Weekly Review 27 May 2023.

Around this time last year, I apologised for the lack of pieces like this one in the past few weeks and explained it by saying I was waiting for Cardiff City to publish their retained list of players which should have been forwarded to the EFL some time in mid May.

The retained list was eventually published in mid June shortly before the EFL would have brought it out anyway, so it would seem that the list might well have been filed with the EFL on time (I’m not aware of any sanctions against City for late filing) and the club just didn’t bother telling supporters about it at the time. I can only assume that the same thing is happening this year and we’re seeing yet another example of City failing to communicate with its fanbase. Credit to City for the very reasonable price of 23/24 season tickets, but there is absolutely nothing coming out of the club currently to engage fans at a time when they want us to be buying/renewing season tickets.

On 27 April, City all but secured their place in next season’s Championship with their 2-1 win at Rotherham and they were mathematically safe by the time they wound their home programme up three days later with the 2-1 loss to Huddersfield. You would have thought that from that weekend the plans for 23/24 would have swung into action in terms of sorting the managerial position out and beginning work on the player recruitment which is absolutely essential given how close we came to relegation and three loan players, who were all among our most influential performers over the last three months of the season, leaving.

In the hours after the Huddersfield match, Chairman Mehmet Dalman held a meeting with representatives of supporters’ organisations in which the impression was given that Sabri Lamouchi would be continuing as manager.

In the four weeks which have followed, the only communication from the club has been the surprising news on 16 May that Lamouchi had left the club. As can be seen, the press release was in the short, raises as many questions as it answers style that we usually get from City. However, some media reaction pieces which accompanied it contained the news that the decision to part with Lamouchi had all but been made before a meeting in London between the Frenchman and club owner Vincent Tan had got under way – the Wales Online piece on the decision contained the following words;

“We’re told discussions did not even get around to a budget for players for the new season, with Tan believing Lamouchi’s time was up anyway.

Actually, there were a few quotes from Mr Dalman again in a BBC piece on 18 May in which I draw your attention to the final sentence in particular.

So, speed was, apparently of the essence, but the proviso that Vincent Tan will have the final say on things is becoming increasingly important in the light of the virtual news black out that fans, and to an extent, media have suffered in the last month or so.

It was reported that Mr Tan was in London as part of a Malaysian delegation for the King’s Coronation on 6 May, so I would assume that his meeting with Lamouchi took place a few days after our final game, at Burnley, on 8 May. It would therefore seem reasonable to assume that City have had close to three weeks to come up with a new manager and, despite the acknowledgement of the need for haste in that BBC piece I linked, there is nothing to indicate that we are close to making an announcement as to who will be leading us into the new season.

Going back to the start of this piece, I mentioned why it took me longer than planned to get the first of these summer reviews out last year, but there is an additional reason why it’s taken me a few weeks to write one this time – apart from what’s been going on at Wales under 17 level over the past week or so (more on that later), there has been absolutely no worthwhile City news to write about!

Although we’re now into the quieter close season period, ordinarilly, this would be a time when the local media especially would be full of speculation about the vacant manager’s post and the identity of players we’ll be looking to sign in the coming weeks, but there’s been hardly anything.

I go on to the Cardiff City News Now feed all of the time, but the sense of expectation I usually have when checking it while we’re looking for a new manager is completely absent because in the last fortnight or so there has been whole days go by without a single City story appearing on it such is the lack of anything for the media to feed off.

There was vague speculation this week that City would be looking abroad for their next managerial appointment with mentions for Turkey, France and Italy I believe it was (to be honest, I’m losing interest in the whole thing now, so I might be wrong there) from mainland Europe and the USA also coming up as a possible base for some of those we’ve targetted.

Closer to home, a Daily Telegraph journalist tweeted about a fortnight ago that the job was Sol Bamba’s if he wanted it, but the one that really says it all about how farcical the whole thing has become was the story that Vincent Tan has a “soft spot” for Steve Morison and was prepared to offer the man he sacked after just ten games of the 22/23 season back in September his old job back!

My opinion of Steve Morison has always been the same, I was never a great fan of his and would not have been bothered if Tan had sacked him after the 4-0 home humiliation by Swansea towards the end of the 21/22 campaign, Instead, Tan backed him to carry out the complete squad rebuild which was required last summer and then, having spent months believing there very little cash available for paying transfer fees, supporters were surprised to see £1.5 million being paid for Callum Robinson. On the face of it, this was a big endorsement of his manager by Mr Tan, except that he then decided to sack Morison a fortnight later!

