What sort of manager is Dave Jones?

One of the things I am becoming increasingly aware of as the months go by on here is that, for some of our opponents at least, you run out of games you want to recall against upcoming opponents pretty quickly – we’ve not played Forest too often in the last forty odd years and I’ve already done the matches that I consider to be memorable against them!

Therefore, I thought I’d do something different this morning and ask the question what sort of manager do we have at Cardiff City? By that, I don’t mean Dave Jones personality because, publicly at least, I think that is fairly easy to judge him, but what about his footballing philosophy – what does he look for in a player, how does he want the game to be played and how does he send the City team out to play every week. For me, the best managers look at the players they have inherited when they first come to a club and use a system which plays to their strengths, but, over time they will be build a team that reflects their outlook more. Having been at Cardiff for nearly six years, Dave Jones is, undoubtedly, in that position now with City, so what is the “Dave Jones way” – I’m not sure there’ll be too much agreement amongst supporters who answer that question!

Dave Jones with Southampton captain Jason Dodd before his life changing arrest on child abuse charges.

Here’s my take on what sort of players he prefers anyway and I’ll follow that up with my take on what the Dave Jones approach to playing football is;

Goalkeepers – if there were more tall, imposing, leader type goalkeepers around who would regularly leave their goal line to deal with crosses then, perhaps, Dave Jones would favour them, but, as it is, he seems happy enough to have relatively short shot stoppers between the sticks in his City teams.

Full backs – you don’t tend to see our full backs bombing up and down the touchlines a la Cafu and Dani Alves (or, more realistically, like Tyronne Mears did for Burnley on Tuesday) – he also seems happy to have right footers playing at left back, but not the other way around. First and foremost, Dave Jones wants his full backs to defend and I would argue that his handling of two young players who could have offered a bit more than that (Chris Gunter and Adam Matthews) shows that he believes that attacking is something that the players he uses in more advanced positions should do.

Centrebacks – with the exception of Darcy Blake last season, all of the players Dave Jones has used in this position have been big, stopper type centre halves. Once again, the philosophy seems to be defenders are there to defend, but, just as at full back, does this approach sometimes put us into a position where we lack defenders with the passing ability to develop play from the back in the manner that a side near the top of the Championship would be expected to?

Central midfield – Dave Jones has tended to like to have a play maker in this area alongside a box to box type midfielder. The pairing of Ledley and Rae were very successful, in terms of results at least, in 2008/09, but they were hardly typical of Cardiff teams under Dave Jones – what Dave Jones doesn’t seem to want in this position is the “destroyer” type which so many of our fans clamour for and, when you consider that, in the modern game, such a player would probably spend about half of the season missing through suspension, I agree with him!

Wide midfield – almost seems to prefer having right footers on the left and vice versa, this means that the players concerned come in field on to their stronger foot and with the likes of Paul Parry and Peter Whittingham, this has meant more goals for the player concerned, but it can also lead to a pretty narrow and cluttered midfield area. Chris Burke is the only player who I would class as a genuine winger that we have had under Dave Jones. Burke is the only player in these positions in the Dave Jones era who instinctively looks to beat full backs on the outside – this means that our strikers get very few crosses knocked back from the bye line to feed off.

Strikers – Dave Jones very much favours a big man/little man strike partnership. The only exception to this rule that I can recall are Alan Lee/Michael Ricketts and Cameron Jerome in 05/06 (when Dave Jones was trying to get the best out of what he had inherited)  and the Paul Parry/Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink pairing of 07/08 but, in this case, although the players were of a similar height, the increasingly immobile Hasselbaink became the target man and Parry the quick runner who played off him.

Dave Jones at the recent FA Cup replay with Stoke City - his critics would say this is about as animated as he gets on the touchline.

So, much for what he prefers in his players, how about our manager’s use of those players. Firstly, it has become a bit of a standing joke about Dave Jones being a 4-4- f*cking 2 man, but I have heard him say that his sides play to now set formula as attacking players can pop up in different areas from where they should if we were playing a rigid 4-4-2. I would agree with our manager there, in my opinion we nearly always play 4-4-2, but a fluid version of the formation. Indeed, I would say that it tends to be an adventurous system that we start games with – this is especially true this season when we go out with teams that do not have a natural sitting midfield player.

Increasingly, Dave Jones has favoured attacking midfield quartets as he leaves his four defenders to concentrate on what he believes they are best at. I would say that his attitude is always to score the first goal in a game by attacking the opposition whether it be at home or away – the number of early goals we have scored this season backs this view up and, going back a but further, I would say that we, bravely, went out and attacked Middlesbrough and Portsmouth in 2008.

As to how we get that first goal, well it may be that the lack of natural passers in defensive areas means that we have to play in a more direct manner, but I would say that we have tended in recent years to look to get the ball up to the big man quickly and then look to play our passing football from there. When your big target man is someone with feet as good as Jay Bothroyd’s are then he is the ideal man for the talented players we have in midfield to play off but a Michael Chopra who his on his game also gives an option for the longer ball with his clever movement

However, if we get in front, I believe we then see Dave Jones’ more cautious side often taking over as that attacking midfield becomes a rigid line of four with the players within it having to perform roles which do not come naturally to some of them (they are, almost always helped out as well with one of our strikers dropping deeper). Tuesday’s game and the recent one at Norwich are obvious examples of this where we were content to let the opposition have the ball in front of us, but we also almost allowed Scunthorpe back into the game as well after scoring as we sat back thinking the job was done. I believe it is instructive that there have been relatively few games under Dave Jones where we have been two or more goals in front at half time and, when it has happened,  the second halves have turned into holding operations- it appears to me that our manager belongs in the “a one goal win is enough” school and, overall, whatever his critics might say, his record at Cardiff suggests his approach is working.

Posted in Down in the dugout | Tagged | Comments Off on What sort of manager is Dave Jones?

Excuses, excuses.

As I left the ground after last night’s disappointing 1-1 draw with Burnley I listened to the commentary team on Radio Wales discussing how tiredness had been a factor in our performance. A few minutes later I heard a reporter on Radio 5 talking about how the poor state of the pitch is undermining our promotion push, so, which one of these were the major reason for our failure to hold on to our lead last night?

Before I gave my opinion on that, I think it needs to be said that we were up against what I thought was one of the better teams to visit the Cardiff City Stadium this season. Burnley fully deserved their point and I could see where their impressive young manager Eddie Howe was coming from when he said that he was a little disappointed that his side hadn’t won given the way the game had panned out.

So, credit to the opposition, but this is a Cardiff City blog concerned mostly with how our team did and a glance at the league table tells you that we should have seen more from our team than we did last night. Therefore, going back to the original question about whether tiredness or the pitch was the bigger factor in what was a disappointing night, I would answer that, although I saw some evidence of the former, neither of them played that big a part and that to blame them is just looking for excuses for a performance in which key players did not come up to their usual standards (an approach that was too defensive after we went ahead didn’t help either).

Although Clarke Carlisle looks to be fouling Jay Bothroyd here, the Question Time contributor generally had our England centre forward in his pocket.

Okay, there might have been some evidence of player fatigue, but the obvious question I have to ask is why should that be? Before last night, we had played three matches in twenty three days while Burnley had played five during the same period and yet, in general, their players looked fitter and more lively than ours. Also, if some of our players looked out on their feet in just the second game in a spell of five matches in fourteen days, it does not bode well for our next three fixtures and has to raise questions about the effectiveness of the club’s fitness training. As for the pitch, well I’m going to say that things were much worse when I were a lad – pitches nowadays are like bowling greens compared to the ones we used to get at this time of the season in the 60’s and 70’s and, anyway, Burnley seemed to pass the ball about well enough on it didn’t they.

After our draw at Norwich I remarked on here about how our team did not press the ball after going 1-0 up and we got more of the same last night as it seemed to me that the policy for the second half amounted to nothing more than holding on to what we had. Therefore, while giving credit to Burnley’s domination in terms of possession, it seemed to me that City were not too worried about letting the visitors have the ball as long as we were set up with two banks of four making it very hard for them to play through us. Although wanting us to be more ambitious, I have to admit that this policy almost worked because, with man of the match Mark Hudson putting in another outstanding performance, we made Burnley look a lot less dangerous than they had done in the first half as they were frustrated into often trying long range pot shots after lengthy periods of possession which had got them nowhere.

Steve Thompson is congratulated after his equaliser which came a few minutes after he received a big round of applause from the home support when he came on as a sub.

However, as Scunthorpe discovered on Saturday, something has to give when the ball just keeps coming back at you to defend all of the time – it was just such a disappointment that, when the equaliser came, it was via a route which we had coped with so well all night. Looking at the goal on television a few times, it looks like Jay Bothroyd let Clarke Carlisle go and so Dekel Keinan was left with two opponents to deal with on the near post. Even so, Steve Thompson appeared to be Keinan’s man and so, after a couple of impressive performances to begin with, our new signing has to take his share of the responsibility for the goal as he let our former striker get in front of him to glance in his header.

Therefore, just as at Norwich, City’s policy of sitting back and inviting the opposition onto them failed late on. However, when I looked at the Burnley team with their pair of thirty something centrebacks, I thought that they were the part of the side which we could dominate and seek to exploit. This feeling increased as the game unfolded because Burnley played with a high defensive line throughout and, in the second half especially, there were opportunities to play our strikers in on goal with the right pass. Unfortunately though, our midfield had dropped so deep that the “killer ball” was always having to be played over a longer distance than it should have been and when the chances came the passes lacked the necessary precision (although all of our midfield players were guilty of this at times, the largely ineffective Peter Whittingham was the main culprit in this regard).

Michael Chopra's clinical finish puts us 1-0 up in added time at the end of the first half.

That said, even if the right pass had been played, there was no guarantee that, on the basis of last night’s performance, the front two would have taken the chance created. I spent nearly all of the first half wondering if Jay Bothroyd and Michael Chopra were on some sort of bonus for every time they got fouled because that was the only explanation I could come up with as to why they spent so much time appealing to the referee (more on him later) with their arms outstretched while play went on around them. To be fair to Chopra, he did play better than he had done on Saturday and found space well for his goal which he put away with the minimum of fuss, but I’m afraid it was not a night to remember for Bothroyd.

One of the reasons I have become such a fan of Jay Bothroyd since he came to Cardiff is because his attitude and commitment has been the precise opposite of what I had expected it to be back in August 2008 when he signed from Wolves, but, a few minutes either side of half time when he reverted to his normal self apart, it was a pre Cardiff City type display from Jay last night. I mentioned earlier about him appealing for fouls all the time, but there were many occasions in the first half especially where he just stood a yard or two off the play and allowed a Burnley player to go for a ball unchallenged. This sort of thing has in no way been typical of Jay since he has been a Cardiff player and I believe him when he says that, if this is to be his last season with us, he wants to play a full part in getting us to the Premiership, but our front two in general and him in particular will have to play a lot better over the coming weeks than they did last night if we are to make it into the top flight.

Finally, I cannot end without mentioning the totally inept performance of referee Roger East and the linesman on the Ninian Stand side of the ground (the one on the Grandstand side might have been just as bad as the clown on our side, but it’s harder to judge from sixty or seventy yards away). Mr East is the referee who gave Coventry a goal in the game at Ninian Park in 2008/09 and then spent what seemed to be about five minutes chatting with his linesman before deciding to disallow it and give us a free kick in the Coventry half for handball! Anyone is entitled to make a mistake though and, to be fair, Mr East has not done badly in previous visits to Cardiff since then, but last night he was inconsistent in his decision making, didn’t seem to know what the advantage rule was and, seemingly, had to be told that when both trainers come on to treat a player from each team, they both have to leave the pitch afterwards and not just the one from Cardiff – Mr East wasn’t the reason we didn’t win, but he didn’t half make a frustrating night even more frustrating!

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Excuses, excuses.