City win, but why such a tiny crowd?

CoymayGiven recent results, I’m pretty sure that everyone connected with Cardiff City would have settled for a 3-1 home win over League One strugglers Colchester United in last night’s Third Round FA Cup tie.

While not a faultless display by any means, there were encouraging aspects to City’s win as a team showing six changes from the 4-2 defeat by Watford five days earlier asserted their superiority over opponents who, for me, could have had a legitimate complaint about the margin of their defeat, but not at the defeat itself.

It was during the middle third of the match that the game was taken away from the visitors – all of City’s goals came between the thirtieth and sixtieth minutes and there could have been others during this time when City’s greater power, allied to an advantage in pace in some areas of the pitch, really did make it look like it was mid table in the Championship v last but one in League One.

Either side of that though,Colchester gave as good as they got – indeed, they were very much the better team for the last twenty minutes or so.

Watching the television coverage, the impression was given that City started off playing their normal 4-4-2 with Kadeem Harris joining Federico Macheda to form a front two, but that wasn’t how it looked to me at the ground.

Right from the first whistle, it looked like City lined up with Tom Adeyemi alongside Joe Ralls in central midfield with Craig Noone and Harris on the wings and Peter Whittingham operating in an advanced central position behind lone striker Macheda.

This 4-2-3-1 with the deployment of Whittingham further up the pitch gave many fans the formation they had been asking for, but there was also a willingness on the part of the advanced midfield three to switch positions which, allied to Adeyemi’s ability to make forward runs, gave the whole thing a tactical flexibility that our managers critics claim he doesn’t possess – to be fair, I’d seen little sign of it before last night mind.

None of these changes of personnel and system was enough to alter the general mood around the ground though as City made a nervous start which saw yet another opposing side dominate possession (that dominant middle third ensured City were actually able to win the possession battle 54/46 according to the BBC) in the opening stages.

However, things gradually began to change as Ralls and Adeyemi in particular began to assert themselves. Ralls provided City’s first goal threat when his shot from twenty five yards drew a good save from visiting keeper Sam Walker and when the ball dropped to him in a similar position twenty minutes later, the midfielder’s well struck effoty got a couple of deflections off Colchester defenders to leave the wrong footed Walker helpless.

Although, the BBC are reporting it as an own goal, I hope Ralls is eventually given it because his shot was on target – it looked to me as if Walker would have saved it, but who can say for sure?

Minutes later, Adeyemi made the sort of driving run forward from midfield that we haven’t seen since Jordon Mutch left – Walker again did well to turn aside a shot taken early by the tall midfielder after he had burst past a couple of defenders.

A fine finish by Kadeem Harris puts us 2-0 up - it's a case of work in progress with him, but I hope we persevere with him, because we have a very few players who are good at the things he does well.*

A fine finish by Kadeem Harris puts us 2-0 up – it’s a case of work in progress with him, but I hope we persevere with him, because we have a very few players who are good at the things he does well.*

When Harris athletically hooked in his first goal for the senior side and substitute Kenwyne Jones capitalised on some poor Colchester defending to nod in a Whittingham corner seconds after replacing the largely ineffective Macheda, it looked as if City had broken the visitors spirit and further goals would inevitably follow. However, although Adeyemi had a couple more decent opportunities to score the goal his overall performance probably deserved, City faded in worrying style – particularly after Adam LeFondre replaced Whittingham.

Once the impressive Freddie Sears had given a neat Colchester build up the finish it deserved with seventeen minutes left, there were times when City looked to be hanging on and things would have  got very jittery if the visitors had been able to score the second goal they probably deserved on the balance of play.

One other slight gripe, we score three and yet none of the goals came from open play. All three of them came within seconds of Whittingham taking a corner – once again, there wasn’t a great deal created in open play.

I’d say what City can take from this game is that, while it needs to be remembered that there will be far tougher tests than this in the coming weeks, the system they used looked to address the biggest problem we’ve had all season – our inability to compete in central midfield.

On an individual basis, I thought it was players who have hardly been regulars this season who did best. Ralls and Adeyemi deserve another chance on these displays, although his overall performance was no more than a six out of ten I’d say, Harris has qualities that have been virtually absent from the team during this season and while there were a few of those dodgy defensive moments thrown in, Declan John did more than enough when was in a position to dictate to the opposition, to ensure that my, almost certainly fruitless, campaign to get him to be used in his original position on the wing will continue! Finally, the brilliant save Simon Moore made to deny Gavin Massey just before half time strongly suggests that we have a more than adequate replacement if David Marshall has to miss matches for any reason.

However, if this game is remembered for anything in years to come, it will probably be for the fact that there were just 4,198 (comfortably the lowest crowd ever for a senior fixture at Cardiff City Stadium) there to see it.

The crowd announcement for the Watford match drew hoots of derision because it was pretty obvious that there were considerably less present than the “official” figure given of 22,000 plus. It’s generally reckoned that there are in the region of 16 to 18 thousand season ticket holders this season – all of these are assumed to be present as far as the crowd given by the club is concerned, but it’s generally felt that around a quarter of them don’t attend for one reason or another.

With a larger contingent of visiting fans (it looked around 250/300 to me) present, I’d only say something like 3,800 Cardiff fans were there last night – of course, with everyone having to pay for tickets for cup matches, only the club will know how many of them were season ticket holders.

Even if we assume that all of that 3,800 had bought a season ticket though, it still means that something in the region of three or four times more chose not to attend.

So, can it be assumed that a sizeable proportion (say something like half) of them did not go to the match as a protest against the rebrand? It’s impossible to tell with any degree of certainty, but my guess is the number who boycotted the match purely as a protest against the rebrand would be pretty small and, more importantly, Vincent Tan and his representatives can say that there were plenty of other legitimate reasons why people might not decide to turn up.

With the game being televised, City being in such awful form, the football being so poor, the opposition not being the most attractive, people looking to save money after Christmas and, sadly, the competition involved not being as popular as it once was, it would be practically impossible for anyone to come up with convincing arguments that the low crowd was solely down to us playing in red with a beermat badge.

 

There are those who say there were even less than there than the announced crowd last night - I'm not sure about that. 4,194 is a pretty pathetic crowd anyway, I don't see what the club gain by fiddling the attendance to a figure like that.+

There are those who say there were even less there than the announced crowd last night – I’m not sure about that. 4,194 is a pretty pathetic crowd anyway, I don’t see what the club gain by fiddling the attendance to a figure like that.+

Although last night’s gate was a thousand or two down on other pretty recent home Cup ties with lower division teams, the tendency has been to get gates some way under ten thousand for such matches – in the last ten years, our gates for home cup ties against sides from lower divisions have been as follows;-

Ninian Park

Macclesfield 05/06 3,849

Barnet 06/07 3,305

Brighton 07/08 3,726

Leyton Orient 07/08 6.150

MK Dons 08/09 6,334

 

Cardiff City Stadium

Dagenham and Redbridge 09/10 5.545

Bristol Rovers 09/10 9,767

Burton 10/11 6,080

Huddersfield 11/12 6,829

Wigan 13/14 17,123

 

Looking at those figures, I find it very hard to find any evidence that there was a widespread anti red boycott of last night’s match. What doesn’t help is that, a Fifth Round FA Cup tie against a Championship side while we were in the Premier League apart, there are no other games in that list from a period when red was our first choice – if, say, we had played Accrington Stanley at home in last year’ s League Cup and got something like 12,000, then a few conclusions maybe could have been drawn from last night’s game regarding changing attitudes to the rebrand.

No, it seems to me that if there is a single match this season whereby the large gaps in the crowd cannot be spun by the club as being anything other than a protest against the rebrand, it needs to be a high profile league game – if sufficient numbers were to take part, a boycott of such a game could have a real impact, with the protests planned for the Derby game four weeks today, that seems the natural choice for any such boycott to me.

*picture courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

+ picture courtesy of https://www.flickr.com/photos/joncandy/sets/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 6 Comments

2014 bows out on an appropriate note.

CoymayHas Cardiff City had a more joyless and debilitating year than 2014 in all of it’s existence? Given that the first half of the year saw us performing at a level we hadn’t competed at for more than half a century and the second half saw us in mid table at the level lower, there’s definitely been worse years in terms of results and quality of football (during the thirties and nineties in particular), but I thought for a while when choosing to use the words “joyless” and “debilitating” because I genuinely cannot remember a year to match the one just about to end when it comes to those two adjectives.

A disaster of a year ended in a wholly appropriate manner as the team crashed to a 4-2 home defeat by Watford which revealed all of the things that are wrong at Cardiff on the field and, more than any other match so far this campaign, also highlighted much that is going wrong off it for the club.

“Joyless” explains itself really. I can only remember one game during this year that I came out of having truly enjoyed it. In the 3-3 draw at the Hawthorns in March, City showed the sort of spirit and resolve that has been lacking so often over the past twelve months to recover from going two down in no time and then conceding a third goal in added time to snatch what was in the end a deserved point. However, even then, the joy was tempered by the knowledge that, despite it all, our chances of staying up were probably less than they had been just as the match kicked off.

The travelling support was in good voice that day as well, but one of the reasons why I cannot say I ever felt the same way after any match I saw at Cardiff City Stadium in 2014 was that, right from the West Ham game that was supposed to be the start of a new era at the club, the atmosphere at home games has tended to be as flat as the proverbial pancake. To be fair, there was hardly ever much happening on the pitch to get the juices flowing and even when we won games, I sometimes asked myself “how on earth did we get the three points?” (e.g. Norwich in February and Reading last month).

I’ve noticed in recent home matches that conversations have tended to be less about what is happening on the pitch and more about discussing things such as the antics of people who are, how shall I put this, letting the ineptitude being shown on the pitch get to them. We laugh at the person concerned and laughs are few and far between at Cardiff City games these days, but it’s the sort of gallows humour I can remember from that period lasting from 1985 to about 1999 when we were, invariably, a pretty ordinary lower division side – taking the piss out of people who are at least showing they care isn’t where I really get my joy out of watching Cardiff City play, but, these days, I suppose beggars cannot be choosers.

He only scores against Watford - Adam LeFondre celebrates after giving  us the lead - the ironic thing was that, just as with our other 4-2 home loss this season, we looked good, by our standards at least in the first half an hour.*

He only scores against Watford! Adam LeFondre celebrates after giving us the lead – the ironic thing is that, just as with our other 4-2 home loss this season, we looked good, by our standards at least, in the first half an hour.*

I’ve no desire to go into too much detail about yesterday’s game, but I suppose that I must. Actually, after Watford played through our midfield far too easily on a couple of occasions in the opening minutes, we settled down somewhat and were worth our 1-0 lead with about ten minutes left of the first half – in truth, this had as much to do with the fact that, up until then, Watford had been rivaling Forest as the worst team I’d seen at Cardiff City Stadium this season, but everything changed when they decided to start playing.

In saying that though, City had a couple of three on three breaks just before Watford’s equaliser, but showing the lack of pace and quality that we’ve become all too used to, they botched them and about a minute after the second opportunity had been spurned, it was 1-1.

After the game I was listening to Jason Perry, Nathan Blake and Andy Legg discussing how the City players reacted when that goal went in. They were right to mention the lack of recrimination or even discussion between them as they trooped back to the centre spot and they were right to say that this was the time when there really needed to be leaders out there on the pitch, but they were not showing any special ex pros insight there, they were just pointing out something that many supporters have been aware of for months.

Not for the first time, the effect of conceding was akin to the air quickly escaping from a balloon, City were utterly deflated and, in no time at all, our two centrebacks (who the press tell us we paid £9 million for) left Ighalo free to head in from close range.

The second half saw Watford, who left their three best attacking players (Deeney, Vydra and Anya) on the bench, stroll through the game – they became the latest opposing side to score with a shot from outside the penalty area against us when Guédioura was given all of the time he wanted to fire in his second goal and Angella then added an easy headed goal to make it 4-1.

What did City have in answer to this? Well, apart from odd substitutions and a route one approach which made the sort of stuff we used to see from yesterday’s opponents and Wimbledon in the 80s look sophisticated, there was absolutely nothing. The selection policy, tactical approach and prehistoric football employed by Russell Slade since he has come to Cardiff would probably be accepted by most if we were winning, but when a side plays like that and is on a poor run, then there aren’t going to be many prepared to fight his corner – speaking as someone who has tried to be sympathetic to our manager, it’s impossible to find anything from our second half showings over Christmas to counter those who want him out with.

Actually, City did manage to do something in the second half, they scored a good goal in added time when Craig Noone beat his man with a lovely bit of skill and crossed for Kenwyne Jones to head in powerfully – Noone was also not too far away with a well struck shot after that, but it was far too little, too late from a well beaten side who were more than two goals worse than their opponents.

In his post match press conference, Russell Slade tried to put our defeat down to four minutes of madness just before half time. I doubt it if he was fooling anyone there, but it did get me thinking “forget four minutes of madness, there’s been more than two and a half years of madness at Cardiff City”.

It’s taken a while, but this takes me on to my use of the word “debilitating”. The on line dictionary I’ve just looked at defines the word “debilitating” as “to make weak or feeble; enfeeble”. It’s worth remembering that ten days before the end of 2013, City fans showed a degree of passion at Anfield that drew respect and praise from around the footballing world. Yes, that passion may have been misplaced as it turned out, but it was in support of a man whose teams, despite some very poor showings towards the end of his reign, always gave of their best.

Show your opposition to our owner and his pathetic rebrand like these supporters did when they unfurled this banner at yesterday's game and Cardiff City employees spring into action and remove it within minutes. However, if you are a City fan suffering from a serious illness who writes to the club expressing your disappointment in reasonable terms over the change to red and, two months later and counting, Cardiff City employees do not even bother acknowledging your letter - such is life at Vincent Tan's Cardiff City in 2014.*

Show your opposition to our owner and his pathetic rebrand, like these supporters did when they unfurled this banner at yesterday’s game, and Cardiff City employees spring into action and remove it within minutes. However, if you are a City fan suffering from a serious illness who writes to the club expressing your disappointment, in reasonable terms, over the change to red then, two months later and counting, Cardiff City employees do not even bother acknowledging your letter – such is life at Vincent Tan’s Cardiff City in 2014.*

Malky Mackay’s sides only tended to lose because their opponents were better than them, if it came to a battle of wills, they might not always have won, but it was very rare that they lost – can that really be said of Ole’s and Rusell Slade’s Cardiff teams?

Just over a year ago, Cardiff City was a club that still had passion, but, 2014 has been a year when much of that quality has been sucked out of so many people associated with it – I don’t preclude some of our players from that either. This has been the year where home supporters have become used to hearing more of opposing fans, of hearing player’s shouts and the dull hum that is heard when hundreds of people are holding conversations in a large area – the atmosphere that we were told could intimidate opposing teams has disappeared.

Yet, perhaps, there was an element of it’s always darkest just before the dawn to what happened yesterday, because, while many decided to vote with their feet as the Watford goals mounted up, there were sections of the crowd who, in vocal terms anyway, were as stroppy as any I’ve heard this year – there were more anti Tan songs, Russell Slade had to endure choruses of “you don’t know what you’re doing” and “getting sacked in the morning”, there were Ole’s as Watford passed the ball around with barely a challenge from City players (it was 68/32 in the possession battle yesterday by the way – obviously, there’s no need for me to say which team had a less than a third of the ball) and derision greeted the “official” attendance figure when it was announced. While not all of these things were helping the team on the pitch, they were signs that people have had enough of Vincent Tan and his rebrand.

With marches and protests planned for games early in the New Year and many, like myself, who were prepared to tolerate the rebrand initially, now thoroughly pissed off with everything to do with Cardiff City, opposition to Tan has never been stronger – yes, I know I and others have left ourselves open to justifiable “it’s two and a half years too late” comments because of what we said back in the summer of 2012, but  we are where we are now and it feels to me as if things are coming to a head.

I’m not naive enough to predict that 2015 will see a return to the club being the one we all fell in love with so long ago, but maybe it will be a year when the fans begin to fight back in the sort of numbers that start to get the club worried. Whether it be through going on marches, going to games and making your contempt for Tan and his rebrand more obvious, boycotting games either on an individual basis or through not buying or renewing a season ticket, I think there are grounds for hoping that next year will see more organised and more widespread resistance to the one man in the world who really wants Cardiff City to play in red – perhaps he might even pluck up the courage to come to a game as well?

* pictures courtesy of https://www.flickr.com/photos/joncandy/    

 

 

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 13 Comments