I called Morison’s sacking the most ludicrous managerial dismissal in City’s history, but to bring him back some nine months later would be more ludicrous still and, if there is any truth in the story, then the club is an even bigger laughing stock than I think it is.

Let’s be clear about this, Morison’s name has cropped up as a possible candidate for a vacant bosses job at one or two clubs over the winter (Swindon springs to mind), but everything suggests that he is just another typical former Cardiff manager.

I’ll explain what I mean by that. In October it will be the sixtieth anniversary of my first City game (using the word “celebrate” doesn’t seem appropriate currently!) and, in all of that time, the only manager I’d definitely say has been “poached” by another club in what could without question be called an upwards move is Len Ashurst when he went from Second Division to First by being appointed Sunderland boss in 1984. Even then, you wonder if he’d have got that job if he’d not been a Wearside legend after playing more than four hundred times for Sunderland in the league.

I daresay you could make claims about people like Frank O’Farrell, Frank Burrows, Phil Neal and Ole Gunnar Solskjaer being City managers who left the club to go higher in the football world, but I’m not convinced by any of them. Ashurst is the only one whose work as a Cardiff manager got a “bigger” club interested in him and, when he left, it was not to become an Assistant to someone else like Burrows and Neal did.

The point is that Morison is like so many one time City managers who either never return to management or have to go down to a lower level to restart their managerial career after an unsuccessful time of it at their previous club.

The truth is that City have always been crap at picking managers if you measure success as the standing of the club they leave us for – looking back further than my first game, our record was not great then either. So, it’s not just under Vincent Tan that we’ve made poor, uninspiring and unsuccessful managerial appointments, but, especially in terms of quality of football, Tan has taken us into unchartered territory with what looks a very odd and mediocre collection of appointments.

When trying to figure out why this should be, you do, of course, have to factor in that all of the evidence of his dozen years and more as our owner screams out that Vincent Tan doesn’t “get” football, but, for me, there’s more to it than that.

I go back to the revelation that back in 13/14 after Malky Mackay had been sacked, Sir Alex Ferguson advised Ole Gunnar Solskjaer not to take the City job when it was offered to him. The man who is the best domestic manager of my lifetime’s judgment about my club as a place that an up and coming manager should not be interested in is not unique either.

Indeed, only this week, Jason Perry, in a Q and A session with Supporters’ Trust members suggested that managers see a move to Cardiff as possibly being detrimental to their career prospects. In doing so, Perry joined former City caretaker boss Danny Gabbidon who had said much the same thing in a recent episode of the Elis James Feast of Football podcast.

That’s the thing, Alex Ferguson was able to see that Cardiff was a possible managerial graveyard almost a decade ago and, in the intervening period it seems to me that this has come to apply even more.

Vincent Tan attracted a lot of criticism during our first season in the Premier League in 13/14 and, to be fair, the worst of it had an element of racism to it. However, there were also sound reasons for feeling that much of it was justified. The rebranding of the club’s kit was the biggest early example of Tan’s faulty footballing judgment, but, in the long term, I would argue that more damaging has been a lack of trust in “footballing people” which it seems stems from the Mackay/Moody episode that has held us back. As confirmed by the current Chairman, it is still holding us back – the lack of a Director of Football type of appointment is a huge problem in my book even though I did read someone make the very reasonable point that Tan would probably fall out with and sack such a person in no time at all if one was ever appointed.

If it is true that the quality of applicant when the Cardiff job becomes available is not of the calibre you would expect for a club of our size, then that may explain this feeling that nothing seems to be happening this time as we hunt yet again for a new manager. It might also explain why the club may be having to look abroad for candidates to fill the post – the cat is already out of the bag about Cardiff in the UK.

Despite our lack of on pitch success, the Cardiff job should still be one to attract some decent quality applicants even if our future is still unclear because of the ongoing Emiliano Sala cases. and the transfer embargo imposed because, bizarrely, we paid the first instalment of the transfer fee to Nantes, but not within the required timescale. This from a club that’s original defence in the courts was that they had made an error in the paperwork when completing the deal.

It’s all suggestive of a poorly run, error prone club and I’m afraid that I’ve now reached the stage where I have no great sense of expectation when the identity of our new manager eventually becomes known. There is no evidence at all which suggests that City will appoint someone who would get those season ticket sales climbing – quite the opposite I’m afraid.

