Like dogs with a bone.

CoymayI put a link to a story about Peter Odemwingie being critical of the tactics used during his time at Cardiff on a City messageboard yesterday and added some throwaway words to the effect that he was lucky to find another Premier League club willing to take him on after the way he performed for us. Predictably, this drew a response defending the player and bemoaning the defensive tactics of our former manager Malky Mackay, to which I replied I didn’t want to get involved in yet another argument about him and I was only commenting on Odemwingie’s play and attitude while he was with us.

Now, I’ve argued Malky Mackay’s cause online and person to person on stacks of occasions over the past few months, but it seemed to me that the position the team finds itself in now means that the present should take priority over the past and I would have preferred to  concentrate on the here and now – in particular, can Ole Gunnar Solskjær’s squad stave off relegation?

Unfortunately however, it seems that some people are not prepared to let the matter rest and after this statement  appeared on the club’s website a few hours later it seems City fans are almost obliged to keep on discussing Mackay and Andreas Cornelius ad infinitum!

I suppose predictably, Simon Lim’s statement drew a response by Malky Mackay, through Richard Bevan of the League Managers Association, countering the accusations of “imprudent and careless management”, with, as has been the case since Mackay was sacked, the Cornelius transfer being right at the heart of the club’s accusations – has a player ever played so few matches and attracted as much discussion and controversy as the young Danish striker in Cardiff City’s history?

I’m not going to go into too much detail on what was in the two statements except to make three observations;-

1. The Cornelius transfer went through on 27 June (more than two months before the transfer window closed), Steven Caulker joined on 31 July and Gary Medel on 11 August. So, we spent nearly £30 million over a six week period on those three players as well as bringing in the likes of John Brayford and Simon Moore. On the weekend the window closed we paid a further £5 million or so for Kevin Theophile-Catherine and Odemwingie, – it just strikes me as odd that nobody noticed how “imprudent and careless” our manager was being over this pretty lengthy period and didn’t do anything to stop those last two deals.

2. Maybe point 1 is explained by the revelation that the club did not appear to know what was happening as far as transfer spending was concerned last summer. After all, how else can you interpret the comments about the five year contract Cornelius was given? Furthermore, Sam Hammam (who, sadly, is still hanging around like a bad smell) makes some remarks towards the bottom of this piece about Vincent Tan and Simon Lim which effectively say that Mackay and Moody were given carte blanche to do much as they wanted when it came to the club’s transfer dealings.

3. If point 2 is correct, then that seems a very dangerous precedent which inspires little or no confidence in my mind as far as Tan and Lim’s footballing decision making is concerned. The line “A manager, even in the Premier League, does not go out and “sign” players.” seems particularly relevant here and, if this was, indeed, not the case at Cardiff, then it seems a bit rich that one of the parties responsible for creating that situation should be trying to absolve himself of any responsibility in the matter.

Simon Lim, Cardiff City's CEO  - "He doesn't know whether certain amounts should be paid in wages or paid to buy players" - so says Sam Hammam!

Simon Lim, Cardiff City’s CEO – “He doesn’t know whether certain amounts should be paid in wages or paid to buy players” – so says Sam Hammam in his “supportive” message to the man who took to the Cardiff City website yesterday to attack former manager Malky Mackay.

If this season ends in relegation (actually, even if it doesn’t), I can see that word “blame” being used an awful lot in the weeks and months that follow. As I mentioned in my reaction piece to the Swansea defeat, I don’t see how any one individual can be held wholly responsible for our season going wrong – there will be plenty of responsible parties and it seems to me that any arguments should just be about how much blame you are prepared to attribute to any of them.

Foremost amongt those parties are bound to be Vincent Tan and Malky Mackay and, although my sympathies undoubtedly lie more with the latter than the former, I don’t think either of them can claim any moral high ground in the battle which looks like dragging on for sometime yet.

I find the club’s website being used in the way it was yesterday (and for the “not a penny more” response to Malky Mackay’s request for funding for January signings) cheap and distinctly lacking in class, but it needs to be remembered that throughout the autumn there were stories which were very detrimental to Vincent Tan often appearing in the media – if they did not come from the man himself, then they surely came from someone who had our former manager’s interests at heart.

In that respect, they are both as bad as one and other – I can’t remember which one accused the other first of “washing their dirty linen in public”, but the words it takes one to know one spring to mind. If either of them really do have the best interests of Cardiff City at heart, it would be good if they could call a cease to hostilities for three months or so to enable the relegation battle to be resolved one way or another without these distractions which have to make Ole’s task all the harder.

One last thought, in this new found spirit of transparency which sees Simon Lim prepared to go into such detail about one of our former players, would now be a good time to ask him for a breakdown of the “admin expenses” figures (which were around 50% higher than the figure he tells us we are going to lose through the Cornelius sale) for season 12/13 that appeared in the latest set of club accounts ? Also, would the CEO be able to come up with a figure for the amount of money the club have made as a  direct result of the re-branding of the club kit and badge in the summer of 2012? No? I thought not.

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Better, but………………..

Coymaydespite a selection which, I daresay, pleased far more supporters than the one at Swansea did and a switch to the 4-4-2 formation which had been called for all season long by some, Cardiff City’s home goalless stalemate with Aston Villa last night leaves them closer to relegation this morning than they were before kick off yesterday.

It’s probably fair to say that with just four defeats in thirteen away matches now, Villa were the toughest of the five opponents we had before the end of the season in what were being called winnable home games, but, even so, a draw last night has, surely, to be viewed as another two points dropped rather than one gained.

