Brilliant in the Championship, but how will Neil Warnock try to transform his Premier League fortunes?

I don’t know if it’s the same for most City fans, but it’s still too soon for me to try and place where this latest promotion rates alongside the other ones I’ve experienced – in lots of ways, five days after the event, it’s still not really sunk in yet for me.

This was the ninth promotion for the club since I first saw them play in 1963 and my gut instinct is that it will become one of my favourite ones, primarily because it was so unexpected. One thing I can say with some certainty is that this promotion will come to be associated with one person more than the other eight were.

I say that while noting that Rick Wright was very much the driving force behind the 1992/93 double winners who captured only the club’s second league title and the Welsh Cup.

Also, however he is viewed by City fans these days, Sam Hammam was the catalyst for our promotion to what is now League One eight years later. Indeed, the level of idolatry Hammam used to get back then was probably the equal of the man who will come to be seen as the architect of our second promotion to the Premier League. As much as Sam tried to involve himself with what was going on out on the pitch though, he was always a bystander like the rest of us once the action got under way, whereas Neil Warnock was there all of the time bellowing out instructions, making the fourth officials life a misery and plotting tactical changes and substitutions which, glory be, actually worked sometimes.

No, I can’t remember a person who has dominated promotion post mortems as much as Neil Warnock has done this time.

Right from his first game when a confident and in form Bristol City side turned up at Cardiff City Stadium for a televised Friday night game, only to leave deservedly beaten by a home side that had been in horrific form up to then, Warnock has been there front and centre – the natural target for any praise and headlines (and flak!) heading City’s way.

Read or listen to almost any of the stuff in the media about our season over the past few days and there will be Neil Warnock’s face looking back at you or his voice regaling you – there have been stories centred around Neil Etheridge’s struggle to stay in the game after his release by Fulham as he told it in his post game press conference on Sunday, but, that apart, it’s nearly all been about our manager.

You don’t stay in the game as a manager as long as Warnock has if you are not a shrewd cookie and, by making himself the issue so often, he has shielded his players from the publicity glare and the pressure which goes with it as the realisation that the “rash” that had infected the upper reaches of the Championship was not going to quietly go away.

Post match discussions more and more featured criticism of decisions by officials, occasionally opposition managers, teams and players, but, never ever, his own side – that might come a little later, but straight after the match there was always praise or a “I thought we did pretty well actually”, no matter how disappointing the performance and/or result.

Strange therefore, that as soon as I switched the radio on after getting into my car on Sunday, the discussion on Radio Wales in the post game phone in was about the possibility of Neil Warnock stepping aside this summer.

Now, there was a time when that notion would not have been a far fetched one. Warnock often talked of how he wasn’t a great fan of the Premier League and the attitudes he found in it in some Board rooms and dressing rooms. No, our manager preferred the muck and nettles of the Championship – an environment that it seemed clear he felt was a far more honest one for all sorts of reasons.

So it was, that I heard someone proposing, I think seriously, that Chris Coleman should now be appointed City manager!

Listening a little longer, I learned that the daft suggestion was in response to the opinions being voiced by Nathan Blake and Kevin Ratcliffe that City would need a different tactical approach in the Premier League, with Blakey very keen on the idea of bringing in a coach, hopefully one with widespread Premier League and continental experience, to oversee training.

On Wednesday’s Blakey’s Boot Room podcast he developed his theme and, by the end, I found myself agreeing with some of what he said. We need to have a plan B and plan C essentially, because the cuter teams we will be facing come August will be able to counteract what were our strengths in the Championship and we also need someone who could make us more precise in the way we went about our preferred mode of play, while also developing the tactical flexibility which will, almost certainly, be required for us to survive at the higher level.

However, although I have become more sympathetic towards Blakey’s point of view, is there really any chance of, firstly, Neil Warnock stepping aside over the course of the close season or, second, agreeing to the hiring of the sort of coach being suggested by our former player?

With Warnock having signed  a new contract which covers next season and him talking about now fancying another crack at the Premier League, the answer to the first question would seem to be a comprehensive no. Of course there were those (myself being one of them I suspect!) who were saying eighteen months ago that a relationship between such combustible characters as Neil Warnock and Vincent Tan was one that was doomed to failure, so the possibility of a falling out which leads to our manager leaving cannot be completely discounted, but there has been no public sign of such an event being on the cards whatsoever so far.

