October 1983 and we’ve got orange nets!

CoymayDuring an e-mail conversation we had on the weekend my brother (who has lived in Birmingham for the past twenty years) confirmed something that I knew anyway – that he still prefers egg chasing to the greatest game in the world. There was a time though when he was a regular at Ninian Park – after leaving Lampeter University in 1982, he saw every home game in the 82/83 promotion season (he even made it to a couple of away games as well).

He didn’t miss too many at Ninian Park in the following season either and mentioned an incident that occurred in the game against Barnsley on 1 October 1983 during our exchange of e-mails that he believed proved his theory that, while I am better at remembering dates and numbers than he is, he is much better than me when it comes to visual matters like colours, patterns etc.

I had to accept that he was right. For example, I can remember taking part in a General Knowledge quiz where my team mates thought we were on to a winner when the quiz master announced that there would be a round where we had to give the shirt sponsors of various top football teams. They thought it would be a doddle for me to get maximum points whereas I knew all that was going to happen was that I was going to get humiliated – I am not remotely interested in things like shirt sponsors because  they are a complete irrelevance to me and I honestly couldn’t tell you the name of City’s shirt sponsors from last season!

However, my brother used the wrong example to try to prove his theory. He was referring back to the famous orange nets incident in the game against Barnsley where he believed that I did not notice that the goal nets had been changed from the usual white to orange. The truth was that as I entered the Bob Bank (which was all terracing in those days) from the Canton Stand end slightly in front of him I noticed the orange nets straight away, but chose not to mention anything because it would be so typically my brother for him to make an issue of it. I decided to leave it to my brother to tell me. I guessed that this would take seconds rather than minutes and sure enough about ten seconds later he piped up with “look at those orange nets, why have they changed them?”!

My feeling when I heard this was a mixture of amusement and exasperation – amusement for the obvious reasons and exasperation because I did not find the colour of the nets to be very interesting at all on a day when I was itching to watch the three debutants in the City line up in action.

That said, one of those making his first City appearance was striker Phil Walker. In a previous entry under this category which also covered the 83/84 season I touched upon the long list of players we tried at centre forward that year to try and replace the injured Jeff Hemmerman – invariably, they were not a patch on the man who had been far and away our top scorer during the promotion season and Walker turned out to be a case in point. As he had come from Third Division Rotherham on loan, my expectations weren’t great beforehand and when his negligible contribution against Barnsley was followed by another poor display in the next match he returned whence he came.

pickelsey

No, my main interest centred on the two players we had signed from Newport County in what has to be the most bizarre transfer deal in my time watching the club. We acquired Nigel Vaughan and Karl Elsey while Linden Jones, John Lewis and Tarki Micaleff all moved in the opposite direction to Somerton Park with not a penny changing hands between the clubs!

There was little doubt that the signing of Vaughan, a goalscoring midfield player who had just gained his first full Welsh cap was something of a coup, but while Elsey had been a regular in the fine County team that really should have been promoted with us in 82/83, it was more doubtful whether he could cope with the step up to Second Division football – by and large, I’m afraid he didn’t. Elsey was used as a utility player by City, but for me, adding a letter “f” at the front of that term would have been a more accurate description of his displays during his two seasons with us!

pictmicallefOf the players who left, Micaleff, who had become something of a bit part player after his return from an operation on the lower half of his body, was not a great loss. Lewis though was a hard working and skilful player who could be used in any left sided position and Jones who had emerged as a dogged and quick right back since making his debut as a seventeen year old in 1979 were first team regulars who had been on the pitch for every minute of league action that season until their departure.

With Vaughan becoming, arguably, our best player over the next two seasons and Lewis not quite making the impact that I thought he would at County, it’s hard to say with any certainty who got the better of the five man transfer deal, but if I had to choose, I would say it was County. While we spent the next two seasons getting relegated to the basement, Newport were able to maintain their Third Division status for a few years before things started to go terminally wrong for them in the late 80s.

