We’re too “nice”.

CoymayA win next week against Hull would mean seven points from our four league matches from the month which which was supposedly going to see the big recovery. Despite all of the forecasts of us needing a minimum of nine or ten points from our February fixtures, I always believed seven points from those four games would represent an acceptable return given where we were at the end of January, so we are still, just about, on course to achieve that.

However, anyone watching City’s display in yesterday’s 2-1 defeat in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup by the holders Wigan Athletic at Cardiff City Stadium will have seen very little to have made them think we are going to get the three points next Saturday.

This latest defeat, to a side who are, in my opinion, under achieving in the division below us, brought an end to a thoroughly miserable week on and off the pitch for Cardiff City. It comes to something when the most positive aspect of the last seven days was a 0-0 home draw against a team involved in the scramble to avoid the drop in which we had to rely on a “save of the season” to cling on to our point in a game in which I was grateful to the referee for only allowing two minutes added time because I feared we would have lost if it had gone for two or three minutes longer.

This looks like a certain goal, but Juan Cala's header in added time at the end of the first half was kept out via a combination of post and keeper. Cala's debut was one of the few encouraging features of the game though - he looks to be a good defensive acquisition based on yesterday's evidence.*

This looks like a certain goal, but Juan Cala’s header in added time at the end of the first half was kept out via a combination of post and keeper. Cala’s debut was one of the few encouraging features of the game though – he looks to be a good defensive acquisition based on yesterday’s evidence.*

Besides that draw against Villa, we were over run in the South Wales derby and had the latest in a long line of off field rows which only make the task we face all the more difficult in the past week. Therefore, a loss in the competition which was meant to provide a welcome distraction to our league struggles only only adds to the doom and gloom surrounding the club with little evidence, as far as I can see, of us making the progress as a team that is going to be needed if we are to have a realistic chance of staying up.

Sadly, I still see little sign of a coherent plan under Ole Gunnar Solskjær’s management. Yes, he wants to play more attacking football and I think it’s fair to say that we are seeing a more positive approach compared to under the previous regime, but, boring though many found it, there was a coherent structure before where the players knew what was required of them. Those players might not have always been been able to achieve what was required of them, but there was a purpose to what they were doing and, for much of the time, we were a hard side to play against – I spent much of yesterday’s match trying to work out what Ole’s last instructions might have been before the team took the pitch.

For example, I was surprised to see the pitch being extensively watered in the minutes leading up to kick off and during half time. Given the weather we’ve been having (Cardiff and district might have experienced a modern St. Swithin’s Day sometime around New Year’s Day because we may well have had forty consecutive days on which it’s rained since then), you would have thought the last thing the pitch needed was more water on it, so I could only conclude that it was an attempt to make it slicker to encourage the sort of quick passing game which, I assume, Ole wants us to play.

So, what did we get for the eighteen minutes before Wigan opened the scoring? Laborious passing from side to side and backwards as we went through all of the various combinations a team could come up with to play the ball back to their goalkeeper! Don’t get me wrong, I prefer to see my team trying to pass the ball, but it should be to a purpose and, for the life of me, I couldn’t see what that purpose was in those opening stages – it may not have been as bad as some of the other starts we have made to matches under our new manager, but, for me, it said to Wigan “welcome to Cardiff, make yourselves comfortable and we’ll wait until you are ready to start the game properly”.

Once Wigan decided that they were ready to start playing, they soon went ahead – Kevin Theophile-Catherine obligingly gave away a needless free kick which we didn’t deal with properly and so yet another team were eventually able to get in down our right hand side as we conceded the latest in a series of goals scored by someone on the far post being on the end of a low cross.

City did up the tempo after that and, after Fraizer Campbell had equalised following a goalmouth scramble, there were signs they were getting on top before Ben Watson got the deciding goal from a long range free kick. Wigan didn’t cause us many problems after that, but they didn’t need to because, as usual, we were so unconvincing when it came to the final pass that there were hardly any times when we suggested an equaliser was coming.

