Malky’s halo slips a little?


Malky Mackay has done superbly in his first six months as Cardiff City manager in my book. The man I wanted as manager before the decision was made has got so much right during his time here so far and the feelgood factor that has been present for much of the campaign up to now has so much to do with him. However, albeit at the twenty seventh time of asking, I thought that legitimate questions could be asked of his decision making yesterday as City’s unbeaten run stretching back to the Peterborough defeat in October came to an end against a decent Middlesbrough team who showed why they have such an outstanding away record this season.

Boro’s 3-2 win owed a lot to a midfield that probably just got the better of the battle in that area of the pitch, but not to the extent that City should virtually concede defeat in the middle of the park with a quarter of the game to go by, essentially, stopping playing in that area as they went route one with the introduction of Rudy Gestede and Joe Mason for Craig Conway and Don Cowie. Conway has often been taken off early in matches over the past couple of months, but Cowie always lasts the ninety minutes normally and, unless he had taken a knock, his withdrawal was a mystery to me. With Gestede looking rusty and short of match sharpness, the long ball approach certainly didn’t pay dividends and Boro were able to exploit the extra space they got in the middle of the park and on the flanks to net the decisive winning goal.

Whilst the introduction of two attacking substitutes was a bold move by a manager trying to win the game, it was hardly as if City were struggling to create chances, because in a game that panned out in a completely different manner than had been anticipated by most of pundits, there were plenty of opportunities at either end as two sides who had been defending so well recently struggled to cope with attacks which had scarcely been going goal crazy in their last few games.

A first City goal for Ben Turner, but, sadly, one of his worst performances for us so far - he was at fault twice in the lead up to the winning goal.*

To be fair to our manager,  I suppose Bates and Williams were not your normal strapping Championship centre backs, they were more your Darcy Blake types who showed enough speed to catch up with Kenny Miller (still no slouch despite being in the autumn of his career) on a couple of occasions, but maybe could have been exploited in the air. Therefore I wasn’t against us playing long balls forward in that last quarter, but I couldn’t see why we did it to the exclusion of all else – we stopped getting the best out of Miller (who I thought was our best player) and did not utilise Mason (who posed more problems for Boro with the few chances he got than Gestede did as we endlessly lumped it forward) enough by playing “proper” football – I just thought that if the word to continuously knock it long came from the bench, it was a wrong decision.

In saying that, it was a day when luck, which we have had a fair sprinkling of over the past couple of months, ran out for City – two incidents within a minute of each other in the first half proved that. I wasn’t going to say much about the penalty claim we had because, sat pretty low down at the corner of the Canton Stand and Ninian Stand, I probably had the worst view in the ground of the incident, but, having seen the television pictures of it now, it was a dreadful piece of officiating by referee and linesman – it was a clear penalty, although I would have given the erratic Steele a yellow rather than red card. With the crowd still up in arms at that decision, Ogbeche’s well struck shot seconds later would almost certainly have been saved by Marshall if it had not got a deflection off the covering Ben Turner.

City's best two players on the day celebrate our second goal - Aron Gunnarsson's name ended up on the scoresheet, but Kenny Miller's assist of the season so far deserved as much, if not more, of the plaudits.*

On another day, both of those incidents would have worked out in our favour, but this shouldn’t be allowed to detract from the fact that, unusually, McNaughton and Cowie got themselves into a mess on the right to present Boro with their first goal and that players like Turner and Taylor, who have been performing well in recent weeks (excellently in the case of the former actually), slipped below those standards and were culpable to some extent in the conceding of the other two goals. Gunnarsson apart, the midfield five were not as good as they can be either, so, it would be wrong to claim we deserved all three points, but  I don’t believe Boro were that much better than us to have deserved the win – 3-3 would have been the result an entertaining and, surprisingly, open match deserved in my book.

Barring a miss by Whittingham from the spot, that’s the result we would have got as well if the referee had done his job properly. Maybe I’m getting more of a grouch in my old age, but I thought Graham Salisbury was the latest in a series of poor refs we’ve had in home games recently – this isn’t sour grapes, because I also thought Boro could have had a penalty as well in the first half, but how there were eight bookings in that match is beyond me. I mentioned on a messageboard that there wasn’t a bad tackle in the game and was picked up by someone who said Andrew Taylor was guilty of a “horror tackle” – not for me it wasn’t, a yellow card offence yes, but no more than that. There was no flow to the game in the closing minutes as Salisbury got whistle happy and stopped play at every opportunity – in my opinion, the referee played too big a part in the outcome of the game.

