Cardiff restore pride, but it’s Fulham who scrape through to Wembley date with Brentford.

Last night I was pleased to see Brentford overturn their 1-0 first leg deficit when they beat Swansea 3-1 in the last ever game to be played at Griffin Park. I’ve often said on here that I don’t regard the jacks as our main rivals, but my relative goodwill towards the team further down the M4 when compared to most other City fans does not stretch to hoping they can have another seven years, or even one year, stay in the Premier League if we couldn’t go up!

What I did say though was that Swansea departed the Play Offs with honour intact after contributing fully to a fine game to conclude a tie where I think the slightly better side made it through and I hoped, but doubted, that City could do the same when the inevitable happened and Fulham made their way into the Final following their win at Cardiff City Stadium on Monday by a 2-0 score line which did not flatter them at all.

Well, City were able to do what I didn’t think they could tonight. No, they did not perform the miracle which would have seen them at Wembley next Tuesday, but they did go to Craven Cottage and give the home side a huge fright with a 2-1 second leg win which included some hair raising moments for Scott Parker’s men as they clung on to a slender lead in a manner which hardly seemed possible given how comfortable they had been for much of the two previous meetings with City in this month.

I’d never got too worked up about the Play Offs because I was not expecting much from them and that certainly applied tonight following Monday’s one sided match, but now, at the end of it all, my feelings are a mixture of frustration and puzzlement. The first part of that pairing is easy enough to understand because we were so close to forcing extra time and, if we had done so, then I reckon we would have been favourites because all of the momentum would have been with us.

The puzzlement part is not so straightforward though and springs from our curious record when it comes to these end of season mini tournaments.

I was quick enough to point out on Monday that our Play Off record at home now reads won one and lost six and I later added some stats that had been provided by a messageboard contributor which showed that our home record was comfortably the worst out of the team’s that have been in the Play Off’s on more than one or two occasions. Therefore, it is only right to report that we have now won three and drawn two of our seven away leg games, but, on each occasion when we have won on our opponent’s ground, that good work has been either reduced or invalidated by losing the return game at home.

Of course, this season is different given that there are no spectators in the ground for these games, so a significant advantage to playing at home has been lost, but, for six of our seven home games there has been big home support at Ninian Park or Cardiff City Stadium which we are often told has a significant intimidation factor and yet away sides, with just the one exception, have been able to beat us – very comfortably as well on two or three occasions I can think of.

We had Fulham rattled for large parts of the second half tonight, but why did we allow ourselves to be bullied by them at times in the earlier match at Craven Cottage and again on Monday night? This is is an element of the game where you would always expect recent Cardiff teams to get the better of their Fulham counterparts, but for much of the time in the two earlier matches, it was the Londoners who looked the physically stronger outfit. It was almost as if we had to wait until the tie was virtually beyond us before we really showed our teeth.

Much had been said about the need for an early goal from City tonight if they were to have a chance of returning a truly competitive edge to the tie and it duly arrived in just eight minutes from an unexpected source.

Both City’s goals tonight had an element of luck to them and for the first one it came first when Will Vaulks, recalled to the team in place of Lee Tomlin alongside Danny Ward and Josh Murphy who replaced Robert Glatzel and Nathaniel Mendez-Laing respectively, slightly overstepped his mark when taking the long throw which led to the corner from Joe Ralls which Curtis Nelson nodded in at the far post – on another day, Ward might have been penalised for a foul as he blocked off goalkeeper Marek Rodak, but Premier League ref Paul Tierney judged that there had been no offence.

Having halved their first leg deficit, what City needed now was five minutes or so of disciplined all round play designed to get Fulham to stew in their own juices so to speak, but, just as at Cardiff City Stadium in August when we scored the first goal of the game from Murphy, we allowed them back into the game with an equaliser in no time at all.

Back in the early weeks of this seemingly never ending season it took Fulham just three minutes to get back on terms, tonight it took them all of twenty four seconds! While credit must be given to the home side for some crisp and incisive passing, it’s also true to say that we allowed Fulham to progress down our left hand side too easily and then when Bobby Decordova-Reid put over a good, low cross, Leandro Bacuna, who did well at right back in terms of his passing and crossing, was rather caught on his heels as he allowed Neeskens Kebano to score quite easily on the far post.

It must be said that, following that burst of scoring in the opening ten minutes, the rest of the first half played out much like most of the two earlier matches between the teams with Fulham largely in control – unlike on those occasions, Fulham were not finding it as easy to deal with our attacking set pieces, but the home team were generally far more threatening with Alex Smithies, our man of the match for me, making good saves to deny Anthony Knockeart and then Cyrus Christie.

Before Monday’s game, Neil Harris had chosen to call the upcoming challenges four halves of football as opposed to two matches. Well, extending that line of thinking to the game between the teams in the regular season a few weeks ago as well, I would say that at half time tonight after five halves of football, the only periods where we had been the better side were the opening quarters of the first two matches, so we had been on top for one half really, whereas I would say Fulham could claim to be better than us in the other four.

The final half of the six went emphatically to City however. I’d mentioned in my piece on Monday’s match that Neil Harris, with his played six, lost six record against Fulham as a manager,  appeared to have something of a blind spot when it came to the team from alongside the River Thames and I’m sure I was not the only City fan who found his starting eleven tonight a strangely conservative selection in a match where I believed we needed to go for it from the first whistle.

I suppose the final outcome of the tie might argue that I was right to think that way, but I’m not sure I was now. Harris explained that Tomlin was not fit enough to start two games in such a short space of time and it seems pretty clear now that the plan was not to get ourselves in a position where the tie was beyond us after forty five minutes tonight and then have a right go at things after that by introducing the likes of Tomlin, Mendez-Laing and Glatzel on a tiring Fulham backline.

Although Tomlin’s night would end in tears after he suffered what looked like a hamstring injury late on which, almost certainly, would have kept him out of the Final if we had made it through and he wasn’t really as influential as you would have expected him to be during a time when City had their best spell in the three games, the first two named certainly did their best to tilt the tie in favour of us as soon as they came on.

Mendez-Laing, who continued his bemusing tendency to be more effective away from home than at Cardiff City Stadium even in these times where home “advantage” does not appear to count for as much as it once did, almost netted with his first touch after another of those dangerous Vaulks throws with a flat, fast trajectory rather than the slower, loopier one that you tend to get from other players, glanced off the head of home centreback Michael Hector towards the unmarked sub on the far post.

Mendez-Laing then headed the ball back in the direction it had been coming from, but was foiled by a good save by Rodak, only for City to again get lucky when the ball then bounced off Hector on a second occasion. This time  it bounced towards Tomlin who had been in an offside position, but, now, having been played on, he hooked a right footed shot into the net from about seven yards.

Sky’s studio contributor Liam Rosenior was probably right after the game when he said the difference between the teams boiled down to Fulham being able to score a home goal in a match in which they were second best for long periods and, for all of City’s second leg heroics, I feel that, just as with the other Semi Final, the slightly better team over the two matches made it through.

Kebano’s immediate equalizer was the clearest evidence of this, but Smithies had to make two saves in short order from the lively replacement for the injured Kebano at half time, Abou Kamara who gave Bacuna something of  torrid time defensively. The second of these saves was a tremendous effort as Smithies finger tipped the shot on to a post and out and it also needed a brilliant headed interception from Nelson to prevent a goal after Kamara had got in again down City’s right and fired over a cross which beat Smithies and appeared to have presented Decordova-Reid with a simple headed chance.

So, despite now losing so many of the second balls and fifty/fifties that they had been winning, Fulham still carried the sort of threat we didn’t see from City for most of Monday’s match.

However, the near misses kept on totting up in the Fulham goalmouth despite City often being their usual careless selves when it came to ball retention. This was something of a surprise considering how easily they were able to open up the Fulham defence at times – not least when a slip by Cyrus Christie meant that a Mendez-Laing cross found its way to the unmarked Murphy on the far post only for the winger to tamely send his header straight at Rodak and then when Bacuna got forward to good effect down the right and put over a lovely, low cross which eluded the sliding Ward by inches.

