If you asked supporters of all twenty four Championship sides to name the club they disliked the most in the division, I reckon that City would be at, or close to, the top when the votes were counted.
I say that because I believe there would be a lot of anti Welsh votes in there and, as we were being told a few years ago that Swansea were many peoples second favourite Premier League side, the large majority of those votes would be cast for us.
After all, I’ll say it myself as a Cardiff fan, most people would find what has been the traditional Swansea style in recent years to be far more attractive to watch than the physical, power based, long ball stuff we’ve played in the last decade or so.
Obviously, I’m not going to vote for my own team in most disliked vote and, for most of my life, the notion that I’d vote for Watford would be too daft for words. After all, I’ve always thought of them as a family club that have been underdogs who have successfully punched above their weight.
In fact, I had a sneaking regard for the Hornets for much of the last fifty years or so, but not any more, not under their current ownership.
The most obvious reason for my dislike of the current regime (that seems an appropriate word to use when talking about the current owner) is their ludicrous hiring and firing of managers, but there are other things which put me off them as well.
Another reason why City may pick up so many votes in that most disliked club poll is that they may think there was something dodgy going with Vincent Tan owned Belgian club Kortrijk when it came to the signing of Kenneth Zohore back in 2016. However, that’s really as nothing compared to Watford.
Apparently, Hassane Kamara who played at left back tonight for Watford at Cardiff City Stadium was originally signed by them for around £3 million from Nice in January of this year, then sold to Udinese (also owned by Watford owner Gino Pozzo) at huge profit seven months later, before being loaned back to Watford again.
I long gave up trying to keep track on the make up of Watford teams because of the continual moving of players between them, Udinese and Pozzo’s other club, Grenada, and thought that if I had been a Watford supporter for as long as I’ve been a City fan, I would probably have given up on them under this owner.
However, after having set out why Watford are among my least favourite clubs these days, I must now say that they were worth their 2-1 win tonight and that I enjoyed a lot of their football. Indeed, there were even four or five in their team whose names I recognised from their previous visit to Cardiff in early 2021 – that’s something I’ve been unable to say about Watford for some time.
City played better tonight than they have done in many of their matches this season and actually scored early as part of a fast start which caught the visitor’s cold. They also finished the game strongly (although that may have had something to do with Watford sitting back after going ahead), but the middle fifty minutes of the ninety belonged to the visitors as they had too much power and skill for us.
A slick, skiddy surface contributed to the quality of a game which I’d rate as the best at Cardiff City Stadium so far this season, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with the three goals that were scored, all of which were straightforward headers from corners.
Yes, I’ll repeat that, all of the goals were headers from corners. Therefore, we’ve finally managed to get our first headed goal from a flag kick in our eighteenth match of the season – normally we’d have four or five, at least, from that source by now.
There were just nine minutes gone when an unmarked Cedric Kipre nodded in Joe Ralls’ corner from six yards out and, with more than eighty minutes to play, you had to think that this would be the game where we scored more than one at home for the first time this season.
It was not to be though, despite the efforts of Jaden Philogene who was clearly City’s man of the match.
There have been plenty of times when our defenders (in particular centrebacks) have been winners of that award, but they couldn’t be tonight because they conceded two pretty poor set piece goals of their own. The first of these came nearly half an hour after our opener when Francisco Sierrielta headed in Ken Sema’s corner.
In truth, the goal had been coming and the same could be said about the winner when it arrived, slightly fortunately, five minutes after the break when Ismaela Sarr glanced in another Sema corner with his shoulder.
City came closest to equalising when the last of a series of mesmerising runs by Philogene helped to set up Sheyi Ojo, but Watford keeper Daniel Bachmann was off his line quickly to block the substitute’s shot.
In the end though, Watford held on for a third straight win and, on this form, look capable of continuing their yo-yo existence of recent years by returning to the Premier Division again.
As for City, it would seem that Saturday’s win was sufficient to extend Mark Hudson’s “interim” management for at least another ten days or so.
In fact, with Hudson revealing that Dean Whitehead, formerly of Stoke Sunderland and Middlesbrough among others, is the new coach that has been talked about almost since Steve Morison left, the interim manager’s hold on his job seems stronger despite four defeats in our last five games.
Whitehead the player who have been a great addition to this squad as he was a midfield operator good enough to have played a lot of his football in the Premier League. As a coach his record is more mixed with plenty of jobs in a short period of time, but his last job, at Turkish club Beziktas, suggests he has something to offer us.
Whitehead, who worked as a coach at Huddersfield with Hudson, joins us with the job designation of first team coach, but cynics among the fanbase may well think we’ll see him managing us pretty soon..
When City’s under 21s lose in 22/23 it tends to be spectacular and Monday’s loss at Millwall falls into that category – for the third time so far this season, we conceded five in a game – following on from 5-0 and 5-3 defeats to Bristol City and QPR respectively, this was another one by 5-0 I’m afraid.
