Cardiff City wants to hear from it’s own supporters – surely some mistake?

CoymayI was going to do my usual type of piece on a Monday night Development team match this morning, but there is a lot happening at the club at the moment, so I’ve decided to do more of a general round up of events since Friday’s game.

I’ll start with the Under 21 match against Colchester. Going into the fixture, City were two points behind leaders Swansea, but had played three fewer games – unfortunately, they blew the first of them by losing 2-0 to a visiting side that spent much of the time defending, but City missed some good chances and their poor final ball meant that Colchester were always in the game – it could be said that they deserved the win because of their better finishing.

The first half was something of a non event with a young City side finally warming to their task in the ten minutes before the break when Tyler Roche had a shot turned aside by the Colchester keeper on his near post, the largely anonymous Guido Burgstaller was also foiled by the keeper as he moved on  to a lovely through ball by captain Tommy O’Sullivan and, following a swift, O’Sullivan inspired, counter attack, Deji Oshilaja fired high and wide having done well to control Burgstaller’s cross.

The second half provided far more in the way of entertainment, with nearly all of City’s chances falling to Danny Johnson  – the striker, who has been in such good goalscoring form lately, was unlucky a minute from time when his well struck shot from eighteen yards rebounded off the upright, but he should have buried the chance he had from about five yards out when O’Sullivan’s poor corner somehow found it’s way to him on the far post and he didn’t look too comfortable when he had to shoot with his right foot after being given a run in on goal in the inside left channel.

On both of those latter two occasions, the Colchester keeper was forced into decent saves, but you felt Johnson could have done better with what were very presentable chances. The same applied to Roche when he shot wastefully high after a good run by sub David Tutonda, while another sub, Gethyn Hill, was more unlucky when he flicked a Kane Owen volley from another O’Sullivan corner just wide.

It wasn’t all one way traffic though by any means, Ben Wilson was forced to tip over a long range shot by the visitors left back and then made the save of the match to deny one of their subs, Conor Hubble. However, he was helpless when Hubble scored from the edge of the penalty area with ten minutes to go and then, seconds after Johnson had hit the post at the other end, he was beaten again when he parried a shot into the path of another sub, Nnamdi Nwachuku who scored easily.

Perhaps City were a little unlucky to lose, but they were some way below their best and, apart from their 3-0 win over a very young Bristol City side, the Under 21s seem to have a big problem scoring goals at Cardiff City Stadium this season – they’ve only managed two in their five other matches there and one of those was a penalty. One last thing, like all City sides below first team level in the last decade or so, the Under 21s always try to play a passing game by building from the pack – given the thud and blunder stuff we’ve become used to seeing at first team level lately, all we seem to be doing is making it harder for our youngsters to break into the first team because it plays a brand of football they aren’t familiar with.

Millwall's Scott Malone, pictured here playing for England Under 19s, looks set to be our first signing of the transfer window (Millwall have already brought in Forest's Dan Garding on loan as his replacement).

Millwall’s Scott Malone, pictured here playing for England Under 19s, looks set to be our first signing of the transfer window (Millwall have already brought in Forest’s Dan Garding on loan as his replacement).

Just a few words about transfer dealings. It’s being reported that Millwall left back Scott Malone has agreed terms with the club and is having a medical today before finalising a £100,000 move, Chelsea youngster Islam Feruz is training with City ahead of a possible loan move and we are being linked this morning with Rotherham’s experienced striker Alex Revell who played for Russell Slade at Leyton Orient and, I believe, at Brighton.

Finally, there was what might just be a very important statement on the club’s website yesterday. Hardly surprisingly, this news of a meeting with supporters this week at Vincent Tan’s behest has led to speculation about a possible return to blue – although the statement talks of “a number of topics in relation to the Club.”, the overwhelming priority for those supporters representatives attending surely has to be the nonsensical rebrand we’ve had to live with for the past two and a half seasons.

The cynic in me thinks that, with season tickets to sell soon and plans for demonstrations by supporters planned during and before upcoming home matches, the club will try to soft soap people with vague promises of more consultation regarding the rebrand in return for us all being good boys and girls and buying our season tickets like we normally do.

I’ve lost most of the trust I had in those running the club over the past two and a half years and let’s not forget that only twelve days ago, the man who now wants to consult with supporters was saying

“Cardiff will stay red and we hope the fans will think carefully and support the club so that we can get promoted to the Premier League”

while talking about Cardiff fans not having kept their end of some mythical bargain he believed he had struck with them – how does any of this chime with

“We care about our fans and their views are important to us.”?

However, although I think it’s only natural that many City fans will share my misgivings, this is an offer that I believe should be taken seriously – I’ve seen it argued by some (not many mind) that there is nothing to be gained by attending such a meeting, but just think of the field day the club would have if they were given the chance to tell all and sundry “we were prepared to talk, but they didn’t even want to listen to what we had to say”.

Apparently invitations have been sent out to more than forty people to attend the meeting. That seems about twenty five too many to me and there has to be a chance that the whole thing will descend into shouting matches between supporters as the club representatives look on in amused silence. I’d like to think though that those who are genuinely there representing other supporters (e.g. the Trust representatives) will be able to make themselves heard as opposed to those usual suspects who seem to think people turn up just to listen to them represent themselves – this should be treated as an opportunity and there’s going to be plenty of unhappy supporters if that opportunity is blown because a few people thought their ego was more important than trying to get Cardiff City back to being the club that most of us loved so much.

Posted in Re-branding, The stiffs | 7 Comments

City win, but why such a tiny crowd?

CoymayGiven recent results, I’m pretty sure that everyone connected with Cardiff City would have settled for a 3-1 home win over League One strugglers Colchester United in last night’s Third Round FA Cup tie.

While not a faultless display by any means, there were encouraging aspects to City’s win as a team showing six changes from the 4-2 defeat by Watford five days earlier asserted their superiority over opponents who, for me, could have had a legitimate complaint about the margin of their defeat, but not at the defeat itself.

It was during the middle third of the match that the game was taken away from the visitors – all of City’s goals came between the thirtieth and sixtieth minutes and there could have been others during this time when City’s greater power, allied to an advantage in pace in some areas of the pitch, really did make it look like it was mid table in the Championship v last but one in League One.

Either side of that though,Colchester gave as good as they got – indeed, they were very much the better team for the last twenty minutes or so.

Watching the television coverage, the impression was given that City started off playing their normal 4-4-2 with Kadeem Harris joining Federico Macheda to form a front two, but that wasn’t how it looked to me at the ground.

Right from the first whistle, it looked like City lined up with Tom Adeyemi alongside Joe Ralls in central midfield with Craig Noone and Harris on the wings and Peter Whittingham operating in an advanced central position behind lone striker Macheda.

This 4-2-3-1 with the deployment of Whittingham further up the pitch gave many fans the formation they had been asking for, but there was also a willingness on the part of the advanced midfield three to switch positions which, allied to Adeyemi’s ability to make forward runs, gave the whole thing a tactical flexibility that our managers critics claim he doesn’t possess – to be fair, I’d seen little sign of it before last night mind.

None of these changes of personnel and system was enough to alter the general mood around the ground though as City made a nervous start which saw yet another opposing side dominate possession (that dominant middle third ensured City were actually able to win the possession battle 54/46 according to the BBC) in the opening stages.

However, things gradually began to change as Ralls and Adeyemi in particular began to assert themselves. Ralls provided City’s first goal threat when his shot from twenty five yards drew a good save from visiting keeper Sam Walker and when the ball dropped to him in a similar position twenty minutes later, the midfielder’s well struck effoty got a couple of deflections off Colchester defenders to leave the wrong footed Walker helpless.

Although, the BBC are reporting it as an own goal, I hope Ralls is eventually given it because his shot was on target – it looked to me as if Walker would have saved it, but who can say for sure?

Minutes later, Adeyemi made the sort of driving run forward from midfield that we haven’t seen since Jordon Mutch left – Walker again did well to turn aside a shot taken early by the tall midfielder after he had burst past a couple of defenders.

A fine finish by Kadeem Harris puts us 2-0 up - it's a case of work in progress with him, but I hope we persevere with him, because we have a very few players who are good at the things he does well.*

A fine finish by Kadeem Harris puts us 2-0 up – it’s a case of work in progress with him, but I hope we persevere with him, because we have a very few players who are good at the things he does well.*

When Harris athletically hooked in his first goal for the senior side and substitute Kenwyne Jones capitalised on some poor Colchester defending to nod in a Whittingham corner seconds after replacing the largely ineffective Macheda, it looked as if City had broken the visitors spirit and further goals would inevitably follow. However, although Adeyemi had a couple more decent opportunities to score the goal his overall performance probably deserved, City faded in worrying style – particularly after Adam LeFondre replaced Whittingham.

Once the impressive Freddie Sears had given a neat Colchester build up the finish it deserved with seventeen minutes left, there were times when City looked to be hanging on and things would have  got very jittery if the visitors had been able to score the second goal they probably deserved on the balance of play.

One other slight gripe, we score three and yet none of the goals came from open play. All three of them came within seconds of Whittingham taking a corner – once again, there wasn’t a great deal created in open play.

I’d say what City can take from this game is that, while it needs to be remembered that there will be far tougher tests than this in the coming weeks, the system they used looked to address the biggest problem we’ve had all season – our inability to compete in central midfield.

On an individual basis, I thought it was players who have hardly been regulars this season who did best. Ralls and Adeyemi deserve another chance on these displays, although his overall performance was no more than a six out of ten I’d say, Harris has qualities that have been virtually absent from the team during this season and while there were a few of those dodgy defensive moments thrown in, Declan John did more than enough when was in a position to dictate to the opposition, to ensure that my, almost certainly fruitless, campaign to get him to be used in his original position on the wing will continue! Finally, the brilliant save Simon Moore made to deny Gavin Massey just before half time strongly suggests that we have a more than adequate replacement if David Marshall has to miss matches for any reason.

However, if this game is remembered for anything in years to come, it will probably be for the fact that there were just 4,198 (comfortably the lowest crowd ever for a senior fixture at Cardiff City Stadium) there to see it.

The crowd announcement for the Watford match drew hoots of derision because it was pretty obvious that there were considerably less present than the “official” figure given of 22,000 plus. It’s generally reckoned that there are in the region of 16 to 18 thousand season ticket holders this season – all of these are assumed to be present as far as the crowd given by the club is concerned, but it’s generally felt that around a quarter of them don’t attend for one reason or another.

With a larger contingent of visiting fans (it looked around 250/300 to me) present, I’d only say something like 3,800 Cardiff fans were there last night – of course, with everyone having to pay for tickets for cup matches, only the club will know how many of them were season ticket holders.

Even if we assume that all of that 3,800 had bought a season ticket though, it still means that something in the region of three or four times more chose not to attend.

So, can it be assumed that a sizeable proportion (say something like half) of them did not go to the match as a protest against the rebrand? It’s impossible to tell with any degree of certainty, but my guess is the number who boycotted the match purely as a protest against the rebrand would be pretty small and, more importantly, Vincent Tan and his representatives can say that there were plenty of other legitimate reasons why people might not decide to turn up.

With the game being televised, City being in such awful form, the football being so poor, the opposition not being the most attractive, people looking to save money after Christmas and, sadly, the competition involved not being as popular as it once was, it would be practically impossible for anyone to come up with convincing arguments that the low crowd was solely down to us playing in red with a beermat badge.

 

There are those who say there were even less than there than the announced crowd last night - I'm not sure about that. 4,194 is a pretty pathetic crowd anyway, I don't see what the club gain by fiddling the attendance to a figure like that.+

There are those who say there were even less there than the announced crowd last night – I’m not sure about that. 4,194 is a pretty pathetic crowd anyway, I don’t see what the club gain by fiddling the attendance to a figure like that.+

Although last night’s gate was a thousand or two down on other pretty recent home Cup ties with lower division teams, the tendency has been to get gates some way under ten thousand for such matches – in the last ten years, our gates for home cup ties against sides from lower divisions have been as follows;-

Ninian Park

Macclesfield 05/06 3,849

Barnet 06/07 3,305

Brighton 07/08 3,726

Leyton Orient 07/08 6.150

MK Dons 08/09 6,334

 

Cardiff City Stadium

Dagenham and Redbridge 09/10 5.545

Bristol Rovers 09/10 9,767

Burton 10/11 6,080

Huddersfield 11/12 6,829

Wigan 13/14 17,123

 

Looking at those figures, I find it very hard to find any evidence that there was a widespread anti red boycott of last night’s match. What doesn’t help is that, a Fifth Round FA Cup tie against a Championship side while we were in the Premier League apart, there are no other games in that list from a period when red was our first choice – if, say, we had played Accrington Stanley at home in last year’ s League Cup and got something like 12,000, then a few conclusions maybe could have been drawn from last night’s game regarding changing attitudes to the rebrand.

No, it seems to me that if there is a single match this season whereby the large gaps in the crowd cannot be spun by the club as being anything other than a protest against the rebrand, it needs to be a high profile league game – if sufficient numbers were to take part, a boycott of such a game could have a real impact, with the protests planned for the Derby game four weeks today, that seems the natural choice for any such boycott to me.

*picture courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

+ picture courtesy of https://www.flickr.com/photos/joncandy/sets/

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 6 Comments