As for the second question, I’m going to play amateur psychologist here for a while and make a few observations about our manager. One of the good things about Neil Warnock compared to most other managers is that he’ll often answer questions honestly – yes, he’s there talking about “going all around the houses” today when he wants to avoid answering a question in media interviews and saying that football managers, like politicians, often talk a load of bull, but he is a more interesting interview than most in his profession because he is blunt and is prepared, to borrow the phrase he used to describe what his team would, hopefully, do next season, to ruffle a few feathers.

From the start, Neil Warnock was honest about his reasons for coming to Cardiff, and, by implication, why he resisted Rotherham’s overtures after their escape from what looked like an inevitable relegation after his time there as a caretaker boss – he wanted that record eighth promotion.

Similarly, he has talked about one of his motivations for staying in management in his seventieth year, was to prove Chairmen and directors who have either sacked him or chosen others before him wrong.

I also mentioned recently that he says that “building for the future” is not really an option at his age, so, you put it all together and our manager is, essentially, in the game for himself – most managers are I daresay, but they don’t tend to be as open about it as ours is.

Mr Warnock, correctly in my view, also talked of what we could expect from the national press next season. First time around in the Premier League, our “Bond villain” owner was fair game to the press and became, alternatively, a figure of fun or a hard nosed dictator prepared to ride roughshod over a club’s traditions – either way, factor in the all too public destruction of our owner’s partnership with the manager who had got us the promotion people had been waiting more than half a century for, and you have a club that got a very negative press back in 13/14.

With Mr Tan having taken a back seat in recent years, it may be that he will receive an easier ride of it this time, especially when you consider that we now have a highly experienced manager who has not been averse to naming a few hacks in the national media who have made a habit of writing negative stories about him.

On that subject, Russell Kempson was a football writer at the Times for sixteen years. These days he writes on Reading games for the Press Association and does a weekly column for something called Get Reading. So, no connection with Cardiff City you would have thought, yet in the last six months, Kempson has devoted the following columns to our manager;-

As Reading have shown with Stam, Cardiff should be wary with new Warnock deal.

Why Warnock thoroughly deserves a touchline ban

Fiery Warnock and Holloway lead the way for Championship touchline antics but another manager is threatening to join them

Why Neil Warnock should call it a day once and for all after ugly Cardiff display against Manchester City 

Warnock’s conspiracy theory for Derby County v Cardiff City game was a joke

Now, perhaps in the dim and distant past, Neil Warnock did something to Mr Kempson to provoke such stalker like behaviour, but, come on! Do the people of Reading really want to be reading about the manager of a club about one hundred and thirty miles away every six weeks or so?

The point here is imagine if Mr Kempson was still writing for the Times, the whole country would doubtless be reading completely one eyed stuff about our manager throughout next season and I cannot help but feel that there will be other journalists about who will ensure that there will be plenty of anti Warnock/anti Cardiff stories in the national press during 18/19.

Put all of that together with his prickly relationship with match officials and other managers he has had run ins with and you begin to see that there are going to be plenty of people around that our manager will want to prove wrong next season.

This brings me on to the “Warnock Way”, whatever that is. Our manager tells that funny story about when he was being interviewed at Norwich and that term came up in conversation about how the club’s fans would react to a team playing the Warnock way, to which the answer came “you mean winning?”.

Good, typical Warnock knockabout stuff there, but there’s also a serious edge to it and, I would suggest, a bit of resentment about the way his teams are perceived as going about their business.

So, to conclude my cod psycho analysis of our manager, I say that, first, he is going to want to prove a lot of people wrong next season. Second, he will want to do it by shattering the widespread belief that Neil Warnock is a very good Championship manager, but he cannot cut it in the top flight -his Notts County team were relegated from the old First Division in 1993, as well as the controversial relegation of his Sheffield United team in 2007 and sackings at QPR and Crystal Palace. Furthermore, he will set out to prove himself at the higher level by playing in what is called the “Warnock Way”.

I might be proved wrong and Nathan Blake proved right as we appoint a foreign coach with the intention of getting us to play differently to how we did over the last nine months, but it’s my opinion that the Neil Warnock psyche makes this very unlikely – like many managers, he has his preferred partners and I’m not aware of him ever working with the sort of coach Nathan Blake is, seemingly, talking about.

To conclude, I’d like to include a link to a good article which appeared on the Wales Online website yesterday which suggests, along with this recent piece where Wales’ Osian Roberts complements our defensive set up in our win at Middlesbrough, that the “Warnock Way” is not as straightforward as some, like me, have thought it was.

