Weekly review 22/7/18.

Top of the list to cover this week has to be Cardiff City’s week in Devon and Cornwall, where their results went as follows;-

15/7/18   Truro City 0   Cardiff City Development  2 (Pilkington, McKay P)

16/7/18   Tavistock AFC   0   Cardiff City   6 (Hoilett, Ralls, Madine 2, Reid, Ward)

17/7/18   St Austell   2 (Eddy, Goldsworthy pen)   Cardiff City Development   4 (Healey 2, Tinsley og, Veale)

18/7/18  Bodmin   1 (Gilbert)   Cardiff City   11 (Reid, Mendez-Laing, K Harris 3 [2 pens], Murphy J 2, Ward 3 [1 pen}, Madine)

19/7/18  Porthleven 1 (Beasley)   Cardiff City Development   9 (Healey 5, McLean, Evans, Waite, Veale)

20/7/18   Torquay   1 (Keating)   Cardiff City   1 (Murphy J)

21/7/18   AFC Liskeard 0   Cardiff City Development 11 (Tomlin, Shaw 2, Pilkington 3 [1 pen], Waite 2, Wootton, Healey, McLean)

The first thing to say is that senior players Stuart O’Keefe and Omar Bogle did not travel to south west England with the party – hardly surprising in O’Keefe’s case really, but Bogle has dropped a long way down the pecking order after his flurry of goals in the limited number of games he got after signing from Wigan.

Also, as can be seen from the list of scorers in Development team games, Anthony Pilkington and Lee Tomlin were used at that level – neither of them were involved in the three senior side games and the same applied to Lee Camp. Therefore, it seems pretty obvious that the five players I’ve mentioned are among those the club are looking to move on, but that might not be as easy as it sounds if they have all had wage rises following our promotion.

Aron Gunnarsson traveled with the squad, but did not get any game time because he was not considered to be ready to play yet following his late return to training after the World Cup, while Kenneth Zohore only featured for forty five minutes in the match with Torquay after being given time off after he became a father for the first time.

As for the results, well, it would be easy to look at that draw against a Torquay team which are now in the sixth level of the domestic pyramid following their relegation from the Conference last season and fear the worst for the coming season, but if the big wins against Tavistock and Bodmin are, rightly, written off as meaning nothing in terms of our prospects for 18/19, then shouldn’t the same apply for Torquay?

One other matter I’d mention is that both of the goals conceded by the senior side came via the same avenue – a long ball over the top which caught our back four cold. Now, normally what happens in these days of “sweeper keepers” is that there is a further line of defence able to nip such problems in the bud if your back four is caught too square and too far up the pitch by a ball played over them, but both of our keepers (Smithies and Etheridge) were caught on their heels and so allowed the opposing forward to get to the ball before them – this is the sort of thing which can be sorted out on the training pitch, but it is a little concerning that such basics were falling down against limited opponents.

Moving on, it would be interesting to find out just what Neil Warnock sees as the primary function of these week long trips to the county which is now his homebase. I believe this is the seventh or eighth time his teams have done it, so he, obviously, places great store by it. However, with the eyes of the national media on us so much more as we are now a Premier League club, it’s hardly surprising that the contrast between what we were doing and what probably all of the other nineteen sides in the division were up to as they jetted to all parts of the world was remarked upon.

Does our manager see it as a team building exercise first and foremost or is it a way to ensure that there is a winning mentality at the club right from the start? I suspect that both apply to some degree, but my feeling is that it’s the team bonding element which takes priority.

The truth of the matter is that, while not every Warnock led expedition to Cornwall has resulted in on field success, the precedent set last season says that, at Cardiff anyway, the approach worked as an unfancied team secured a promotion which was widely put down to a great team ethic that enabled them to perform at a higher level than their collective ability suggested.

Already, it’s being said, probably correctly, by many pundits that if Cardiff are to survive in the Premier League, it will be down to that united front which relies on everyone putting a full shift in as they cover for any team mate in trouble.

Hardly surprisingly, it’s been a quiet week on the transfer front. Matt Kennedy, who was released at the end of last season after a City career which saw him occasionally threaten to break into the first team as a regular starter, signed for St. Johnstone and I wish him all of the best there (he has the talent to succeed at that level).

However, it’s a potential move that is threatening to justify the “transfer saga” label so beloved by the press which has been the only real subject on that front this week with Neil Warnock suggesting that the clubs (City and Liverpool) want the move, as does the player (Marko Grujic), but the agent doesn’t.

Is that just our manager wanting to stir things up a bit in his usual manner or is he saying it as it is? There’s no way of knowing is there, but I read that Grujic will choose between us and Galatasaray (who can offer Champions League football) in the next few days.

I cannot deny that I have a little sympathy with the view expressed by some City fans about this loan move – while I would say it is over simplifying things to say Grujic is just not good enough full stop, it is a fact that he was more out of our team than in it as last season came to an end.

