineptitude which suggested he was out of his depth.

My earlier comments notwithstanding, I would say that this press conference was the single moment when Peter Ridsdale lost the support of significant numbers of Cardiff City fans – granted he was placed in a very awkward position, but the man who had the ability to get audiences eating out of his hands at times, this time looked a harassed and unconvincing figure who appeared to recognise the hopelessness of his position when he tried to draw the conference to an end after what must have been a painful twenty minutes or so for him. After that, the club struggled on with three more High Court hearings which were adjourned each time without the tax bill (estimated to be £1.9 million) being paid and other creditors emerged from the woodwork threatening to use the courts to get what they were owed. Embarrassingly, the FAW were still owed £62,000 some three months after Cardiff City Stadium had hosted it’s first international fixture (they were paid the money they were due from the Liberty Stadium for a game played at Swansea in February within a fortnight) and many local small businesses suffered because of the club’s inability to pay their creditors – a team like Notts County, rightly, attracted much criticism for getting a promotion on the back of spending money they didn’t have and. frankly, I think we would have deserved the same if we had won on Saturday.

However, you got the feeling that the dramas and crisis’ of February, March and April were played out without significant contributions from Peter Ridsdale who had become the focus of protest marches and sometimes vicious criticism relating to the financial mess we found ourselves in. Some messageboard critics seemed eager to blame our Chairman for everything that was wrong at the club and it needed to be remembered that there were plenty of others whose contributions could be questioned who were quite happy to see Mr Ridsdale cast as the whipping boy. The thing is though, that when negotiations with the Malaysians resumed after a break of a couple of months, it was Steve Borley who was flying out to the far east to continue talks with TG and billionaire Vincent Tan, not Peter Ridsdale – all of which tended to add authority to those who claimed that our Chairman had been marginalised by the powers that be at the club for the way he had handled the earlier negotiations with the potential investors.

Peter Ridsdale often said that his job was to get the new ground up and running and to secure the club’s future through obtaining new investment to deal with the crippling debts that were around long before he arrived at Cardiff City and, with the team having played before a sell out crowd to bring down the season at their new home and the investment from Malaysia confirmed at this morning’s EGM, it can be argued that he has delivered on both counts. Indeed, he has been talking in glowing terms about the legacy he will be leaving in recent days and yet I keep getting this feeling that if the club have really muddled through the financial crisis which engulfed it for most of the season, it is in spite of rather than because of Peter Ridsdale  – his failure to mention the winding up orders the club have faced in his final interviews as City Chairman being typical of the off hand manner in which he has appeared to deal with something which, as Chester fans will tell you, threatened the very existence of our club.

Yes, it is true to say that Peter Ridsdale wasn’t solely responsible for what happened to make his final season such a fraught one off the pitch at Cardiff City, but any sympathy I may have for him is dissipated by the fact that he was always so willing to claim sole credit when things were going well – with Mr Ridsdale, it was always “I” and “me” rather than “us” and “we” and I think it is somehow appropriate that two of the four photos used in this piece are of the posed variety which gives the impression of someone who enjoyed the idea of “playing at” being a Chairman. Peter Ridsdale loved all the trappings of his very highly paid job, but gave the impression that the, not so, little details were a bit beneath him and would sort themselves out eventually. His methods, ultimately proved to be unsuccessful at Leeds and at Barnsley and I would argue very strongly that they did at Cardiff as well – I am being generous when I mark him at 3 out of 10 for his work during the 09/10 season.

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on 2009-10 for Peter Ridsdale.

2009/10 for Dave Jones.

This time last year Dave Jones was under as much pressure as he had been at any time since November 2007 when he was, reportedly, given two games to save his job. Back in May 2009 there were plenty who were calling for our manager to go after the end of season capitulation which saw us go from genuine automatic promotion contenders to seventh placed also rans in the space of four matches and that sort of thinking carried through into the start of the 09/10 campaign which started with a feeling that he was very much on trial.

