City stop the away rot (kind of).

CoymayOn 19 October last year, Jordon Mutch put us ahead after ten minutes at Chelsea. Just over two months later, he netted our consolation goal fifty seven minutes into a 3-1 defeat at Liverpool on 21 December. In between those two goals, City played a total of 497 minutes without finding the net in an away match. Given that the two sides Mutch scored against were to finish third and second respectively in the Premier League last season, the identity of the sides who shut us out is quite surprising – trips to Norwich, Villa, Stoke and Palace were all considered winnable at the time, but although we ended up taking points at Carrow Road and the Britannia Stadium, the fact we couldn’t score against any of them played a large part in the change of perception of Malky Mackay’s team from one that could survive in the top flight to bona fide relegation candidates.

There are definite parallels between that run and the one the current team are having in front of goal on their travels after yesterday’s goalless stalemate with Birmingham at St. Andrews took it to 430 minutes without an away goal since Kenwyne Jones equalised for us at Brighton on 30 September and with our next five away matches being against teams currently in the top ten of the Championship. the potential is there for the current run to stretch well past last year’s.

This is especially true when you consider who we have played in our last four away matches – Blackpool, Bolton and Birmingham were all in the bottom three when we took them on and Milwall had not won in eight games. When we were drawing our away games without playing well in August and September, these were the matches that were supposed to lead to us climbing into the top six as the squad start to look as good as everyone kept telling us it was. Instead, we have had to rely on a 100% cent record in our last four matches to keep us in touch with the Play Off places, but the momentum such a run at the Cardiff City Stadium should have bought us has not arrived because of our woeful away results and, importantly, performances.

The current scoreless run is already comfortably the worst we’ve had at this level since our promotion in 02/03 and the conclusion I draw from that is that it’s all very understandable because our away performances have been the worst I’ve seen over a significant number of away games during that time – we really have been that bad away from home this season.

When a side isn’t scoring, attention will always fall on the strikers – on many occasions, this can be unfair because there are others missing the chances, but you have to say that, in recent away games at least, the few worthwhile opportunities we’ve had have fallen to our front men. Yesterday, Federico Macheda, who still doesn’t convince me with his all round play, but is at least scoring in home games, missed the two best chances we had, while Adam LeFondre, who always puts in a shift, but cannot buy a goal at the moment (the one he thought he got against Ipswich has, apparently, been taken off him by the dubious goals panel), had a couple of opportunities he might well have put away in more confident times.

Three months into the season and Adam LeFondre still awaits his first goal in a competitive match. I suspect the prospect of facing his former club in our next match  will be enough for Russell Slade to keep him in the team, but even our manager's faith in our misfiring striker must be ebbing away by now.*

Three months into the season and Adam LeFondre still awaits his first goal in a competitive match. I suspect the prospect of facing his former club in our next match will be enough for Russell Slade to keep him in the team, but even our manager’s faith in our misfiring striker must be ebbing away by now.*

Kenwyne Jones is still off on compassionate grounds following the murder of two of his cousins in Trinidad last month and so wasn’t available for selection at Bolton and Birmingham, but it was a brave decision a month ago by Russell Slade to drop the man whose goals had been responsible for our 1-1 draws at Blackburn, Fulham and Brighton in favour of the players who have formed our front two since he took over at the club and, so far, it’s, at best, arguable if Macheda and LeFondre have repaid our manager’s faith in them.

When a team is creating so few chances on their travels I suppose it’s inevitable that there is a degree of anxiety involved for the person it falls to when one does come around, but Macheda and LeFondre are being paid more than most players they’ll face this season (as well as quite a few in the Premier League I daresay) to convert them – LeFondre in particular is struggling badly in that department of the game at the moment and, surely, there has to come a time when Russell Slade must seriously think of switching the attacking personnel and system (which we keep being told is an attacking one) for our away matches.

4-4-2 away from home under Slade has not delivered against three sides of the type this squad, laughably described as the best in the history of the Championship a few months ago, should be trampling all over if what we are told about it in the papers is to be believed. My own view has always been that we were not as good as the hype told us we were, but, on the other hand, we really should be doing a lot better than five points, and five goals, from nine away matches – particularly when you consider that six of the teams we’ve faced are currently in the bottom eight of the division.

