A bit of a non event really.

Coymay

So, the big day proved to be something of a sad anti climax as a professional and very well organised Newcastle side did a job on City which reduced them to a team with plenty of perspiration but too little inspiration.

City’s display on Sunday provided moments of quality, but that’s all they were… moments. We needed a lot more than that if we were to succeed in managing more than just ruffling Newcastle’s feathers occasionally and, given what our Chairman was saying last week about how supporters should be expecting a top six finish and the, reputed, size of our wage bill, it could be said that we had a right to expect more from the team yesterday. Certainly, the fluency, movement and style which destroyed Scunthorpe and Bristol City were not present.

However, to merely focus on City’s shortcomings, would be to ignore the fact that, especially as they are set up at the moment, Newcastle are a very, very hard team to break down. Once they had taken the lead, City were nearly always faced with the conundrum of finding a way past the nine outfield players set out in front of them. Just the bare numbers involved would have presented enough of a challenge, but when you saw the quality of their midfield five and the whole of their back four, then you realised the size of the challenge we were faced with.

The Newcastle fourteen yesterday contained twelve members of the squad that were relegated last May when they gave such a gutless performance at Villa Park on the final day of the campaign as their demotion was confirmed. That day Newcastle looked like a club without spirit or harmony out on the pitch, but, right from the off yesterday, they looked an outfit who were right up for the challenge – if only I could say the same for the City!

For the third home league match on the trot, City were slow out of the blocks – Scunthorpe really should have been at least one up after twenty minutes on the first day of the campaign and the wurzels were certainly the better side in the first ten minutes when they came here. Yesterday though, City’s luck ran out in that department as their slow and nervous looking beginning helped hand the initiative right to the visitors who were good enough to take advantage of our generosity as they fashioned a fairly routine goal.

colcciniceleb_275x155Coloccini’s matchwinner was the third goal we had conceded from a close range header in successive games and this is a situation that needs sorting out quickly. While David Marshall could certainly have done better with the initial corner, questions have to be asked as to why Newcastle had two men, both good headers of the ball, left relatively free on the far post when the second cross came in.

After the goal, the truth is that Newcastle never really looked like scoring again. This was despite an effective, hard working and skilful contribution from their lone front man Nile Ranger which left one wondering why our Academy system, which is good at finding defenders and midfield players, have done so poorly in finding strikers of real quality. Apart from the imported Cameron Jerome, City haven’t found a quality young striker in ages and, although Josh Magennis offers hope that this situation can be rectified, when you compare what he has to offer currently with what we saw from Ranger yesterday you realise that it is still very much a case of work in progress with Magennis.

One last thing about Newcastle before I finish with them – it really does make me laugh when I hear people talking about their “threadbare” squad! Yes, they are currently short of strikers, but, when a team can bring on three subs that have 165 international caps between them and, as far as I am aware, have spent their whole careers in the top divisions of the various countries they have played in until now, “threadbare” hardly seems to be the right word to describe them!

Newcastle had a squad which should never have been relegated last year and, although they have lost a lot of big names since then, their current one compares very favourably with any in the Championship – they really should be looking at a top two finish given the talent they have available to them. Strangely however, it may be that they will hit problems when they have all of their striking options available because this may make them more prepared to push men forward when they are leading whereas they are currently ideally set up for sitting deep and defending such leads when they get them.

Anyway, enough about Newcastle, was there anything positive to be taken from the City performance? Well, the spirit was good and we never gave up, but, apart from that, there wasn’t much in the team performance to take consolation from. On an individual basis, our midfield four were faced with a huge task given the quality and numbers that the visitors had in that part of the field, but I thought Joe Ledley stood up to the test pretty well and provided nearly all of the craft and guile (something which we needed a lot more of all over the pitch) that came from the central midfield area. Chris Burke had a good spell in the first half and we always looked more dangerous attacking down the right than the left, but, increasingly he tended to run down blind alleys and our attacks began to lose momentum when he got the ball.

Although he wasn’t given too much to do defensively, I liked the way that Paul Quinn always looked to use the ball constructively (he was one of a very few City players who were composed in possession in the early stages). However, the best of our players for me was Jay Bothroyd – although he, once again, spent too much time on the deck, virtually every time City were able to cause Newcastle problems, Bothroyd was at the heart of it.

Newcastle provided our players with a test of strength as well as technique and, for me, Bothroyd was the only one who consistently passed both of those tests – yes, in an ideal world he would score more goals than he does, but, while he keeps on playing with the commitment that he has shown so far this season, I don’t think I would want to swap him with any of the players who do a similar job at other clubs in this league.

