Chelsea draw ends a mixed season for the Academy.

Having started their season off with a very creditable 1-1 draw against FA Cup finalists Liverpool’s Under 18’s in an away match shown live on that club’s TV channel. City’s Academy side ended it with a 2-2 draw at Treforest against Chelsea’s youngsters on Saturday morning. The first team’s game with Leeds meant that this match against the other Cup Final team was one of only two home fixtures for the Under 18’s that I missed this season, but this report from Chelsea’s official site gives a pretty detailed, if one understandably one eyed, description of what happened. Okay, Chelsea obviously didn’t have their best team out having played in the Youth Cup Final the night before, but for our lads to come back from 2-0 down to get a draw deserves praise and, combined with last week’s 4-2 win at Derby, it represents a decent end to their campaign (for the record, Jesse Darko and Theo Wharton were our scorers on Saturday).

If the beginning and end of City’s season was satisfactory, then it must be admitted that some of what went on in between was not as encouraging. I say that knowing the focus at this level is very much on player development and not team results and when you consider that five second year scholars (Ralls, Darko, Saint-Luce, Nugent and Oshilaja) were offered pro deals by the club (I think I’m right in saying that this is the highest number since we gained Academy status), then, possibly, I’m being harsh in that judgement, but when this year’s team were bad they were very bad. The performances against West Ham and Coventry were as poor as any I’ve seen from a City Academy team over the past eight seasons and, against the latter, there was not even the excuse of a weakened team to fall back on because it saw a City side featuring six players who had been offered professional deals by the club comfortably beaten by a visiting outfit that included many of their Under 16 players.

Perhaps my sense of disappointment is due to the fact that the group of City players which formed more than half of the team that thrashed England 4-0 at Under 16 level last season became first year scholars this season and so I was expecting more from them. Again, I could be guilty of being harsh on those lads there, because you only have to see the difference between Kevin Sainte-Luce and Jesse Darko in their second year at Academy level compared to their first to see that this is a stage where that extra year can make a big difference. As it was, the two players I’ve just mentioned spent a lot of their campaign playing for the new Under 21 Development team (as did Adedeji Oshilaja) and this helped explain why results tended to tail off in the second half of the campaign.

Highspots of the season for me were a 4-0 win over Watford (traditionally a club with a strong Academy) in October and a very entertaining 3-2 victory over Villa later that month. Coming back from 2-0 down to beat Portsmouth in March deserves a mention as well  and City also played well in their unlucky 2-1 defeat by Tottenham in the Youth Cup game played at Cardiff City Stadium in front of a crowd of over a thousand.

Theo Wharton - my nomination as City's youth player of the season.

My nomination of Theo Wharton as my player of the season at this level is both predictable and deserved. Although he played quite often for the Under 18’s last season, Theo can still play at this level next year, but the offer a two year pro deal and a first team debut not long after his seventeenth birthday suggests he probably won’t be doing so. What impresses me most about Theo is the stamina which guarantees he will still be going as strong in the ninetieth minute as he was in the first. Sometimes when a player’s stamina levels get praised, it can be a way of masking a lack of technique, but, on the often difficult Leckwith pitch, Wharton has been able to show that he possesses the requisite skills as well – another good thing is that he doesn’t show a trick or two in a showboating way, but because it’s the best method to achieve his goal.

Tom O'Sullivan, here seen celebrating after scoring England Under 16's in 2010, has already been offered a three year professional contract despite only being a first year Academy scholar.

While some members of the Wales team that I mentioned earlier have found the step up to Academy level a testing one, Tommy O’Sullivan who, like Wharton, has been offered a pro deal as a first year scholar, has increasingly looked at home amongst his elders. Usually one of the smallest players on the pitch, O’Sullivan has been used in a deeper role than the one in which he did so well for his countryWales last season, but he still shows the same cleverness and awareness and it’s easy to see why the club were prepared to offer him a three year contract as Premiership sides began to sniff around. Given his size, I wouldn’t be surprised if Tommy still plays for the Academy team on a regular basis next season when, hopefully, some of the other good players we have in his age group (e.g. Declan John, Josh Yorwerth, Rhys James, Gethyn Hill and Jaye Bowen) will make a bigger impact.

Although two years might seem a long time when you are as young as these lads are, it flies by in terms of the time that they have to make enough of an impact to earn a professional contract. I believe that the number of contracts that have been offered over the course of this season indicates that our current manager is a more sympathetic and trusting judge of young players than his predecessor was, but, even so, some who have shown genuine ability over the past year or two like Mamadou Dialllo, Yannis Drais, Josh Powell, Adam Davies and Jordan Carter have been released within the last few weeks – my best wishes to them, and all of the others who have been told they are being let go, for the future.

Posted in The kids. | Tagged , | Comments Off on Chelsea draw ends a mixed season for the Academy.

Cardiff City’s end of year home report – C minus, not good enough.

Yesterday lunchtime Cardiff City brought the curtain down on their home programme for the regular league season with a 1-1 draw with Leeds United which was fairly typical of the fare served up at Cardiff City Stadium in 2011/12 in that you went away from the game with no complaints about the team’s attitude, but ruing their lack of a cutting edge and their inability to kill opponents off when they were on top in games. This time though, the penalty for dropping home points was more severe as Middlesbrough’s surprising 2-1 victory over a very disappointing Southampton team a few hours later meant that our four point lead over them was whittled down to two and Tony Mowbray’s side had ensured that the race for the last Play Off place will go into the final match of the campaign.

As is the case at every club I suppose, there’s a lot of talk at Cardiff at the start of each season about turning our home ground into a “fortress”, but, especially in this most competitive of leagues, it’s one thing to talk about such matters and another to actually manage it. I don’t feel we’ve achieved this aim in any of the nine seasons since we returned to this level, but, given the excellent start we made, the failure to do so this time around makes it feel all the more disappointing.