Perhaps the most telling part of the story of the five man transfer though was the fact that Jones and Lewis, who had both been in a pay dispute with City before they left, increased their basic wage by signing for Newport. When you consider that City were a division above County and that their average gate was more than twice as much as Newport’s that season, it really does bring home how bad City’s finances were at that time and it is to manager Len Ashurst’s great credit that he was able to put together a team that survived pretty comfortably in the Second Division that season despite working on what could not even be described as a shoestring budget!

picjlewis2The team that year were always able to rely on the occasional good victory to keep them clear of the bottom three. For example, a week after the Barnsley match, Nigel Vaughan scored his first City goal as a Carlisle team that based their unlikely promotion challenge on a mean defence were comfortably beaten 2-0 at Ninian Park. A woeful Cambridge United team were thrashed 5-0 a month later and Huddersfield were beaten 3-1 in a fine match shortly after that. There were more defeats than wins, but the victories kept on coming at a regular enough rate for relegation never to become a serious issue.

However, clues as to the weakness of the squad were there in the number of heavy defeats they suffered – there were ten of them by a margin of two goals or more. The game against Barnsley turned into one such occasion as the visitors, who were below us in the table at the time despite having played a game more, cantered to a comfortable 3-0 win once they had dealt with some early pressure from a team containing three newcomers all eager to impress.

piclijones

Barnsley had a goalscoring midfield player of their own in their midst though. Ronnie Glavin was a classy, if inconsistent, performer who was easily good enough for the First Division on his day and he was in the mood that day as he ran the show. Glavin’s goal gave Barnsley a half time lead and, in a one sided second half, he added another after David Geddis had doubled the visitor’s lead.

City were a well beaten side, but they were a better outfit than they showed that day. Anybody watching that game would have expected Barnsley to finish way above City at the end of the season, but there was only a gap of one point between the sides come May and City gained full revenge in February when goals from Ian Baird, Gordon Owen (who left us to join Barnsley at the end of that season) and a Larry May own goal gave them a 3-2 win at Oakwell – from memory our orange nets had long since disappeared by then!

1 October 1983

Cardiff City 0 Barnsley 3

City Dibble; Elsey, Dwyer, Mullen, Bodin; Owen, Tong, Gibbins, Vaughan; Walker, Bennett (Matthews)

Barnsley Findlay; Joyce, May, Law, Chambers; Wilkes, Glavin (2), McGuire, Gray; Cunningham, Geddis (1) sub. Airey

HT 0-1

Att. 6,433

Posted in Memories, 1963 - 2023 | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Robust Ridsdale fights back.

CoymayIn the three weeks or so since my last entry in this category, there have been all sorts of rumours as to impending financial disaster at the club – some of it at least coming from people who you would expect to have a bit of inside knowledge as to the real state of things at Cardiff City. For example, someone on a Burnley message board (?????) claimed that we had come very close to administration over an unpaid tax bill (speaking of which, has our Chairman……. no, I’d best not go there!), there have also been claims about staff being laid off and that work on a training area for the Academy at the club’s base in the Vale of Glamorgan had to be halted because they couldn’t afford to pay the builders.

When this is looked at in conjunction with the announcement of the Platinum Ambassador scheme whereby the club wanted supporters to pay for 2010/11 season tickets in October/November and the launch of the Academy Foundation scheme which asks for a donation from supporters to raise a total of £20,000 towards Academy running costs then it’s completely understandable why the term “no smoke without fire” has been done to death on the messageboards recently. For my part, another term has come to mind when looking at these rumours – there is certainly plenty of “circumstantial evidence” around, but not enough for to me vote guilty.

All of this seems a little odd at a time when our Chairman is talking about us being debt free by the end of 2010, but I wonder if all of the rumours and innuendo are linked to the negotiations that are currently on going with Langston regarding the settling of their loan notes debt in that it probably doesn’t do the club’s cause any harm at all if there is plenty of gossip doing the rounds about it’s parlous financial state.

