As I watched City’s Under 23 side toil in vain to make an impression on a Bristol City team that were their betters in virtually all departments of the game at Cardiff City Stadium last night, it would have been easy to blame their 2-0 defeat entirely on a bizarre selection that saw them take the field with a trialist right back (I believe it was Matt Makinson of Blackburn – he did as well as any City player on the night) at centre half, a centre half at right back, three central midfielders who are all most effective playing a holding role, another central midfielder on the left wing, a right back/right wing back on the right wing and an attacking midfielder at centre forward.
It’s fairly well known that at Ajax’s successful Academy, young players are given game experience in all outfield positions in an effort to improve their development into what I’ll call all round footballers. Therefore, it would be tempting to think that something similar was happening last night, but then you realise that, in one area of the pitch at least, those who picked the team had barely any choice but to go with the selection they made.
I don’t like putting the word “diminutive” in front of James Waite’s name virtually every time I mention him, but his size, or lack of it, becomes more of an issue when this natural central midfielder cum number ten is used, as he has been frequently lately, as a lone striker by the Under 23s.
It would be an exaggeration to say that Waite has to play against a couple of centrebacks who are twice his size when he plays up front by himself, but not much of one and it’s also true to say that, based on what I’ve seen in the last two or three years, he is most effective as a goalscorer making late runs into the penalty area from midfield.
However, it’s when you ask who could have played up top instead of Waite that you realise that, in the absence of Mark Harris and Ibrahim Meite (who has yet to score a goal for City at any level since he first played for the club in November I believe it was) after their time with the first team at Wigan, there were hardly any other candidates for the striking job.
Isaak Davies, who scored the winner for the Under 16s against Swansea after coming on as a sub on the weekend, is someone from the Academy ranks who has scored on a fairly regular basis at Under 18 level this season – I’d describe him as a striker first and foremost, but ask me to name another one among those who would be realistic candidates to have been included last night and, Harris and Meite apart, I can’t think of any.
Fred Gounongbe has disappeared off the face of the Cardiff City world in recent months and it’s hard to see Rickie Lambert as a candidate for the Development team at this stage of his career, so, with Davies not included last night, who was there who could play up front?
The lack of attacking options on the bench (there was a goalkeeper, three defenders and a winger) really brought home how few strikers we have below first team level at the club and as the best finisher and the closest thing we had to someone who instinctively reacts and thinks like a goalscorer, you realise that it had to be the “diminutive” Waite up front.
Nevertheless, while accepting that it’s not all about results at this level and that there has been something of a revolution below first team level at the club in recent months, last night’s match still had a feel of a bunch of kids being thrown in at the deep end to sink or swim as they were, in many cases, asked to play in positions they were not too familiar with.
The revolution I mentioned earlier has seen the majority of those who started the season in our Under 23 and Under 18 sides released or in the process of being released. In the absence of any official statement from the club, it would be wrong of me to state the names of those who I believe have been let go as if it were a fact, but I will say the list keeps on growing and more players seem to have been let go than I first thought.
One name I’d not put on that list yet is Macauley Southam because he has continued to be selected for recent Development team matches, but he was not involved last night and it was very odd to see twenty one year old Jordan Blaise, who is the closest thing we have to an “experienced” Development team regular at the moment, only on the bench.
The squad was the youngest I’ve ever seen us field for a game at this level and with so many of the starting eleven not playing in their accustomed positions was, in my opinion, crying out for one or two more senior players to help guide them through what was always going to be a testing ninety minutes.
Yes, I accept and sympathise with the view that we shouldn’t have expected much from our sides below senior level after Christmas – with so many players who are being asked to play against opponents who are a good bit older and bigger than them, it was never going to be about results, it’s about trying to get more home produced players into the first team and this is not going to happen in the short term.
However, when you consider that, from memory, it took us until the game’s three quarter point to have a goal attempt (I’m not talking about an on target attempt – we didn’t have one of them – I’m talking about an attempt of any kind), you do wonder what was gained from last night’s game in terms of player development. I accept that there might not have been much that could have been done in the forward positions, but it was always going to be a big test for the teenagers on show without many of them having the added disadvantage of playing out of position while not having many, if any, team mates with the sort of experience at this level to talk them through the process.
For the record, Bristol won thanks to a soft goal scored by their speedy and impressive left winger Jonny Smith (who was signed from Wrexham I believe) and a fine finish by Diego De Girolamo, who scored a hat trick in the first meeting between the teams this season and is exactly the sort of player who is familiar with playing at this level that we so lacked – that’s not me wanting a return to the Tommy O’Sullivan and Theo Wharton days there either, it’s me asking why are we making it harder than it could be for the fifteen, sixteen and seventeen year olds we are fielding at this level these days?