Certainly, our calamity at Derby apart, our defensive record over the season suggests that the tactical approach highlighted in those two pieces was a success. On the other hand, in my opinion, the attacking intention as described in the Wales Online piece became less and less frequent after a very encouraging start and the long high ball to an isolated striker who was not good at heading the ball, when Zohore was playing at least, gradually took over. It does show however, that it is wrong to write our manager and his coaching staff off as just being long ball dinosaurs.

I appreciate and agree with the argument which says we need to be better at playing the sort of game we have been doing and also that we will need to find a bit of sophistication and subtlety to turn to if we are struggling with the bludgeoning approach. However, essentially, although I’m not a great fan of the Warnock Way as I understand it, hasn’t he earned the right to give it a try at the highest level if he wants to?

Neil Warnock has got the record he craved at an age where he probably thought he would be seeing out his days working on his farm in Cornwall, who is to say that he won’t be able to prove his critics wrong in his latest encounter with the Premier League as well?

 

 

Posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch | Tagged | 8 Comments

This time Cardiff City reach the Premier League the right way.

I must admit to getting annoyed when, as has been happening with some supporters in recent weeks, the 2012/13 promotion is under mined and written off as not quite being the “real thing”.

That annoyance is felt not because an owner who made a major mistake from which the club has still not completely recovered or a manager who it turned out was shown to have feet of clay have never received the credit they were due. No, it is felt because a group of players, who did the supporters and club proud by comfortably winning the title (what else could they have done better than that?), have tended to be under appreciated because of all of the hoohah about the rebrand and the dispute between Messrs Tan and Mackay.

Those players were placed in an awkward position by Vincent Tan’s decision to change the colour of the club shirt, because they were hardly going to start biting the hand that feeds them. The large majority of footballers are, essentially  mercenaries – you get the odd ones who end up playing for a club that means an awful lot to them, the club they supported when they were a kid, but, essentially, they are guns for hire.

That’s not to say they cannot become supporters, as well as employees of a club (Kevin McNaughton and Andy Campbell made long journeys from the other end of the country to be at yesterday’s match to prove that), and I think it is one of the great plus points of Cardiff City that so many of our players retain an affiliation and an enthusiasm for the club when they become ex players of ours.

I can think of a few members of the 12/13 squad who have felt able to say what they really felt about the rebrand once they became former Cardiff City players (and there was the occasional hint from one or two of them while they were still here as well), so I’ll never stop giving them the credit for what they did five years ago and will always try to fight their corner when there are any comparisons being made between them and the current day squad.

However, I’d be lying if I didn’t acknowledge that the promotion achieved yesterday with a 0-0 draw with Reading at a packed Cardiff City Stadium has a better “feel” to it than the one half a decade ago. True, there are still those for whom the break they made with the club in 2012 has been a permanent one, but City has felt like a united club in a way it has not been for years this season – the absence of sub plots about the colour shirt we are wearing and off field personality clashes has ensured that, everybody has been pulling in the same direction this time.

I suppose, in an ideal world, promotion would have been achieved with a vintage performance and a win, but there seems to have been a tradition established in the last twenty years whereby if we get promotion confirmed in a home game, it has to be that it ends in a nondescript 0-0 draw.

I can remember a goalless draw with Scunthorpe in 98/99 when we made it out of the old Fourth Division which at least had some goalmouth action to it, but yesterday’s game was like the one against Charlton in 2013 – virtually incident free, except that it was even less of a spectacle in terms of what happened on the pitch.

I was going to say that I’ll waste little time on the ninety minutes of tedious football that had to be endured before we could start really celebrating, but I will go into some analysis of the game and how it was shaped by the crowd’s reaction to it. Now and again, the quality, or lack of quality, involved in what’s happening out on the pitch has little bearing on how it is a game is remembered – when a match makes the transition into an occasion, as this one did, the football almost, but not quite, becomes irrelevant.

The fact of the matter is that, with a draw being enough to suit either sides needs if events went a certain way elsewhere, there was always a chance that yesterday’s encounter might develop into one where neither side was exactly busting a gut in chasing the win.

It would be wrong for me to say that I first became aware of Neil Warnock the manager when he was with Bury in the late nineties. he had already been in the managerial game for almost twenty years then and had carved out a reputation for himself at clubs like Scarborough, Notts County and Plymouth. However, it was definitely at this time that I used to think of him as football’s 0-0 king. If your team needed to achieve a goalless draw in any given game, then you could do no better than have Neil Warnock in charge for it – our manager has moved on since then and our promotion was certainly not achieved on the back of stacks of 0-0s, but the knack of being able to ensure that a game doesn’t produce a goal is something that I don’t believe he has lost completely.