Although I always tended to blame the players rather than the manager for what went wrong after we had looked to be in such a strong position after beating Burnley on Easter Monday, I acknowledged the pressure Dave Jones was under when I said;

“Dave Jones is going into his fifth season as City manager and he needs to silence those doubters pretty quickly to guarantee he will lead us into a sixth season in charge at Cardiff.”

in a piece I did on here speculating on what the new season held for our manager.

As it turned out, Dave Jones’ job security never became an issue – City came storming out of the starting gates with Micheal Chopra scoring goals galore and were leading the table at times in the early stages of the season. In typical Dave Jones feast or famine style, there were bad runs in September, November and February which saw City losing more games than a team chasing a top six place really should do, but the truth was that, apart from the week after Ipswich had won 2-1 here on 29 November, we were never out of the top six from late September onwards.

Given all the off field uncertainty that could easily have effected on field matters, this was some achievement, but it also has to be acknowledged that through the summer of 2009, Dave Jones was given plenty of money (far more than he should have been as it turned out) to spend on new players. Besides the club record transfer of Michael Chopra from Sunderland, over £2 million was spent on our defence as a new keeper, two centrebacks and a full back all arrived for significant fees, so when our manager and others go on about not being given any money to spend in January, it does need to be remembered that Dave Jones was given more cash for new players in the summer of 2009 than any other City manager in the club’s history.

In saying that though, I believe that Dave Jones had been assured that there would be more money to come in January when he was buying Hudson, Gerrard and the rest and my view is that he expected to the “golden ticket” money to be used in the manner in which the club said it would when the scheme was launched. The fact that it wasn’t, put Dave Jones at a serious disadvantage compared to every other manager in the Coca Cola Championship with the exception of Neil Warnock at Crystal Palace come the new year.

Despite all the money spent on the defence, our goals against record was poor for a top six side, there was still the matter of us often losing the central midfield battle and we didn’t have an obvious replacement for the talismanic Jay Bothroyd in the event of him being injured or suspended. While other managers could identify weaknesses and do something about them, Dave Jones was in a completely different position – the emergence of Darcy Blake as a player who would make the starting eleven on merit when City had a, rare, clean bill of health was almost like us signing a new player, but this was more than offset by a dreadful run of injury and illness problems which saw key members of the squad missing for periods of months rather than weeks.

That City were able to maintain their challenge at this time reflects tremendous credit on the players and manager, but, inevitably, the loss of so many of the squad, as well as the club’s parlous financial position, began to have an impact – when City went to Coventry on 16 March, they had lost four out of their last five matches and they looked to be losing their coveted top six place to the home team when Clinton Morrison put them ahead. From somewhere though, City recorded a 2-1 win courtesy of a holy disputed penalty in added time and they never looked back in the regular season from there.

A defeat at Derby in the last game of the campaign counted for nothing because City were already in the Play Offs on the back of an unbeaten run of ten games which has seen two of the three great constants of the Dave Jones years exploded – the old chestnut about Dave Jones’ sides always running out of steam in the closing games of a season no longer applies and Coventry, Swansea and Sheffield Wednesday were all beaten after they had gone 1-0 up.

After making a meal of dispatching a Leicester side who should have been out of the tie at 2-0 down in the Semi Final of the Play Off’s Dave Jones stood on the brink of what would have been the biggest achievement of his managerial career. When you consider the circumstances under which he has had to operate at Cardiff and, in particular, what he had to put up with after August 22 when we signed our last player (Kelvin Etuhu), I think promotion would have put him right up in the  top echelons of English born managers in the game – his continuing prickly relationship with the local media which has seen him refuse to speak to Media Wales journalists recently (can’t say I blame him for this given the rubbish some of them come out with) would have been forgotten and our manager would have had a nine out of ten, at least, season.

Sadly, one game changed all of that. The oft described “biggest game in the club’s history” with it’s huge financial rewards to the winner and abject disappointment to the loser means that our manager fell at the final hurdle. Firstly, there was the choice of centrebacks for the Blackpool game. There are many who won’t be using hindsight when they tell you that the selection of Blake and Hudson was a mistake and if you watch our defending in the second Leicester game you can see what they are getting it. I would have, just, gone for Blake and Gerrard myself, but I really do think that this was an awkward decision for our manager in which he could have gone any one of three ways (I always felt he would end up picking Hudson and Gerrard) and would have, in all likelihood, ended up being criticised.

