Bellamy looks on as Development team go second in their league.

Cardiff City’s Under 23 team started their season playing home matches at the club’s training centre in the Vale of Glamorgan, but since mid September the games have been shared at the Leckwith athletics facility and Cardiff City Stadium.

Last night’s game with with Coventry at the latter venue continued a strange trend which has seen results and performance vary greatly depending on where the team were playing. I’ve seen all three matches at Leckwith, with City’s displays getting progressively worse as they’ve drawn two without scoring and lost the other one 1-0 – believe me, if you had sent a naughty young son or daughter to watch one of these matches on a Monday afternoon and then told them they’d go to another one unless they started behaving themselves, you’d soon have a perfectly behaved little cherub or angel on your hands!

When the game is at Cardiff City Stadium though, it’s a different matter completely. After a draw against Sunderland in a match where the Under 23s were always the better team, there have been 3-0 and 4-0 wins over Palace and QPR respectively and now they have a 3-1 victory over a lively Coventry side who could feel that the margin of defeat was harsh on them.

In those earlier conclusive wins over the two London sides, City put out very experienced sides by Development team standards, with a sprinkling of first team squad members involved, but this latest match saw something in line with the sort of selections that have been the norm in recent seasons.

You would have thought that only Declan John out of last night’s ten outfield starters would have a chance, albeit a very slight one, of playing Championship football for us in the short to medium term. Therefore, to beat a Coventry side whose record at this level is a lot better than you would expect from a club where the first team look like they could well be relegated to the Fourth tier this season, was more of an achievement than it may at first appear.

When City rubber stamped their early authority with a goal after eight minutes as Semi Ajayi fired home from close range after Marco Weymans’ precise cross. I felt the game was going to be a very one sided, but, instead, Coventry had grounds to feel that they could, and should, have been in the lead after thirty minutes play.

City did get sloppy during this time, but that wasn’t the only reason for the away side taking control and visiting captain Devon Kelly-Evans should have equalised after Murphy, who had already made one or two decent saves, could only palm a shot out to him standing just six yards from goal, but the resultant effort flew wide when it looked easier to score.

Kelly-Evans was more impressive with a run past two or three opponents and then a shot that went just wide and the visitors then had  what looked like a good shout for a penalty turned down after Jordan Blaise barged into George Thomas, only for a referee who was an odd mixture of let them get on with it laissez-faire and officious clamping down on harmless looking tackles, to award a free kick on the edge of the penalty area for another offence.

City needed to raise their game if they wanted to hold on to their lead and, to their credit, they did. Centre forward Mark Harris probably should have done better with a header from about six yards out and then a fine pass from Ajayi found Macauley Southam on the left, who crossed low for Harris to sidestep keeper Addai, only to see the ball roll out harmlessly for a goal kick as he ran out of room.

Captain Tommy O’Sullivan’s performance had tended to mirror his teams with a strong start being followed by some careless stuff, but he then provided a moment of the sort of quality that had many thinking they were watching a probable first teamer of the future when he first played at this level about five years ago. O’Sullivan’s lovely ball found the influentiual Southam whose crisp shot gave the pass the finish it deserved.

City, who probably owed their lead to the fact that they were that bit more assured in front of goal than their opponents, were watched from the technical area by two more members of what seems to be a huge cast of coaches/assistants lately.

I think it was Jarrad Harvey who was the “main man” this time, but alongside him was Craig Bellamy, the newly appointed Player Development Manager. Bellars was lower profile than his colleague, but occasionally gave instructions to the players when he felt it was required. However, based on this evidence, if he ever does become our manager, those who like their bosses to be shouting, jumping about like a jack in the box and waving their arms about constantly on the touchline, are not going to be impressed!

Semi Ajayi puts us 1-0 up.*

Maybe the Bellamy influence was felt most in the choice and use of substitutes because, in what was the most interesting aspect of the night to me, we saw the sort of players the club must have had in mind with the “revamp” of the Development team talked about last week, given plenty of game time.

The replacement of Matt Kennedy, who was quiet by his usual standards at this level, by Under 18 team regular James Waite at half time did not appear to be a the result of an injury for the winger and the way Harvey spent time talking to him on the touch line for a minute or two just before half time gave the impression that it was a planned move.

Whatever the cause of Waite’s early introduction, he immediately looked confident and was soon getting away a well struck shot from twenty yards that caused Addai few problems.

On the hour mark, it was the turn of sixteen year old Sion Spence to get his first taste of football at this level. Spence, who started the season in the Under 16 team, has done well since becoming a regular in the Under 18s and his introduction in  place of Weymans, hopefully, represents the best example so far of the “fast tracking” into the level below the first team that will become a fairly regular occurrence under Bellamy’s watch.