Similarly, Paul Clement really needs to make a success of the Reading job if he is to maintain the status of a good, or possibly great, manager in waiting which he enjoyed when setting out on his managerial, as opposed to coaching, career at Derby. He is still at a stage where he is being hired for his promise rather than his achievements, but he has shown something of a talent, particularly at Swansea, for getting unexpected 0-0 draws away from home.

So, we had a contest between two sides managed by men who would appear to be pretty adept at making sure their side doesn’t lose if that is all that is required – given how things panned out, is it really that much of a surprise that the game turned out to be such an insipid one?

Certainly, Reading, knowing that a point would be enough for them, made it clear that was the limit of their ambitions from the start. The game stats from the BBC make for interesting reading for a few reasons, not least that, almost uniquely this season, we dominated possession against a team that it was almost impossible to get the ball off last season, by 54/46!

Leaving aside for now the possibilities raised by letting us have more of the ball in the belief that our lack of creativity would ensure a pretty easy ride for any opposing team, the stats also show just the one goal attempt by Reading and it wasn’t on target. Of course, there is always the dread that your opponents might conjure up a goal out of nothing, but, honestly, the only time I truly feared we might concede was when it seemed for a split second that one of their players was going to get a free header from a second half corner, but, in true City style this season, someone from our team got in to divert the ball behind.

With their time wasting started from the first whistle, Reading’s sole concern was denying us the win that we went into the game needing. Well, once we got our usual first few minutes of giving our opponents all of the possession of the ball they wanted out of the way, we looked like a team who were looking for nothing less than the three points. It didn’t stay that way, but fifteen goal attempts is a decent figure – even if only three of them were on target.

Truth be told, it was a day for scuffed and scruffy shots from City – I can only remember a first half effort by Junior Hoilett that flew not far wide as an example of a well struck shot all afternoon. For the rest, even the one from Kenneth Zohore that was cleared off the line by Liam Moore late on, it was a case of players not catching the ball right resulting in a series of tricklers which rolled wide or, very occasionally, gently into the arms of Vito Mannone.

Was it the tension of the occasion that made our shooting so poor or, to come at it from a completely different angle, was it that, for much of the game, the players concerned may have known that it didn’t really matter much whether their shots went in or not?

I can’t answer that question with any certainty, but, I can apply how I felt for about two third of the game to this and so I would say it was because of the latter of those two options.

I’m not technically minded at all when it comes to these things, but it is a constant source of frustration to me that, while people in other parts of the ground appear to be able to get a decent signal for their phones when there is a good crowd at a match, I never can. With the same applying to those sat around by me at the corner of the Canton and Ninian Stands as well, I was forced to rely on crowd reaction to find out what was happening at St Andrews where Birmingham, level on points with Reading, but with a much worse goal difference, were entertaining a Fulham side who knew they were up if they got a better result than us.

It became quite enjoyable trying to glean what was happening in Birmingham – not being big headed or anything, but I was pretty good at it. Sometimes it was easy – for example, when the Canton Stand erupted around the fifteen minute mark when there was nothing happening on the pitch to justify such a reaction (take it out of it’s context, and barely any of the football played by City and Reading merited an enthusiastic response!) and when something similar happened around the eighty seven minute mark, it was clear that either Birmingham had scored or the final whistle had gone at St Andrews.

On the other hand, when a chant broke out from a section of the Ninian Stand of “three nil to the Birmingham” just after half time, it didn’t have the ring of truth to it for me and so I disregarded it. Similarly, I guessed correctly when what had been a continuous chant about us going up gradually changed into “all we are saying is give us a goal” – Fulham had scored at least once.

In the eight days since we won at Hull, I’d read and heard so much about had tense it was going to be during the Reading game, but, apart from about ten minutes when it turned out that the score at Birmingham was 2-1,  it never got anywhere like that for me, because it seemed fairly clear that Fulham were not going to get the win they needed and, with Reading showing little or no attacking inclination, a draw always looked well within our capabilities.

Indeed, such is the faith that I have gained in this manager and squad of players that, even if Fulham had got it back to the situation whereby nothing but a win would do for us, I think, by hook or by crook, we could have come up with that goal because that’s what we’ve tended to do in home games against sides from the bottom half of the table all season long.

