Anti climax as Manchester City win as they please at awe struck Cardiff.

I’m not going to spend a few paragraphs trying to describe what it is that makes those watching enjoy a football game that they will recall with affection in the future, but, despite the presence of one of the greatest Premier League (and old First Division) teams ever, the biggest crowd watching a Cardiff City match in more than forty years and nationwide television coverage on the BBC, our 2-0 loss to Manchester City yesterday in the Fourth round of the FA Cup didn’t possess whatever it is that makes a football game great, or even memorable, in my opinion.

I’ll accept that this is a harsh judgement, but I came away at the end of it all feeling curiously flat. Manchester City had lived up to their billing and so I suppose they had fulfilled their part of the bargain, so, presumably, it was our contribution which led to my sense of anti climax?

The trouble with being too critical of our contribution towards a game where I found it hard to shake off the feeling that, if we had scored, our opponents would have promptly gone straight up the pitch to restore their two goal lead is contained in those very words – recognition has to be given to a Man City team that were a long way from having the individual and collective off day that was required to make yesterday’s game into a memorable occasion, as opposed to the procession it became.

Right from the first whistle, the visitors looked as if they meant business and the warning bells had been ringing even before Joe Ralls was, perhaps harshly, penalised for a foul on Gundogan in the fifth minute. What followed though brought home the size of the challenge facing City as Kevin DeBruyne drilled his twenty yard free kick under the corner of a jumping City wall and into the corner of the net as Neil Etheridge looked on helplessly some ten yards away from the other side of the goal to where the ball entered the net.

In some circumstances, a goal like that would be seen as something of a fluke, but you just knew that it was not bad luck that had undone City, it was a combination of talent and attention  to detail that you see only from the very best.

For a start, De Bruyne has form when it comes to scoring free kicks in such a manner – as shown with this one from last season. Secondly, the scorer revealed after the match that Pep Guardiola had noticed during his scouting trip to watch our Third round replay win at Mansfield that all of the players in our wall had jumped when defending a free kick in a similar position.

So, combine an ability to do things with a ball that you don’t see from most other sides with a scouting system that picks up the small details when it comes to weaknesses in upcoming opponents play and you get an idea of what City were up against yesterday.

However, it goes further than that. I’d known about Guardiola’s “six second rule” and had seen his Barcelona team of around eight years ago (the best club side I’ve seen) combine amazing talent with an almost fanatical work ethic in their quest to completely dominate all opposition, but it was another thing to be actually at a game to watch how hard they worked to regain possession on the rare occasions when they lost it.

So many of the people around by me would cheer whenever a City player managed to get a toe in to win the ball as, for no more than a second, they sensed that the opportunity was there to put together a swift counter attack, but, invariably, just as quickly as possession had been won, it was lost again as it was our opponents who would be sweeping forward on the counter to threaten our goal once again.

For me, the one thing above all others which makes Guardiola one of the great manager/coaches is that he has a knack of producing sides which combine outstanding football skill with a tremendous work ethic – nearly fifty five years of watching football at all sorts of levels has taught me that you can often get one of those qualities in a side, but it is very rare to get them both together.

Therefore, I went to yesterday’s game with the attitude that we would be up against a side that was better with the ball than any team we had faced this season – no great surprise there, but there was a feeling that they may well be the best we had come up against when not in possession as well.

However, it was only when I saw the whole Man City package in action that I fully realised the size of the challenge we faced. Before the game, I had said on a City messageboard that, although I couldn’t see beyond a Man City win, I thought we could cause them problems in a couple of areas.

I’ll come to one of them later, but the other one was from attacking set pieces where I figured what would be a significant height advantage could pay dividends. However, when we were awarded free kicks in the sort of areas that usually allow us to send Sean Morrison and co up from the back to cause Championship defences plenty of problems, our opponents yesterday simply set their defensive line so high that it became very hard for whoever was taking the free kick to connect with their target in an area which might put the Man City goal under threat.

