Cardiff City Greatest Games: The Bluebirds’ Fifty Finest Matches – a review.

CoymayBeing honest, if it wasn’t for the fact I wanted to make people aware of the recently published book “The Journey Back – Cardiff City’s rise through the Divisions 1991-2013” which I have co-written with Richard Holt, the Cardiff City Books segment of the blog wouldn’t exist. It does though and, in an effort to show I’m not solely obsessed with selling copies of our book, I thought I’d do a review of the City book I’ve been reading for the past few weeks.

“Cardiff City Greatest Games: The Bluebirds’ Fifty Finest Matches” is the self explanatory title chosen by author Sean Wozencroft (a third generation City fan) for a book which I’ll admit I did not have a good feeling about when I first saw it. To explain what I mean, at 206 pages it’s hardly a short book, but there’s fifty matches to be covered and as I opened it up for the first time I was half expecting to see the sort of large fonts used that you come across so often in sporting autobiographies as a fairly flimsy narrative is stretched to a number of pages which just about begins to justify the price being charged.

In short, I was half expecting a read that was somewhat light on detail – I could not have been more wrong. The first clue that I had misjudged things came when I saw the size of print – the smaller than normal font size meant that just over 200 pages in this book equated to something like 230 or 240 of them in most books. However, it was when I started reading that I soon realised that attention to detail was one of the strengths of Sean’s book rather than a possible weakness.

You only have to get through a page or two of Cardiff City’s Greatest Games to realise that this is something that has been written by a genuine fan of the club, not some opportunist looking to take advantage of City’s promotion to the Premier League. The depth of Sean’s research is very impressive and, in many ways, the parts I enjoyed most were the pieces on the earliest games where the use of the match reports of the day cast new light on games that I was aware of, but not to any great detail – for example, it was only after reading the chapter on our Cup Final defeat by Sheffield United in 1925 that I realised that I had known next to nothing about that match beforehand.

Again, I had known of our terrific record against Liverpool until the clubs headed in opposite directions during the last forty years of the twentieth century, so it was good to have some flesh put on the bones with chapters about two of our victories over them in the 50’s (and, no, that 4-0 win at Anfield in Bill Shankly’s first game in charge isn’t one of them!).

From around this point onwards, the book gets into territory that I’m familiar with, but, invariably, there were little snippets in chapters on games I’d watched where I found myself saying “I’d forgotten about that”. The runs to the FA Cup and League Cup Finals are given the attention they merit and I was particularly pleased to see what is my favourite City match of recent times (the 2-0 win at Middlesbrough in the 2008 FA Cup Quarter Final) get a chapter.

A couple of minor quibbles. Firstly, when I was watching us thrash the hapless P.O. Larnaca in 1970 I did not for one moment think I was looking at a game which would feature in any list of City’s fifty greatest matches – on the other hand, the superb 5-1 win over FC Nantes a few weeks later in the next round of that season’s Cup Winner’s Cup would make it into my top fifty list. However, with the Larnaca victory being our biggest in European competitions, it has a statistical significance (just like the 16-0 trouncing of Knighton Town in the Welsh Cup in 1961 which also features) and, anyway, that’s one of the attractions of books like this – no City fan is going to agree with all 50 of Sean’s choices and half the fun is recalling matches which didn’t quite make it into the book.

The second small criticism is the use of the term “the old lady” to describe Ninian Park – it only happens once, but, as someone who never heard our old ground described in that sentimentalised way before it was due for demolition, I must say it still grates every time I hear or read it.

That apart though, this is a book I enjoyed reading and will, no doubt, return to again in the future. If you are only going to get one Cardiff City book for yourself or as a Christmas present, then it has to be The Journey Back (obviously!), but if you are after a second one then I can certainly recommend Cardiff City’s Greatest Games – eight out of ten.

 

 

Posted in Cardiff City Books | Tagged , | Comments Off on Cardiff City Greatest Games: The Bluebirds’ Fifty Finest Matches – a review.

Feelgood factor fades as toothless City draw a blank……again.

CoymaySat with my brother and his son in the corner of Villa Park where the Trinity Road Stand and the Holte End meet, I was about as far away from the City fans as it was possible to be at yesterday’s 2-0 defeat to Aston Villa. However, I could still easily hear the choruses of the new song supporting our manager, “Don’t sack Mackay” being sang throughout the match and couldn’t help but appreciate the irony of a situation whereby the impressive visiting support were belting out their backing for our manager while the team was turning in a performance which, if repeated too often, would, almost certainly, see Malky come under pressure for reasons other than those that have dominated the headlines for the last month or so.

Now there are those who say that Villa were a poor side who were there for the taking, but, despite having gone 380 minutes without scoring before kick off, I thought they were pretty comfortably better than us and the two goal margin between the sides was about right – while it was Villa’s lack of goal power which was making the headlines beforehand, it’s a worrying six in nine league games (just one of them coming from a striker) for our misfiring team.

City spent the afternoon offering further evidence of the truth of the maxim that domination of the football doesn’t always equate to domination of the game. At Upton Park on the opening day of the season, City had 52% of the possession and one goalscoring effort on target while losing meekly by 2-0 to West Ham, yesterday they had 56% of the ball and managed to double their on target efforts while losing by the same score. Perhaps, with their resolute defending and goalkeeping which kept Villa out for the first 80 odd percent of the game, City didn’t deserve to have the adjective “meekly” applied to yesterday’s display, but the blunt truth is that the Villa back line and keeper have probably not had as easy an afternoon as that all season.