A win would have been nice and I certainly could have done without the moronic pitch invasions and flares. I also would have preferred it if the closing minute or two didn’t include Gary Madine pretty obviously telling Mannone to take his time when he had the ball and the sight of City players standing about on the half way line, while Reading knocked it about thirty yards away. That was all a bit West Germany v Austria 1982ish to me, but, so what? Events elsewhere deemed that nothing that was happening was worthy of further investigation, it was simply what was bound to happen in the situation that City and Reading found themselves in at that time.

A perfect day ended with the Supporters Club Player of the Year do (apparently it was £72 a head, so you’ll be getting no eye witness account from me!) and perhaps the best tribute this group of players could receive is to think of the number of genuine contenders for the main award this season.

Sean Morrison was a deserved winner (the Hull game clinched it for me), but he only finished one per cent ahead of Sol Bamba. Joe Ralls’ cause was not helped by his late season injury and Junior Hoilett’s slight slipping of standards in recent weeks (completely excusable given his workload over the past ten months or so) probably scuppered his chances. Besides that, you have the underrated contribution of Neil Etheridge (a remarkably good Bosman signing from a League One club), Joe Bennett’s development into a top quality Championship left back and Callum Paterson’s goals and infectious attitude.

However, it’s when you consider all of those who have had what I would call good seasons, yet were no more than also rans in Player of the Year terms, that it sinks in just what an amazing season we’ve had – Lee Peltier, Bruno Manga, Aron Gunnarsson, Danny Ward, Nathaniel Mendez-Laing, Kenneth Zohore and Jazz Richards all fall into that category for me and I’m sure there are one or two others I’ve forgotten there as well.

I could go on at great length in a tribute to all involved, but I think it’s better I leave it to the man himself – Neil Warnock, the man who, more than anyone else, made our promotion possible – to do that. Here’s what he had to say at the Player of the Year do

“Vincent has told me how to manage my team this year… I’m going to tell him how to run his businesses next year!

But the biggest thing is that he cares, and not many people are daft enough to put the money in that Vincent has put in.

I have to mention Callum Paterson, the young player of the year, and he must be the youngest 45 year old I’ve ever seen!”

and

“It’s been great to be in charge of such a great group of lads, when I look around the characters – all of them.

People take a lot for granted in football and some people don’t get a lot of credit. I want to thank people like Neil Etheridge, who’s come from Walsall, Brian Murphy has been unbelievable.

All of the defender s, Jazz who has come back from injury, Pelts never stops moaning, Benno one of the best full backs I’ve ever managed, Bruno who would probably be the best player in our team next year. I’ve got big Sol, who we had to rescue today, along with Junior Hoilett – who both show what you can do with application. Bamba has done it all season.

The unsung heroes… I would play Matthew Connolly tomorrow if I had to. I’ve got my skipper, who could have gone to Sheffield Wednesday if he wanted to. That was great to have kept Morrison, who has ended up as good a skipper as I have had in 38 years.

I’ll probably forget somebody but my wife absolutely loves this bald headed, bearded viking – who has got a chance for the World Cup – and we all wish him every success. Incidentally, he couldn’t get in the team before I came.

You’ve got a young lad, Joe Ralls, who has been unbelievable since I’ve come and will only get better. If we hadn’t got promoted, we wouldn’t have seen Joe Ralls because he’d be in the Premier League.

I’d like to thank two loan lads who have done brilliant, Marko from Liverpool and Bryson who has got unbelievable energy.

Two unsung heroes for me are Loic Damour and Greg Halford, thank you to both of you.

Onto the forwards, Ken Zohore has been our mainstay.

The pleasing thing for me is people training hard when you can’t play them. People like Pilkington have been different class.

I’d also like to thank a player who has made me enjoy my trip to Nottingham Forest this year. Danny Ward.

Then we’ve got another one. Vincent mention Mahrez for £450k. But I get them from Rochdale for nothing! A massive thankyou and well done to Mendez-Laing. Also a big thankyou to people who came to help us out on loan, like Liam Feeney and Jamie Ward, alongside Armand Traore. Kadeem has trained relentless but not had a look in, but well done. And obviously Junior… I took him off the scrapheap and told him I’d get a club. When I went to QPR, he’d been thrown into the under-18s and I told him he could play straight away. I know what I’m getting from Junior and it’s a tremendous accolade to get the players’ player.”

Thanks to all of those mentioned and to the likes of Mehmet Dalman and Ken Choo, but, most of all, thank you Neil Warnock – I might knock the way your team plays the game at times, but you’ve been amazing for this club and I’ve not seen a better manager in my time supporting City.

 

 

Posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch, The Championship | Tagged , , , , | 25 Comments