Back to blue.

Earlier this afternoon club Chairman Datuk Chan Tien Ghee (TG) issued this statement on the club’s official site. So, there you have it, we won’t be playing in red as our first choice kit next season. Time to start popping the Champagne corks then – not for me though thanks, because I’ve got this strong churning feeling in my stomach. I’m not certain what’s causing it, but it did come on just as I was hearing Alan Whiteley read out the fifth paragraph of TG’s statement at the meeting I attended at Cardiff City Stadium a few hours ago – anyone who feels that today’s news is a cause for celebration should have another read of that paragraph and think about it for a while.

Perhaps after they have done that they could tell me where the good news is in learning that the man who has been writing the cheques every month for the last couple of years to keep the club solvent has his spokesman saying “but the club inevitably now faces bold and real world decisions should we want to see the club survive. As romantic and simplistic a notion as it may seem, maintaining our current course without growth or change, is not, and cannot be, an option.”? Before anyone says we can go into administration if Vincent Tan is no longer prepared to bankroll us or that he won’t walk away after he has put millions of pounds into the club, let’s not forget that this is not a Langston situation where the debt is unsecured, at the moment this is a secured loan which he is entitled to in full if the club goes to the wall.

As for us popping into administration for a couple of months and then coming back after as good as new again with some other billionaire owner, well I draw your attention to this story in the local press today which talks of our £70 million debt – strikes me that any administrator might have a bit of a problem finding a buyer for a Championship (emphasis on the word “Championship”) club with debt levels like that. This is far from a day for celebrating, this is not a day for messageboard banter (I hate that word!) or triumphalism, this is a day when we should all hope that there is a way out of this mess because if there isn’t, I think the future is too awful to contemplate.

For those who are looking for some feedback from today’s meeting, it got very heated at times as the twelve people present proved that, whatever else they are, they are passionate supporters of the club. Once again, I’d like to thank the four club employees who hosted the meeting, but the lasting memory I’ll take from it was what one of them said regarding Vincent Tan’s commitment to the club. The person I’m talking about decided to stay at a less well paid job at Cardiff City after he had been accepted for a position at a Saracens RFC. I think that says all you need to know about Julian Jenkins’ commitment to the club and so, while I cannot speak for the others present, when he says that Vincent Tan has already put tens of millions into the club without getting a penny back, that he has connections with 350 shops in the Far East which could be ready to stock Cardiff City merchandise and that plans have already been drawn up for the stadium expansion and new training facilities, that an agreement with Sam Hammam was imminent regarding the Langston loan note debt and that Malky Mackay and Alan Whiteley have already been in negotiations with transfer targets, I believe him.

Kuala Lumpur - could it ever be a hot bed of Cardiff City support? After today's events we may never know the answer.

If there was any good news to come out of the meeting, then it was that the Malaysian investors had agreed to a change to incorporate a Bluebird into the badge we had been shown on Tuesday (it’s below the Dragon and motto). As I said when asked about it, for some mysterious reason, club colours, badges and Bluebirds mean little to me, so I was hardly the person they should be seeking an opinion from, but, what I could recognise is that there had been a spirit of compromise shown by the Malaysian investors.

Unfortunately though, I came out of the meeting believing that something I had been suspecting for a couple of days might well be true – there are cultural and behavioural differences between Cardiff and Kuala Lumpur that are hard to breach. On the one hand, we find it very difficult to understand something that Vincent Tan seems to believe in implicitly – that is that changing our colours to red could have transformed the club’s fortunes, but, without knowing all of his thinking on the matter, it’s impossible to be persuaded. That shouldn’t mean that his ideas should be dismissed out of hand though – speaking as someone who has spent the best part of half a century watching us cock things up and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory so often while wearing blue. maybe he has a point!

On the other hand, it would appear that the Malaysians have been genuinely upset by behaviour that we probably dismiss as ill judged, but passionate. Speaking for myself, I was surprised that they would abandon their plans as quickly as they did, but then again, I don’t understand the Malaysian psyche (very few of us do) – confrontation (which is what messageboards and social networking sites sometimes seem to thrive on most) does not sit well with them.