When it came to corners, I’d read a fans column on Wales Online last week which said that City had a “puncher’s chance” of causing an upset. I thought that was quite a neat way of describing our chances of making it into Round Five, but it shows the extent to which we were unable to lay a glove on our opponents that we only gained two corners all game – they came in quick succession sometime around the eightieth minute with the first, taken by Joe Ralls, producing  a scramble which led to the obligatory shout from the Canton Stand for a penalty for handball whenever the ball goes anywhere within yards of an opponents arm and the second was carelessly wasted by Junior Hoilett.

Morrison and Callum Paterson were able to get their heads on the odd long throw and occasional free kick to provide a hint of what might have been, but, generally speaking, the visitors were just too canny for us in the way they went about defending their goal.

So, all of the above needs to be borne in mind in any assessment of our performance yesterday – various people (including our manager) had called Man City the best club side in the world in the build up to the game, but I can’t say that with any certainty, just as I can’t state categorically that they are the best in Europe, but what I am clear about is that they are the best, by some distance, that this country has to offer, so, inevitably, they should have been too good for us.

Yet, I just cannot shake this feeling that not only did we make it easy for Man City to slip into their rhythm right from the first whistle, but also that the way we went about trying to recover from conceding that early goal played right into our opponent’s hands.

Yes, I know the challenge facing us was about as tough as it gets, but there are precedents out there involving teams from our division that show that it is possible for a Championship side to give Man City the sort of testing encounters that they so manifestly didn’t get yesterday.

Early in the season, albeit in a game between two under strength teams, Wolves took Man City all of the way at the Etihad in the League Cup before succumbing in a penalty shoot out following one hundred twenty minutes of goalless football. More relevantly, just as in the first leg, it took a goal in added time to separate Guardiola’s team and Bristol City at Ashton Gate last Tuesday as they clinched a 5-3 aggregate win against opponents that had shown the temerity to “have a go”at their betters both at home and away.

Sadly, we started the match in a manner which reminded me of the recent game at St James Park where Newcastle sat with ten men behind the ball from the off as they tried to bore Man City to distraction (it didn’t work, they also got beat 2-0) – Neil Etheridge had already been forced into the first of a string of good saves before DeBruyne’s early strike.

I found myself comparing our timidity in those opening minutes to what we had seen from Newport County as they more than made up the huge gap (bigger than the one between us and Man City I’d say) in terms of league position, playing strength and resources to come out of their game with Spurs at Rodney Parade on Saturday disappointed to have only drawn 1-1.

It did look as if we had found some of Newport’s boldness for a while as Hoilett’s long range shot was grabbed just before it crossed the line after it had been fumbled by keeper Bravo and Joe Bennett did very well to get clear of his marker to whip in a beautiful cross that Paterson was very close to nodding home, but, largely, the second of the two things I thought we needed to do to cause our illustrious opponents defensive problems refused to happen.

I’m referring to rediscovering Kenneth Zohore’s attacking mojo. I thought he showed up pretty well at times as he held on to the ball when under pressure and was able to bring team mates into play, but his hesitant response when played into the sort of areas where he could have stretched Man City’s full backs and central defenders was very telling.

The Zohore of the second half of last season and the early part of this one would have used his pace and power to drive at his opponents in a manner which would have got a crowd that was desperate to applaud anything that their team did even adequately involved, but, instead,  Zohore’s response appeared to betray someone who is going through something of a crisis of confidence when he gets into the sort of situations that he was relishing a few months ago.

Also, unfortunately, yesterday’s match only reinforced something that I think was generally accepted by City fans – we are very poor at passing the ball for a team that currently sits third in the Championship.

Of course, given what I’ve already said about how difficult Man City make it for you to retain possession, you could hardly expect one of the poorest sides in the second tier when it comes to keeping the ball to suddenly start popping it around like, say, Fulham on a good day, but the fact that we barely seemed to try to pass the ball in a half decent fashion before someone resorted to lumping it was still disappointing.