Birmingham striker Wes Thomas is shown the red card by referee Kevin Friend after an off the ball scuffle with Sean Morrison who had to leave the field with a head injury. In truth, the sending off happened so late in the game that the only real effect it had was to virtually ensure us the draw at a time when the home side had been putting us under a lot of pressure.*

Birmingham striker Wes Thomas is shown the red card by referee Kevin Friend after an off the ball scuffle with Sean Morrison who had to leave the field with a head injury. In truth, the sending off happened so late in the game that the only real effect it had was to virtually ensure us the draw at a time when the home side had been putting us under a lot of pressure.*

All things considered, there were less changes from the Bolton game than I was expecting (especially when you consider Bruno Manga’s absence was an enforced one due to injury). Our manager’s continuing faith in LeFondre especially is, understandably, getting him criticism on the messageboards and, while the return of the fit again Anthony Pilkington for Joe Ralls was a predictable change, there was more flak coming Slade’s way when the news came through that Fabio, generally regarded as one of our best performers this year, had been left out. I can see why this decision would annoy people, but, having heard the guarded praise the manager gave when asked about the player (he was complimentary about Fabio’s play going forward, but less so about his defending) and seen two of the goals at Bolton come down his side, it didn’t come as a complete surprise to me – it had also been predicted by some in the local media.

In the event, I think it has to be said that Russell Slade could claim his defensive changes in particular worked as City managed just their fourth clean sheet in their last thirty nine league matches. Was it a coincidence that two “old faithfuls” from the promotion team of two seasons ago were in our back four yesterday? Ben Turner (solid and effective in his first Championship game of the campaign) and Matt Connolly (unlucky to have lost his place due to injury after being just about our most consistent player in the first six weeks of the season), along with Aron Gunnarsson, are players who were deemed to be not good enough for the Premier League by many of the critics – that may well be true, but they are proven performers at this level and, with the Icelandic international being possibly our most reliable performer since Russell Slade took over, I’m far from convinced that, with the possible exception of Bruno Manga, the expensive players brought in to replace them are an improvement on them.

Given that Connolly’s worst performance by some distance this season came when he played at left back against Norwich, Slade got it right in my book when he moved John Brayford over to the left to become Fabio’s replacement and slotted Connolly in at right back. Connolly will never be the attacking threat that Fabio can be and Turner will never be as composed on the ball as Bruno looks, but what we had yesterday was a back four that knows all about defending at this level and I don’t believe it was a coincidence that it resulted in our opponents firing a blank.

That’s one reason why yesterday can be seen as an improvement of sorts and another is that I believe that, for the first time this season in an away match, the claim “this was a game we could and should have won” had some justification to it. If we are going to improve to a level where we begin to look like the away team we have been at this level over the past decade and more, then the process is more likely to start with the sort of scrappy and grim encounter we saw yesterday than it is with us playing superbly and blowing someone away three or four nil.

So, I think yesterday has to be seen as a small step in the right direction, but the fact that we are talking about a draw, which offered continuing proof that we are getting things badly wrong at one end of the pitch, against a team who have an unbelievably bad home record as being some sort of progress, only goes to show how far we’ve fallen since Malky Mackay’s “boring” 2012/13 team ruled this league – all this with a squad which cost a lot less in transfer fees than this one did and I’m pretty certain it was paid significantly less than this one is.

Pictures courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

 

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

City youngsters dominate, but end up losers.

CoymayIt was a strange old game at Leckwith yesterday lunchtime as Cardiff City Under 18s somehow contrived to lose 4-3 to Bristol City. On the one hand, they will feel they were unlucky to lose a match they were completely dominant in for very long spells, but they were so careless in some respects that it could be said they got what they deserved in the end.

On a sodden pitch that saw water coming up from the surface as the players splashed about, the sides contrived to provide some good entertainment, but that will be of little consolation to a City side who really should have won the game comfortably.

The pattern of the game was established in the first five minutes as some crisp City passing created shooting opportunities for Eli Phipps, Dylan Rees and Abdi Noor. For the first of them Phipps was not too far wide, Rees hit the side netting with the second from a difficult angle and Noor was also wide with his effort, but on both of the latter two occasions the players involved might have been better served looking to play in better placed team mates.

It felt like a goal was coming and, sure enough, a couple did arrive in the next few minutes – thing is, they both went into City’s net! For the first, City’s keeper Luke Wakeman came charging off his line deal with a through ball, but his decision was proved to be a wrong one when the visitors centre forward got to the ball first – that touch took him clear of the keeper and he slipped the ball into the empty net.

A couple of minutes later, Ashley Baker needlessly conceded a free kick about twenty five yards out, the resultant shot was blocked by the wall and then as the City defence rushed out, the ball was chipped to the far post where an unmarked wurzels player hit an angled volley into the net to double his sizes lead – it was poor defending, but credit to the scorer for a good finish.

For a few minutes I thought I had been transported to a first team away match, but, after that strange interlude, the pattern reverted to normal – in fact, it was a lot more one sided than it had been in the opening minutes.

In truth it was one way traffic towards the wurzels’ goal for the rest of the first half, but it was now that the visitors’ keeper came to the fore. Three times he palmed away well struck shots – Robbie Patten, Jamie Veale and Noor were all foiled with the save from the creative Veale being especially impressive.

Veale was also responsible for a series of testing inswinging corners from City’s left that the keeper    dealt with decisively by punching clear, but he was grateful for some last ditch blocks by defenders at times and there were a couple of occasions when Phipps and Noor were inches away from getting a decisive touch.

It would have been easy for City’s heads to drop at this stage, but they finally got a reward for their dominance deserved, although they also needed a pretty big slice of luck as another Veale corner was touched on at the near post – for a while it appeared that the keeper had made another fine save, but the ball just about trickled over the line. My first instinct was that it was an own goal and this was backed up by the fact that no City player was congratulated by his team mates as they made their way back to the centre spot.

Jamie Veale, the skillful midfield player was City's best performer against Bristol City in my opinion.*

Jamie Veale, the skillful midfield player was City’s best performer against Bristol City in my opinion.*

Having got one, you had to think that City could add one or two more goals pretty quickly, but Bristol were able to survive the last few minutes of the first half with relatively few alarms.

The second half saw City attacking again in the opening stages and they were soon level when Veale and Patten combined well to set up Phipps who confidently knocked the ball in as the visitors appealed for offside. From where I was sat it was impossible to tell whether the Bristol protests were justified or not, but there would be another offside call a few minutes later that I was perfectly positioned to comment on.

Before that though, City continued their pursuit of what now looked like an inevitable third goal. Bristol’s keeper added a couple more tips around the post to his impressive catalogue of saves and then when he finally made a mistake when he dropped another Veale corner, he was able to recover and be in position to turn aside Noor’s effort when it came in.

Just as in the first half, it felt like a goal was coming and, amazingly, just as in the first half, it was the visitors who scored it, but, if the earlier goals owed a lot to City’s sloppiness, this time they could only curse their luck as they fell victims to a very poor decision by a linesman.

I was right in line with Bristol’s number ten I think it was as he burst on to a long pass and fired a shot into the net from about twenty yards out and couldn’t believe it when the goal was given. It may have been one yard, it might have been two, but he was definitely offside and I wasn’t the only one sat level with play who was bemused by the lack of an offside flag – just as with their second goal though, the wurzels scorer had to be complemented for a fine finish.

City’s response to those two first half goals had been very impressive, but, this time, they looked quite flat after such a controversial decisionl and Bristol were able to gain a foothold in the game for the next twenty minutes or so as they looked for a fourth goal on the break.

City were still getting shooting opportunities, but they tended to be from distance and the accuracy was not there with most of them – as well as that too many players looked for the shot when a pass would have been a better option. However, they were able to rouse themselves for the last fifteen minutes or so as Veale (my City man of the match) and Noor were again foiled by the goalkeeper – there was also a Noor cross that flew across the face of goal with no one able to force it in.

As the ninety minute mark approached, it looked like City would have to accept it was just one of those days, but when Rollin Menayese headed yet another corner across goal, I think it was Baker who forced the ball in to make it 3-3.

City were now looking for a winning goal in the two or three minutes that remained, but when they gave away a cheap corner you almost knew what was coming and I wasn’t surprised when a Bristol player was left completely unmarked to head home.

There was just time for City to force one last corner which was claimed by the wurzels heroic keeper. Seconds later the final whistle blew and, although the better side had lost, the contrast between how the sides defended those last two corners was revealing – City were unlucky, but also their own worst enemies at times.

* picture courtesy of http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/

Posted in The kids. | Tagged , | Comments Off on City youngsters dominate, but end up losers.