A winning debut for Forde as City see off Preston in 06/07

Ever since he had regained his first team spot around halfway through the 2005/06 season, Neil Alexander had been an automatic choice in City’s first eleven and the job of back up keeper at Cardiff had become a pretty thankless one. Tony Warner and Martyn Margetson had shared the job for a year or more, but, with Warner eventually being sold to Fulham and Margetson winding down his playing career before his move into coaching, there was a vacancy which was filled by Irishman David Forde, whose CV included spells at Barry Town and West Ham, who signed from Derry City in January 2007.

Forde’s arrival didn’t make many headlines as Dave Jones brought in five other players during that January transfer window to try and aid a promotion challenge which had got completely bogged down during a winless run lasting more than two months and, although the contributions of the new men was virtually nil during this time, a run of thirteen points from six matches had got the team back in the promotion frame when Preston arrived on 23 February for a Friday night televised six pointer at the top of the table.

City stood in seventh place six points off the second automatic promotion place, while Preston were fourth with three points more than us having played a game less, so a win for the visitors would have opened up a handy lead for them over us as the campaign went into it’s final quarter. Therefore, to hear Ali read out a City team which included Forde in goal for illness victim Alexander (the club had kept this very quiet in the build up to the game and I’m pretty sure that Alexander’s absence would have come as a shock to most City fans)  as I arrived in the ground hardly increased confidence that we could deal with a visiting attack which included David Nugent who was banging in the goals that year and would soon be winning a full England cap.

With the rain emptying down, conditions weren’t great for keepers or defenders, but the solidly built Forde made a decent early save to calm any nerves as both teams rather cancelled each other out in the first half an hour or so in which the main talking point was probably City’s new keeper’s challenge on Nugent as they both went for a through ball. I mentioned that Forde was a solid citizen earlier and the more slightly built Preston striker was always likely to come off second best in any collision between the two of them. Indeed, it could even be said that Forde almost relished the physical challenge as he flew out of his goal to clear up the situation, but, although the immediate danger to City’s goal had been dealt with, Forde’s challenge, which left Nugent down and injured, could easily have earned him a red card in conceding a penalty on another day.

Looking at the pictures from the television coverage later on, I have to say that I don’t think City could have had many complaints if the decision had gone against them, but, in the event, play was allowed to continue and Nugent didn’t reappear after the break as Preston were forced to withdraw their best player as a result of the injury inflicted on him by Forde. Before Nugent was taken off though, City got themselves into the lead thanks to a goal two minutes before half time from the player who has turned out to be the best signing by far that Dave Jones made that January.

Peter Whittingham’s crisp finish after good work from Michael Chopra and Paul Parry was the highspot of a personal performance which was the best he had given since signing for the club some six weeks earlier, but his influence on the match became more marked in the early minutes after the break which saw a crazy period of three goals were scored in three minutes. The first came seven minutes after the interval when Michael Chopra received a pass from Roger Johnson and was brought down by Liam Chilvers for an obvious penalty which Chopra converted himself as he scored his twentieth goal of a great first season with the club, but within seconds, Preston had been given a penalty of their own when Johnson was adjudged to have fouled Nugent’s replacement Neil Mellor.

This time the decision was a more controversial one with doubts as to whether the offence had occurred inside the penalty area, but, I suppose that having, maybe, got away with one earlier, City couldn’t have too much cause for complaint this time  – as it was, that fine penalty taker Graham Alexander took the chance to get his side back into the match using a unique toe ender style (I’ve seen him score a few since then using this method) to fire the ball past Forde into the roof of the net. City were then awarded a free kick straight from the kick off and Whittingham’s excellent dead ball delivery was headed back across keeper Andy Lonergan and into the corner of the net for a first ever City goal by Roger Johnson who celebrated with a run along the touchline in front of the Bob Bank which only has Michael Chopra’s hot boot celebration against Bristol City last season to rival it as the most memorable seen from a City player in recent years.

Things calmed down a bit after that, but City went further in front when Whittingham gave Alexander a case of twisted blood as a superb piece of skill left the Preston captain helpless to prevent the low cut back cross which laid a goal on a plate for Chopra. If Chopra’s free kick a few minutes earlier had been a two or three inches lower then the tap in given to him by Whittingham would have seen him completing a hat trick, but, as it was, his effort rebounded off the cross bar thereby robbing the top scorer of a goal from a free kick in a fourth consecutive home match.