This season especially, the  Championship seems a league where more sides are resorting to a long ball game and, with so many of our recent signings being six foot tall or above, we very much seem to be going down the road where we are looking to succeed through power based, direct football.

Although, increasingly, it seems to me that we need to pass the ball better than we do (maybe the, up to now, pretty anonymous Marko Grujic can eventually help bring about an improvement in that department?), we might just have enough to turn our current high position into a top two or Play Off winning one come May – although I can’t help thinking that their passing was probably better than ours is currently, there are sides that have made it into the Premier League playing similar type football to us (Sheffield United and Stoke spring to mind).

Yes, I know we were up against the best yesterday and it should not be forgotten that Hoilett was unlucky with a fine shot that flew narrowly over as we managed to build up some pressure towards the end of the game, but, while our present way of playing just might be able to get us promoted, I saw nothing yesterday to indicate that we would be able to survive, let alone prosper. in the Premier League if we continue to undervalue possession of the ball in the way we do at the moment.

I cannot finish without mentioning Bennett’s sending off. First thing to say is that the tackles were out of character for a player who had only been shown red twice previously in his getting on for two hundred and fifty senior appearances. At the ground, I thought the full back’s foul on Leroy Sane was a cynical one aimed at stopping someone from moving into a goal scoring position that was worthy of a yellow card, but having watched it again now, I thought it was far worse than, for example, the one that saw Sunderland’s N’Dong sent off in their recent game down here and so, surely, a red card would have been the correct punishment?

Neil Warnock made a fair point I suppose when he argued that it’s hard to get tackles right against players that can move as quickly as Sane does and I completely agree with our manager about Bennett’s second yellow card. Having got lucky with the first challenge (as his team did when a goal by the impressive Bernado Silva was ruled out thanks to a very dubious looking offside decision), it’s hard to know what went through the full back’s mind as he dived into another tackle well into added time which ensured that he will miss next week’s game at Leeds. The match was as good as over at this stage and our manager described Bennett’s poor second tackle as “absolutely pathetic” and “disrespectful to his team mates”.

Bennett’s dismissal put the tin hat on an evening that saw a team that has done so well this season cast in a pretty poor light – I had gone to the ground not expecting to see us featuring in tonight’s Fifth round draw, but hoping that we would do ourselves justice, I’m afraid I don’t think we did.

 

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 26 Comments

The strange case of Cardiff City’s inability to fire when they play with a back three.

There was a thread on the City messageboard I use most last week in which readers were invited to nominate their best Cardiff team from players who have turned out for us this Millennium. I had a go at it and was reminded of something I knew anyway – we’ve had an awful lot of good centrebacks since 1 January 2000!

A list of the candidates that I decided to leave out tells you all you need to know about the strength in depth we’ve had in this area down the years. Loyal servant and hero of the never forgotten FA Cup win over Leeds sixteen years ago Scott Young barely featured in my thoughts, James Collins, Darren Purse, Glenn Loovens, Roger Johnson, Mark Hudson, Ben Turner, Matt Connolly, Steven Caulker, Sean Morrison and Bruno Manga were considered and cast aside, while others such as Gabor Gyepes and Anthony Gerrard who were decent players for us were not considered at all and I’m sure there are one or two others that I’ve not mentioned at all who may be regarded as candidates by some.

Turning to the current day, I think all you need to say about the depth and quality we have in this area is that Connolly, our Player of the Season two years ago, someone who was a regular in Neil Warnock’s title winning QPR side in 10/11 and someone who has played an important part in three other promotions from this division since then, has barely been able to get in our matchday squad, let alone the team, this season – before anyone says ah, but he’s old and over the top now, I should inform you that he only turned thirty in September.

Switching sports for a while, it’s said that the Australian attitude in cricket towards the selection and captaincy of their test team is to pick their best eleven players and then the one who seems to have the most in terms of leadership qualities becomes captain. The claim back in the eighties was that someone like England’s Mike Brearley, a fairly ordinary batsman who was still picked by the selectors for his outstanding ability as a captain, would never have got near the Australian team.