Craig Bellamy’s first half free kick, which barely tested Brad Guzan, was one of those on target efforts, but, I’m darned if I can remember the other one  and the closest I thought we came to scoring all afternoon was when home striker Libor Kozak nodded just wide of his own goal shortly before Bellamy’s effort.

Kevin Theophile-Catherine, and Andrew Taylor for that matter, got into more dangerous positions than the players in front of them - our full backs didn't do too badly in my opinion.

Kevin Theophile-Catherine, and Andrew Taylor for that matter, got into more dangerous positions than the players in front of them – our full backs didn’t do too badly in my opinion.

 

Now, there are those who maintain that a more attacking approach would have made all of the difference yesterday. I disagree, even without the injured Wiemann and Agbonlahor, the speed with which Villa broke on the rare occasions when we did commit men forward proved what was already known – that is, that, even at home, Villa are essentially a counter attacking side and I’d maintain that we would have been asking for trouble if we had gone there and looked to have a go at them.

There are plenty of City fans around who seem to believe that they know more about the game than the professionals (nearly all former players at a high level within the domestic game) who see the players for far more than the ninety minutes every week that we do. They don’t know the true domestic, fitness, training and personal issues which may be bothering any one of our squad and yet they presume they are better qualified to make judgments on our squad than Malky and his staff – although I do try to make observations which occur to me while watching matches on here rather than trying to lecture our manager on what he is doing wrong, I’ll admit I don’t always succeed and so, at times, I’m as guilty of this as the next person.

However, if Malky and his staff think that having a go at sides is not the best way we can pick up the points to stay in the division this season (thereby earning the chance for further strengthening of a squad which may be more attractive to some players who didn’t fancy committing to us as a newly promoted club), then I have to say that, based on what I’ve seen so far, I agree with them.

Let’s face it, we are not very good at having a go at other sides are we. I’d say the only match we’ve done that to good effect has been Fulham – I still maintain that we picked a more attacking line up at Norwich and ended up somehow clinging on to a point despite being overrun at times by a team who managed thirty one attempts on goal.

If average is classed as tenth or eleventh in the table, then, based on the first eleven Premier League games of the season, I would rate the different departments of our team as follows;-

Goalkeeper = Average

Defence = Just below average

Midfield = Below average

Strikers = Relegation material, maybe even bottom of the league

Now, to be fair to our strikers, Fraizer Campbell has shown against, arguably, the best team in the league that he can be an influence on matches at this level and Peter Odemwingie’s goalscoring record in the Premier League says he can be an effective performer. Also, playing as a lone striker in a side set up like ours is most weeks is a very tough and, I should think, frustrating task,  but, as a collective, I’d say these two, plus Maynard and Gestede, are amongst the three weakest in the league.

It has to be said as well, that this is now very much Malky Mackay’s squad, but, in his defence, our manager can point to the fact that there is another striker who has seen all of three minutes of league action so far this season who should be included. I’ll admit that, when Andreas Cornelius is fully fit, it’s putting an awful lot of pressure on a twenty year old to expect him to be able to transform that very poor overall rating I gave to our strikers, but, he’s obviously got something that interested plenty of other clubs at this level and I’m certainly not going to write him off without getting a proper chance to show his worth as some seem almost pleased to do.

Villa players celebrate Leandro Bacuna's opening goal. it was a superb free kick which I don't think David Marshall and the wall could have dome more to prevent - but it was a needless foul (which led to Gary Medel's first yellow card for the club) which gave the home side the opportunity to break their scoring drought.

Villa players celebrate Leandro Bacuna’s opening goal. It was a superb free kick which I don’t think David Marshall and the wall could have done more to prevent – but it was a needless foul (which led to Gary Medel’s first yellow card for the club) which gave the home side the opportunity to break their scoring drought.

So, although I cling to the hope that Cornelius might prove to be good enough to bring about a change in approach and I feel Craig Noone should have been given at least one chance off the bench to try and prove his worth at this level, I must back an approach which has so far seen us gain points at a rate which would, almost certainly, see us surviving in the Premier League if repeated over the course of a full season.

In saying that, I’ll finish by making a few of my observations about yesterday. First, Aron Gunnarsson and Don Cowie have their strong points, but, playing as advanced midfielders with orders to make forward runs at Premier League level does not appear to play to them and, so, having them, along with the goalless in 2013 Bellamy, as the ones charged with helping our lone striker out only made an already difficult task even harder for Odemwingie and then Campbell.

By contrast, the midfielder who is a proven goalscorer at Championship level was sitting deeper and. although passing neatly and showing some nice touches at times, played in a more conservative manner – I agree with what Nathan Blake says about Peter Whittingham this season, he seems happy to play a support role and let Gary Medel do the sort of passing which was once considered a speciality of his. Talking of Medel, he was, once again, one of our best players, but his performance tailed off in the last quarter of an hour when a City side which had to attack proved so ineffective at doing so.

Once again, the defenders and goalkeeper did a decent job and proved the most reliable parts of our team in my opinion. I refer especially to David Marshall and Steven Caulker here with the latter being my pick as our best player – his occasional forays forward in open play tended to end up with our punchless team at least getting into a dangerous position.

* N.B. “The Journey Back” can be bought by clicking on the words

“The Journey Back – Cardiff City’s Rise through the Divisions 1991-2013 now on sale”

appearing above in the header of this page.

Posted in Down in the dugout, Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , | 2 Comments