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , | Comments Off on A bit of a non event really.

The “match day experience” a bit lacking for reserve and Academy matches!

CoymayThis section was intended to give reports and views on games that I had seen Cardiff City teams play at this level, but this message, reproduced below, that I posted on the Cardiff City Mad messageboard this morning explains why it might well be one of the least used parts of this blog!

“Last week Peter Ridsdale was crowing about how well the club had done to secure a shirt sponsorship deal a month or so later than virtually every other club in our league. Our Chairman also took the opportunity to have a dig at critics, many of whom are posters on this site, of the club’s marketing, ticket and media staff amongst others as he praised the “unsung heroes” that are employed at Cardiff City.

Judging by what I have read, many of the criticisms that have, seemingly, upset Mr Ridsdale are completely justified, but, leaving that aside, I thought I would give another example of the work that these “unsung heroes” do.

A week ago last Saturday I posted the following thread on here

http://www.ccmb.co.uk/fudforum/index.php?t=msg&goto=1504 662&rid=19&S=6a4797c9daaddf7c0db0a44404a74ac6#msg_15 04662

concerning the Academy game with Portsmouth which was played that day and, as mentioned in the thread, I sent a short message through the “feedback” section of the official site which said that, surely, it was not too much trouble to just put a couple of sentences on there informing supporters of any change of time, date, venue etc. of Academy games in the future – I have not even had an acknowledgement of that message from the club up to now.

Last Saturday the Academy Under 18s played Charlton in a game which the club programme had been saying would kick off at 12.30pm as opposed to the normal 11.00 am. When I checked the relevant page on the official site, I found that, apart from having been updated to include the result of the Portsmouth match, it was unchanged from the link I posted in my original thread i.e.

http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/page/Academy/0,,10335~1711348 ,00.html

and there, at the bottom of the page, was the same line “U18 home fixtures will be played at Cardiff Athletic Stadium,” that had been proved to be totally inaccurate the previous week. Therefore, I decided this time around to take Tonteg Bluebird’s advice and use the club’s contact point for confirmation of where and when the Charlton match was taking place. At around 8 o clock on Saturday morning (some four and a half hours before the advertised kick off time) I sent Anthony Redwood an e-mail saying;-

Having been caught out by the change of venue for last week’s match, can you confirm that the game against Charlton is at the Athletics Stadium (kick off 12.30pm) please.

Thanks.

Paul Evans”

I did not get a reply before midday on Saturday (not really blaming the individual concerned for that because he may well have been too busy on match day morning to answer e-mails from people who were not related in any way to any of our Under 18 team – he also should never be put in that position either). So, for the second successive week I drove a mate of mine to the venue the club were telling me the game was being played at and arrived at the time that the club were telling me the game would start.

The previous week I had arrived at Leckwith to find an Athletics meeting going on and was told by stewards that the game had been switched to Treforest. This time around, I arrived to find the stadium completely empty and not a steward in site – I learned later that afternoon that the game had once again been switched to Treforest.

I am still waiting for a reply to the e-mail I sent on Saturday morning and have this morning sent a further mail commenting that “customer care really does seem to be an alien concept at Cardiff City these days”.

In my original thread I also commented that the club seem to discourage supporter attendance at reserve matches on the very rare occasions that we actually have a second team fixture and what happened last week could be taken as further evidence of this.

I was surprised to learn from Dave Jones’ pre Newcastle match press conference that there had been a reserve game played against Hereford last week (we won 3-0 apparently), but you try finding details of it on the official site (it’s useless trying the section headed “reserves” because the last entry in there is dated 12/01/09!)! I still don’t know where the game was played so it may well be that I would not have gone anyway, but, that’s not the point – interest in the club is as high now as it has been for decades, but so much of what goes on at the club just does not reflect this.

Although many will doubtless feel that the reserves and Academy teams are relatively trivial matters compared to the first team, there are quite a few of us who enjoy watching our younger players in action. I got a buzz out of watching the early performances and seeing the development of players such as Ledley, Jerome, Blake, Gunter, Ramsey and Matthews before they got their first team chance, but nowadays it seems as if the club are going out of their way to make it harder for us to watch non first team action – I’m sure there is nothing sinister behind this, but a little bit of communication with and thought for those genuine fans of the club who will be watching reserve and youth football long after the relatives of the players involved today will have stopped doing so wouldn’t go amiss.

Posted in The kids., The stiffs | Tagged , | Comments Off on The “match day experience” a bit lacking for reserve and Academy matches!