Again, the substitution was almost certainly a planned one, but when Under 18s captain Cameron Coxe came on for Blaise for the last fifteen minutes or so it was because of an injury.

Coxe, a full back/wing back who I’d never seen play centre back before, slotted seamlessly into the middle of the defence and did a good job, while the two lads in midfield did not look out of place at either. There was the odd misplaced pass, but the way Spence and Waite combined to set Declan John free for a late shot that was turned around the post by Allai was a delight, with the former showing his trademark appreciation of what’s going on around him to slide a precise pass out to the latter, whose cheeky backheel put the full back in on goal.

With Coventry unable to fashion as many threatening positions as they had managed in the first half, the game was fizzling out somewhat, but then a run down the left past a few City defenders by a Coventry player produced a low cross which left Thomas with a tap in from a few yards out.

Having got the goal they deserved and set up what could have been a very interesting last quarter of an hour or so, Coventry, or rather their keeper, then proceeded to shoot themselves in the foot – while I didn’t mean that literally of course, Allai was pretty lucky not to have damaged his foot in another way.

When O’Sullivan took aim from about twenty five yards out, he produced another well struck shot, just like Waite’s had been, and although the save was more difficult this time for the Coventry keeper, he should have done a lot better than knock the ball out to the advancing Harris who had a simple task to restore City’s two goal lead from the edge of the six yard box.

Allai knew he was at fault and, like plenty of goalies before him when they have conceded a goal kicked one of the posts in frustration, but, this time, it was done with such force that the clang on contact echoed around the stadium – he really could have done some serious damage to himself, but the ironic thing was that his kicking, which had been pretty erratic, seemed to improve significantly after this!

As this table shows, City end the year four points behind Charlton (who usually win this league) in second place and travel to face the league leaders in their first match after the mid season break.

On the face of it, we look well placed to become one of the two sides to take their place in the end of season Play Offs. It’s not a new situation for us either because we have been regular contenders near the top of the league since the current format was introduced in 2012 I think it was.

However, the almost complete lack of youngsters breaking into the first team in that time rather backs up the notion that results at the levels below the first team are not that important, it’s about developing players who are good enough to make an impact with the seniors. Hopefully, they’ll then either have a long, successful career at Cardiff or earn them the sort of transfer fee that enables clubs to undergo the sort of rebuilding job that so many of our rivals did last summer.

Therefore. if the presence of the likes of Coxe, Spence and Waite in the Under 23 team helps brings about a decline in results that sees us miss out on a top two finish, it will still be for the best if it means that our Academy will eventually again be doing what it hasn’t been for far too long.

*picture courtesy of  http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/

 

Posted in The stiffs | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Cruel defeat for City as squad limitations are laid bare.

First thing to say is that yesterday’s 4-3 defeat to Barnsley was the most dramatic home match I’ve seen in ages – in fact without giving the matter too much thought, I can only come up with two second leg Semi Finals (against Leicester in 2009/10 and Palace in 11/12) which, possibly beat it in terms of club games played at the new stadium.

When we pulled back to 3-3 with a couple of minutes left, I asked what do we do now, settle for the point which, given the circumstances it would have been gained under, would have maintained the feelgood factor that had built up following the victory over Wolves on Tuesday. or go for the win and leave ourselves vulnerable to an opponent who had shown themselves to be very effective counter attackers all afternoon?

It was a question I asked while being close to hundred per cent sure what the answer was. The momentum of the occasion and the atmosphere it engendered meant we were always going to go for the win – you only had to see the way Aron Gunnarsson grabbed the ball to take back to the centre spot after our equaliser to realise that.

As a fan, this was exactly what I wanted us to do and the truth is that, given the speed Barnsley showed when getting forward throughout the ninety minutes, they may have been able to fashion a winner anyway if we had taken the “boring” option of being a bit more cautious during the remaining minutes. I say this because I also thought it was a match which laid bare a host of fundamental problems that showed why Neil Warnock has only tended to play down expectations as to what can be done this season.

When people were talking of Play Off challenges after City had taken seven points from Warnock’s first three matches, the manager was saying things like it’ll probably get worse before it gets better, while his non stop references to what he was hoping to do in the January transfer window said all you wanted to know about what he thought of the strength or otherwise of the squad he had inherited (the fact that he chose to add four players to it before his first game in charge also tended to give the clue that he thought we were far from being in a false position in the table).

Bearing this in mind, the manager’s post match comments yesterday were very interesting. I mentioned on here after the Wolves game that Anthony Pilkington had said that there had not been a true Warnock dressing room rant since he had arrived at the club, but this sort of thing strongly suggests that some of the team at least were on the wrong end of his tongue (probably at both half and full time) yesterday.

The manager makes particular reference there to the two Barnsley goals which highlighted one of the major differences between two squads which, to be honest, don’t seem to have much in common.

