Ken Choo and Russell Slade meet City supporters.

CoymayI had a ticket for last night’s meeting at Cardiff City Stadium where CEO Ken Choo and team manager Russell Slade answered questions from supporters, but must admit that I headed to the ground with little enthusiasm.

To be fair to both men though, I thought they did a decent and, within the parameters they have to work to, honest job in giving those present as much information as they could.

What follows will not be a faithful record of all that was said, more my recollections of how the evening went. My intention is to just set out what I can remember now and try to keep my own comments on it to a minimum. I’ve had more than enough to say about our manager on here over the past year or so and a lot of it has been critical – suffice it to say that nothing he said led to any dramatic changes in the way I feel, but I did respect the way he went about things and can now better understand where he is coming from on some matters.

Here’s what I can recall about some of the main topics discussed.

January transfer window and transfer business before that

Russell Slade said that there was a hope that he would have some money to spend in the upcoming window, but, to use his own words, he would have to wheel and deal, so it looks like any spending we do will mainly be from funds raised by player sales. Based on what was said, our manager is basically content with the goalkeeper and defenders he has and my impression was that he felt similarly about central midfield – it sounded like striker and winger were the positions where we would be looking to strengthen and the feeling I got was that we may well be looking towards mainland Europe for any newcomers.

This leads me on to Vincent Tan’s tie up with Belgian team KV Kortrijk, It sounds like this project is meant to have benefits for City – there have already been those reports about people at that club brokering the Idris Saadi deal and Ken Choo hinted it may go further than that, while Russell Slade said that some of the younger players we’ve signed as what he called “projects” came here without him having seen them play (we’ve signed French and Belgian teenagers in the last six months).

There was also talk about our manager’s mixed record in the transfer market so far – Russell Slade didn’t duck the matter, but said that one of the reasons for signing players like Revell and O’Keefe was to get the “right sorts” into the dressing room. The distinct impression given was that morale wasn’t great in the squad last season and our manager talked of senior players in our ranks who had been around for a few years feeling that something had to be done to change the mood around the place. I don’t think this comes as a surprise – from the outside, there seemed to be cliques in the squad last season and I’ve no reason to disbelieve what was said on this matter last night.

First team.

The distinct impression I got here was that Russell Slade is not some ostrich burying his head in the sand about what the team needs – he talked about the squad needing to improve in the sort of areas fans talk about. For example, he said we need to get more pace into the team, we need to create more from open play, we need more goals from midfield (but said he doesn’t see Peter Whittingham as a ten goal a season man these days) and, although he was fairly pleased with how we are doing at home, we need to be more assertive on our travels.

As for individuals, the strong impression I got was that Joe Ralls would be playing more of his football in central midfield from now on – Joe was also one of a few that Mr Slade thought had it in them to be scoring more often (Craig Noone and Anthony Pilkington were also mentioned in this regard).

Ken Choo spoke well at last night's meeting with fans - the CEO is often at the Under 18 and Under 21 matches I watch and I've always felt that he is a "safer pair of hands" than some who did his job in the past.*

Ken Choo spoke well at last night’s meeting with fans – the CEO is often at the Under 18 and Under 21 matches I watch and I’ve always felt that he is a “safer pair of hands” than some who did his job in the past.*

Academy and younger players

Our manager was blunt when it came to this subject, he thought a club the size of Cardiff should be doing better than it has been in recent years.

Listening to what he had to say, I got the impression that Russell Slade is not a big fan of the current system regarding Under 21 team football. Maybe I got it wrong, but it sounded to me as if he preferred something like the old Football Combination system where we had a reserve team made up of something like a 50/50 split of senior players out of the first team for whatever reason and players aged between, say, 16 and 19 who were being rewarded for good training and/or age group performance.

Having watched Under 21 football for three and a bit seasons now, I must say I agree with our manager if I have read him right – there are times when the occasional side plays our Under 21s with about four or five first team squad players in their ranks, but, more often than not, our opponents will field sides full of teenagers.

Bearing that in mind, I can understand our manager’s apparent preference for loaning players out over letting them turn out for the Under 21s every week – Mr Slade again mentioned Tommy O’Sullivan “stagnating” in the Under 21s and that was the strong impression I gained when watching him play early in the season.

There was a good question asked from the floor about why so many players, not just at Cardiff, who look great prospects at certain ages, do not kick on and improve when they reach their mid to late teens – the question also asked referred to youngsters who have been released by the club who had something that seems to be in short supply throughout the full time pro squad at Cardiff now – pace.

Ken Choo made some interesting comments on this when he talked about the good crop of 13 to 15 year olds we have coming through. The CEO used them to try to illustrate the long term commitment to the club by the current owners, but also talked of a player within this age group who had committed to City despite interest from top clubs in the Premier League (he also said he had turned down a bid by Man City for one of our young players this week).

Mr Choo did emphasise that it is very hard for a club of our size to resist the overtures of really top clubs if they are determined to get one of our kids, but, even so, I’ve heard from other sources that we have some good prospects coming through. This year’s Under 18 side seems to me to contain more fifteen and sixteen year olds playing on a pretty regular basis than you’d normally expect, so, perhaps, in a few years time, we’ll be back in a situation where we will be achieving the two or three youngsters breaking into the senior squad every year that Russell Slade talked of last night.

One last thing on this subject, I’ve no way of checking it, but, as a long standing critic of our manager for his failure to encourage young players at Cardiff, I was taken aback to hear him say that one year while he was at Notts County, nine youngsters from their youth system broke into the first team squad!

Other stuff

Both men talked about the impact of Financial Fair Play rules on the club with the clear impression being given that we were heading for a transfer embargo if things had carried on as they were.

On a personal level, while I’m sure I know where his ultimate loyalties lie, I’ve also thought that in Ken Choo we have a CEO who is more sympathetic to supporter opinion and desires than some of his predecessors. The club have tried hard in the past year to rebuild bridges with their “conversion” to the blue cause (it was good to hear Mr Choo say that we would be playing in blue at Bolton on Saturday – why on earth did we have to play in red at Derby though?) and, sadly, have got little tangible reward in terms of people coming through the turnstiles for it.

The truth is, as I see it, that last night we had two men who have had to try to pick up the pieces following a series of on and off field blunders which were committed before they arrived at the club. Yes, we can argue about how good or bad Russell Slade is and I think it’s fairly obvious to regular readers of this blog that I’m not a huge fan of his, but last night tended to confirm something that I knew already – he had, and still has, a hell of a job on his hands at Cardiff.

Although he chose his words carefully, our manager’s disappointment with the atmosphere at our home games came through. He spoke about Cardiff fans being well known for their passion and commitment towards their team, but it’s a passion and commitment that he’s rarely, if ever, seen during his time here.

Yes, the nature of the football his team has played for most of the past fourteen months has been responsible for much of why a trip to Cardiff City Stadium has become akin to a visit to a library in some ways. but the apathy caused by a mixture of disillusionment, anger and disappointment was already firmly in place before he and Mr Choo arrived.

* picture courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

Posted in Down in the dugout, Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , | 8 Comments

So cruel on improved City.

CoymayI was not confident beforehand that Cardiff City would find themselves ahead in the closing minutes of yesterday’s home game with Burnley, but, if they were, then I knew that would certainly not mean that the three points were guaranteed.

I say that because, perhaps, more than any side in the Championship in the past few seasons, Burnley under Sean Dyche do not know when they are beaten – in their 13/14 promotion season especially, they mastered the knack of turning defeats into draws and draws into victories late on in matches.

Therefore, it shouldn’t have come as a total surprise to those City fans who braved the elements to watch yesterday’s match that a Burnley side unbeaten in their last eight games were able to consolidate their position as one of the five teams who have broken clear of the rest of the Championship by coming back from 2-0 down with five minutes left to gain a point.

So, it would be wrong to say that it was something of a fluke that Burnley found a way back into a match in which they were second best for long periods.

All of this means Sean Dyche was right to point out that there was more than just good fortune involved when it came to his team’s fightback, but I’d love to know how he would have described the equalising goal if it had been scored against his team three minutes into added time to rob them of two points!

The truth is that no matter how much he talks about his team having earned their point, it still took an outrageous slice of good fortune for a ball that was going at least a yard wide to rebound off a helpless defender and roll apologetically over the goal line.

I suppose it all is just more evidence of something that anyone who has followed the game for any sustained period of time probably has to acknowledge as a truth – the old cliche about luck evening itself out over the course of a season is rubbish, the top sides have more than enough of it, while the also rans have to cope with more than their “fair share” of kicks in the teeth.

So it is, that Matt Connolly, a realistic contender for City’s player of the season so far and one of their best performers yesterday, has now seen the ball hit him and trickle into his own net (in fact, on both occasions, the ball travelled so slowly that it didn’t even have the strength to hit the back of the net!) deep into added time at the end of the game twice and his team have lost three points as a result.

Without Connolly’s inadvertent and unfortunate intervention yesterday and the one at Rotherham in September, City would now be occupying the one Play Off place the nineteen clubs outside the top five appear to be fighting for this season. Yes, that’s more than we deserve on the general level of our performance so far, but I daresay that, if they are being honest, supporters of the other clubs in the fight to finish sixth would say much the same thing about their team.

Given how the game finished, it’s easy to forget what happened in the first eighty five minutes (and for most of the time after Burnley’s first goal as well) and be negative about a team that even Its own manager admitted in his pre match press conference was high on functionality and low on flair.

As usual, the messageboards went in search of scapegoats (they do even when we win!) and, of course, our manager was featured prominently in any list of people to blame – I’ll get to my opinion on Russell Slade’s part in yesterday’s proceedings presently, but, for now, I’d like to talk about the positive aspects of City’s performance.

Aron Gunnarsson (who has played well in out last two home games) beats Tom Heaton to put us 1-0 ahead. As against Reading, both of our goals came from set pieces and it's now an embarrassing eight matches since we last scored in open play and, even if we manage one at Bolton next week, it will be more than two months since the last one we got at Brighton. Trying to stay optimistic, I suppose we came close to a goal in open play on a few occasions yesterday - there have been plenty of games recently where it never looked remotely like happening.*

Aron Gunnarsson (who has played well in out last two home games) beats Tom Heaton to put us 1-0 ahead.
As against Reading, both of our goals came from set pieces and it’s now an embarrassing eight matches since we last scored in open play. Even if we manage one at Bolton next week, it will be more than two months since the last one we got at Brighton. Trying to stay optimistic, I suppose we came close to a goal in open play on a few occasions yesterday – there have been plenty of games recently where it never looked remotely like happening.*

I mentioned earlier that we haven’t looked like a potential top six team too often this season, but I’m encouraged that there were times in our previous home game (against Reading) when we did and that there were long spells yesterday when we did.

It’s going to be tough to put the way the match ended behind us, but there were plenty of reasons for optimism yesterday.

I’ve constantly cited the lack of entertainment on offer during Russell Slade’s time in charge as being a big reason for the decline in attendances and loss of atmosphere at home games – to repeat something I’ve often mentioned before, I’ve yet to come out of a home match that Russell Slade has been in charge of thinking “I really enjoyed that”.

Well, that’s still the case, but, that late own goal is the only reason I feel that way. Yesterday’s was definitely the best performance I’ve seen from a Russell Slade side at Cardiff City Stadium – a disappointing outcome of course, but at least I went home feeling I had been entertained.

What any analysis of the game has to acknowledge is that it was played in absolutely awful conditions. For most of the time, there was torrential rain, but, worse than that, there was a wind, gusting to gale force, that made it very tough to play controlled football.

Speaking for myself, it was only when I got out from the Ninian Stand and began the walk to my car that I realised just how strong the wind had become as the match went on. I believe that, with the new ground not being as open to the elements as Ninian Park was, we have been lucky that strong winds have not been as much of a factor at City home matches in recent years, but it seemed to me that, more than in any other match I’ve attended at Cardiff City Stadium, it was yesterday.

Therefore, the option of the long pass from the back looking for Kenwyne Jones’ head was not as popular as it usually is with City for the simple reason that the wind would send the ball away from its intended target.

No, this was a day for keeping the ball on the deck as much as possible and trying to work yourself into a promising position and it says much for the way City passed it in the first half in particular that they were able to do this pretty often.

Of course, when that promising position was out by the touchline then, invariably, this meant a cross where the ball was put into the air and so, given the conditions, it would be wrong to be too critical of the quality of some of the crossing when nothing came of these opportunities.

Even so, the returning Tom Heaton (when was the last time City played in a match where both goalkeepers were captains?) was a busy man as he was forced into a string of saves, with the best of them for me being his tip over of a Craig Noone effort which appeared to take a slight deflection.

Noone was lively on the right flank as City put in their most threatening half of football of the season, while Peter Whittingham on the left may not have been as dangerous, he, as you would expect, benefitted from a less direct approach from the side.

However, it was in the centre of midfield where Joe Ralls and Aron Gunnarsson confirmed the  impression given for most of the time they have been paired as a central two, that their relative youth gives them an attacking vibrancy and movement not seen in the other combinations we may select.

The two combined for the opening goal when, somewhat surprisingly, Whittingham stepped aside to allow Ralls to deliver a free kick which was guided in nicely by the Iceland’s captain’s head.

That’s three assists now for Ralls in our last two home matches and those are figures which suggest he won’t be coming off dead ball duties any time soon.

City’s youngest player was also given corner taking duties from City’s left, but Whittingham was still taking them from the right.and, shortly after one of his deliveries into the six yard box was nodded not too far over by Jones, Sean Morrison beat Heaton to another one to double City’s lead.

It was a testimony to the quality that both of the left footers possess when it comes to dead ball delivery that were able to knock in high balls with such precision in the prevailing conditions.

By contrast, Burnley’s problems in harnessing the wind advantage they had in the second half as a succession of crosses and passes from open and dead ball play, drifted a long way past their targets and out of play or through to David Marshall emphasised how well City had done to make as many opportunities as they did when they were playing with the wind.

The goal scored by by Rouwen Hennings with five minutes left with a shot that Russell Slade said Marshall felt he should have done better with, was a rare example of Burnley creating something in open play.

However, apart from a free kick which brought a good, sprawling save from Marshall, there was little from their dead ball deliveries to worry City until Heaton made his most significant contribution of the day by sending in a free kick from just inside the City half that fell into a dangerous area around the penalty spot – the ball was half cleared to Dean Marney who did well to put in a cross from which Michael Keane’s header should have flashed harmlessly wide to leave City within seconds of what I would have rated as their best win of the season so far – it didn’t though and so Russell Slade’s army of critics have another stick to beat him with.

Now, I’m a fully paid up member of that army, but I didn’t think our manager got a great deal wrong yesterday. The substitution of Jones by Federico Macheda seemed an odd one to me because, although Kenwyne had little left to give, he certainly would have been handy in trying to cope with the aerial assault that led to the equaliser (for me, Whittingham or Noone off and Manga on would have made more sense).

That apart, the substitution of Gunnarsson by O’Keefe made no sense whatsoever if it was tactical, so I presume it was because Gunnar didn’t have ninety minutes in him after his recent injury and bringing on the man who is still some way clear of the rest as our top scorer after a promising, if not spectacular, debut by Tony Watt seemed a sensible decision.

Also, although it was a week late, Slade at least accepted the error of his ways in going with Whittingham in central midfield rather than Ralls at Derby – overall though, I thought our manager produced a team which played in a manner that offered hope that the top six finish he says is the target for the season is not quite as outlandish as it has seemed throughout most of the Autumn.

The pair under the umbrella are quite close to the pitch, but they would have needed it if they had been sat where I was at the back of the Ninian Stand when the second half started - the building of Tan's Folly has ensured that it's now possible to get drenched there when the weather is as bad as it was yesterday!*

The pair under the umbrella are quite close to the pitch, but they would have needed it if they had been sat where I was at the back of the Ninian Stand when the second half started – the building of Tan’s Folly has ensured that it’s now possible to get drenched there when the weather is as bad as it was yesterday!*

Finally, a bit of a whinge. One of the few good things about the smaller crowds we are getting is that you can move from your season ticket seat at the front of the Ninian Stand where you would get soaked to one right at the back where you can stay dry. That was the plan at least when the rain became so heavy yesterday, but we were still getting drenched when sat in our new seats because we were below the part where the original stand roof had been removed to accommodate Tan’s Folly – shouldn’t those with season tickets in this area have had a slight decrease in the amount they pay for this deterioration in conditions?

*picture courtesy of https://www.flickr.com/photos/joncandy/albums/with/72157659435809474

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 8 Comments