I’ll finish by saying something about a message I read when I got in that had been posted on one of the boards after the statement by TG which, once again, set me thinking that Malaysian values may be the right ones to follow. Now, although I probably don’t show it often enough on here, I have a stoical outlook when it comes to my team – there’s not too much that upsets me about them and I can usually find something to laugh at when it comes to all things Cardiff City. However, it was a good job that my cat was out when I saw a thread titled “The Malaysian Ownners can stick their money up their arse if money is the only motivation.” because she would have been kicked from here to kingdom come! Thankfully, I’m pretty sure that the message has now been deleted and, on the off chance that TG, Vincent Tan or any other of the Malaysian investors get to read this and saw that abomination, I can only apologise for what that moron posted. We aren’t all like that you know – perhaps a few of us should have done more to make that clear over the past few days, because I’ve a nasty feeling that the damage might already have been done.

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Back to blue.

Proposed change of kit, badge and nickname – meeting with club last night.

Yesterday evening there was a meeting held at Cardiff City Stadium between representatives of the club and members of the Supporters’ Club, Supporters’ Trust, the Travel Group and representatives of the two main Cardiff City messageboards. Here is a report on what was said and, as someone who was present last night, here is a message I posted this morning regarding my feelings on the matter now;-

“I was at the meeting to discuss the proposed changes to our kit and badge last night and I thought I’d give my feelings on the matter following what was said there.

Before I do though, I’ll just quickly set out what my position was beforehand – I didn’t want the changes and was concerned about whether what we were seeing was the thin end of a wedge which has worse to come in the future. However, as long as it was only the kit and badge that was being changed, then I could live with that and was prepared to give the Malaysian investors the benefit of the doubt.

I must admit that as I listened to the passionate views of the majority present who were against the proposals I did think to myself “What’s wrong with me? I love the club as much as these people do and yet I cannot get as worked up about the colour blue and a bluebird as they are”.

I did take on board what was said by all and there were some very good points made, but I can only go by what I feel and I genuinely can’t get as excited as others about matters which, to me at least, are incidental to why Cardiff City are my team.

Before I finish about the meeting, I must say that the way the changes have been foisted upon us leaves a sour taste – that’s not meant as a criticism of the club staff present last night by the way (they were given a thankless task, but made the best job they could of it under the circumstances). I believe the lack of consultation with supporters groups beforehand was a mistake by the Malaysians which has only served to harden attitudes against the proposals – an explanation as to why they feel these changes are needed would I’m sure have got some supporters at least onside with them.

As to where we go from here, well, first, I’d say insulting and abusing those who feel differently to how you do does nobody any good – these are personal matters for all concerned and I’d go as far as to say that there isn’t a right or wrong in this argument if you arrive at your decision by thinking about what Cardiff City means to you.

Groups like the Supporter’s Club and the Trust are consulting with their members to get their views, but, although this will, hopefully, produce a decent sized sample, there’s more amongst our present support that don’t belong to these organisations than there are who do.

Therefore, what I think would be great is if just one online poll could be set up with three answers (“Yes”, “No” and something like “I can live with them”) to a question which read along the lines of “Are you in favour of the proposed changes to our kit, badge and nickname?”. Ideally this could be run independently of messageboards and other City websites and there would be mechanisms in place to ensure you could only vote once.

This wouldn’t be perfect because there are still large numbers of supporters who don’t have access to the Internet, but if it did take off then I believe it would definitely provide an opportunity for supporter’s representatives to go back to the club with a verdict which would allow them to say that the stance they were taking was the legitimate view of our fans.

Whatever happens though, it is essential that as many supporters as possible make their views known. I think it goes without saying that the most vociferous group will be those who are against the changes, but, in a way, it is more important that those in the “Yes” and “I can live with them” groups I mentioned earlier get their views over as well.

I say this because the nightmare scenario for me is that, through no fault of their own, supporter’s representatives go back to the club with a strongly anti change attitude (because that’s what their consultations told them) which eventually drives Vincent Tan and TG away when there might have been a majority in the “I can live with it” camp who just sat on their hands and didn’t get involved.

Based on what I’ve seen so far, I would say that those of us who can live with these changes are in a minority, but, let’s try and make certain that as much as possible is done to ensure that this really is the case. It’s often been said that those of us who post on messageboards are not truly representative of your “average” Cardiff City supporter and there has to be a chance that this is true on this matter – I’ll go along with the majority view if it turns out to be a different one to mine, but let’s try and do as much as we can to ensure that it is really a “majority”.”

 

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged | 4 Comments