Healey the difference (again).

CoymayThere haven’t been many of the goal filled romps we saw last season in home matches for the Under 21 side this time around – they’ve invariably been tight affairs contested by evenly matches teams. As to why it’s been harder going for the Development team this season, I think you only need to look at the fact that in 12/13 there was always a nucleus of experienced over age players selected as the rule that said four over 21’s (one of whom, had to be a goalkeeper) could be selected was nearly always utilised.

Filip Kiss and Etien Velikonja were regular starters in last year’s team and at various times you had people like Ben Turner, Craig Conway, Rudi Gestede and Joe Lewis being selected, while first team members who were still young enough to be included like Joe Mason and Jordon Mutch often featured as well. This time around, the reliance has, increasingly, been on youngsters not long out of the Academy – I’m not sure whether this is a deliberate policy, but the large number of players we have sent out on loan probably means that we would be unable to field sides as experienced as last year’s even if we wanted to.

It’s to the youngsters credit then that, with one exception, they have found ways to win their league matches at Cardiff City Stadium this season. This applies particularly to last night’s 1-0 victory over a Charlton side which beat them in the Final of the end of season Play Offs back in May and it was all the more praiseworthy that they did so with the most inexperienced team I’ve seen us field at this level.

Having Kadeem Harris back for his first start since returning from the injury which ended his very successful loan spell at Brentford helped, but Ben Wilson, Bradley Williams, Dane Griffiths and Tom James are novices at this level (I’m pretty sure it was a first start for the Under 21’s for the last two named) and so the likes of Luke Coulson, Josh Yorwerth, captain Theo Wharton, Tommy O’Sullivan and Rhys Healey found themselves cast as the “old heads” charged with guiding their team through what was something of a new experience for around half of the squad named.

City were immediately into their stride once the game finally kicked off after a delay of twenty minutes or so. The feeling among the people sat by me was that the delay was down to a couple of faulty sprinklers which could not be switched off, but, given the way Charlton started, you got the impression that it was their late arrival which had caused it. The visitors struggled to find their bearings in the first two or three minutes and could have found themselves three down in no time as, first, keeper Dillion Phillips foiled Healey in a one on one, then O’Sullivan fired narrowly wide from twenty yards and then Dillon was grateful to see a short range shot fly straight at him after Harris had beaten his man to get to the bye line and provide the cross.

Maybe Healey’s chance came too early in the game, because it was the sort of opportunity he has been putting away all season, but, whatever the reason, it was one of the things that characterised a sloppy start by the striker who constantly misplaced passes to present possession to the visitors. Whatever was afflicting Healey proved to be contagious, as City’s fast start soon subsided into a twenty minute period of careless passing (even the usually reliable Wharton and O’Sullivan were affected) that saw them being forced onto the back foot as Charlton took charge.

That said, the only time the visitors got into a threatening position during this period came when James was forced to clear for a corner after a Charlton player had been played in down City’s left and when Dillon failed to deal with a Harris corner which seemed to kept out by a combination of a covering defender and the upright, the home side again showed that they carried the greater goal threat. Within seconds, this had been proved when a corner from the other side of the pitch found it’s way to Healey and he sent a first time shot low into the corner of the net from around fifteen yards to give his side the lead with around half an hour played.

It was Healey’s twelfth goal in thirteen league matches and, once again, he had shown that unerring instinct that all good goal getters have of being able to forget about how the rest of their game is going and react in the correct manner when a chance comes along – it wasn’t an eye catching finish, but my guess is that about eighteen of those on the pitch at that time would not have found the net under similar circumstances.

City’s (and Healey’s) game improved  after that and if there was going to be another goal scored before half time, all of the signs were it would come from them as Charlton survived a series of scares before the break. However, the early stages of the second half saw the visitors have their best attacking spell of the game as they went a bit more direct and forced Wilson into a good diving save and then hit the post from a close range chance that probably should have been converted.

Central defender Tom James recovered well from the error which cost his side an early goal in last week's Youth Cup match with Chelsea. Last night he was arguably City's best player in the Under 21 team's 1-0 win over Charlton in what I'm fairly sure was his first start at this level.*

Central defender Tom James recovered well from the error which cost his side an early goal in last week’s Youth Cup match with Chelsea. Last night he was, arguably, City’s best player in the Under 21 team’s 1-0 win over Charlton in what I’m fairly sure was his first start at this level.*

Wilson also had to deal with a far post header when Charlton worked another presentable chance, but, with Yorwerth and James doing a fine job, the last quarter of the game saw City a bit more comfortable. Indeed, as the visitors were forced to take more and more risks in their search for an equaliser,  it was City who began to look the more likely scorers again as they threatened to catch their opponents on the break and it was only an awful offside decision which robbed Healey of a great chance to double the lead with about five minutes left.

Instead of the great chance he should have had, all the striker got was a yellow card for his troubles as he put the ball into the net after the flag had, incorrectly, been raised. Healey was the third City players to be cautioned with the earlier yellow cards for Kane Owen and the hard working Griffiths for fouls both being justified in my opinion – mind you, there was plenty that referee Chris Smith got wrong on the night. Apart from the guy who prompted a pitch invasion by an irate pensioner at the end of a game last year, I’ve found the referees for these matches to be pretty good on the whole, but that couldn’t be said of Mr Smith who couldn’t seem to make up his mind whether he was someone who generally let things go or whether he was a card happy character who whistled for everything.

Particularly confusing was his use (or to be more accurate, non use) of the advantage rule as there were plenty of times where he appeared to let the play go on, only to whistle some time later to bring it back for the original foul even though the team in possession had sometimes got themselves into a promising situation. Although I thought Mr Smith favoured Charlton in his general decision making, I must admit that it was the visitors who suffered most through his odd interpretation of the advantage laws.

Anyway despite the sub standard officials, City saw the game out against opponents who had beaten them 5-2 earlier in the campaign, and had only lost twice in the league until last night, to strengthen their hold on top spot in the league. With second placed Brighton being held at home by Bristol City last night, City now lead the table by six points and are at least seven in front of the team in third – if they can make the end of season Play Off’s, then I’d say it would be a more impressive achievement than last year, given the, seemingly, weaker sides they’ve had to field.

* picture courtesy of http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/

Posted in The stiffs | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Accepting the inevitable.

CoymayIt’s funny, I genuinely thought at half time during City’s humiliating and soul destroying 4-0 defeat by Hull at the Cardiff City Stadium yesterday that we were playing pretty well. Actually, we were in a way, we were neat and purposeful in much of our build up play and we were, at long last, creating the chances that I have accused our midfield of not being able to for most of the season.

However, what I was not recognising, or, probably, to be more accurate, I was trying not to recognise because the truth was so painful, was that we had just put in another forty five minutes in which we looked every inch a relegation side.

There are different ways a team can look like a relegation side. For example, they can go to a place like Crystal Palace and fail to compete with a whole hearted, but limited opponent who wanted the win so much more than them.

A very sad picture, the players in shots feelings are clear after hull's third goal, but what is most telling to me are the looks of resignation and acceptance in the crowd - people have lost faith in the club both on and off the field.*

A very sad picture, the players in shots feelings are clear after Hull’s third goal, but what is most telling to me are the looks of resignation and acceptance in the crowd – people have lost faith in the club both on and off the field.*

They can also not turn up for the first forty five minutes of a new manager’s first home match in which a desperately out of form and injury hit West Ham side are allowed to get a goal in front and then spend the second period comfortably withstanding some toothless attacking despite being reduced to ten men. A third alternative would be that they go to the ground of their bitterest rivals for a relegation six pointer and totally cave in once they go a goal behind.