I’ll finish this section off by saying that Luton face Coventry in the Play Off Final today. Whichever side wins, it will be a fantastic story of triumph over adversity when you consider that Luton were in the National League when Fergie was advising Ole not to become our manager and Coventry were in League Two when we achieved, and then wasted, our second promotion to the Premier League under Vincent Tan.

If it is to be Luton who go up, that will have much to do with the two Welshmen who have been their manager in recent times. Nathan Jones laid the considerable groundwork and Rob Edwards has taken over since the autumn. Rhondda born Jones is a former City player who is widely reported as being a fan of the club and was criticised by some for the manner of his celebrations when Luton won at Swansea in 21/22,

Jones is available now and wants to get back into management after his horror spell at Southampton, so, on the face of it, he’d be an ideal choice for the City job, but, instead, if he’s going to be appointed as manager of a south Wales club this summer, it looks much more likely it’ll be of the jacks!

Similarly, Edwards was free and available at the time we were looking for a manager after Morison’s dismissal after becoming Watford’s first sacked manager of the season. Like Jones, Edwards wouldn’t have cost us a penny in compensation and yet there was nothing to indicate we were interested in him (or could it be a case of him, and Jones, not being interested in us?).

When you consider the advantages Vincent Tan’s money should have given us over the two clubs playing for a place in the top flight today, there should be embarrassment at Cardiff City Stadium as to, first, how the huge opportunity we were handed has been wasted and, second, that, we are in a worse position on and off the pitch than we were before our owner arrived at the club.

I’m sure some will dispute my contention that we’re worse off when it comes to off pitch matters when they remember all of those threats of Administration and winding up orders under Peter Ridsdale, so, perhaps, I should add the word “potentially” to it.

There was a time when I’d look at our huge debt (much bigger than it was under Sam Hammam or Ridsdale), but be reassured by more knowledgeable voices saying that all of it was owed to Vincent Tan, so it wasn’t a problem

However, that has changed in recent years, Mehmet Dalman (or a company he’s associated with at least) is also owed millions by City and the latest accounts contain a mention of a further loan totalling millions from another party which remains unidentified at this stage – I’m not an expert, but there seems to be more potential around now for things to turn distinctly awkward for us financially.

This has been a pretty bleak read up to now so it’s good that I can end on what is a better news story – partially so at least. In fact, scrub that, I think this is a very encouraging story which, hopefully, means that we might be seeing the emergence of the best group of payers to come out of our Academy, in terms of strength in depth, since its inception nineteen years ago.

I’d already written on here about how the national Under 17s had become the first Welsh side at age group level to qualify for a major tournament since 1981, well they’re now back from having taken part in the Euros in Hungary and, although they fell at the first hurdle (i.e. the group stage), I’d say they came out of it with their honour intact.

I’m often quite critical of City’s Academy, but you’ve got to credit them for the number of current and former Academy members in the Welsh squad for the Euros – if wasn’t quite domination, but it wasn’t far short of it.

Captain Charlie Crew of Leeds was Wales’ best player for me. The midfielder looked a fine prospect and it’s a bit galling to think that at the back end of last season he’d played for our Under 21s as a fifteen year old before signing for the Yorkshire club, who will, almost certainly be in the same division as us next season, last summer. Similarly, forward Gabriela Biancheri was at City until January when he signed for Manchester United, while the team’s leading scorer Iwan Morgan of Swansea is also another ex City Academy player.

Even so, the original squad selection still contained seven current members of our Academy. Goalkeepers Luke Armstrong and Lewys Benjamin, centreback Dylan Lawlor, full back/wing back Luey Giles, Josh Beecher, who it seems can play anywhere on the left, midfielder Troy Perret and winger/attacking midfielder Cody Twose all were in the original squad and they were joined by central defender Alyas Debono when an injury necessitated a further change.

All bar Benjamin saw some game time in the tournament, Lawlor started all three matches, Armstrong, Giles, Beecher and Perrett two, while Twose started one and came on as a sub in another and there was a substitute appearance for Debono in the final match.

All three games Wales played ended up with a 3-0 scoreline. Despite dominating the opening half, two great chances missed at 0-0 by the same player (not one of the City contingent) cost them dear as a goal just before the interval followed by two more towards the end of the game gave heir Hungarian hosts a very flattering win.

