April 1971 and a journeyman called Charlie Woods breaks City hearts.

Coymay

With just over a fortnight of the 1970/71 season left, it looked as if the battle for the two promotion places to the First Division (there were no Play Offs in those days) would go right to the wire – the situation at the top of the table read as follows (it was two points for a win back then)

P W D L F A Pts
Leicester City 38 19 14 6 53 29 52
CARDIFF CITY 37 18 13 6 60 31 49
Sheffield United 38 18 13 7 61 37 49
Hull City 38 17 13 8 47 33 47
Carlisle United 38 17 12 9 56 40 46
Middlesbrough 38 17 10 11 57 40 44
Luton Town 37 16 11 10 53 37 43

Leicester had got themselves a handy lead and would go on to win the title, while Hull, Carlisle Middlesbrough (who drew each of their final eight matches) and Luton all came up short during the run in leaving it to a straight fight between City and Sheffield United for the second promotion spot.

Even though one of their remaining matches was at Bramall Lane, City’s game in hand had them looking favourites to regain the position in the top flight that they had lost nine years earlier, especially when it was considered that they had lost just one of their last fifteen league matches.

The feeling that this was City’s year was all the stronger when you looked at the games facing the two teams on 17 April as City entertained a Watford team safe from the drop but without a win in eight matches and a Birmingham team inspired by 16 year old Trevor Francis and on a run that had seen them lose just twice in eighteen games faced Sheffield United at Bramall Lane.

pic1970-71a

Whilst the fact that City’s last three home matches had been ground out 1-0 wins against teams that were mid table or lower offered a clue as to the quality of the football they were playing, they were getting the job done and a couple of good draws at Swindon and Middlesbrough in the previous two games had everyone anticipating another couple of points towards promotion that afternoon.

Now, from a distance of thirty eight and a half years, the memory can play tricks with you, but my recollection is that City did not play badly at all against Watford, but, no matter how hard they tried, they simply could not put the ball in the back of the net.

The first half especially was one way traffic towards the visitors goal, but Watford’s Welsh born keeper Mike Walker (who went on to manage Norwich and Everton) was having an inspired afternoon and, when he was beaten a couple of times, the woodwork came to his rescue.

There are certain matches when your team lays siege to the opposition goal and does everything else but score which you just know will end up with the opposing team breaking away to sneak a goal . That is precisely what happened about midway through the second half when Watford’s left winger Charlie Woods scrambled in the matchwinner  from close range.

After this shock to the system, the normal pattern of the game resumed with City dominating again in terms of possession and territory, but, although there were still awkward moment that Watford had to survive, there was now a frenzied look to their attacks as supporters began to see the promotion dream die right in front of their eyes.

Sheffield United’s 3-0 win over Birmingham only increased the suspicion that this had been a decisive day in the promotion battle as they edged two points clear in second place. However. when they could only draw 1-1 at Middlesbrough a week later, City’s fine, and very rare, win at Norwich by 2-1 courtesy of first half goals by Brian Clark and Alan Warboys cut the deficit to a single point.

Therefore City travelled to Sheffield for their showdown with United knowing that a draw would put them in a position where wins in their last two matches would see them promoted no matter what their rivals did in their final game. Sadly, it did not work out that way as, for the first time since he had dropped out of the side in January the defence really missed the know how and anticipation of the veteran Brian Harris.

Just as against Preston last season, City suffered a hammering in a match that was vital to their promotion hopes as the home team romped to a thoroughly deserved 5-1 win with City’s lone reply coming from a deflected effort by Harris’ replacement Steve Derrett.

Suddenly Sheffield United were in a position where they knew that a win, or probably just a point, from their last match would clinch their promotion and, coincidently, they were at home to Watford. In the build up to the game, Charlie Woods was quoted in the papers saying that his team would do City a favour by beating our rivals and as a fifteen year old kid at the time, I clung on to the belief that he would be as good as his word, but the supporters of both clubs had already made up their minds as to what was going to happen.

So it was that while a crowd of 38,817 turned up at Bramall Lane fully expecting to cheer their team into the First Division, just 15,772 (the third lowest gate of the campaign and nearly eleven thousand down from the last match at Ninian Park) were there to see City do what was required by beating Orient 1-0 in a poor game decided by Brain Clark’s first half header. However, although you got the usual brief surge of excitement when somebody starts a rumour that your rivals had been beaten, it soon subsided as it was confirmed that Sheffield United had won easily by 3-0.

City travelled to their remaining match at Luton knowing that there could have been thousands going along with them from South Wales hoping to see a great moment in the club’s history. Under the circumstances, it was no surprise that a Malcolm McDonald hat trick consigned them to a 3-0 defeat which left them in third position three points short of runners up Sheffield United.

Many City supporters old enough to remember that season are of the opinion that it was the Watford defeat that really cost us promotion in 1970/71, but I don’t agree with that because we had recovered from it to the extent that we went up to Sheffield knowing that we didn’t have to win the match. However, what I would say is that the Watford defeat must have come as a real shock to the system of the City team and management and, perhaps, the belief that they could go up wasn’t quite there after Charlie bloody Woods played his part in ensuring that it is now forty seven years and counting since we played top flight football!

17 April 1971

City 0 Watford 1

City Eadie; Carver, Murray, Phillips, Bell; Woodruff, Sutton, Gibson, King; Clark, Warboys

Watford Walker; Butler, Eddy, Franks, Williams; Welbourne, Walley, Garbett, Scullion; Woods (1), Wigg

HT 0-0

Att. 26536

Posted in Memories, 1963 - 2023 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on April 1971 and a journeyman called Charlie Woods breaks City hearts.