City had also rediscovered their dead ball threat as well as Ralls’ free kicks and corners and Vaulks’ throw is caused consternation among the home ranks. Strangely, Fulham were able to keep Sean Morrison relatively quiet from these restarts, but others such as Nelson, Vaulks and Ward all had sights at goal as Fulham showed signs of buckling under City’s assault.

The closest we came to the elusive third goal was probably when Mendez-Laing, Nelson and Glatzel moved in on a Ralls free kick only for what looked like a combination of Christie and Rodak to keep out the German’s close range effort from where the ball found it’s way to Vaulks who hit a sweetly struck first time effort from fifteen yards that the keeper, who had been on the floor a second or two earlier, sprang up to turn over the bar.

Hardly surprisingly, City’s efforts to find a third goal became more and more frantic as the clock ticked down and Fulham were surviving what turned out to be six and a half minutes of added time pretty comfortably until another City sub, Callum Paterson, nodded on a ball played towards the right flank into the path of Glatzel who couldn’t quite keep his fiercely struck volley low enough. After the game, Neil Harris said he expected Glatzel to score from that opportunity, but he did concede it was a very tough chance of a kind that the striker had shown himself capable of taking in training.

Great credit for City in the end then for showing that they were deserved top six finishers despite looking little more than mid table nobodies for much of the season. Although a few of our players showed how much defeat hurt them, I’d prefer to look at the understated Fulham reaction at the final whistle which was an implicit confirmation of what a fright they had been given by a side that had been written off, certainly by this supporter, after the First Leg.

This performance, along with five or six others over the past year, make me optimistic that we could do as well or better in 20/21 with some shrewd transfer market business in the coming weeks. The average age of the team needs to come down and the improvement in ball retention together with a less one dimensional gamer plan has to be maintained and built upon, while also retaining the ability to play a more direct, set piece orientated game when needs must and then I don’t think we’re too far off being a strong contender in a league which is gaining six sides that do not strike me as being too intimidating compared to some others that have been promoted or relegated in the recent past.

The 2020/21 season is due to start in six weeks time on 12 September and so we’re looking at a very short time before we see a return to pre season training. With a shortened, and you would assume more frenetic, transfer window (the speculation has already started with a story that Wigan and Wales striker Keiffer Moore’s heart “is set on joining Cardiff City“), I’m sure I’ll have enough to write about in my weekly reviews, there’ll also be the odd quiz and story on more general matters plus, hopefully, information regarding the publication of the book on City that I’ve been working on for the past fifteen months or so.

Finally, a thank you to Neil Harris and the squad for being able to take minds off the testing times we’ve all been having to live through over the past few months. Football, and in particular Cardiff City has helped restore something of a feeling of normality and the altered circumstances in which games take place has not affected me as much as I suspected it might – certainly the lack of a crowd became something of an irrelevance tonight.

In so much as you can, enjoy the rest of the summer and let’s hope City can continue to do as well playing football in the Covid 19 era as they have done up until now,  

This entry was posted in Out on the pitch and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Cardiff restore pride, but it’s Fulham who scrape through to Wembley date with Brentford.

  1. Colin Phillips says:

    Thanks, Paul.

    A very long season and as always your game reports and analyses have been as excellent as ever.

    It was nice to come out of the last game of the season with a fair amount of credit. I think Fulham have more quality than us but our effort and fight almost overcame our lack of quality.

    Don’t think too much comment on individual players is necessary but I would like to commend Smithies performance and also select him as man of the match for Cardiff.

    You say you are puzzled about our record in the play-offs, I’m puzzled by Danny Ward’s performances. When he comes on as a substitute he always seems to be in the right place and his finishing has probably been the best of our strikers this season, yet when he starts the game he struggles to get involved and was anonymous for most of last night’s game.

    Ah! the transfer window. The last half-dozen of these have been poor for us and from I’ve read about the lack of funds available I don’t see this one being any different. Lots of suggestions that we should try to off-load some of geriatrics but who would want to take them off our hands, not for a fee anyway. Unless Mr. Harris can work some magic in the loan market I think our line-up come September won’t be a great deal different to last nights, just that the legs and lungs will be that much older.

    I think that we can say that Neil Harris has done a decent job so far I just hope that the board will give him some scope to bring some younger faces in.

    Once again thanks Paul for your excellent blog and, of course your wonderful responders – you know who you are.

  2. Lindsay Davies says:

    Thanks, Paul, for a terrific report, and spot-on reflections.
    It was a night to be proud of the boys, and a feeling of pride goes a long way.
    But, I’d be very fed up if our Benefactor doesn’t stump up the lolly so that we can build on what appears to be a strong base.
    Wishing one and all a happy summer.

  3. BJA says:

    Good afternoon Paul and others – Thanks for your usual impeccable summary, more midnight oil used.
    I felt a strange sense of satisfaction at the end of the game last night even though we will not contest the Play Off Final on Tuesday. That we lost over two legs was a shame, but my mood was all about the game yesterday, and to triumph over a team that had been clearly better over the two previous recent matches matches was cause for that feeling. We gave Fulham an almighty fright, Henry Winter in the Times implied as much.
    Could we have won – yes, and one or two near misses for a third goal. But at the end of last night’s proceedings, I guess we could well have had a problem in any immediate team selection for next week with Tomlin clearly out for a while, and headaches from indifferent performances from more than one.
    Smithies and Nelson stars, with Morrison not far behind.
    Thank you Paul for the million plus words that you must have used these past 12 months. Have a rest and ready yourself for 12th September.

  4. John Saunders says:

    Your first goal was a foul.on the keeper and the second a lucky bounce off Hectors knee! Apart from.that Fulham had the best chances and your goalie had to make two unbelievable saves.Add to that the bias of the referee towards you and the equal bias ofxSkys commentators. You weren’t unlucky !

  5. huw perry says:

    Thanks Paul again for such a comprehensive analysis following last nights disappointment.
    We Dave it s right good go and I really didn’t think 4 weeks ago I could muster up much enthusiasm for this lockdown football part of the season . However with a bit of momentum following the Leeds result it has definitely grown on me. Being able to follow on CCTV has helped – even though the commentary was annoying.

    But the best surprise has been the quality of passing and style of football we have tried to okay – in stark contrast to nearly everything served up at home matches in the “regular” season.
    To see us passing it confidently around, give and go’s and little triangles has been a revelation.

    I know we have occasionally resorted to lumping it and returned to long throw fixation with some success in the recent matches, but we at least now offer an alternative which is far more pleasing on the eye. More of this next season please!

    Over the course of the season great to see Smithies, Nelson and Vaulks develop and for Ralls to really grow in stature. Honourable mentions too Tomlin, Morrison and many others who have given their all. And hats off to the manager for overcoming the doubters and starting to impose a style that offers hope for next year.

    Finally big shout out to you Paul for your devotion to sharing high quality reports at ridiculously short notice after matches are over, always with fantastic analysis – the best out there!

    Thanks also to fellow contributors and please can we now have a rest??

  6. Clive Harry says:

    Just a quick comment from me to end the season Paul. Never mind play offs, your weekly reports deserve automatic promotion and a Championship trophy!

  7. The other Bob Wilson says:

    Thabks for some great replies and to those of you with nice things to say about the blog – I mean it when I say that if this site can be called a success then a large part of that is due to consistently high quality of the Feedback section, your efforts throughout this very long season have been much appreciated,
    As always, it’s good to see a contribution from a supporter of an opposing club – welcome to the forum John, although I must admit your message prompted me to laugh out loud when I saw it because such one eyed opinions are very much a rarity on here! There’s nothing wrong with the sort of thing you say, it just seems out of place here and I must say that as I have already admitted both of our goals had an element of luck about them and that I thought Fulham were the slightly better of the sides over the two legs, I’m not sure what more I can say to be even handed in my judgement of the tie! We have a contributors on here who would give your comments about the ref short shrift because they are convinced there is an anti Welsh bias from most match officials in our games. Although the officials for the first leg did have me thinking they may have a point, I tend to disagree with this and four bookings and thirteen fouls each for either side suggests Paul Tierney did not favour Fulham or Cardiff on the night.

  8. Colin Phillips says:

    Hi! John Saunders, I look forward to your future contributions to this blog.

    Good luck at Wembley and if you beat Brentford all the best for your season in the Premier League.

  9. Dai says:

    While it has been a very positive state of affairs since lockdown I think what happens next, and how successful we are to become in next five years, can be summed up by three quotes spoken shortly after this game:

    “compared to most other City fans does not stretch to hoping they can have another seven years, or even one year, stay in the Premier League if we couldn’t go up!” (from your article)

    “Blood and thunder outdoes pretty passing: in truth, if Cardiff played the type of pretty-pretty football Fulham do, I doubt many Bluebirds fans would actually like it that much.” (Glen Williams, Walesonline)

    “Unless I’m mistaken, the football club should be built on hard graft, effort, determination which should represent the part of Wales that we live in and the club we play for….Add some quality to it as well, and we want to be successful” (Neil Harris, post-match chat as written up in Walesonline).

    I really can’t see why we wouldn’t use Fulham this season still coming to an end (as opposed to previous years) as a model club to follow as the stats show they’re comfortable on the ball but the commentators were really talking about how there shape and work without possession had improved so much and how horrible a player like Harrison Reed is to face – “blood and thunder” may work at Championship level but the Premier League is rapidly becoming more tactically astute and technically skillful throughout and “graft, effort, determination” is the minimum you need for success not the majority of the picture. I sincerely hope that Neil Harris’ quote, despite the apparent similarities, isn’t saying the same thing as Glen Williams as this would only ever lead to one year stint in the premier league.

  10. The other Bob Wilson says:

    Hello Dai and thanks for what I think is your first post on here. I agree completely with your concluding paragraph because it does such a good job of putting what I think is something that Glen Williams, pretty obviusly, and, perhaps Neil Harris are unable to grasp – it doesn’t have to be either “pretty tippy, tappy football” or the “blood and thunder” stuff. To be honest, I think Glen Williams’ comments are idiotic because they fail to acknowledge that the world is usually about greys, rather than black and whites.
    Us and Fulham are particularly good examples to use because both sides failed to stay up last season while representing the black of blood and thunder, physical, ugly football to the exclusion of technique and the while of a tippy, tappy. probably naive approach which seemed to hold that glaring defensive deficiencies at Premier League level could be overcome by throwing together a variety of attacking players of very varying standard assembled at great cost.
    If Fulham do win on Tuesday then I would argue that they will have returned to the Premier League because they have learned a lesson from last season in that they have become less watchable for the neutral, but have introduced the qualities you mention. After about eighty per cent of the 19/20 season where it was hard to see any signs of development after becoming even more “blood and thunder” thanks to our former manager’s summer recruitment, the post lockdown matches have contained faltering steps towards the more rounded game we need in the 2020s.
    How many sides play just the tippy tappy stuff much derided by those who adhere to the “get stuck in” approach? Archetypal tippy tappy side Arsenal won the FA Cup yesterday with extensive use of the long ball, but had the ability to play in a rounded style which included aspects of the sort of football more often associated with that club.
    It’s no coincidence that City made the progress to make the transition from top six outsiders to Play Off team when they started to get better at holding on to the ball – they weren’t great at it still, but they were certainly better than they had been and, although not as potent from set pieces as they had been initially, later games proved that paying slightly less attention to the Warnockball approach doesn’t have to mean that they positive things you had from that method of play have to be lost.

  11. Mike Hope says:

    The thing that has pleased me most under the new management and particularly since the lockdown,is that the players have clearly been spending more training time on the basic skills of passing and receiving the ball.
    Under the previous regime a player in possession of the ball in his own half had only two ideas when under pressure, a long punt downfield in the approximate direction of our tallest striker or a pass back to the keeper.
    We now have players with more confidence to pass the ball and more importantly colleagues with the confidence to make themselves available to receive the pass.
    We should always have been able to do this and the next step is to be able to do it more quickly and accurately.
    I am optimistic about our potential to combine improved skills with the nous to play what our previous manager called “winning football “

Comments are closed.