The second half saw us increasing the number of pretty ball players on the pitch, but it said so much about the contribution of Noone, Berget, Zaha and Kimbo that, despite the odd moment which got the crowd excited for a second or two (but came to nothing) from them, it was the youngest member of the quintet who was the only one who suggested to me that something tangible might come from his trickery. Mats Dæhli’s ability to spot and deliver short little passes around the edge of the box at least threatened to unlock the Wigan defence in a way the other four couldn’t and he came as close as anyone to equalising with a shot which was deflected on to the roof of the net.

However, in many ways, the second half reminded me of the West Ham match. Plenty of possession, but no cutting edge whatsoever with the main difference being that at least the West Ham keeper had a few shots to save whereas, apart from a fairly routine stop from a Noone shot, Al-Habsi had virtually nothing to do as his team saw out the game pretty easilly with Ivan Ramis showing why he would have been a fine signing for us if he had passed that medical.

I don’t like saying this, but, based on those two second halves I mentioned, Ole has had a month to put together something approaching the team he wants and yet we seem to have gone backwards – we were poor against West Ham, but we were less convincing against a team from a lower division yesterday.

We seemed to lack the leader who could take the team with him as he tried to bring about a change of attitude and as a series of Zaha stepovers came to nothing again or the latest very hopeful penalty appeal was ignored, I found myself thinking we are too nice a team to play against under our new manager.

Mats Dæhli could do with a bit more power and pace when it comes to the Premier League, but the ability is certainly there and represented City's best bet to open up the Wigan defence as they strove for the equaliser which wouldn't come.*

Mats Dæhli could do with a bit more power and pace when it comes to the Premier League, but the ability is certainly there and he represented City’s best bet to open up the Wigan defence as they strove for the equaliser which wouldn’t come.*

Now, I’m not saying that we should start kicking everything that moves or that we should fill the team full of hulking great giants, but we hardly look like a side battling for our lives. The sad truth is that there are few precedents that I can think of where a team at or near the bottom of the league turns around their fortunes by adapting an approach that sees them start playing “the beautiful game”.

Words like “battle”, “fight” and “scrap” are applied to the situation at the bottom of a league every season because that’s exactly what it is and yet all season long, City have had best disciplinary record in the Premier League. Therefore, even Malky Mackay’s “negative” teams of the autumn were hardly a bunch of cloggers, but at least they were organised and sent out with an attitude which saw them trying make life as difficult as possible for their opponents – maybe Ole is trying to do the same, but I’ve seen little proof of this so far.

The league table tells us we are worse than most of the sides we will be facing from now on, so you would have thought that one way that gap could be bridged would be for City to try and impose themselves physically on their opponents. As I mentioned before, this doesn’t have to be by kicking opposing players, but it would be good to see us show teams that they are going to face a physical as well as a footballing battle over the upcoming ninety minutes. We need a lot better than what we saw against  a team which were, supposedly, inferior to us yesterday – fear ridden passing it back to the keeper and a front six with four or five “dainty” ball players is not going to get the job done.

* courtesy of  http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

 

 

 

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Like dogs with a bone.

CoymayI put a link to a story about Peter Odemwingie being critical of the tactics used during his time at Cardiff on a City messageboard yesterday and added some throwaway words to the effect that he was lucky to find another Premier League club willing to take him on after the way he performed for us. Predictably, this drew a response defending the player and bemoaning the defensive tactics of our former manager Malky Mackay, to which I replied I didn’t want to get involved in yet another argument about him and I was only commenting on Odemwingie’s play and attitude while he was with us.

Now, I’ve argued Malky Mackay’s cause online and person to person on stacks of occasions over the past few months, but it seemed to me that the position the team finds itself in now means that the present should take priority over the past and I would have preferred to  concentrate on the here and now – in particular, can Ole Gunnar Solskjær’s squad stave off relegation?

Unfortunately however, it seems that some people are not prepared to let the matter rest and after this statement  appeared on the club’s website a few hours later it seems City fans are almost obliged to keep on discussing Mackay and Andreas Cornelius ad infinitum!

I suppose predictably, Simon Lim’s statement drew a response by Malky Mackay, through Richard Bevan of the League Managers Association, countering the accusations of “imprudent and careless management”, with, as has been the case since Mackay was sacked, the Cornelius transfer being right at the heart of the club’s accusations – has a player ever played so few matches and attracted as much discussion and controversy as the young Danish striker in Cardiff City’s history?

I’m not going to go into too much detail on what was in the two statements except to make three observations;-

1. The Cornelius transfer went through on 27 June (more than two months before the transfer window closed), Steven Caulker joined on 31 July and Gary Medel on 11 August. So, we spent nearly £30 million over a six week period on those three players as well as bringing in the likes of John Brayford and Simon Moore. On the weekend the window closed we paid a further £5 million or so for Kevin Theophile-Catherine and Odemwingie, – it just strikes me as odd that nobody noticed how “imprudent and careless” our manager was being over this pretty lengthy period and didn’t do anything to stop those last two deals.

2. Maybe point 1 is explained by the revelation that the club did not appear to know what was happening as far as transfer spending was concerned last summer. After all, how else can you interpret the comments about the five year contract Cornelius was given? Furthermore, Sam Hammam (who, sadly, is still hanging around like a bad smell) makes some remarks towards the bottom of this piece about Vincent Tan and Simon Lim which effectively say that Mackay and Moody were given carte blanche to do much as they wanted when it came to the club’s transfer dealings.

3. If point 2 is correct, then that seems a very dangerous precedent which inspires little or no confidence in my mind as far as Tan and Lim’s footballing decision making is concerned. The line “A manager, even in the Premier League, does not go out and “sign” players.” seems particularly relevant here and, if this was, indeed, not the case at Cardiff, then it seems a bit rich that one of the parties responsible for creating that situation should be trying to absolve himself of any responsibility in the matter.

Simon Lim, Cardiff City's CEO  - "He doesn't know whether certain amounts should be paid in wages or paid to buy players" - so says Sam Hammam!

Simon Lim, Cardiff City’s CEO – “He doesn’t know whether certain amounts should be paid in wages or paid to buy players” – so says Sam Hammam in his “supportive” message to the man who took to the Cardiff City website yesterday to attack former manager Malky Mackay.

If this season ends in relegation (actually, even if it doesn’t), I can see that word “blame” being used an awful lot in the weeks and months that follow. As I mentioned in my reaction piece to the Swansea defeat, I don’t see how any one individual can be held wholly responsible for our season going wrong – there will be plenty of responsible parties and it seems to me that any arguments should just be about how much blame you are prepared to attribute to any of them.

Foremost amongt those parties are bound to be Vincent Tan and Malky Mackay and, although my sympathies undoubtedly lie more with the latter than the former, I don’t think either of them can claim any moral high ground in the battle which looks like dragging on for sometime yet.

I find the club’s website being used in the way it was yesterday (and for the “not a penny more” response to Malky Mackay’s request for funding for January signings) cheap and distinctly lacking in class, but it needs to be remembered that throughout the autumn there were stories which were very detrimental to Vincent Tan often appearing in the media – if they did not come from the man himself, then they surely came from someone who had our former manager’s interests at heart.

In that respect, they are both as bad as one and other – I can’t remember which one accused the other first of “washing their dirty linen in public”, but the words it takes one to know one spring to mind. If either of them really do have the best interests of Cardiff City at heart, it would be good if they could call a cease to hostilities for three months or so to enable the relegation battle to be resolved one way or another without these distractions which have to make Ole’s task all the harder.

One last thought, in this new found spirit of transparency which sees Simon Lim prepared to go into such detail about one of our former players, would now be a good time to ask him for a breakdown of the “admin expenses” figures (which were around 50% higher than the figure he tells us we are going to lose through the Cornelius sale) for season 12/13 that appeared in the latest set of club accounts ? Also, would the CEO be able to come up with a figure for the amount of money the club have made as a  direct result of the re-branding of the club kit and badge in the summer of 2012? No? I thought not.

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments