Pitch a convenient excuse or a great leveler as Wales scrape win?

CoymayAaron Ramsey was playing for City, so I think it must have been in 2007 when I watched an Academy team game with Watford which, possibly because the grass pitches were waterlogged, was played on the 3G pitch up at Treforest. Watford were clearly ill at ease on the artificial surface and found themselves three down in ten minutes, but sorted themselves out from then on and the rest of the game was a competitive affair which City ended up winning 3-1.

Watching the match from the sidelines, it struck me that Watford had convinced themselves there were demons in the pitch which were just not there – while it wasn’t quite the same as playing on grass, it was easily the best artificial surface I’d seen football played on (I’m old enough to remember Loftus Road, Deepdale and Boundary Park from the 80’s!) up to then – Russia had entertained England on a similar pitch around that time as well and the general consensus was that it had played well.

Therefore, I tended to take the stories about a possible change of venue for last night’s Euro 2016 qualification match between Andorra and Wales because of concerns about the newly installed 3G pitch with a pinch of salt – after all, it was the same type of pitch that had been deemed acceptable getting on for ten years ago and, surely, the technology used to create such pitches has developed and improved in the intervening period?

Well, it only took a minute or two’s viewing to make me realise that I was wrong.- the pitch at the Andorra National Stadium was a disgrace and I’m baffled as to how UEFA deemed it acceptable. In layman’s terms (i.e. my level of expertise on the subject!), 3G pitches consist of artificial grass, supplemented by a layer of sand and an infill of rubber crumb. Now, it seems to me that the balance between those three elements was just about right on the pitches referred to earlier, whereas there was much too much of the rubber crumb on the pitch at the Andorra National Stadium.

Parts of the pitch looked more black than green and there was far more rubber flying through the air when the surface was fairly routinely disturbed than there had been from those earlier pitches. Chris Coleman was right when he said that it was not a surface to run with the ball on and I also had sympathy with his view that you may as well “forget it” if you were a passing side.

An example of the sort of thing that happened every time the pitch at Andorra's National Stadium was disturbed last night.

An example of the sort of thing that happened every time the pitch at Andorra’s National Stadium was disturbed last night.

The one incident which summed it all up for me came about a minute after Wales had finally edged 2-1 in front when a back pass was rolled to Wayne Hennessey  – it should have been a routine situation for a keeper who is usually a very good kicker of the ball, but, this time, the ball took the sort of hop pitches like this are supposed to rule out and bounced three or four inches in the air which led to Hennessey’s clearance scuttling along the floor straight to an Andorra player about forty yards out with not many of our defenders between him and the goal. Thankfully, the home side were not good enough to take advantage of this opportunity, but it did show what a lottery the pitch made of things.

So, I support the view that the pitch was a leveler which affected us a lot more than it did our more limited opponents. However, this doesn’t stop me believing that Coleman and his players should not be excused from criticism for what was still a poor performance and somewhat lucky victory.

As far as the manager goes, it wasn’t so much the 3-5-2 formation he used that I found fault with, more the personnel within it. Dean Saunders said what I had already been thinking when he questioned before the game whether the wing backs selected were going to get far enough up the pitch and provide enough of a goal threat in terms of their crossing and willingness to shoot – in City terms last night’s opponents merited a 3-5-2 with Noone and Pilkington in the wing back roles. not Brayford and Fabio.

In fairness to Chris Gunter, getting up the pitch was never an issue with him, but there were times when he got into promising positions and you were wishing for more quality on his cross. On the other flank, Neil Taylor (more suited to the wing back role than Gunter you would have thought) struggled after conceding the early penalty and did not look as assured as normal.

The wing backs Coleman selected are both, essentially, full backs which meant that we went on to the pitch against the side ranked 199 in the world, a side who had never taken a point in a European Championship qualification match before, a side that had not scored a competitive goal in four years and a side who have only won one competitive match in their history with five defenders!

What also galled me was that as the game wore on and remained deadlocked at 1-1 as Wales struggled to create any meaningful chances, we still stuck rigidly with three centrebacks despite them frequently only having one man to mark between them. We failed to note the example provided by our first goal when Ben Davis (comfortably the best of our back three in my opinion) stepped forward into midfield to provide the cross which led to our equaliser. Andorra did break dangerously once or twice in the second half, but, with Joe Allen (one of the better Welsh players on the night) always willing to cover such breaks, we still looked over manned at the back for a team like Andorra – there may well be a time and a place for the system and personnel Chris Coleman used, but last night didn’t feel like it to me.

The players shouldn’t be immune from criticism either. The goal we conceded wasn’t down to the pitch – it was down to James Chester carelessly giving the ball away (not for the only time), then us not dealing with a routine long throw in (Andorra tried a few of those in the first half and I don’t remember one where a Welsh player got the next touch) and then Taylor reacting in a  panicky way on the far post. Yes, it could be argued that we’ll see a lot worse than what Taylor did go unpunished in the Premier League this weekend, but the wing back risked being penalised and a set of officials that gave us absolutely nothing in the first half (just like the pitch, referee Vincic was not up to the standard required at this level) reacted accordingly.

Wales looked uneasy at the back for much of the time and, in front of the defenders, we weren’t great in midfield – Allen battled manfully, King was anonymous apart from when he missed a great headed chance in the second half and Ramsey had his worst game in a Welsh shirt for a while as he became another player whose effectiveness was blunted by the pitch.

Gareth Bale's reaction after both of his goals offers further proof, if any were needed, that playing for Wales means an awful lot to the world's most expensive player - shame about the pitch invasion, I just hope it doesn't lead to sanctions against the FAW and.or Wales supporters.

Gareth Bale’s reaction after both of his goals offers further proof, if any were needed, that playing for Wales means an awful lot to the world’s most expensive player – shame about the pitch invasion, I just hope it doesn’t lead to sanctions against the FAW and.or Wales supporters.

Ramsey did play a lovely long pass to Gunter in the opening seconds (unfortunately, long passes soon gave way to hoofs upfield as Wales took their manager’s advice and forgot about the passing game) and there were some lovely moments of skill from him (including some dribbling which showed that it was not completely impossible to run with the ball just before he picked up the injury which set the seal on a pretty miserable night for the former captain), but. like so many of his colleagues, he found it hard to show that he was up against opponents used to playing about six levels lower than he does.

Even matchwinner Bale didn’t really conquer the awful pitch because he was nowhere near as effective as he normally is in terms of his first touch and his ability to break away from opponents, while his pace was not the factor it usually is. However, what he never stopped doing was trying and his quality was able to shine through when he was able to take the pitch put of the equation. Examples of this came with his goals – his header for the equaliser was a beauty as he glanced the ball into the corner from about fifteen yards out and, although Wales were a little lucky to benefit from Vincic’s new found ability as the game wore on to spot examples of Andorran players breaking the rules when the ref ruled that Bale’s eighty first minute free kick be retaken – he made no mistake second time around with a shot which would have beaten much better keepers than Pol.

As Wales were labouring to victory, our next two opponents met in Zenica and, while the outcome showed Cyprus will be no pushovers next month, their 2-1 win over Bosnia was undoubtedly a great result for us. That said, I’m sure all involved know that we cannot keep on relying entirely on Gareth Bale for inspiration – besides our Champions League Winner, there were eight Welsh players with Premier League clubs in last night’s starting line up and more of them need to play as if that is their natural level.

Just to finish, our Under 21’s followed up Friday’s 2-2 draw in Finland with a 1-1 draw (Tommy O’Sullivan started and Theo Wharton came on as a sub as Lee Evans’ late goal rescued a point) in Lithuania to end in fourth position in their qualifying group – thankfully, Wales’ senior team were just about able to avoid the sort of banana skin the youngsters fell on when losing 1-0 to San Marino at the start of their campaign.

Posted in Wales | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Still more questions than answers after another ordinary performance.

CoymayI really would like to be able to do a wholly positive review of a City league game this season, I’d get much more pleasure in writing about a good display which carried considerable promise for the coming weeks than I do from being critical all the time, but I’m afraid it was more of the same yesterday at Craven Cottage where, given the balance of play, we did well in the end to get a 1-1 draw against a Fulham side that had not gained a single point from their first four Championship matches this season.

Before going any further, I should say that Fulham looked anything but a bottom of the table team yesterday. In the first half especially, they looked as good as any team I’ve seen us play so far as Scott Parker, surprisingly being used in an advanced midfield position, gave a reminder of what a fine player he still is – Fulham will soon start climbing the table if they keep on playing like they did yesterday.

That said, I think the question needs to be asked as to whether Fulham are really as good as they looked at times yesterday or was it a case of us making them look good, because we are tending to make every league opponent we play look good so far this season!

If Fulham deserve praise for the way they played in the first forty five minutes (and I think they do), then it also needs to be said that we were woeful in that time – Ole said it was the worst we’ve played so far and I’m certainly not going to argue with him on that score.

After a fairly even first twenty minutes when we had quite a bit of the ball without really threatening a goal, we slipped into the sort of desperate stuff we saw in the second half at Blackburn and the first half at Wolves whereby we were hanging on desperately to stay in the game as our opponents swarmed all over us. To be frank, we have spent more time looking like relegation candidates this season than we have done looking like a team which has this squad which we are constantly told is amongst our strongest ever – a squad that the bookies keep telling us is among the favourites to win the league.

Maybe that’s the problem, if you keep on being told your team has such a strong squad, you start to take it as a matter of fact, so expectation levels rise accordingly and you start judging them more harshly when performances resolutely fail to match the hype?

