A different type of defeat, but still yet another home loss.

CoymayI’ll tell you what, anyone wanting to make a very tidy sum for themselves in a couple of months time needs to lump as much money as they can spare on Charlton Athletic getting promoted at the end of the season.

Any team that plays as badly as the Londoners did for 90% of yesterday’s match at Cardiff City Stadium and still ends up winning are surely dead cents to win all of their remaining matches as long as they keep their performance levels slightly above abject.

The visitors were second best for long stretches of the game and for much of the time had a vaguely disinterested look to them as their opponents were winning battles that they normally lose.

For example, and I’m really not joking here, City won the possession battle 54/46 (the first time they’ve had more of the ball than their opponents in a league match in five months I make it). A leading reason for this was that the home side were winning most of the 50/50 challenges in the middle of the park.

Joe Ralls, very harshly left out of the starting line up in what was a sadly predictable selection in my opinion, was particularly good at this facet of the game after coming on as an early sub for the injured Aron Gunnarsson and, while “dominating” would be putting it too strongly, City were enjoying the very rare luxury of edging the midfield battle.

City's best player, Conor McAleny  in action - of course, because our manager is so utterly predictable with his substitutions, you just knew he was going to be taken off around the hour mark.*

City’s best player, Conor McAleny in action – of course, because our manager is so utterly predictable with his substitutions, you just knew he was going to be taken off around the hour mark.*

For much of the first seventy minutes or so, City were able to work the ball to their wingers and full backs in fairly threatening areas. It would be an exaggeration to say that they were turning on the style, but it was so much better than the desperate and clumsy long ball stuff that was our signature for the months around the turn of the year.

Peter Whittingham was lucky to come straight into the side after his suspension, but, just like the other midfield returnee Craig Noone, can be said to have won his battle with his opposite number. In fact for much of the time, City were winning those individual battles all over the pitch.

Now, anyone who wasn’t at the game yesterday must be reading this and wondering how on earth it ended up as it did. Well, one reason was that, just as it has been all season, the passing, although more accurate and plentiful than normal, was not done swiftly enough, hence my earlier need to qualify the word “threatening” with “fairly”.

Another less obvious reason for us not winning in my book is that, while they certainly don’t come along too often for this team, they do not capitalise on these periods when they are on top in matches..

The whole of the first half was an example of what I mean. The words I would use to describe it would be pleasant and comfortable. “Pleasant” probably isn’t a word a manager would want to be used to describe his side, but that’s how it felt as polite clapping broke out to greet some of the home team’s work (City’s lack of zip in passing the ball I mentioned earlier was perhaps the reason why this never developed into something more raucous) – the adjective was also very appropriate when considering the warm and sunny conditions that were more in keeping with May than March.

This brings me on to “comfortable” and it’s this word that goes to the heart of the shortcomings shown yesterday. Sitting there in the sun enjoying watching City in control amounted to one of the more comfortable halves of what’s been a pretty uncomfortable season.

I honestly cannot remember Charlton even remotely threatening the City goal in those forty five minutes, but what did all of this comfort and control amount to when it comes to an attacking threat of their own?

From memory, there was an early shot by Noone and a late effort from the impressive Conor McAleny that were both dealt with by visiting keeper Henderson without too many alarms, but I’m struggling to think of much else – most sides in this division cash in when things are in their favour as much as they were when Charlton were giving their impersonation of a team going through the motions.

To be fair, City were much more purposeful in a five to ten minute spell following a quiet start to the second half. With Noone to the fore, the feeling was growing that a goal was coming and City were able to deliver when the winger’s cross was turned back by Kenwyne Jones into the path of Federico Macheda – now, the Italian may have his faults, but, unlike some of our strikers, you’d always back him to put away easy chances like this one.

With Charlton still offering nothing up front, there was a feeling that the game was as good as won, and so City’s inability to maintain the intensity of the minutes leading up to the goal, would not cost them, but it was now that luck took a hand as Whittingham had to leave the pitch to get stitches put in a mouth wound.

