Comfortable in the end as Cardiff keep Play Off hopes alive at Barnsley.

Having not seen as much live football in a month as I usually do through February, I decided to wander over to Blaenrhondda Park this afternoon to watch a Sully Sports* team I saw take on City in a Welsh Cup tie about forty five years ago (one of my PE teachers from school was in their team that night) while listening to Cardiff’s game at Barnsley.
I just looked it up and City played Sully in 1976 and we beat them 5-0 with Tony Evans scoring a hat trick – they were a highly rated Welsh league side back then. So, presuming it’s the same team, they were called Sully Town back then*, they played in the same black and white kit as this team, it’s sad to see them in their current position adrift at the bottom of the Premier Division of the Highadmit South Wales League with just three draws to show from their twenty matches.
However, they will be feeling a little better about things after what I would guess is their best result of the season in drawing 1-1 with a Blaenrhondda side that sit sixth in the table.
To be honest, Blaenrhondda will be wondering how they didn’t manage to turn their incessant second half pressure into a win. The chances to do so we’re certainly there, but they were guilty of trying to walk the ball into the net at times and their finishing didn’t reach the standards I saw from them last season.
On the balance of play, there really should have only been one outcome – a win for Blaenrhondda. However, Sully deserve credit for some great last ditch defending and for how they overcame the blow of having to change their goalkeeper in the first half – they also provided a moment of genuine high quality football with their goal just before half time.
Blaenrhondda had taken the lead around the twenty minute mark when Sully made a bit of a mess of defending a corner and the ball was eventually driven in from about ten yards following a bout of penalty area pinball. Up to then, the home team had given an impression of being in command while never really looking like scoring and this situation was repeated once they had done so – it looked like they thought they only needed the one goal to seal the win.
Such thinking began to look somewhat optimistic when Sully started to show some signs of attacking life towards the end of the first half, but there had been nothing whatsoever from either side really to suggest they had the sort of quality we saw from Sully when one of their players took aim from twenty two yards and curled a lovely side right footed shot high into the net leaving the home goalkeeper helpless.
The match had kicked off at half past two, so it had been possible to give it my full attention for the first half, but, after that, it was the City’s game at Barnsley that I paid more heed to.
I must admit, that I wasn’t expecting a great deal from an unchanged City side at the start of the match because, after the brief excitement of three wins out of four nearly a month earlier, the last few matches had returned to the December/January formula whereby draws were very much the order of the day.
There wasn’t much to suggest that we could expect to see anything other than a grim, hard fought low scoring draw or a narrow defeat in a first half in which City’s performance was described as woeful on a couple of occasions by the commentator..
Former Wales captain and City centreback Kevin Ratcliffe was the game summariser and it was clear he was not impressed by what City were producing in those first forty five minutes. Now, I know Ratcliffe is not popular with many City fans in this role, but, having seen four months of Neil Harris’ Cardiff City now, I certainly found myself agreeing with much of what he was saying.
For example, Ratcliffe said he struggled to see much difference to the sort of stuff City were producing and how we were playing under Neil Warnock. Ratcliffe also mentioned something which has bugged me about City’s play when we’re struggling to make an attacking impact – it’s the way the ball is just hooked forward over shoulders in the vague direction of other players by our midfielders.
Ratcliffe was also correct in my view when he said City had players who were capable of playing some decent stuff at times, so he struggled to see why they were restricting themselves by sticking with such a rigid way of playing the game.
With Barnsley playing what good football there was on display and troubling City at times with their pace going forward, it was the home side who would have been happier with the situation at half time in what was virtually a must win match for both teams. All City had to show was an Albert Adomah shot competently turned aside by home keeper Brad Collins and a Will Vaulks near post flick of a Joe Ralls corner which went over the bar. However, for all of their promising build up play and their lively running in attacking areas, Barnsley had not forced Alex Smithies into a save – that one effort from Adomah was the only on target attempt of the half.
Therefore, there must have been a realisation from Neil Harris that, as poorly as his team were playing, this was definitely a game that they could win if they stepped things up a bit in the second half.
I’m afraid I cannot remember the exact figures for this, but City have something like the fourth worst first half record in the Championship this season and the fourth best when it comes the second half of matches, so maybe what followed was not that much of a surprise, but count me as one of those who was shocked by how comfortably we did manage the win in the end over a club that we have now lost to only once in fourteen games. All of the stats show how we were deserved winners in the end, with the BBC’s figures showing we had thirteen goal attempts to Barnsley’s six, we won the on target attempts seven – nil, the corner count eight-three and, right from the kick off we were at the home team in a manner barely seen by us on an away ground this season.
Junior Hoilett perhaps should have given his team the lead when he flicked a Joe Ralls cross narrowly over and there was a shout for a penalty when Callum Paterson went down under a challenge with Collins after the keeper had made a mess of a long and high punt by Leandro Bacuna – for me, there might have been our foul by our striker on a defender before the incident, but, if referee James Linington, who did not book a player all afternoon and sounded like an improvement on some of the clowns we’ve had in charge of matches lately, did not see that as an offence, it’s hard to understand why he didn’t point to the spot (more evidence of anti Paterson bias I wonder?)
Collins then saved well from Joe Bennett and Vaulks had a shot more comfortably dealt with by the keeper – if it is possible to feel a goal is coming for your team while listening to a match, then this was the time and Barnsley duly cracked soon afterwards when City passed the ball across the field in a manner completely at odds with what had been seen from them earlier and Adomah was given it with space to run into which he exploited by getting to the byeline and crossing low to the near post where Vaulks saw his first effort saved, but he had more luck with his second one which found the bottom corner.
The City contingent were treated to a close up view of the Vaulks goal celebration and within no more than a minute they were celebrating a second goal when Paterson ran on to a fine long pass by Dion Sanderson which was misjudged by a home defender and calmly steered the ball in.
If Vaulks’ celebration was to be admired, then the same could not be said of Paterson’s, but this old duffer who snorts at pre rehearsed celebrations found it very funny as, by contrast, he indulged in the sort of feeble handstand and forward roll that I would have come up with in my pomp nearly fifty years ago!
A by now thoroughly despondent Barnsley team had nothing to come back with in response and so, amazingly given their four match winless run, City now find themselves just two points behind sixth placed Preston.
Therefore, despite being unconvincing almost all season long, City are right in the promotion shake up with just nine matches left to play. Normally, the fact that five out of the nine games we have left are at home would be seen as something in our favour, but too many draws have turned what was a formidable record in front of their own fans into just a pretty good one – Leeds come here next weekend having well and truly got over their early 2020 wobble by recording five straight wins without conceding a goal and next Sunday would be an ideal time for the team to rediscover the knack of winning at home because it could prove to be a real launching pad, are City up to the challenge I ask?
I’ll finish by congratulating Ton Pentre for making it into the top half of the Welsh Premier League (South) after looking like they were destined to come bottom of the division through the first half of the campaign. Although their position is a little misleading due to them having played more ,matches than most of the sides around them, Ton Pentre are now looking safe from the drop due to a series of wins over sides in trouble themselves – last night’s 2-1 win at Croesyceiliog being a case in point with ex City Academy player Johnathan Kift getting one of the goals.