I think the word “performances” is important there. A few weeks ago, plenty of people were talking about what a tough start to the campaign we’d been handed and I feel we should not lose sight of this. If we still accept that the fixture computer has given us a very testing reintroduction to the Championship, then eight points from five matches (as well as a couple of wins in the League Cup) is a perfectly acceptable start- especially when you consider five of those seven matches have been away from home.

It’s when you equate those results with performances though that things become more problematic because, given the way we have played most of the time, eight points is the very most we deserve and I just cannot see us being able to keep on picking up points at the same rate over the course of a season if we keep on playing like we are.

Of course, it needs to be said that a squad of players with as many newcomers as ours has needs time to gel, but this is nullified somewhat by the fact that so many of the teams we play are in much the same position. For example, Fulham fans, obviously, will not be happy with their position and results at the moment, but at least they have the consolation of seeing that their team gave them a hint of what might be when they had us chasing shadows at times yesterday.

What have we seen from  City so far that suggests there is better to come? Well, for me, there’s been a good opening period at Blackburn, a few flashes against Huddersfield and a strong start to the second half against Wigan when we suggested that our billing as promotion favourites might be deserved and that’s about it.

Hardly surprisingly, people are beginning to question the manager, but I thought Ole had quite a good day yesterday. After all, he picked the defence that most of us wanted to see at Wolves and, overall, I must say I felt quite positive about the team he selected. I suppose some can question Ole’s role in a preparation that saw us outplayed so much in the first half, but, judging by his post match comments, it sounded to me as if he correctly identified where it was going wrong for us and, if he did read the riot act to his team at half time (I certainly would have in his position!), then it had the desired effect.

I say that while recognising that, although we were definitely better after the break, we still weren’t that good, but I think at half time we were heading for a hiding and yet we were able to see out the last quarter of the game pretty comfortably – I’m prepared to give our manager some credit for that improvement.

Even during the fairly good opening twenty minutes, we moved the ball too ponderously and too many seemingly simple passes went adrift, but what was truly alarming was that how, from about the twenty minute mark, heads seemed to drop so quickly as Fulham upped the tempo and got in amongst us.

I'd say that, like plenty of his team mates, Anthony Pilkington only gave a five out of ten performance yesterday, but his switching of flanks with Mats Dæhli for the second half did coincide with a big drop in the effectiveness of Fulham's chris David who was, arguably, the best player on the pitch in the first forty five minutes,*

I’d say that, like plenty of his team mates, Anthony Pilkington only gave a five out of ten performance yesterday, but his switching of flanks with Mats Dæhli for the second half did coincide with a big drop in the effectiveness of Fulham’s Chris David who was, arguably, the best player on the pitch in the first forty five minutes,*

The character of the Championship hasn’t changed in the year we’ve been away – it is still a league where virtually every team you play works as hard as they can for ninety minutes and you have to hope that some of your match winners (almost every team has three or four of them) can come up with something special that gives you an edge. At our worst, we do not compete or work as hard as the teams we are up against – it seems that some of our players believe that our, alleged, superior talent is all we need to claim the three points, but, as at every level of football, you’ve got to earn the right to be able to show that talent.

No one epitomised that attitude more than Kenwyne Jones who was back to his attitude of last season during the first half – he was awful and I don’t think he could have complained if he had been taken off during the interval. Instead of that though, the opening seconds of the second half saw him chasing back about twenty yards to put a Fulham player under pressure and you thought “that’s better”. Rather like  his team, Jones wasn’t great in the second forty five minutes, but he was able to impose himself on the game, while also giving the impression that he cared about what was going on.

The striker was able to see out the ninety minutes for the first time this season and was still closing down opponents in the final stages and, as well as that of course, he got the goal which gave us a point as he, first, won a header, and then moved on to a neat Mats Dæhli pass (the youngster and Matt Connolly were our best players on the day in my opinion) to score comfortably.

Jones and most of his ream mates had a much better attitude after the break (our passing was still poor much of the time though)  – something must have brought about this change and it seems to me that the most likely reason for it was what was said to them at half time. As the person who is responsible for what happens in our dressing room during the interval, I’m prepared to give Ole the credit for this, but, unless performances that offer some justification of our promotion favourites tag start appearing soon, then I fear he was only papering over the cracks yesterday.

I don’t believe five league games is enough to conclude for certain that a team or squad isn’t as good as everyone seems to think they are, but, if we get to, say, eight matches and we are still only seeing fleeting glimpses of quality, then I think it begins to become reasonable to ask whether this squad really is as good as it’s built up to be and whether it has the quality to maintain an eight points from five games rate over the course of nine months?

If it turns out that such questions are justified then, although he was reasonably successful in fighting a fire yesterday, Ole is, I’m sure, going to be held responsible – he has said himself that this is his squad now and I hope for his sake that his players start living up to their billing soon.

* picture courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , | 9 Comments