This is relevant as far as Cardiff City in 2017/18 is concerned, because, if it was ever decided that the best eleven players at the club would be selected every week, if fit and available, then I believe that Morrison, Manga and Sol Bamba (who was one of the two centrebacks in my team of the Millennium selection along with Danny Gabbidon) would be there in the side game after game.

This is why I’ve been an advocate of us playing three centrebacks for the last few years. I was pushing the merits of playing Connolly, Morrison and Manga as a central defensive trio before Bamba signed for the club and spent the summer of 2016 looking forward to watching the three of them launch a new era of possession based, cultured football at the club founded on a defensive unit comprising three players who were well above the standard of the average level of performance in that area at this level.

Well, we all know what happened to Paul Trollope’s Brave New World! I think it’s probably fair to say that when the highly regarded coach was sacked less than two months into the campaign, the main reason why we found ourselves last but one in the Championship was more to do with our inability to put the ball in the opposition net than keeping it out of our own, but, nevertheless, three at the back had not worked and there were very few dissenting voices when new manager Neil Warnock opted for a more orthodox back four in his early matches in charge.

Yet, I suspect that even our manager, who I believe would be happy to accept the description “football traditionalist” for some of what that term entails at least, must have looked at his squad in training and wondered how he could get three out of Connolly, Morrison, Manga and Bamba into his starting line up.

This might explain why it was a back three put in an appearance at times as last season was transformed from a relegation struggle into a comfortable mid table ending that even included the sniff of a top six finish at times. It may also explain why, as Connolly drops out of contention, Neil Warnock still seems to want to get the names Morrison, Manga and Bamba on his team sheet this season.

Mr Warnock has been in charge at Cardiff for getting on for sixteen months now and going into matches with three centrebacks has remained a theme, albeit an intermittent one, of that period.

As someone who has championed this cause for years, you would think that I would be all in favour of that, but, after watching our 0-0 draw with Sheffield Wednesday at Hillsborough yesterday evening, I admit defeat – the current crop of City centrebacks are just not suited to playing three at the back and the system should be consigned to the dustbin for the foreseeable future!

I say that even though I daresay some would look at that final score and conclude that, by keeping a clean sheet, which ensures we are 80 per cent of the way towards achieving the pre season target of fifteen, the system must have worked – after all, isn’t the first priority for any centreback to defend the goal of the side they are playing for?

My answer to that question has always been yes it is, but I would argue that, this time at least, the reason we didn’t concede a goal wasn’t because of the performance of our centrebacks, it was despite it!

I don’t know whether it’s because having that extra insurance through the middle that having three centrebacks, as opposed to two, should provide causes a feeling of uncertainty or, possibly, complacency whereby you get the thought “someone else can deal with that rather than me” or not, but, whatever the reason, cases where Neil Warnock’s use of three centrebacks can be classed as conspicuous successes are thin on the ground.

Yes, the formation may have worked to a fashion (as it did yesterday I suppose) on the odd occasion, but is our goals against record when we play with a back four under this manager worse than when we play with a back three? Not having access to the sort of comprehensive statistical and analytical data that is considered to be the norm at professional football clubs these days, I cannot provide the definitive answer to the question I ask, but I strongly suspect that it is no, it isn’t – in fact it’s better!

To repeat, although the first priority when playing in a back three should be defending, the theory is that the standard of passing out from the back should be improved because there will be a little bit of extra time on the ball for each of the three players involved. So, it could be argued that this will in turn lead to an improvement in the quality of attacking play – if there is evidence to suggest that this has happened when we play three at the back, then it it is too subtle for me to have noticed it. Last night for example, I’d say it could be argued that this happened for the first half an hour or so, but, overall, we gave another demonstration as to why only two sides in the top half of the Championship (Middlesbrough and Preston) have scored less goals than us.