 

The goal which should have ensured City took the three points - the otherwise anonymous Federico Macheda sidefoots City ahead.*

The goal which should have ensured City took the three points – the otherwise anonymous Federico Macheda sidefoots City ahead.*

Those three or four minutes where the team were down to ten men saw a momentum switch as Charlton finally began to hint at why they had won four of their previous five games. Credit to the visitors, they were given a sniff of a chance and took it – Whittingham was back on the pitch when the right side of City’s defence went missing after a corner had only been half cleared and sub Chris Eagles had plenty of time to pick out scorer Tony Watt.

City’s response was underwhelming, both in terms of what happened on the pitch and in the dugout – the introduction of Alex Revell was unimaginative and “lower division” in its thinking – Jones and Revell up front has never worked before and it didn’t work this time.

Our manager tells us that the team is now much fitter than the one he inherited, but the fact is that we have scored just three goals in the last ten minutes of league matches this season and only one of them, Kenwyne Jones’ against Leeds, can be said to have counted for anything – the other two were consolation goals in a losing cause.

We have not once done what Charlton did yesterday – that is score a goal in the closing stages which meant they ended the game with more points than they were on for in the eightieth minute. Maybe this was why I was telling anyone who’d listen that we were going to lose this game and, sure enough, within twenty seconds, Sean Morrison had given away the needless penalty that handed the points to Charlton.

There have been so many games this season where the same weaknesses raise their heads and it’s become hard to find different ways of, basically, saying the same thing, but at least yesterday was a little different in that a new weakness was discovered. Being outplayed by this Cardiff team is akin to being mauled by a dog that has forgotten to put its dentures in – perhaps it may not be such a good idea to put thousands on Charlton going up, after all, they aren’t going to be playing sides as obliging as Cardiff every week.

* pictures courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 5 Comments

Six decades of Cardiff City v Charlton Athletic matches.

CoymayNormal format with six questions on our next opponents – answers will appear on here tomorrow.

60s. There is one former and one future City player in this Charlton team group from the late sixties, who are they?

charlton_athletic 1

70s. This man was a regular member of Charlton sides that faced City during this decade, can you name him and how did he serve the club after his retirement?


charlton_athletic 2jpg

80s. This player made most headlines during his early years in the game and his career could be said to be on the slide by the time he joined Charlton in the late 80s when he was 26, do you recognise him?

charlton_athletic 3jpg

90s. This player’s stay at Charlton ended in the mid 90s and spanned a decade – he has a unique place in the club’s history that is commemorated to this day, can you name him and what was the achievement for which he’s remembered?

charlton_athletic 4jpg

00s. Name the 17 year old who was a scorer for Charlton against City during this decade.

10s. He’s played twice for Charlton against us during this decade, but he’s being kept out of the team at his current club by a 42 year old, who am I talking about?

 

Answers.

60s. Paul Went is stood second from the left in the back row and to his left is Graham Moore.

70s. Colin Powell was a winger responsible for creating many of the goals scored for Charlton by the Derrek Hales, Mike Flanagan partnership, after retiring from the game, Powell served as Charlton’s groundsman from 1992 to 2014.

80s. Steve MacKenzie who was once the country’s most expensive teenager player as well as being the scorer of a spectacular Cup Final goal at the age of 19.

90s. Colin Walsh, who scored the first goal for Charlton at the Valley following their move back to their old ground in 1992 after four years away in a 1-0 win over Portsmouth – there is still a banner at the ground commemorating the goal.

00s. Jonjo Shelvey scored Charlton’s first goal in the 2-2 draw between the clubs in April 2009.

10s. Ben Hamer was in goals for Charlton in the two matches we played against them in 12/13 – he is currently at Leicester where he has recently been the understudy to Mark Schwarzer.

 

Posted in Memories, 1963 - 2023 | Tagged | Comments Off on Six decades of Cardiff City v Charlton Athletic matches.