I’ll say here and now that I cannot remember the last time I’ve seen a Cardiff team score a goal like Barnsley’s second and third ones yesterday (actually, the goal with which Peter Whittingham completed his hat trick in what may well be the last 4-3 match we played before yesterday, against Sheffield United at Brammal Lane, springs to mind now, but that was more than seven years ago).

To me, the statement which makes up that last paragraph says a lot about the sort of team Cardiff City have become in recent years. In fact, that probably should read the sort of team we have been for the majority of the time I have supported the club, but I’ll return to this theme later, because first I want to talk about the thing that so annoyed our Neil Warnock yesterday – our defending.

I agree with our manager when he said all four goals were poor ones to concede, but it’s those two length of the field breakaways that seem to have upset him most, because he feels that steps to deal with such things had been taken in the lead up to the match and were not adhered to by a couple of our players (presumably the pair of outfield players who did not go forward for the free kick and corner the goals stemmed from?).

Those who respond to my scribblings on here are a perceptive bunch and there was a reference  a few days ago to how we were nearly caught on the break by Wolves a couple of times after we had won a free kick or corner and sent our centrebacks forward. It had also been noticeable to me that Whittingham was having to do some pretty desperate covering and tackling as Brighton looked to break from our attacking dead ball situations in the home match before that.

It seems that opponents have spotted that what is our greatest attacking strength (an aerial attack from free kicks, corners and throw ins) also opens the door on one of, many it would appear given our goals against record this season, many defensive weaknesses.

What Brighton, Wolves and now Barnsley have done in our last three home matches goes to the heart of so much of what modern football thinking is about – football is probably as much about counter attacking today as it has ever been and our opponents yesterday struck me as very good exponents of this art, but they were also helped on their way by the fact that we appear to be so ill equipped to deal with it.

Let’s face it, any team that is relying on a player like Whitts so much in such positions is asking for trouble. To be fair to him, he has done pretty well recently in this department and he was unlucky yesterday when, having worked really hard to get back after taking the free kick, his interception saw the ball go straight to Josh Scowen to present him with a tap in for Barnsley’s third goal.

While mentioning the third goal, I’m going to digress for a short while to talk about Ben Amos. Having watched the highlights of the game a few times now, I’d say this is the only one of the four goals Amos should share a portion of the blame for. The keeper was certainly culpable for Wolves’ goal in midweek and his charge from goal for Scowen’s goal only made Barnsley’s task all the more simple, but I don’t see why he should be held responsible for our opponents first and last goals – there are many on the messageboards who are doing this.

I thought Sean Morrison left the scorer too much space for the first goal, but there was also a fine ball played by the impressive Conor Hourihane and an outstanding header by Sam Winnall in there as well – that header was placed to perfection and left Amos with no chance. Also. for the fourth one, I think it’s reasonable for a keeper to expect his centreback and left back (Bruno Manga and Peltier in this instance) not to let an opponent, in this case Marley Watkins, to burst between them and leave them both trailing in his wake, so ours was caught on the hop somewhat when this duly happened.

As with all of Barnsley’s goals, the problems started ahead of Amos. For the second one, we were in trouble once Craig Noone’s powder puff challenge for a header left Barnsley in control of the ball eighty yards from our goal with only two of our outfield players in front of them. It didn’t help our course either when another one (think it might have been Junior Hoilett) fell over as he chased back, but as was the case, all afternoon, Barnsley were able to prove that they had significantly more players with real pace in their team than we do.

So, Amos was not a major culprit behind our loss for me, but what I will say is that I feel our defence does not have much confidence in him and, as I’ve mentioned before, there’s been a lack of the sort of saves another impressive Barnsley player (the Wales qualified Adam Davies) made yesterday from him throughout his three months in the team. I can’t help thinking that if we had Davies in goals for us this season, our goals conceded figure would not be among the worst in the Championship.

It was always going to be hard for any keeper who was seen as David Marshall’s replacement and, possibly, I’m misreading our manager here, but I found his refusal to discuss Amos in yesterday’s post match press conference to be pretty revealing – I’ve thought for a while that goalkeeper was one of the positions Neil Warnock wanted to sign someone for next month and and I’m even more convinced of that now.

Not everything our manager said reflected his frustration at what he had just watched though. For the second successive game, Warnock spoke in very positive terms about striker Kenneth Zohore and, on the subject of the Denmark Under 21 international, I’m going to repeat myself here by praising the contributions of those whose views you’ll find in the Feedback section of this blog by saying that the responses to my piece on the Wolves match also included an analysis of Zohore’s technique when jumping for high balls in which the writer compared him unfavourably with Heidar Helguson who, I would guess, is about three or four inches shorter than him.