*Sully Sports are not the same team as the Sully Town side City played in 1976. If you visit the Feedback section regarding this report, you’ll see a message from a poster by the name of Cyncoed Slumdog outlining some of the history of both clubs and I’ve also received an e-mail message from Mark Adams which I will incorporate into my reply to Cyncoed Slumdog’s message.

Apologies to all concerned for my mistake.

This entry was posted in Football in the Rhondda valleys., Out on the pitch and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Comfortable in the end as Cardiff keep Play Off hopes alive at Barnsley.

  1. Clive Harry says:

    Morning Paul/All. Just a couple of quick points, one of them historical (not hysterical). Firstly, I’m not one for conspiracy theories but I am starting to wonder about refereeing and City. Yesterday’s non penalty decision when the keeper rugby tackled Paterson was ludicrous but was only the latest in a long line of ridiculously poor decisions which haven’t gone in our favour. Also, it’s not as if this is a recent phenomenon – I can go back to our first Premier League season andremember us having blatant penalty appeals ignored as well as visiting players getting away with murder with referees who appeared to be almost matey with some established teams. It seems as if our little brothers down the M4 are suffering similarly.
    Secondly, I don’t think Sully Sports are connected to the Sully you refer to. They were an ambitious outfit who were unable to progress because of their facilities. They overcame the problem by taking over/combining with Lake United who had their own ground at Cwrt yr Ala (now occupied by Caerau (Ely)) and they were renamed Inter Cardiff and Inter CableTel in return for large sponsorship. They subsequently moved again to Leckwith Stadium and played in Europe three times including against Celtic in front of over 50,000. I remember it well because I was their Press Officer! There was one further twist when they ran out of money and were taken over by UWIC before disappearing. History lesson over – hope you’re not all bored rigid!