By contrast, the Irish were dominant throughout their meeting with us and Wales could have no complaints about a defeat which confirmed their departure from the tournament despite them still having a game to play.

Wales responded to that disappointment superbly though and looked set for an honourable goalless draw against a Polish side which had stuck five on the two sides we’d played beforehand going into the last eight minutes when Biancheri nodded them ahead. Morgan then weighed in with a couple more goals of his own and Wales, who had been been the better team in the second half, came through to win comfortably in the end.

From a City perspective, I was most impressed by Josh Beecher I think who, besides doing a good job defensively in both of his games looked a creative player going forward – indeed, with an effort against the woodwork and a couple of shots saved by the keeper, he was Wales’ greatest attacking threat against Poland until the late goal rush.

While all eight City players now face the toughest part of their efforts to become a senior footballer as they start the stage which sees a possible transition from young hopeful to first team member, and it’s a process that the club have not been great at mastering for much too long now, you’d like to think that, this time, the sheer number we have performing at such an elevated level will mean that one or two of them at least are potential first teamers for us.

Posted in Out on the pitch, The kids., Wales | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Cardiff City looking for a new manager – again.

Just over a year ago (I think jt was on 13 May), Cardiff City announced their first signing of what was expected to be an extensive rebuilding job with the arrival of Forest Green midfielder Ebou Adams on a Bosman free transfer – Adams had been one of the stars of the team which had won the League Two title under ex Welsh international Rob Edwards’ management and had been selected in the PFA Divisional team for the 21/22 season.

There was some doubt as to whether Adams could manage the two league jump in standards at the age of twenty six when he’d played all of his football in the bottom two divisions of the EFL or lower, but it was believed he would be representative of a more realistic recruitment approach as the team moved away from the boring long ball style which had characterised Cardiff City for years, albeit with a declining degree of success.

Sixteen others followed Adams, but, as we now prepare for another new season, still no one knows yet whether the Gambian international can hack it at Championship level as a freak shoulder injury about five minutes into his debut pre season game followed by a series of other injuries and niggles meant that Adams never got to kick a ball in competitive action all season for our first team. He did manage to get in a couple of appearances for the Under 21s last month, scoring a lovely goal in one of them, but, just as he was finally getting fit enough to be considered for the senior side, the season ended.

I mention Adams because, after yesterday’s surprising news that City would not be extending the short term contract signed by Sabri Lamouchi back in January, he will be in the incredible situation whereby he will be w0rking with his fifth Cardiff City manager when he returns from holiday for pre season training in about five weeks time and yet he must feel as if his time here has not really began yet!

I wonder if any other player has had an introduction to a new club like Adams has? He was signed by Steve Morison, would have at least worked with Morison’s successor, Mark Hudson, in pre season training, bur would have been recuperating when the man who was a short term caretaker, Dean Whitehead arrived. Adams would then have had about three months working under Lamouchi who probably paid him little attention because he could not help in the relegation fight the team found itself in.

Yes, of course, what was Steve Morison’s brave new team with its revolutionary (by Cardiff standards anyway) way of playing had been ripped up and discarded after ten games and about two and a half months by then when owner Vincent Tan decided the manager had to go as the team struggled for points and, even more, for goals.

After that, City gradually underwent a transition back to the long ball team of old as a goalkeeper signed to play a full part in Morison’s playing it out from the back philosophy spent the final two thirds of the campaign whacking tt seventy yards up the pitch most of the time.

Ludicrously, a squad put together to completely change the way we played (with a consequent loss of old strengths like set piece ability at both ends of the pitch) went back to playing in a manner which did not, on the face of it, utilise their abilities to the full.

The truth was that, however City’s 22/23 squad were told to play, they weren’t very good at it and with home form wretched for a thrid straight season, they found themselves in a position where many, perhaps the majority, of fans were expecting to go down when Lamouchi arrived in late January with the team having gone eleven matches in all competitions without winning.

Cleverly, and probably correctly, Lamouchi made avoiding relegation the sole measure of success as far as he was concerned at Cardiff. Three straight losses represented a poor start, but he managed to stop the rot just short of a club record run of matches without a win and when we were able to scrape clear of the drop because of a points deduction for one of our relegation rivals, the Frenchman was able to say it was “mission accomplished”for him.

