Top two finish a realistic target now for Wales.

Coymay17 November 1993 was a watershed moment in Welsh football – it signaled a sea change in the fortunes of the round ball game in a land where it is forever fighting an unequal battle against it’s “national sport”, rugby union. Of course, it was hardly a case of success all the way before then, but, after Romania beat us 2-1 at the old National Stadium twenty one years ago, we went from being an outfit good enough to beat the World Champions Germany in 1991 to one that was losing 3-2 in Moldova and 5-0 in Georgia in qualifying matches within a year.

It seemed that the psychological impact of another near qualifying miss where penalties had played a significant part (possibly a second occasion where there had been a death at one of these very important nights in less than a decade had an effect as well), but the departure of coach Terry Yorath didn’t help either. Also, although they’d play on for a while yet, Wales’ best players were going over the top (Southall, Saunders, Rush and Hughes were all in the team hammered in Tbilisi) and, hardly surprisingly, there weren’t the players coming through to seamlessly replace them.

The truth is that Wales have only had one decent tilt at qualification for a major tournament since then – the Play Off defeat by Russia for Euro 2004 when a team that also contained  a lot of players coming towards the end of their international effectiveness won the first four matches in their qualifying group.

However, and not before time, a second serious Welsh bid for qualification since Paul Bodin’s penalty miss all those years ago looks on the cards after last night’s excellent 0-0 draw in Brussels against Belgium (rated the fourth best team in the world in the latest FIFA rankings). Wales may have lost top spot in the group as Israel continued their excellent start to their campaign with a 3-0 home win over Bosnia, but I believe their chances of being at the 2016 European Championship Finals have to be rated higher than they were before the latest round of fixtures.

Eden Hazard was Belgiium's biggest attacking threat by some distance, but, on this occasion, he is foiled by Wales' most under rated player Chris Gunter who I still think should be playing for City by rights.*

Eden Hazard was Belgium’s biggest attacking threat by some distance, but, on this occasion, he is foiled by Wales’ most under rated player Chris Gunter who I still think should be playing for City by rights.*

I’ve only watched the game once and so may think a bit differently when I have a second look at it, but, although Belgium had the majority of the possession and pressure, I didn’t think they had that many chances to score because Wales were pretty effective at blunting them. In my opinion, the outstanding Joe Allen and, to a lesser extent, Joe Ledley did such a good job in screening the centrebacks that the hosts were unable to get to see the whites of Wayne Hennessey’s eyes too often.

When they did though, the keeper was in fine form with his best save being the one quite early on which denied Chadli after a very neat one two with Origi and his handling in the closing stages as the home team resorted to knocking more crosses in was assured. Without the injuries which have caused him so many problems, I believe Hennessey would only have the peerless Neville Southall in front of him as the best Welsh keeper of the past fifty years, but he’s still young for that position and, if he can stay fit (with Boaz Myhill having retired from international football, an injury to Hennessey could be almost as serious for us as one to Gareth Bale), he can still fulfill the promise of his early days in the national team.

Even the best keepers need some luck though and Hennessey certainly had it when Lombaert’s beautifully struck shot smacked off the inside of the post and bounced out not long after Chadli’s effort, but, although the irrepressible Eden Hazard always threatened to do something special which would unlock the Welsh defence, the last hour or so saw few real threats on the Welsh goal until the dying seconds when Benteke’s header was kept out by what seemed to be a combination of Hennessey and the covering Bale.

Thinking about it, that was the most expensive player in the world’s most important contribution of the ninety minutes and, if there was a down side to Wales’ night, it was that for long periods of the first half especially, Bale was reduced to something of a spectator who sometimes had to close down Belgian defenders when the ball was in their half.

I can understand why Chris Coleman (who had another good night and was vindicated in his selection of  a flat back four when many, myself included, were calling for three centre backs) used Bale as a striker given the injuries to Simon Church and Sam Vokes, but I’m not entirely convinced we are getting the best out of our most influential player when he is not involved for such long periods of a game.