So, where do we go from here? Is there any need for widespread changes to team and system because of this defeat? My feeling is that there isn’t – the side has done excellently so far and we were more effective playing 4-5-1 than we were the 4-4-2/4-3-3 that we finished with yesterday. However, although we missed his defensive covering when he went off, maybe the time has come to give Craig Conway a rest and let Joe Mason play in an attacking midfield role through the middle? I realise that this would give us even fewer natural wide players, and, although he hasn’t really been producing the goods for a while now, Conway is still one of the best crossers of a ball we have. Mason has a habit of making things happen when he is on a football pitch though and, unless and until we bring in some players with that X factor that Malky Mackay talks about next month, that’s something we could have done with a little more of from the start yesterday – maybe we wouldn’t have had to end up playing all that route one stuff late on then.

* = pictures from http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

 

 

Posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch | Tagged , | Comments Off on Malky’s halo slips a little?

Stalemate at the New Den, but the unbeaten run reaches eleven.

Another one of those matches which I can only make a few general observations about I’m afraid because I was only able to catch snippets of the action on the radio while the game was being played. A draw always seemed a likely outcome though if for no other reason than this is what we always seem to do at Millwall lately – the previous four Millwall v Cardiff matches having ended all square. If the result was no great surprise, then the 0-0 scoreline may have been as it’s only the second time this season that we have failed to find the net in a competitive game – with the other being the televised draw with Leicester in September, it’s reassuring that, so far at least, no goals for Cardiff does not mean we end up being beaten.

Even so, I must admit to a tinge of disappointment at the result just as I had after the 1-1 draw at Coventry in our previous away fixture. With Coventry in danger of becoming marooned at the bottom of the table, I daresay my reaction to that result is understandable, but it is more a tribute to how well Malky Mackay and his squad have done so far that I should even contemplate yesterday’s match as being a case of two points dropped and not one gained. Millwall may well be involved in the relegation struggle, but they are no mugs at home and a couple of defensive loan signings from Villa look to have shored up their defence somewhat.

Talking of defence, it’s now some time since we last conceded – I make it 389 minutes or nearly four and a third matches since we let in a goal and, even then, I’m still not convinced Lucas Jutkiewicz’s header at the Ricoh Arena was over the line despite what Malky Mackay says! My painstaking research (!) tells me that this is our best run in that respect since we went five matches without an opposition goal in our 1998/99 promotion season – although I must admit that Nottingham Forest, Blackburn, Birmingham and Millwall is a slightly more impressive roll of honour than Leyton Orient, Exeter, Torquay, Scarborough and Chester!

 

Joe Ralls in a battle for possession with Millwall's Liam Trotter - apparently. the 18 year old was assured and looked at home at this level in what was his first league start.

Praise for this sequence has to go to a goalkeeper and back four which yesterday included a couple of changes with Mark Hudson and Andrew Taylor returning from injury for Anthony Gerrard and Lee Naylor respectively, but it has to be said that having five players in front of them who are all natural midfielders rather than one or two who are strikers or wingers cum midfield players must be a help. One of the potential drawbacks of operating with a 4-5-1 that does not seamlessly convert to a 4-3-3 with a front trio who feel fully at home in advanced positions though is that your goalscoring potential suffers and three goals from our past four league matches suggests that sides are finding ways to cope better defensively with our system that, usually, only includes one genuine attacker.

Millwall manager Kenny Jackett admitted after the game that he had changed the way his team usually set up because he didn’t think he could allow Peter Whittingham a free rein in midfield like Birmingham had done last week. Instead, he went some way towards following Forest’s example of putting a man marker on City’s matchwinner – the scoreline suggests that Jackett’s policy was a success, but it’s worth noting that Whittingham seems to have been involved in our three best attacks with his early shot being saved by Mildenhall, his pass bringing a header from Kenny Miller that the keeper also denied and he was also involved in the creation of the late chance which saw Rudy Gestede (returning as a sub after missing ten matches with a hamstring problem) blaze over the bar. However, with the home side hitting the woodwork in the first half through Henry and then missing a great opportunity in the dying minutes when sub Henderson’s close range header bounced up and over the bar, it appears that this was a match that City could not really have claimed to be unlucky to miss out on the three points.

To finish on a bit of a hobby horse of mine, this now makes six draws from eleven away league matches and, for me, this is the only slightly unsatisfactory aspect of our Championship campaign so far. Now, I’m not really talking about yesterday here, but more the four away matches that have ended 1-1 in which we have scored first. Although some of the teams below us made up some ground yesterday, Southampton’s and West Ham’s draw and defeat respectively meant that yesterday’s stalemate didn’t hurt us in relation to the top two. Three points rather than the one from one of the matches at Portsmouth, Blackpool, Leeds and Coventry though would now have us level on points with West Ham, while victory in two of those games would have us just a point behind Southampton at the top – again, it’s down to how well we have done under our new manager that I keep on about this subject, but, as of now, we are genuine top two candidates and too many away draws after scoring first are keeping us out of the automatic promotion spots.

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | Comments Off on Stalemate at the New Den, but the unbeaten run reaches eleven.