It was because of this that I watched Zohore more closely than normal yesterday when it came to his aerial prowess. In fact, it’s probably more accurate to say his lack of aerial prowess, because, to borrow an analogy from another sport I’ve used before about him I think, he doesn’t punch his weight when the ball is in air.

As the Barnsley centrebacks won header after header from balls pumped in Zohore’s direction in the first half, this was one of the main reasons why I coupled him with Craig Noone  when saying “they’re both playing as if they’re thinking, well I did well enough on Tuesday to keep my place in the starting line up for a few games”.

I didn’t think Zohore did that well in the first half, but it seems our manager disagrees with me because he was glowing in his praise of the player afterwards – I should say that I thought he was much improved after the break mind. Warnock did repeat his claim from earlier in the week that Zohore was one of a small group of players (is Emyr Huws another one I wonder?) who he had thought were a little lazy in training and that he needs to get a bit fitter, but he also said that he was looking to spend “decent” money on a striker in January,and, based on what he had seen in the last two matches, he wouldn’t be able to get better value for money than Zohore.

Neil Warnock also paid Zohore a compliment while bemoaning the sort of finishing which saw Hoilett, twice, and Rickie Lambert blow great scoring chances, when he said that he wished that they had fallen to him and, when asked what sort of striker he has been looking for, his reply was “one like Kenneth Zohore”.

The more I think about it, the more I believe that many of us, including our manager perhaps (after all, he did call himself “a lucky sod” when he said he wouldn’t have found about Zohore if was hadn’t played as badly as we did in the first half on Tuesday night!), have been fooled into thinking that, because of his size, Zohore can only play in a certain way.

I’ve said consistently, that although they all have their little differences, essentially, we only have one type of striker in contention for the first team these days – that is, targetmen. I’ve been expecting us to try to sign a mobile, nippy striker in the Chopra/Earnshaw mould, but when you have someone who has that ability to to move centrebacks about, has a bit of pace and power about them and could, with experience and the right coaching, become a real presence in the air, why not go for someone of Zohore’s size, rather than the shorter player I’d been expecting?

I’m not as convinced about Zohore’s finishing as our manager appears to be and I’m not saying he can become the sort of stylish, and unplayable, front man Jay Bothroyd was when the mood took him, but I see some similarities between the two players. For example, on Tuesday, his pace was able to earn himself a bit of space about thirty yards from the Wolves goal and the pass provided when it came was weighted so perfectly that Anthony Pilkington didn’t have to break stride before taking a touch and scoring. When Zohore found himself in the same sort of position yesterday late on in the game, the pass was, again, of exactly the right weight to Kadeem Harris, I think it was, only for the momentum to be lost by a combination of a poor first touch and a wrong decision by the receiver.

Yesterday Barnsley needed some dogged defending, good goalkeeping, helpful refereeing (the same ref who should have awarded us a penalty in the dying minutes at St. James Park last month this time missed a blatant handball in the box and there were two challenges in quick succession in the second half which could have seen us awarded spot kicks on another day) and some luck to gain their three points, but they were also very, very good at what they were good at.

I was most impressed with Barnsley’s pace and penetration going forward when I watched them in the League One Play Offs last season and the step up in standard has not seen those abilities being diluted either based on yesterday’s evidence. However, it’s not just speed that Barnsley possess, it’s players with the technique and composure to get things right while playing at pace.

There are some signs that Kenneth Zohore may have a bit of that to his game, but, sadly, I don’t see many of his team mates with those abilities – I mentioned earlier that we don’t score goals like Barnsley’s second and third (or fourth, for that matter) ones, but it’s not just pace our squad lacks, it’s also the reliable feet and calm, clear, minds that enable you to cash in on the opportunities your speed has won you.

It’s only fair to say that we played some good stuff going forward in open play and twenty two goal attempts to Barnsley’s ten may tell a story about our profligacy, but it also tells one about the “flow” of the game. However, where Barnsley looked like an attacking unit, we seemed like a team that was benefiting from moments of quality from individuals.

Only Newcastle have scored more than Barnsley’s thirty eight goals from twenty two matches in the Championship this season and so the attacking potency they showed yesterday was not a one off. The Yorkshire club have put together a squad that plays good, modern day, football in an entertaining manner consistently, largely, of players signed for modest sums from the lower leagues, many of whom know what it feels like to be rejected by so called bigger teams.

Speed of body and mind appears to high on the list of attributes that manager Paul Heckingbottom looks for when recruiting players and, watching his team yesterday and comparing it to the character and make up of our squad and the things that many supporters will tell you we’ve lacked for years, I couldn’t help but think that for “speed of body and mind” at Barnsley, read power and physique at City in recent years – in fact, while it would be wrong, to say it has been forever thus at Cardiff, it sometimes feels like it.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch | Tagged , , , | 17 Comments