When we beat Birmingham on December 4, we had taken twenty three points out of thirty from our home matches. Seven wins and two draws from ten games is automatic promotion, let alone Play Off, form, so to end up with a record that has us winning less than half of our matches at Cardiff City Stadium has to be seen as big let down. Eleven wins and seven draws from twenty three home matches isn’t a bad record I suppose, but I believe a side pushing for a top six finish would expect to do better than that. Twenty nine goals conceded is much too high a figure and yesterday was the seventh time we had held a lead in home matches which we ended up not winning – it’s inevitable that comparisons will be made between Dave Jones and Malky Mackay as Malky’s first season in charge ends and, in many  ways, I’d say our manager comes out of such comparisons well, but I’m pretty sure both of those figures tended to be a fair bit lower under our former boss.

Roger Gibbins (a player and coach under Eddie May) and Jimmy Goodfellow (the club physio during Eddie's time in charge) lay a wreath on the pitch for our former manager before yesterday's match - many members of the double winning 1992/93 team turned up to honour one of City's most popular managers.*

Ironically though, the display in the game that completed our home programme was, in my opinion, our best at Cardiff City Stadium for some time (as far as league matches go, I don’t think we’ve played as well since beating Reading on January 2). If any two games proved the truth of the old adage that it’s results and not performances that count at this stage of the season, it was the ones seen at Cardiff City Stadium over the past five days. We played much better yesterday than we did against Derby in midweek and yet the Play Off place that had looked a virtual certainty is now down to the ranks of a probability – still not bad at all, but, given the precedent of 08/09, we all know that nowhere near as much has to go wrong now as it did then for us not to make the top six.

I was listening to Wales coach Osian Roberts talking about City on the way to the game and he was saying that he was impressed by how Malky Mackay had gradually ingrained his way of thinking into the way we play. As an example he said that David Marshall was far more inclined to belt the ball upfield in the early months of the season, but now when he has the ball, our centre backs split and he invariably gives it to one of them as we try and build from the back. I had been vaguely aware of this over the past few months, but paid particular attention to it yesterday and, it’s true – it’s not very often the keeper kicks it long now. We have become more of a passing team (albeit one which retains the option of going long if and when we can get Rudy Gestede fit) and, although it’s not always been the case, yesterday that approach was working for us – we generally passed the ball pretty well and, although we were never completely on top, I thought we were looking as comfortable as any team can do at 1-0 up until Leeds’ out of the blue equaliser.

I used the word “generally” in relation to our passing there because in the most important area of the pitch, it didn’t match what we saw elsewhere. For me, Joe Mason had an excellent first half, but I’d say overall Liam Lawrence (who I criticised a fair bit earlier matches, but he’s been very good recently) pipped him for City’s man of the match and yet both players wasted excellent second half opportunities, which saw them get to the Leeds byeline, with poor crosses. In Lawrence’s case, his pass was hugely over hit and I’m afraid the same description could be applied to too much of Peter Whittingham’s shooting (particularly from free kicks) and passing lately – we were careless at times when we got into the final third of the pitch.

To be fair to the man who deservedly won the Supporters Club Player of the Year award last night, Whittingham was more influential than he has been recently – just as he did with Michael Chopra’s winner last season when the two teams met, he played a glorious long pass to open up the Leeds defence that allowed Mason (who, for some reason, doesn’t seem to like scoring at the Canton Stand end!) to lob in our goal. Not long afterwards, Whittingham was at it again as he put Kenny Miller through on goal – this was the sort of chance Miller was gobbling up earlier in the season, but, unfortunately, his goal against Watford has not completely restored his finishing touch and he never looked that convincing as he allowed Andy Lonergan to save.

Joe Mason, who would be my favourite to finish as our top scorer now, nets another quality goal to give us a lead which, like too many others this season, we were unable to hold onto.*

The keeper’s fabulous second half save to deny Andrew Taylor’s sweetly struck volley was mentioned by Malky Mackay after the match, but, for me, Miller’s miss was as much, if not more, of an important moment in the game because, far from being the highly motivated, snarling and snapping outfit that I was expecting them to be, Leeds seemed pretty tame to me. Disinterested would be too strong a word to use to describe them, but I couldn’t help thinking that there would not have been much of a response from them to going 2-0 down before half time if Miller had scored and the opportunity would have been there to record a big win. Instead of that though, that inability to kill off sides in home matches that I mentioned earlier resurfaced and the visitors were able to get a foothold in the match, which eventually enabled them to score a well worked equaliser.

City’s response to being pegged back to 1-1 was pretty impressive – Filip Kiss’ introduction gave us some midfield urgency (something we tend to lack in our normal starting line up midfield) and we did put our opponents under a fair bit of pressure, but the lack of precision when we got into dangerous areas haunted us to the end. Just as we have had to do too many times at Cardiff City Stadium lately, we had to settle for a draw against the sort of side that the league table tells us we should be beating.

As to what the league table tells us about next week, well Middlesbrough’s away record (and their high energy display yesterday) suggests they can win at Watford despite the fact that Sean Dyche’s team have only lost one in twelve. To my way of thinking, we have to assume that Boro will win, but, with us having spent virtually the whole season drawing on the grounds of teams in the lower half of the table and Palace’s home record exactly matching our away figures of won seven, drawn eleven and lost four, it seems to me that yet another draw has to be the most likely outcome – if only there weren’t those demons from 08/09 hovering in the background tormenting us though!

pictures courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Cardiff City’s end of year home report – C minus, not good enough.