Yet, at half time I thought there were genuine grounds for optimism that we were on our way to a second successive home win – we hadn’t made the what was becoming traditional bad start to a game under Ole Gunnar Solskjær and, if dominated would have been too strong a word to use, had been the better side with the Villa woodwork being hit twice in a thirty second spell and  a goal, correctly, disallowed along with some bright and, at times, vibrant football that had the visitors on the back foot for long spells with Brad Guzan undoubtedly being the busier keeper.

It’s almost goes without saying that we had yet another obvious looking penalty shout turned down, as, just as he did when he was here for the Sunderland match, Chris Foy chose to ignore a blatant foul on a City striker which he would surely have given if it had taken place outside the penalty area. This time it was a Nathan Baker foul on Kenwyne Jones that got added to the long, long list of strong penalty claims which we’ve had turned down and it would be very informative to hear why the officials involved didn’t consider them to be fouls or handballs. It needs to be said as well mind, that, as well as being the only side in the league not to be given a penalty this season, we have not had one given against us either and there have been a few times when I’ve thought they should have been.

Kenwyne Jones in action with Villa defender Joe Bennett - like a number of Ciuty players, he seems to have turning in a ninety minute performance.

Kenwyne Jones in action with Villa defender Joe Bennett – like a number of City players, he seems to have trouble turning in a ninety minute performance.*

Amazingly, given the stick he’s had down the years from City fans over that Leeds match, Mark Clattenburg’s refereeing in games he’s taken involving us has been of a consistently higher standard than any other of his so called “elite” colleagues and  one thing I won’t miss if we go down are the officials who seem to believe someone has to commit actual bodily harm on an opponent or pick the ball up and walk with it under their arm for ten yards before they point to the penalty spot!

So, forty five minutes in and things were looking good – embarrassingly, we still had just the one goal to show for the twelve first halves where we have attacked the Family Stand this season, but our reputation as a second half team left definite grounds for optimism. Unfortunately, however, it soon became clear that, although the eventual result wasn’t as damaging as Saturday’s, we were experiencing a Swansea type second half fade out.

I didn’t spot anything that Paul Lambert did tactically to explain why it was now Villa, not City, who were forcing the issue, but force it they certainly were and if a draw was probably the right outcome over the ninety minutes, I’d say that by the end of the game it was Villa who were more justified in wondering how they didn’t end up with the three points.

Quite why they didn’t came down primarily to two more magnificent David Marshall saves, with the one he made from Andreas Weimann in added time being the best seen from him this season in my opinion. However, Marshall couldn’t have kept Villa out by himself and there was also some very good centreback play for City fans to applaud.

Steven Caulker and Ben Turner have both struggled in the past couple of months with the latter in particular looking drained of confidence at Swansea where, very unusually for him, he was found wanting when dealing with a dead ball situation for the jacks’ third goal. Many expected Turner to be dropped for last night’s match, but, in adversity, he showed the character and commitment that City are going to need in spades over the next three months. I was going to say that Turner was back to his form of the autumn when his blood and thunder approach combined with Caulker’s more interception based game looked like a very effective combination at this level, but, with a couple of clever short passes thrown in as well, it was actually better than then because his distribution was of a higher standard.

After a less than convincing forty five minutes at Bolton in his first full appearance for the club, Magnus Wolff Eikrem came on as a replacement for Jordon Mutch for the last hour of the game and did better with some composed and, occasionally, incisive passing - I feel he should take confidence from what he did last night.*

After a less than convincing forty five minutes at Bolton in his first full appearance for the club, Magnus Wolff Eikrem came on as a replacement for Jordon Mutch for the last hour of the game and did better with some composed and, occasionally, incisive passing – I feel he should take confidence from what he did last night.*

With Caulker also stepping out from the back to give the pass which enabled Kevin Theophile-Catherine’s cross to provide our only worthwhile second half chance, City had a solidity down the middle which they have lacked in league matches under Ole until last night and, if the support from full back still wasn’t entirely convincing, Theophile-Catharine looked a more reliable defensive option than Fabio had done in his two matches and Declan John stuck to his guns well after a start in his duel with Mark Albrighton which suggested the teenager was going to be in for a very long night.

Overall then, it was much better from a defensive viewpoint, but I’m afraid that further forward it was a lot less convincing. Playing a pretty rigid 4-4-2 like City did does increase the workload on the midfield quartet and with three of them suffering second half fade outs (Zaha, and after fine first halfs, Noone and Medel) which I think went some way to explaining the turn of tide after the break, I can’t help thinking that a fluid 4-5-1/4-3-3 is the better option. I say this for two reasons, first to give some more help to the midfield and, second, we lack the predatory striker who can consistently score from the opportunities provided by the target man playing alongside him.

That said, speaking as someone who has been consistently blaming our midfield fives for not creating enough chances for our strikers, I accept that this is by no means a straightforward matter with consideration also having to be given to who is fit and available for the Hull match – Craig Bellamy may have been a little harshly treated, but he’s got no one to blame but himself for his suspension and Ole didn’t sound too confident about Jordon Mutch’s injury in his post match interview, so it could be that people like Whittingham, Kimbo, Gunnarsson and Cowie might come back into contention.

Whatever formation we play though, it’s now just three home matches in thirteen in which we have scored the first goal, while, if we maintain our current rate of scoring, we are going to end up with something like twenty six to twenty eight league goals scored in the season. I’ve not looked it up, but I’m pretty sure that a total in that range would represent a club record low for league goals scored in a season – there is absolutely no way I can see us staying up if that happens.

* pictures courtesy of  http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , | 5 Comments