Anyway, enough speculation, what did Peter Ridsdale actually have to say yesterday? Well, it would appear that what he said on the GTFM phone in last night was very much along the lines of what he told a group of Trust members at a meeting  yesterday afternoon. In his radio appearance, Mr Ridsdale came across as being very positive about the club’s future and, as he always does, sounded very convincing in doing it as well. However, previous experience of occasions like this has taught supporters that what sounds very good in practice with our Chairman doesn’t always work out to be quite so good in theory.

PeterRidsdale4

In the interests of fairness though, I’ll report what I consider to be the four most important points raised by Mr Ridsdale without comment;

1. The club does have a cash flow problem currently, but he argued that every other club in the country has one as well.

2. He confirmed that the negotiations with Langston had stalled a while ago – after an initial agreement, the other side came back with added demands which the club could not agree to. However, Mr Ridsdale also said that he was of the opinion that things had now moved on and, recent telephone conversations with Sam Hammam in his capacity as Langston’s representative had him hopeful that an agreement could be signed off within days – he did add the rider that he had felt much the same way before and had been wrong, but his gut feeling was that things would work out this time.

3. As well as his comments regarding the Langston situation, Mr Ridsdale also repeated his view that he hoped the club would be debt free by the end of next year – that is that the loan debt to PMG will also be cleared.

4. It was confirmed that Mr Ridsdale is still in contact with Dato Chan Tien Ghee (in fact he speaks to him on a daily basis) and that the planned investment into the club will go ahead. Furthermore, it was revealed that there was another party who were also eager to invest in the club and he seemed pretty confident that this will happen.

However, it was made clear that there would only be investment from the two parties mentioned above if the Langston debt was cleared. Our club was considered a very attractive proposition for potential investors if the threat of legal action was removed and Mr Ridsdale argued that as Langston would not get paid anything without the sort of financial input into the club that Dato Chan Tien Ghee and a possible second investor were offering then it is in their interest to settle with what is currently being offered.

That all seems pretty logical to me and I hope Mr Ridsdale is right, but, essentially, it appears that in the last few months we have been back in another game of poker with Langston/Hammam whereby the club, probably struggling on the financial front through not selling one of Joe Ledley or Ross McCormack during the summer, is hoping that agreement can be reached. If it isn’t by the time that Langston/Hammam can use the option of taking the club to court again in January, then the future could be as bleak as those rumours were suggesting.

One other thing, Mr Ridsdale made it clear that he cannot comprehend why so many of the club supporters seem so cynical regarding the future. In particular, he sounded exasperated that some supporters could not take the Platinum Ambassador scheme at face value (i.e. as a goodwill gesture to the club’s support) – I think that is understandable from his perspective. After all, the CV he presents of his time here is an impressive one – he has delivered on the new ground as well as getting the club the sort of training facilities that they could only dream about three years ago, last season saw us finish in our highest position for thirty eight years and we reached the FA Cup Final two seasons ago and all of this has come about despite having a surplus of £22 million on transfers over the period he has been in charge.

The trouble is though that, as he acknowledges, our supporters deserve at least a taste of Premiership football and it is far too long since we last featured in the top flight. Long term fans of the club in particular have had what seems a never ending stream of chancers telling us how great things are going to be and, after we finally believed that our previous owner was going to take us to a place amongst the elite, the disappointment caused by the financial collapse that was Black Friday was tangible. As someone who has only been connected with the club for around five and a half years, I don’t think it’s possible for Peter Ridsdale to judge how people who have followed this club for thirty years and more feel about things – to be honest, I am quite optimistic about our future, but, no matter how good things look at the moment, I cannot really blame those amongst our support who say “Yeah, but what’s the catch?”.

One last thing, speaking as someone who now only has to look at a bar of chocolate or packet of biscuits to pile on the pounds, well done to our Chairman for losing three stone in weight this year!

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Robust Ridsdale fights back.