As mentioned this time last year, I decided to do another review of a season to follow on from Real Madrid and all that which was about 1970/71. This one is about the 1975/76 season and will be called Tony Evans walks on water. I finished writing the book over the weekend and now it’s a question of tidying it up, proof reading, inserting a few photos and designing a cover before sending it off for printing.
As always, the blog will still be free to read for anyone who chooses not to make a donation towards its running costs and, apart from the one in the top right hand corner which is to do with Google Ads, you will never have to bother about installing an ad blocker to read this site because there will never be any.
Donations can be made through Patreon, PayPal, by bank transfer, cheque, Standing Order/Direct Debit and cash, e-mail me at paul.evans8153@hotmail.com for further payment details.
Can I end by thanking all of you who read and contribute towards the blog in the Feedback section, but, in particular, a big thank you to all who have donated in the past and continue to do so now.
Thanks, Paul.
Do you find it worrying how many goals we are conceding from set-pieces and why this is happening?
Feels wrong to talk about overall picture of things after narrow loss against side with one of the biggest budgets in the league, but here we go…
The mistakes of the past seem more and more obvious as each season progresses: i) wasting time and money on rebrand creating needless division; ii) the Sala incident and fall out since which appears to be a transfer ban heading our way; iii) Warnock (after initially saving the club) then damning its future with parachute money wasted – best teams in this league either those benefiting from largest budgets or built best over several years and we never got close to promotion thanks to Warnock’s final transfer windows; iv) ending up in situation where 17 players and a change of approach needed in one of the shortest off-season breaks we’ve seen.
We play far more attractive football now and will continue to do so – David Wagner’s backroom staff is now our managerial team seemingly without us being able to afford David Wagner himself – but feels like the pyramid is challenging us to continue along this path despite another season of relegation risk before they then allow real chance of attracting players like Flynn Downes to improve things further.
But I still find our overall strategy very confusing. Morison switched us to 4-3-3 which is probably wrong formation for Harris, Davies, Robinson, Etete, Colwill and possibly others. We have plenty of strikers who want to play as part of front two, but do we really have that many wingers/wide attackers coming through system? We have plenty of wing back players but do we have a Frank Lampard in the midfield 3?
Maybe we have signed so many players from youth sides of premier league teams because we’re wary of transfer ban and want projects who can grow together? But if that is the case, a really impressive coaching side of things is needed to develop them and how long has it taken to get in Hudson’s mate from Huddersfield days? A coach who has had very short spells at awful Shrewsbury team and in Turkey since leaving Hudson’s side.
Good coaching and players who fit together into the system sees Birmingham 3 points and a number of goals scored ahead of us when a few weeks ago we were clearly the better side.
While we’re seeing moments of enjoyable, effective football, it’s like a thousand pieces which weren’t meant to fit together being forced into a whole. We’ve got the extra coach in now so things should improve (slightly) on the field but still feels like we need an extra director to bring things together with bit more of a plan. Our aim now is to become like a Blackburn, Swansea, Preston, Sunderland* as the sides competing near the top without much of a budget to spend but feels like we’re some way off that yet.
*Not QPR or Millwall who have natural advantage of being London sides, not Luton who play like Barnsley under Valérien Ismaël, but Sunderland who were one of the best until both their strikers got injured.
Apologies for the late reply.
DJ, you make some great points – for example, the David Wagner connection (always thought his early Huddersfield sides were good footballing sides) and Warnock’s waste of parachute money. Like you, I’m not convinced about the need for wingers, or to be more precise, this set of wingers. Hudson seems very keen on Ojo, but I see no improvement on the frustrating loanee of two years ago (in fact I’d say there’s been a slight decline), but Philogene may be making me reconsider that opinion – I thought he was very good again yesterday and was surprised to see him taken off so early.
I really don’t think we’re too far away from being a middle third side or even a bit better than that. However, any analysis of this squad has to factor in its chronic lack of goals or players with genuine striking instincts. Robinson improves our goal threat, but only slightly and, at the moment, it’s hard to see us averaging a goal a game over the course of the season and relying on 1-0 wins to the degree we do is dangerous. We do have two players who haven’t kicked a ball yet this season and another who might make a big difference has barely played – will the addition of Davies, Adams and Colwill enable us to score at a rate that would see us climbing the table rather than the current bouncing between, say, twentieth and twelfth? It seems a tall order to me.
Colin, the answer to your question is yes. As to why it’s happening, I think it’s down to a lack of the sort of size and power which used to make us one of the best when it came to attacking and defending set pieces. This was always going to happen to an extent given what Steve Morison wanted to create here, but what I didn’t expect was that he would commit to the new methods so completely that he would make us weak in things like set pieces and physical power up front.