What probably marks out a relegation side as much as anything though is how they get punished when they aren’t playing too badly. The BBC’s stats for yesterday’s match showed that we had 56% of the possession and had twenty three goal attempts compared to Hull’s twelve (and I’d say maybe half of those from our opponents came when the game was all over at 4-0).

I honestly didn’t think Hull were that good yesterday, but, tellingly, half of their goal attempts were on target whereas just 22% of ours were. As I mentioned above, our strikers could not complain about a lack of chances – I don’t know whether it was because he was trying to prove himself against a former club, but Fraizer Campbell never looked confident in front of goal, while Kenwyne Jones (who I’m afraid is turning out to be just the type of player Stoke fans said he would be for us) showed exactly why his recent goal scoring record is so poor.

On the other hand, Hull scored four from what I can only remember as five decent opportunities in the first sixty seven minutes. You can look at their first goal and say they got lucky with a deflection, but they were gifted the ball in a dangerous position by Magnus Wolff Eikrem (who I thought was playing well until then) and questions have to be asked about the defending for at least two of the other goals – City certainly helped Hull along the way to their comprehensive victory.

So, although I suppose it can be argued that we were unlucky and the score didn’t really reflect the balance of the game, it cannot explain away the ineptitude shown at either end of the pitch or that, not for the first time under Ole Gunnar Solskjær, we looked like a side that is completely wrong for a relegation scrap.

Sorry to return to something I mentioned last week, but we are in a scrap, battle, fight, call it whatever you like, with a bunch of players who as a group seem hopelessly ill equipped to succeed in that struggle.

What we have (especially since the January transfer window) are plenty of pretty ball players who can be very easy on the eye at times, but, where is the substance, the heart and the pride?

Yes, we can have twenty three goal attempts in a match (which, incidentally, is more than we managed in any Premier League match under Malky Mackay’s management), but what difference does it make when at the end of it we have registered another zero to go with the other fourteen so far this season?

Those extra goal attempts are coming at the expense of defensive solidarity and midfield “dirty work” which Gary Medel apart (it’s two home defeats, no goals scored and seven conceded in the two games he’s missed this season), our “nice” players in the middle of the park are unable to perform to an acceptable standard. So, with no end product at the one end and less stability at the other, what good is this new attacking philosophy doing us?

Although I would prefer it if Malky Mackay were in charge, nothing would please me more than seeing Ole Gunnar Solskjær turn things around, but, with each passing week, it looks less and less likely*.

Although I would prefer it if Malky Mackay were still in charge, nothing would please me more than seeing Ole Gunnar Solskjær turn things around, but, with each passing week, it looks less and less likely*.

Sorry, but I felt more comfortable with, and would prefer to see included now, a Gunnarsson in the middle of the park who will at least compete and do what I would like my players to do in a relegation scrap – scrap! I would also feel more comfortable if I could see some signs of the attitude we had under Malky Mackay whereby we were generally a lot harder to break down than we are now.

If you are my age then you earned your City supporting spurs so to speak watching us in relegation battles most seasons. We won the battle most of the time, but, from memory, I don’t recall us doing so by playing the sort of sometimes pretty, but generally ineffective, powderpuff football this side has been producing for the past couple of months – soft touches get relegated and, make no bones about it, we are a soft touch these days.

Of course, I should end by pointing out that if you look at the table, our position is not terminal by any means. Going back to those successful relegation battles in the seventies, I can remember bad defeats in March and April which left us in far worse positions than we are in now, but it’s our record at both ends of the pitch which gives me so little hope this time.

We have now failed to score in 56% of our Premier League matches this season and we have conceded twenty eight goals in the eleven games we have played since beating West Brom in early December. We will need to concede about half that number in the same number of matches to have any realistic chance of staying up and, if we were to do that, then we will also probably need as many goals scored in those eleven matches as we have managed in the twenty seven we’ve played so far – can you honestly see that happening?

*pictures courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 7 Comments