Apart from that though, the City team virtually picked itself and although there have been some since the game who have said they would have gone for all sorts of weird and wonderful systems beforehand, I defy any City fan to say with hand on heart that they had big problems with us starting off with Dave Jones’ tried and trusted 4-4-2 no matter what formation Blackpool used. The trouble is though, that there had been rumours throughout the preceding week that Jay Bothroyd, who was almost universally regarded as our most important player, had been struggling with a calf injury and as soon as it became clear that the rumours had a factual basis to them, then the situation changed and, all of a sudden, 4-4-2 was no longer the best way of countering Blackpool’s well established 4-3-3.

Leaving aside conspiracy theories about how fit or unfit Bothroyd actually was, it did seem that the City bench were caught on the hop by what happened – when the response came it was, disappointingly, predictable as the word went out to get the next biggest man on and stick with the 4-4-2. It always cracks me up when people on messageboards accuse Dave Jones of being “tactically naive” when what they really mean is that he didn’t do what they thought he should, but, this time, I have to admit that anyone thinking that does have a point. I mentioned on here a few days ago that those who saw him replace Bothroyd in the first few minutes of our defeat at Doncaster back in August thought that Kelvin Etuhu would never make a target man in a million years. Now, in the interests of fairness, it has to be said that Etuhu started in the suspended Bothroyd’s place for the marvellous home win over Leicester and for the hard earned victory at Palace in March, but I still say the balance of evidence from the games he has played in the central striking role is that Etuhu is far better suited to the position he prefers (i.e. on the wing, where, by the way, I didn’t think he did too badly when he was switched there for the closing minutes on Saturday).

Dave-Jones-Cardiff-City cropped

A straight swap of Etuhu for Bothroyd looked doomed to failure from the moment it happened but, given Dave Jones’ reluctance to play Ross McCormack and Michael Chopra up front together, it was the only real option if we wanted to continue with our manager’s favourite formation – something more original was required, the formation we used at Bristol City in the FA Cup Third Round tie back in January for example. That night with the City squad ravaged by illness and injury, Dave Jones sent his side out in what was almost a  4-5-1 formation with Joe Ledley sitting in front of the back four, Gavin Rae (who was replaced by Soloman Taiwo in the first half) and Aaron Wildig as a middle two and Peter Whittingham in a central role behind Michael Chopra with Ross McCormack alternating between supporting Chopra and dropping deeper to play in wide areas.

After the game I can remember Dave Jones saying that City had been forced to play the ball more to feet than they would normally do and the fact that they were able to do so with some success in a game played in a blizzard with snow settling on the pitch proves that we have the players who could have come up with the same approach on Saturday if we had tried it. Such a system could have nullified Blackpool’s extra man in central midfield, asked questions of Keith Southern (who, I understand, was Sky’s man of the match) and moved their centrebacks around more. With Chopra playing so well, he would surely have been able to cope with being a one man strike force at times (let’s face it, that’s what happened anyway!), but instead we went for the same old, same old 4-4-2 – perhaps the real reason we went with such an out of character formation at Bristol was that Bothroyd, Magennis and Etuhu were all injured at the time?

Even allowing for Bothroyd’s injury, we would be in the Premiership now if the third great constant of the Dave Jones years had held true, but, after only losing the once, to Ipswich, after scoring first during the regular season, we failed to heed the warning that we had got when Leicester won after going 1-0 down. You could argue, with some justification I suppose, that this showed that Dave Jones’ luck ran out at the worst possible time, but, other things that went wrong look to be the result of human error rather than fate. Despite this I am happy to hear that the intention is for him to still be here come August  – it was still a good season all round for Dave Jones, but it could have been so much better and so I can only rate it as a 7 out of 10 season for our manager.

Posted in Down in the dugout | Comments Off on 2009/10 for Dave Jones.