  2. PR says:

    Morning,
    CH, I am glad someone else is beginning to see what is going on.
    We, and Swansea, are not wanted in the premiership. They will do all it takes to stop us,.
    I know we are not a good footballing side but neither were Wimbledon. Its goals that win games not the style of football.
    I was on Rob Phillip’s phone in following the Wigan and Brenford games. The second time I said it is a form of bias which in turn because we are Welsh is racism
    They will hide behind lies, Linnington, Saturday ref stated he felt it was just a coming together. Lie. It was blatantly obvious he hauled him down. Wasnt Etheridge penalty against Leeds just a coming together, that ball was also going out of play. The ref couldn’t wait to give that yet we cannot get the most obvious ones.
    I have written to the authorities and the state. I get s different view from the stands, the refs angle means he sees it different and the game is so fast you will get differing opinions.
    Faceless administrators hiding behind excuses. How fast was the Chelsea offside. Yet they are not even embarrassed by it. Those officials are still in premiership yet that may have been the moment we were relegated. Have refs been told not to give Welsh clubs anything?
    I recall our first premiership season it was only when we were almost certainly relegated we were awarded a token penalty against stoke.
    We should all write to the authorities so they know that we can see through their bias.
    There is no place in sport for racism. We all need to be inclusive but that needs to start at the top. Put their own house in order first.
    If it’s not how I see it. What is it? Every ref is bad? Then why do they have better games the following week and why isn’t anything done about it. They don’t see fouls as penalties. Yet Wigan got one, so to Leeds yet agaist Wigan we could have had 3.
    Then there is the coincidence of Swansea v Fulham. Swans don’t get penalties yet fulham get one right at the end of the game with the game goalless. Is that not a blatant attempt to get a fulham win. Yet apparently it was not even a foul whereas at least one other was blatant.

  3. The other Bob Wilson says:

    Thanks both for your replies. Regarding refereeing, having now seen the pictures on the extended highlights of the game produced by the club website, I think I was wrong to say Callum Paterson fouled the Barnsley before the incident with the goalkeeper – there was no foul there, but there was certainly one by Collins on our player. In fact, I would say we probably saw the worst of the several dubious decisions we seen against us in recent weeks! Is this all part of a deliberate policy against us? I’m still not convinced it is – all teams can point to decisions which go against them over the course of a season, but we seem to be suffering from a lot of them all around the same time. That said, I’ve already said on here I think Paterson does suffer at the hands of officials because of the way he niggles away throughout a game and I’m beginning to wonder if there is situation whereby referees don’t like the way we play – after all,especially in these days, fans don’t like it, the media don’t like it and other managers, especially of teams we’ve just played, always have a dig about the number of long balls we play, so is it unreasonable to assume that some refs don’t as well and this comes through occasionally in their decision making in games involving Cardiff City?
    Thanks Clive for clarifying the situation regarding Sully Town/Sully Sports, I’ve put a correction at the bottom of the story and I should say I’m grateful to Mark Adams who e-mailed me with the following yesterday;-

    “Just for background, Sully Sports are not connected to Sully FC who kept going until about 1990.

    That club could be arguably said to be Cardiff Met. Not sure how good your knowledge of local football is but Sully FC and AFC Cardiff merged (more of a takeover by Sully) to play at Cwrt yr Ala in 1990 as Inter Cardiff. Inter Cardiff reached the League of Wales but financial catastrophe was never far away and they were baled out by players from UWIC. The club became UWIC Inter Cardiff shortly after and then dropped the latter two words from the title before UWIC became Cardiff Met.

    The Sully Sports FC grew from Barry Plastics and Dow Corning (can’t remember which was first) playing at the BP Sports Club in Barry. They came within one game of reaching the Welsh League on at least one occasion but have hit hard times, particularly this season when a departing manager took a loty of players with him.”

Comments are closed.