Neil Warnock says we are looking at two more signings (both of which will be loans), one of them is Grujic, while the other is a so far unidentified striker. Now, it wouldn’t surprise me if our manager, as is his wont, is being a little “economical with the truth” there, However, if we really are only looking at a Grujic type player in terms of our central midfield, then I maintain that, having lost the assets which Craig Bryson possessed more than anyone else in the middle of the park for us (e.g. box to box and closing down of opponents), we will be weaker in that area of the pitch than we were last season and we were hardly brilliant then!

No, the area where I have most doubts about our team ethic being sufficient to cover up for other defects is in the middle of the park – if we have to have “bread and butter”, can it at least be of the artisan variety – our manager is very keen on artisans after all!

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , | 15 Comments

One of the great World Cups, but what will 2018’s legacy be?

Russia 2018 ended with the Final it deserved – France beat Croatia 4-2 in the highest scoring Final since 1958 when Brazil beat hosts Sweden 5-2. That finale was enough for me to take 2018 above the 1986 tournament into second place, behind 1970, in my list of the best World Cups I’ve seen.

My previous piece on this summer’s tournament had been written at the Semi Final stage where I got things half right by predicting a France v England final based mainly on the fact that their respective opponents would be tireder than them. That proved to be pretty much the case as France stifled the attacking life out of the Belgians once they had scored the game’s only goal with a header from a set piece, but, amazingly, Croatia defied their two previous extra time and penalty shoot out triumphs to end up winners over an England side which had enjoyed the better of the first forty five minutes and had deservedly led 1-0 at the break.

Once the Croats had equalised midway through the second half, there was only one side in the game as, from somewhere, they found the strength to start winning the physical as well as the footballing battle to overcome an England side whose limitations were rather exposed in both this game and their 2-0 Third and Fourth place match loss to the Belgians.

Croatia had played their third consecutive one hundred and twenty minute game, but, such was the belief, bravery and sheer stamina they showed against England, that I dared to think that 2018 would have fairy tale winners, as a country with a population not much bigger than Wales ending up coming out on top.

The fact that Croatia could claim to be moral winners of the Final will count for nothing in years to come. For now though, the memory of their enterprising and skillful play in a Final where they got very much the worst of the decisions (VAR’s limitations when it comes to penalty awards for handball were again shown) made by a referee who was simply not up to officiating in a game of this magnitude.

Croatia have a right to feel hard done by, but, at the same time, they were up against the team which were, by far, the most effective of the countries that played the sort of game which I expressed reservations about in my previous piece on the tournament.

The sit back, let them have the ball and then hit them on the break approach probably hit it’s high spot in the tournament when hosts Russia beat the keepers of the old Tiki Taka flame, Spain, in the round of the last sixteen in a match that had the feel of a new order taking over from the old.

However, France were the team best suited to getting the best out of the new approach, because they had the attacking pace and quality in the likes of Mbappe and Griezmann to fully utilise the counter attacking opportunities they were set up to exploit.

France scored four in a game twice in their six matches in Russia 2018 as they showed those attacking skills to great effect, but it’s also true to say that there was another side to them. When Belgian players accused France of playing “anti football” against them in their Semi Final, it could, to some extent, be put down to sour grapes, yet you couldn’t help but think that Hazard and co had a point of sorts.

This goes to the heart of my fear that, for all of it’s excitement and feelgood factor, Russia 2018 might end up doing the game (and I mean the game here, not all of the incidental stuff that goes with it these days) of football more harm than good.

If Spain were the instigators of the old order, then France are the team to encapsulate the new one and, just like Spain at their best around a decade ago, the French are the example that followers of the new approach will aspire to.

However, it is inevitable, that the huge majority of disciples of any footballing fashion will not be as talented as those they follow. So it was,  that Tiki Taka floundered on the rocks as teams without the talent to utilise it to it’s best advantage became boring imitators that stuck religiously to the possession mantra while not having the wit or flair to know what to do with it – in the end, Spain went the same way as all of the others, as evidenced by their cowardly and clueless display against Russia.

France were able to show what they were capable of against Argentinian and Croatian sides that came out to play against them, but, even with Mbappe, Greizmann, the influential Matuidi, the indefatigable Kante, a Pogba who was finally able to show what all the fuss was about and a pair of effective attacking full backs, they were rendered fairly toothless against opponents that sat back and looked to counter attack them.

The only 0-0 draw of the tournament was between France and Denmark and it was comfortably the least entertaining game played in Russia 2018, as well as, probably, it’s worst. Denmark, were a team that had the considerable attacking talents of Christian Eriksen to call on and also possessed some of the required attacking pace to utilise the counter attacking game, but they were so, so dull – as were their Scandinavian counterparts Sweden (they had none of the attacking pace to counter attack effectively, so ended up relying on set pieces and penalties for their goals).

Here were two of those less talented disciples I was talking about earlier. Russia, for all of their over achievement and the drama it produced, were another and there were others – if sides embrace the France 2018 approach as enthusiastically as Spain’s was ten years ago, we are in for some dull, dull football in the next few years.

 

 

 

 

Posted in General football stuff | Tagged | Comments Off on One of the great World Cups, but what will 2018’s legacy be?