My guess is that a majority of supporters agreed with him in that respect. With Chairman Mehmet Dalman heavily hinting that he thought Lamouchi would get the job on a longer basis. it was widely expected that there would be an announcement to this effect soon after it became mathematically certain we would stay up shortly after our win at Rotherham on 27 April.

Such an announcement never came, but it was assumed this was because Vincent Tan (over here as part of a Malaysian delegation for the King’s Coronation) would be meeting Lamouchi in London for a meeting where the deal would be finalised and the plans for another rebuild, after the failure of the last one, would be discussed.

Except, the days following the meeting dragged on with no news until it was confirmed yesterday that Lamouchi would be leaving the club once his contract ends and, apparently, discussions at the meeting “did not even get around to a budget for players for the new season, with Tan believing Lamouchi’s time was up anyway”.

That quote gives the lie to what I believed had happened when I first heard the news – Lamouchi thought the budget for the tough task facing him over the coming months was not enough. If we are to believe the Wales Online piece, it might be that Lamouchi was not offered a big enough salary, but, maybe, it was as the quote states that Vincent Tan was not convinced that the former Ivory Coast manager had done enough to justify a further contract?

Predictably, our owner has been getting it in the neck from many supporters for what they see as more evidence of the crazy decision making at the top which has seen us tumble to the extent that we’re relying on points deductions for others to stay up. All of this despite us being a club pushing for a Play Off spot in the late noughties before the billionaire we all thought was the final piece of the jigsaw back in 2010 had even been been heard of.

I’ve said before that Vincent Tan has spent enough for City to have been far more successful under his ownership than they have been, but when blame starts being apportioned as to why this should be the case, he has to be the main reason for the Tan era having to be judged a failure.

The line trotted out by many, including myself, with monotonous regularity that the people at the top of the club do not understand the game and how we really should have a Director of Football is being heard and read an awful lot again. However, I’m going to say something novel (others might say mad!) here and ask is Tan right this time?

There are messageboard debates going on about the relative merits of Messrs Morison, Hudson and Lamouchi in light of Vincent Tan deeming none of them to be good enough for what he wants for his club. Lamouchi had always had the advantage of being deemed a “proper manager” by many as against the other two who, I presume, were seen as glorified coaches. I agree to the extent that I’d rate Lamouchi as better than Hudson and a shade better than the too abrasive Morison, but was he better to the extent that he had proved himself to be the man to take us forward for the next one of two years?

I rhink you have to put yourself in Vincent Tan’s position here. At this time of year in the previous two seasons, he’d found himself in the same position he was in last week when he met Lamouchi. In 20/21 and 21/22, Tan had appointed managers until the end of the season when he’d decided the man in charge at the start of the campaign was not up to the job. In both cases, he decided to stick with the replacement for the upcoming campaign. So it was that Tan found himself having to pay up Mick McCarthy’s contract after sacking him in October of the new season and then exactly the same thing happened a year later with Morison.

Given this, I think it’s reasonable to believe that Tan wanted more evidence during late January to early May that Sabri Lamouchi was a big enough improvement on Mick McCarthy and Steve Morison and he decided there wasn’t enough of it.

You could argue that Lamouchi was unlucky because circumstances out of his control meant that he had to perform that much better because of the failings of Messrs McCarthy and Morison. However, even if it’s accepted that Lamouchi was an improvement on Morison and Hudson and that he was certainly not working with anything that could remotely be called his team, his record was mediocre.

In my piece on the Burnley game, I set out my misgivings when it came to appointing Sabri Lamouchi for a longer period than the few months he was contracted for. I’m not going to go over them again here, but, having outlined my doubts, I’d be a hypocrite if I now started criticising Vincent Tan for the decision he had made. It would be completely unfair if I said I was not convinced by Lamouchi and then lambasted Tan for also not being convinced!

Yes, I was surprised by Vincent Tan’s decision, but I can’t really fault it if he had what I’d call reasonable doubts about Lamouchi’s suitability. However, we’re in a position where our embargo restricts us as to what sort of market we can shop in and to get the sort of quality in terms of free transfers and loan signings that I believe are imperative for us, we have to move very quickly – the signs are that we’re not doing that.

Mehmet Dalman has said before that all of the major decisions at the club are made by one man and that’s how this episode feels to me – Vincent Tan alone made the decision to let Sabri Lamouchi go.