Preston were a well beaten team by then though and the last few minutes saw Dave Jones give a chance to two of his less successful January buys in Jason Byrne and Matt Green (who with Simon Walton and Iwan Redan completed a quarter of flops brought in during that time) and the latter missed a good chance to make it five in the five minutes or so he had on the pitch before the final whistle signalled a victory which seemed very important at the time but was later rendered pretty meaningless by a run of just five points from our remaining eleven fixtures which left us tailed off in thirteenth place after being six points clear at the top at the end of October.

As for David Forde, he was given a chance to impress during the final six matches of that season in which I think I was in a small minority of supporters who thought he did quite well. Dave Jones obviously thought differently though because Forde never played another league game for us and, after loan spells at Luton and Bournemouth, joined Millwall when his City contract wasn’t renewed. Forde was first choice right from the start at his new club and he has now established himself as a reliable Championship quality keeper at Millwall who would have particularly enjoyed his fine save from Whittingham’s penalty on his return to Cardiff a couple of months ago.

23 February 2007

Cardiff City 4 Preston North End 1

City Forde; McNaughton, Johnson (1), Loovens, Ledley; Parry, Scimeca, McPhail, Whittingham (1); Chopra (2) (Byrne), Thompson (Green); Subs (not used) Gunter, Blake, Flood

Preston Lonergan; Alexander (1), St. Ledger, Chilvers, Hill; Whaley, McKenna Pergl, Pugh; Nugent (Mellor), Dichio (Agyemang); Subs (not used) Henderson, Sedgewick, Wilson

HT 1-0

Att. 12,889

Posted in Out on the pitch | Comments Off on A winning debut for Forde as City see off Preston in 06/07

A bunch of bottlers or not as good as we are made out to be?

Cast your mind back to the balmy, carefree days of October when Dave Jones was telling the world that, at that stage, we were ahead of the points target he and his staff had set the team for this season – I wonder, did the City’s think tank take into account our traditional November slump when setting this target? If they did, then it might well be that we are still on course to beat it because, let’s face it, four points from five matches isn’t that bad by our standards for this month.

I’ve admitted defeat in trying to fathom out why we are so crap in November and from now on am going to accept it as a matter of fact – while Dave Jones remains in charge of Cardiff City we will have a slump during the month of November and there’s nothing that can be done about it. Anyway, I wonder if, this time around anyway, the November thing has been a bit of a red herring (and I say that as someone who has been more guilty than most of referring to it during our run of poor results)? This month’s programme always looked a tough set of fixtures with four of our games being against sides with genuine promotion aspirations and our return of just one point from these fixtures cannot be put down solely to the month they happened to be played in.

Reaction to yesterday’s 2-1 defeat at Queens Park Rangers on the messageboards has tended to fall into one of two categories. The first of these sees our team as being the most talented in the Championship who consistently fail on the big occasions – in short we are a bunch of bottlers. Now, speaking as someone who will believe to his dying day that we bottled it completely at the end of the 08/09 season, I can see in a way why people might think that. After all, I can remember Brian McDermott the Reading manager saying on Sky’s Football League preview show at the end of October that anyone who finishes above Cardiff will go up automatically – the football world at large tends to see us as one of the two best sides in this league and so when we lose against rivals near the top of the table, it must be down to a lack of nerve mustn’t it?

Opposition players have been making a habit of breaking away from Seyi Olofinjana in recent matches.

The second viewpoint is the usual we are crap one that appears every time we lose (or even draw) a match. The table shows that we are, obviously, not crap but, if it comes down to a choice between this option and the talented bottlers one I think I am beginning to side more with those who say we are not as good as every one seems to want to tell us we are.

Until 7 November I believed Dave Jones when he said there was more to come from this side – although City had just been doing enough to get the job done in many of their matches, some of the football played against the likes of Doncaster, Bristol City, Leeds and Norwich backed this up (mind you, even in these games there were spells where the opposition were dominant). However, I must admit that the Swansea match saw me lose a lot of faith in this team – forget about who it was against, the tactical and footballing ineptitude shown by our manager and players that day came as a real shock to me as it got me wondering if there was an element of the Emperor’s New Clothes about us.

In saying that, speaking as someone who thought that defensively we were not a top six team last year, merely swapping Tom Heaton for David Marshall and Lee Naylor for Mark Kennedy was hardly going to lead to a dramatic improvement in that department – with Anthony Gerrard away at Hull this year and Adam Matthews not playing as well this time around, I would say there is a definite case to be made for saying that we are weaker at the back now than we were last season. To counteract this, we certainly have more depth in midfield and, although Peter Whittingham’s move to central midfield has meant we have lost a fair bit of fire power, the arrival of Craig Bellamy and Jay Bothroyd’s fine form makes us stronger up front.

However, just as was the case last season, having four or five of the best individuals in the league is not that much of an advantage if the “supporting cast” is of a level which is no better than average for the Championship. To illustrate what I mean, if you compare the back fives of the two teams yesterday player for player, I would pick the QPR one over ours in every case (especially since Kevin McNaughton has become more injury prone and inconsistent over the past eighteen months or so). To be fair to our defenders, I am comparing them with the Championship’s best there, but the point is that I feel there are a fair few other back fives around who are better than ours – Hudson, Blake, Gyepes and co are all decent to good performers who will have occasional outstanding games at this level, but I don’t see any of them as serious contenders for a Championship’s best eleven selection and, surely, a top two side would have at least one goalkeeper and/or defender in the running for a place?

The same applies, to a lesser extent, in other areas of the team and here I am afraid questions need to be asked about some of Dave Jones’ signings. I never saw Seyi Olofinjana as the midfield “enforcer” that he was built up to be – he enjoyed a very good start to his City career and was effective in stopping the opposition playing, but when two sets of supporters say the same thing about one of their ex players, you tend to think they might have a point and, at the moment anyway, Olofinjana is fading after a bright beginning just like Stoke and Hull fans thought he might.

As for Jason Koumas and Chris Riggott, we are fast reaching the stage where, for all the use they have been, we might as well have signed them in the January window. I would guess that the injury plagued Riggott is at least not costing us too much and, for me, Dave Jones’ better summer signings have been the cheap ones like Heaton and Danny Drinkwater, but I think we are going to need more than bargain basement signings in January if we are going to be successful in what is something of a promotion or bust season.

It has been claimed that there will be millions available for new players in January if we can maintain a top two spot. Therefore, we need our big players to start being as influential as they were back in October and then we can, hopefully, start adding some solid virtues like defensive reliability and consistency to our team – that’s boring I know, but we need top two (or, at least, top six) ability all over the pitch, not just at the top end of it.

A fine finish to win the match by Taarabt, but should he really have been allowed to get into that position so easily?

Anyway, I suppose I had better say a few things about the game that was played yesterday and the funny thing is that, despite all of the largely negative stuff above, I didn’t think we played too badly at all (certainly a lot better than the dross we served up against Swansea and Forest and during the second half at Scunthorpe anyway). Perhaps QPR were slightly more deserving of the win, but, overall, I thought a draw would have been a fair outcome and that is what we probably would have got if what was an obvious penalty had been given for that foul on Jay Bothroyd – as an aside, I see Neil Warnock was very complimentary towards the ref after the match, but I would have loved to have seen his reaction if Mr Friend had ruled in our favour (as Warnock accepted he could well have done) and then still turned down what looked a very good shout for a penalty for his side right at the death!

I believe that a lot of the after match criticism from supporters was as much to do with what has been happening in the previous three weeks as it was about us being so poor yesterday – if that game had been played in isolation, I daresay most of the after match discussion would have been about how we were robbed by the officials. If we keep on playing like that, we are good enough to keep a promotion challenge going because we do have more quality than recent results would indicate, but, I happen to believe that the quality is more thinly spread than it should be for a promotion side. I think money needs to be spent in January for that situation to change and, if he is given that financial backing to go with what he was provided with to bring in Bellamy, Olofinjana, Keogh, Koumas and Naylor (that doesn’t look as impressive a list now as it did back in September does it), then Dave Jones can have no excuse – anything short of promotion will not be good enough and I would not expect him to be here come June if we were preparing for the 2011/12 campaign as a Championship team.

Posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch | Tagged , | Comments Off on A bunch of bottlers or not as good as we are made out to be?