Are Cardiff City the “flat track bullies” of the Championship?

Coymay

Perhaps I am mad, but I am going to compare the present Cardiff City team with a former England test cricketer who was born in Zimbabwe here! Please bear with me while I try to explain what I mean (and to all of the non cricket fans out there, I assure you that you won’t have to read endless paragraphs about that, fantastic, sport here!).

Graham Hick was a batsman who never fulfilled the massive potential he showed when he first started playing for Worcestershire about twenty five years ago because he couldn’t handle the step up in class that came with test cricket. At county level Hick had a fantastic record and he broke records galore, but when asked additional questions about his technique and temperament by test bowlers, he struggled and in time, Hick became known as a “flat track bully” which meant that in ideal conditions (i.e. batting on a flat cricket pitch and against modest bowling) there was no one better, but if the pitch was doing a bit and the bowling was of a higher quality, then he wasn’t half the player he could be.

After watching last night’s 6-1 demolition of a hapless Derby County team, I found myself thinking of Graham Hick because I believe that our record so far shows that, in certain circumstances, there is no one better than us in this division, but, when it comes to the tougher tests, there still have to be doubts about whether this City team has what it takes to clinch the top six spot that we are told we should expect.

article-0-06A219EB000005DC-932_468x306We are currently sitting in fifth position because our goal difference is so much more better than the other four teams that have the same number of points as us and this is despite the fact that three of our four defeats have been by two goal margins. The fact that we have an average home record at the moment of three wins and two defeats is not reflected in our goals for and against record which shows that we have scored thirteen and conceded four. This, along with the 3-1 win at Plymouth, shows that when we do get on top in matches, there are few, if any, teams in the Championship as capable as us of taking maximum advantage.

On the other hand though, we are now the only team in the Championship who has yet to pick up a point after falling behind in a game and, so far at least, we have been the ones that back down when our opponents have stood up to the “flat track bully”. Therefore, questions that were raised about the mentality of the City team at the end of last season apply equally to this season so far – you can’t help thinking that too many of our players are too fragile mentally and do not react well to being put under pressure.

Automatic promotion, or even a top six finish, is not earned by showing you can win 6-1 or 4-0 when everything is in your favour, it comes about by fighting and scrapping for points when you aren’t playing well or are being put under pressure away from home. So far this season, we have only done that twice (at Blackpool and at Reading) and there will have to be more evidence of this over the next five or six games before I will start to believe that last night represented a real turning point in our season.

That fragility showed last night in the lack of professionalism that saw us start the second half off with ten men (players could almost watch an episode of Eastenders in the modern, ridiculously stretched out, half time break, so what on earth was it that kept Jay Bothroyd off the pitch for a further minute?), the sloppy corner we conceded and then our failure to deal with a straightforward cross knocked in from a deep area. Until we got the third goal, things were looking pretty dodgy for a while and it all came about because we started off the second half in a manner which a Sunday morning parks team would have been disappointed with.

Anyway, that’s enough negative stuff – a 6-1 win should be a time to accentuate the positive and last night there was plenty to be positive about. For example, the marvellous cross from Peter Whittingham for our second goal, Chris Burke’s lovely flick on for our third goal and the way Burke cut in to beat his man before superbly putting away our fifth goal but the biggest positives for me were the performances of Michael Chopra and Steve McPhail.

_46466828_chopra1st_huw226Before I talk about them though, I’d like to have a brief look at what happened last night from a Derby viewpoint. Nigel Clough was right to claim that his team paid for being so seriously disrupted, especially at centre back, by injuries. However, this made the decision that the visitors would play with a high back line and rely on an offside trap (a policy which needs much practice beforehand by the defenders as individuals and as a unit) when they had so many players out all the more strange.

Derby’s approach might have been understandable if, for example, they were up against a couple of static, target men type strikers, but given the presence of Chopra and McPhail, especially, in the opposition it was asking for trouble.

Our opponents may have set themselves up in a way designed to bring out the best in them, but Chopra and McPhail still had to deliver and didn’t they just! In Chopra’s case he gave a master class in finishing and playing on the shoulder of the last defender with his hat trick goal being my favourite, but, incredible as it may seem when we are talking about someone who has scored four in a match, I don’t think he was our man of the match on the night.

For me that accolade goes to Steve McPhail. On the way to the game I listened to Jason Perry describing McPhail as a “brave” footballer because, no matter how the team is doing he always “shows” for defenders looking to pass the ball rather than lump it upfield and he also tries passes that are ambitious but carry a risk of  losing possession thereby drawing groans from the crowd. I agreed with Perry regarding the first bit of that analysis but not with the second because for about fifteen months, McPhail has struck me as having become a “backwards and sideways” passer who has started to look for the safe option.

_46467197_chopra4th_huw466x260However, last night, given the chance to hit Chopra and others with quick and accurate passes over a variety of distances by the opposition’s tactics, McPhail cut Derby to ribbons. He also showed an ability to win the ball which hasn’t always been present and was instrumental in ensuring that the team didn’t start the match as sloppily as they have been doing recently.

Dave Jones copped a lot of flak for recently rating Steve McPhail amongst the best midfielder’s in the Championship and, any City fan who was seen much of his play over the past fifteen months could only assume that this was designed to boost the player’s confidence. However, are there many midfielders in the Championship who could have done a better job in unpicking the Derby defence with the opportunities he was presented with last night?

McPhail was presented with conditions which were all in his favour against Derby and exploited them to the full – the challenge for him, Michael Chopra and the rest of their team mates, that Graham Hick failed to meet, is to make a better job than they have done of handling situations where the odds are not so much in their favour.

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Are Cardiff City the “flat track bullies” of the Championship?