This should really be a three step process whereby Tan makes his decision on Lamouchi, has someone lined up already to quickly come in as new manager and the recruitment people have fairly well advanced plans in place when it comes to transfer targets – the quality of loan signings we’ve made in the last three transfer windows suggests there are people at the club who know what they’re doing in that regard at least.

Tan has carried out step one and you’d like to think that step three is in progress, but step two doesn’t look particularly encouraging to me currently.

The almost complete absence of realistic candidates being discussed in the media in the last twenty four hours suggests that they’ve been caught on the hop by Lamouchi’s departure. It looks like there was a general acceptance that he was staying at City until yesterday’s club statement was released,

It seems to me that, at this stage, there are only two names worth discussing as our next manager. Sol Bamba has often been described as a future City manager and with none of the club’s coaching network being confirmed as having left with Lamouchi, it must be assumed that Sol is still in place. Therefore, on the face of it, you would think that his appointment as manager would be popular and cheap.

They were the reasons why Mark Hudson got the job in the eyes of many and we know how that worked out. Club “legend” (I think both Hudson and Bamba have earned that well over used description) or not, does Sol Bamba have it in him to not only transform this group of players into something better, but also oversee the arrival of the five or six new players who will have to improve a squad weakened by the almost certain departure of Sory Kaba, Jaden Philogene and Cedric Kipre?

If it was my choice, I’d keep Sol on as an Assistant Manager if possible because he has a lot to offer the club, bur I believe we can’t afford another Morison/Hudson type gamble at this stage.

So, that leaves just Nathan Jones for now. He’s available, has indicated that he is ready to go back into management after his traumatic experience at Southampton and has proved himself as a very good manager at Championship level – he also has an affinity for Cardiff City. and I think he’s made for us in lots of ways.

However, thus far, Jones has proved himself an outstanding manager of Luton Town and not much else. His spell at Stoke just did not work out and although I wouldn’t be overly critical of him in terms of results at Southampton (their record under two other managers this season ohem to be clearly the worst team in the Premier League), there were times towards the end of the short while he was there when the pressure seemed to be getting to him. To be fair, I think it was maybe more a touch of naivety and inexperience when it comes to dealing with the media at Premier League level from a very honest man that caused that problem for Jones, rather than any possible mental problems he was suffering from.

I like the idea of Nathan Jones as City manager, but can’t help thinking that a mixture of that honesty I mentioned and Vincent Tan’s autocratic handling of his club could lead to a pretty quick departure for the man from Blaenrhondda for reasons other than poor results.

Since about the time that Vincent Tan fell out with Malky Mackay and Ian Moody, I’ve always felt like there were plenty of men who could potentially be very good Cardiff City managers who will always steer clear of the club under its present ownership and this always has to be borne in mind when we find ourselves in the increasingly frequent position of needing a new manager.

Under different circumstances, taking over a club like Cardiff after a narrow relegation squeak would be seen as a good opportunity for a manager. However, let’s be realistic, we went through four managers last season, we’re under an embargo that only lets us bring in free transfers and non loan fee temporary transfers and we have an owner whose reputation within in the game is I daresay that of a non loveable eccentric!

So, even though I’m on Vincent Tan’s side to a large extent this time, I don’t think the decision to let Sabri Lamouchi go while we look elsewhere is a sign that our owner finally “gets” professional football, it’s probably more a business decision than a footballing one and now we’re in a “watch this space” position when it comes to a new manager. The appointment when it comes will probably be a surprise, but I doubt it if it will be a pleasant one!

Finally, I suppose it depends on how you view Nathan Jones as to whether Luton’s progress to to Play Off Final last night with a 3-2 aggregate win over Sunderland can be seen as proof of what a good job he did there or that he was just a supporting member of a cast which was able to carry on as if nothing had happened when he left.

One thing worth thinking about though is that Ebou Adams’ former manager at Forest Green, Rob Edwards is now in charge of Luton after they picked him up following his sacking at Watford around the time Vincent Tan was getting rid of Steve Morison. Could Edwards have been tempted here as Morison’s successor I wonder or, maybe more relevant, did Edwards’ name ever crop up at that time in Boardroom discussions at the club about our next manager?

Luton will face the winners of tonight’s game between Middlesbrough and Coventry (currently level at 0-0 after the First Leg) foe a place in the Premier League in around ten days time.

Posted in Down in the dugout | Tagged | 2 Comments