To look at our three centrebacks individually, Manga had another of those “dreamy” games where you wonder if his mind is completely on the task in hand. As far as Sean Morrison is concerned, the fact that we have conceded just once in the four games since he came back from injury only strengthens the suspicion that, out of all of the players who have suffered medium to long terms injuries this season, he is the one whose absence caused the most problems.

However, even the player I’d rate as our most consistent defender this season allowed the man he was supposed to be marking to make a run in behind him which could have resulted in us going 1-0 down in the first half and, while the main blame for what was, arguably, Wednesday’s best chance of the game lie with Joe Ralls for a wayward header, I thought it was a situation which Morrison would usually have dealt with.

As for Bamba, he was skinned down the left inside the opening minute and that set the tone for what was, by his standards, an error strewn display, with another piece of poor defending by the left hand touchline giving our opponents the chance to create their other contender for best chance of the match.

No, although I’d again rate Morrison the best of them, our three centrebacks’ individual contributions were some way short of the standards they’ve set themselves during their time at Cardiff, while, as a unit, they again did nothing to advance the claims of a back three over a flat back four.

This time I’d say the main reasons for our clean sheet were twofold – Neil Etheridge continued his good form since being recalled to the team after a two game absence and Wednesday’s finishing was of the standard you would expect from a team that has now failed to score in five out of its last six matches.

The home side were one of my tips for a top six finish this season, but the gradual decline in the quality of their attacking play during the time Carlos Carvalhal was manager has continued until it cost the Portugese his job a month or so ago. Therefore, with an injury list that makes ours look like a minor inconvenience, perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised by how ordinary they looked early on compared to the team that were one of the better visiting sides to come to Cardiff City Stadium this season in a 1-1 draw back in September.

Wednesday were there for the taking early on and maybe we would have done so if it were not for the dubious decision by Premier League referee Roger East to deny Kenneth Zohore what would have been the sort of goal which could have snapped him out of his current malaise. Our first choice striker is not getting much luck in front of goal at the moment, but, with Neil Warnock saying in his pre game press conference that he feels Zohore’s main problems now as he recovers from his two months out are mental not physical, I do think he lets his head drop too easily.

However, generally speaking, our performance matched that of our recent loan signing Yanic Wildschut – a lively first third and then, generally, second best. Wildschut did have our best attacking moment in what was a very barren second half when his shot from the edge of the area whistled narrowly wide, but, as Neil Warnock said after the game, he looked like someone who was making his first start in a couple of months as the game went on.

Our manager thought the same about Marko Grujic who managed to pick up a yellow card within ten minutes of his City career, brought an element of order to our midfield and then waned as an influence, before being withdrawn for Callum Paterson in what I would class as an okay debut overall.

Also, there was an unexpected plus as Kadeem Harris was named on the bench and saw his first glimpse of senior team action of the season as he replaced Junior Hoilett for the last ten minutes or so.

Finally, to return to Messrs Morrison, Manga and Bamba, there are two other methods by which Neil Warnock has managed to get the three of them into the starting line up. First, the experiment of using Bamba as a sitting midfield player has had mixed results overall, but, having mentioned “conspicuous successes” earlier, I would say that term could be applied to two games when it happened (Villa at home last season and Leeds at home this) – Bamba as a midfielder appears to work when it takes opponents by surprise and I’m sure we’ll see it again.

The other method is whereby Manga is picked as a right back. There has been some criticism from fans of how Bruno fares when faced by a particularly pacey winger, but team results have generally tended to be good when he moves out wide – he also gives us a bit of quality when he goes forward from that position. With Jazz Richards back and giving the sort of good quality, quietly efficient, performances that I’d say are his trademark and Lee Peltier not far off a return seemingly, I wonder if we will see much of the Bruno at right back approach in the future, but I’d call it a success overall and, to show how much my attitude has changed, would prefer it now to a Morrison, Manga, Bamba back three!

 

 

 

 

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged | 10 Comments