That first goal attempt I mentioned came from Cameron Coxe who was put clean through on goal just before Bristol scored for the second time, but the full back/wing back, who was Under 18 captain at the start of this season and is now one of our more experienced Development team members, was playing on the wing and was one of nine starting outfield players we had who I’d say were not familiar with getting chances like that at this level of the game, predictably shot wide. Jamie Veale had a free kick that went over and Waite lashed at a shot that went well wide, but that was it as far as any hope of a City goal went in their final home game of the season.
Having nominated someone who I believe is no longer at the club as my Under 18 Player of the season, I’ll finish by saying that someone else who I’m not sure will be here next season impressed me most for the Development side – Marco Weymans was superb in the 7-1 win over Watford and was consistently good in most of the other matches I saw him play,
Despite some neat football played occasionally by our lads, the side we put out reminded me of parks football when only eleven have turned up and you then have to pick a side even though they all play in a similar position. I can appreciate the thinking behind the development cull but not the thinking behind the way it’s being carried out.
Last night’s side cried out for somebody like Meite up front (has ten minutes on Saturday made him a first teamer?) instead of the talented James Waite who was a lone striker up against a big centre back who has been in the Wurzels senior squad recently. Towards the end he was joined up front by Cai Williams – another talented lad but even smaller and presumably younger than Waite. By now, the Bristol centre backs must have felt as if they were playing a school team with a number of chances to cross being spurned by our wing backs (at least Coxe had reverted to his normal position by now), presumably because crossing was a waste of time. Meanwhile our only player with any physique, Jordan Blaise, had been brought on to play an advanced midfield role instead of his normal centre back role.
I found the whole scenario rather bizarre and think that whatever cull may have been necessary, it didn’t benefit the promising lads who were sent out last night.
Finally, I can only echo Paul’s thoughts on Marco Weymans who was frequently the creative mainstay of this side.
Thanks Paul for the report , it does sound worrying indeed about the lack of direction and what appears to be total confusion.
Could it simply be they are just running down the clock this year , with a view to installing a completely new set up and squad next year ??
With only one game left I think you may be right there Russell but I still think it isn’t a very satisfactory way of doing it.
Paul – Thanks for your recent two reports on the home games, the Forest and Bristol City Dev. matches, neither of which I was able to attend because of prior social commitments. Sounds like I did not miss too much from the City’s perspective.
I am not sure where the team selections for the Development side are taking us. We seem to have a lot of personnel, but unsure of where to position them in the side. Strange that bearing in mind we started this season eight months ago.
You are aware of my thoughts on Marco Weymans, as you state, the one stand out player this season, better than Harris ot Meilte in my opinion. I keep everything crossed that he will not be one of the many departures come May, and that he may even still appear for the first XI this year, but is that really too much to hope for?
Final thought. Much as I appreciate all that NW and his team have done in helping us to mid-table, I just wish he would have a little restraint in some of his comments about a lack of finance to help strengthen the playing personnel for next season. I’m sure that does not go down too well in the Far East.
I’m not too bothered about other positions when it comes to our young players. For example, I’ve seen some wingers who look to be good prospects who have done well at Under 16 level and have made some impact when used in the Under 18s. A look at the team on Monday night showed that there are plenty of defenders and midfielders coming through, but where are the strikers? The fact that Jamie spent so much of the early months of the season playing as one in the Under 23s and James Waite has had to play in that role recently was/is able to mask just how few we have, but on Monday, it really brought home how few we have in our ranks who think and react like strikers – as I said in my piece, it was a strange selection in some ways, but in making Waite the lone striker, they were playing the one player available who could make a decent fist of the job.
It was significant that last Saturday, the under 16s had a striker in the starting line up who was only 13 or 14 years old – I’ve mentioned Isaak Davies (who I like the look of) a few times on here, but there’s no one else I’ve seen at age group football (i.e Under 18 and Under 16) who is still at the club and is a specialist striker.
I think there is some truth to what Russell says in that it’s almost a case of just getting this season out of the way at all levels – you would hope that those lads who have been playing for the Under 23s and Under 18s during the second half of the season will be more competitive in 17/18 and the latter would also benefit to some extent from an influx of players released by other clubs.
As for Weymans, based on what I’ve been told, I’d be surprised if he’s with us next season.