If the Welsh midfield as a whole did a good defensive job, they were not as successful in providing the pass which would give Bale, and others, the chance to get the goal which could have got us three points not one – the only time Bale was a threat in open play was when he shot narrowly wide from an opportunity he virtually created on his own.

If we had an Aaron Ramsey operating at somewhere near his best, then I’m sure Bale would have seen more of the ball in areas where he could have hurt Belgium, but, like a lot of players at Arsenal this season, the playmaker is not looking too confident at the moment (a recent injury is probably not helping matters either). I didn’t think Ramsey was poor last night, but, for a player with such a good technique, the ball is taking a fraction of a second longer to “stick” with him than it normally does and so he is playing passes under that bit more pressure, hence the accuracy isn’t quite there.

Even with Ramsey firing on all cylinders, this Wales side has the same weakness that all better ones I’ve seen have had – they all had one department of the team where they were significantly weaker than the rest of it. In the seventies, we were let down by what was a threadbare strike force on the frequent occasions when John Toshack was out injured, while, the early eighties saw the advent of Rush and Hughes cure our striking problem, only for us to have a decade where the midfield no longer had the creators needed to feed them (if only Builth Wells born Kevin Sheedy had opted to play for the land of his birth!). Ten years later, we had a nice balance in midfield and Bellamy and Hartson up front, but we were weak at full back (especially if Mark Delaney wasn’t available) and short of depth at  centreback.

Four goals scored from four matches tends to tell a story and even with our injured strikers available, this is a barren era for Wales qualified senior players who play up front, with no obvious candidates to improve things coming up through the youth ranks as far as I can tell. Therefore, it would appear that, with the probable exception of the the final match at home to Andorra, all of the remaining games will be tight and tense affairs where wins after conceding two or more goals will be thin on the ground.

If things come down to goal difference (unlikely in the current format which shows goal difference in matches between the sides who finish on the same number of points applies before all other games are considered), then the signs already are that Israel and Belgium will pip us, but if we keep on playing with the discipline and organisation which has seen us concede only from a penalty and  a goalkeeping error so far, then we can make the top two in this group-.

Aaron Ramsey may not be firing on all cylinders at the moment, but he proved the old adage about class being permanent and form temporary to be correct last season and I see no reason why he can't do it again.*

Aaron Ramsey may not be at his best at the moment, but he proved the old adage about class being permanent and form temporary to be correct last season and I see no reason why he can’t do it again.*

Cyprus shouldn’t be ruled out yet after their 5-0 win over Andorra, but I don’t see them sustaining a challenge through to the end of the campaign and, unlike some, I view Israel’s win over Bosnia as a good thing. I say this because if it means that with just two points from four matches, the number one seeds in the group cannot afford to lose another game if they are to reach the eighteen point mark that is taken by many to be the number needed to make sure of automatic qualification and with Bosnia still to go to Belgium, they are going to find that difficult.

The decision to expand the Finals competition to twenty four teams had already given us our best chance of qualification for a major tournament in a decade. My suspicion always was that, if we were going to make it to Euro 2016, we would do so through a third place finish and victory in the Play Offs, but, lack of quality strikers notwithstanding, I’m quite a bit more optimistic of a top two finish now because it’s looking increasingly likely that it will be Israel who’ll be our main rival for automatic qualification. Israel have done very well up to now and, historically, they don’t lose too many qualifying group matches, but there’s a solidity, star quality and depth to this Welsh squad that we’ve not seen for a generation or more.

That might seem a bold claim, but, when you look at the team that faced Belgium, besides Bale, we had five players who are, arguably, first choices in the strongest team their Premier League side can field (Ashley Williams, Taylor, Allen, Ledley and Ramsey), a couple of Premier League players who are not regular starters at their clubs, but are proving themselves on the international stage (Hennessey and Chester) and three Championship players, two of whom have played quite a bit of Premier League football in their careers. You look at the teams the other nations in the British Isles have put out over the past few days and only England are stronger in my book – the Republic and Scotland have that bit more depth than us, but with Premier League regulars Dummett and Collins on the bench last night, we have real strength in depth in some areas of the pitch at least.

I know FIFA rankings can be baffling at times, but with twenty four European teams taking part in the tournament in France in 2016, shouldn’t the country whose football team is currently rated the twenty first best in the continent have real grounds for believing they will be one of them – our biggest guns have not really fired yet either.

* pictures courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Wales | Tagged , | Comments Off on Top two finish a realistic target now for Wales.

The Swansea/Cardiff divide in 2014.

CoymayIn what may come to be seen as the Cardiff equivalent of the famous “crying jack” interview from about twelve or thirteen years ago, local journalist and City fan Steve Tucker has stirred up something of a hornet’s nest with this piece on the current situations of Cardiff City and our rivals to the west, Swansea City. I must say, I think it’s a generally fair and pretty impressive piece with some capital city one upmanship thrown is as well to stir things up a bit! I don’t wholly agree with the use of the word “chasm” in the headline when it comes to on field matters because, unlikely as it might seem now, City could still be in the same division as the jacks next season (I’m assuming they aren’t going to get relegated) and the history of Cardiff/Swansea matches down the years tells you how it’s been impossible for one team to establish dominance over the other whenever they are in the same league.

Sadly though, I think “chasm” is a perfectly fair word to use in describing how the club’s compare in terms of off pitch matters such as financial and business management as applied to football. Swansea have a coherent policy and a playing philosophy at their club they’ve stuck with for a decade or more while at Cardiff there always appears to be some kind of discord and a playing style which seemed to change every ten minutes under our former manager!

Anyone wondered what would have happened if Cardiff City had gone into Administration in the summer of 2000 instead of being taken over by Sam Hammam? My guess is that the club would have gone down the Swansea route of starting afresh again, twice, and, who knows, we may have ended up with the same sort of arrangement that the jacks had after their second Administration in 2002 whereby fans (through a Supporters’ Trust) were given a say in the decision making process – would the jacks have been taken in by a “white knight” like Sam Hammam, supposedly, riding to the rescue when they were in Administration as well? My guess is they would.

Fair play to Swansea, in the last twelve years they have become everything we aren’t, but if I was a jack, I’d now be counting my blessings that there wasn’t a Hammam on the scene at the Vetch back in 2002.

Ridsdale Hammam

So, while Swansea went one way and prospered with the best period in their history, we’ve also had fifteen years of relative prosperity on the field at least, but, haven’t we paid a very high price for what success we’ve seen.

You can almost break the last 14/15 years into three periods of five years each at Cardiff City. Early on we had Sam Hammam whose bluster and bravado fooled a lot of people for a long time – they were exciting times, but the Kav’s, Thorne’s and Prior’s were all bought with money the club could never earn and, at one time, we, reportedly, had the third highest wage bill in the Football League despite us being in the third tier!

Hammam put us £30 million in debt (the debt was, I believe, £1.3 million before he arrived) and, worse than that, the club were lumbered with the £24 million loan note debt which would eventually see them taken to Court over with Langston (the company the debt was owed to) “representative” Sam Hammam to the fore! City had a brush with Administration themselves in March 2005 when the wages couldn’t be paid and a chastened Hammam brought in former Leeds Chairman Peter Ridsdale to try and sort the mess out before being forced out of the club himself in December 2006.

This saw the start of the Ridsdale era which, in general, saw a more realistic approach in terms of spending, but, even so, the debt level refused to come down despite a policy of selling the team’s best players every season along with talented youngsters who it seemed the club were trying to sell as soon as they broke into the first team. There was still the tendency towards spending money the club didn’t have both in terms of transfer fees and wages though, but, just as with Hammam, we were told our financial worries would be a thing of the past once the new ground was built.

To his credit, Ridsdale delivered where Hammam couldn’t in terms of the ground, but it was far from the panacea to the club’s financial woes it was promised to be. Ridsdale couldn’t  deliver as far as the club’s finances were concerned and things got so bad that season tickets for season 10/11 went on sale in October 2009 in a desperate bid to raise revenue for the club – there was also the dubious “golden ticket” scheme where fans were told the proceeds of season ticket sales would be spent on new players in the January transfer window, remind me, who did we end up signing that month?

Ridsdale was eased out by the new Malaysian investors in 2010 and, for a while, it seemed we had struck it lucky because billionaire Vincent Tan paid off the taxman, thereby removing the threat of possible liquidation through the courts, and provided funding which enabled the club to bring in the likes of Craig Bellamy and Aaron Ramsey (albeit on loan). Speaking for myself, 2011/12 is my favourite season in recent years. We reached a League Cup Final and, we may have failed, but, unlike so many other Cardiff sides from the Hammam era onwards, we failed heroically – the football wasn’t always great, but we had a team that seemed to give everything they had every week and we weren’t throwing money about like there was no tomorrow.

It was too good to last. In March 2012 Vincent Tan (who must have been as popular an owner as we’ve ever had at the time) decided he was going to be more “hands on” in his relationship with the club – it wouldn’t be fair to say it’s been downhill all the way since then, but let’s say the snakes have been quite a bit longer than the ladders! Tan Hammam

In the early days of Tan’s closer commitment to the club, it was often said that he might not know much about football, but he’s a shrewd business man who will not repeat the mistakes others at the club made in the decade before he arrived – if only that were true!

I’ll not go into details here about the examples of poor off field management at the club over the past two and a half years because I want to be able to watch the Reading match in nine days time, but, suffice it to say, the failure to use people with experience of football administration and  financial practices has I believe cost the club an awful lot, not just in financial terms.

Tan likes to give himself a fresh start from time to time which means he doesn’t have to take a share of the blame for things that happened under his watch. Hence the Committee that was set up around this time last year to discuss and make decisions on future transfers in the wake of the deals of the summer of 2013 that are still being investigated amid allegations of malpractice and yet were signed off by his appointee  and the inference that he was an innocent bystander when the decision, now seen to be a disastrous one, to appoint Ole Gunnar Solskjær was made.

On the subject of managers, I wouldn’t be too critical of most of them in terms of what they managed to achieve on the pitch despite all of the off field shenanigans – nothing has been proved against Malky yet except that he was stupid and indiscreet when it came to his text messages and Dave Jones’ teams may have had a tendency towards mental frailty, but he did a good job for the club given the circumstances he worked under. However, I’ve got to make an exception with Ole – I take no pleasure in saying this, but I’m struggling to think of a single saving grace to his time at Cardiff (his signings were poor, the, supposedly more attacking, football dreadful, results were shocking, his team selections mind boggling, tactics baffling and the Mackay induced team spirit evaporated very quickly).

As stated above, I don’t believe there is a “chasm” between the two clubs when it comes to on field matters. True, we fell an awful long way in the nine months when Ole was here, but differences in playing terms are small compared to what else separates Cardiff City and Swansea City.

1Ole

I’ve mentioned before that while Vincent Tan fails to deliver on promises made two and a half years ago regarding a new training ground (if I’m being honest, I’d not be too bothered if this came to nothing mind) and a debt to equity conversion, he remains no more than another Sam Hammam spending money left, right and centre and then leaving the club to pick up the tab – the truly worrying thing is that the figures involved now are so much more than they ever were under Hammam.

So far this season, Vincent Tan has opted not to come to any games this season preferring to make pronouncements on how things are going so well at Cardiff from his ivory tower in Kuala Lumpur. If he does get to take in a game this year (particularly one at Cardiff City Stadium) he may notice a few changes, because gradually throughout 2014 the feelgood factor at his club has been disappearing (not that there was much of it about in the latter months of 2013).

To me, this is another area where there is a “chasm” between the football clubs in Wales’ two biggest cities. Forty miles down the road from here is a club where a feelgood factor has been around for about a decade – it’s fun in so many ways being a Swansea fan, whereas at Cardiff, Tan’s rebrand has been a leading factor in turning his club into one lacking joy, enthusiasm and hope. Truth is though that Vincent Tan is not solely responsible for any chasm that exists between the two clubs – there’s a roll of dishonour starting with Sam Hammam that should be given their share of the “credit” as well.

 

Posted in Out on the pitch, Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments