Langston loan note debt agreement signed.

CoymayThe club made this announcement yesterday on their website and, although the wording could be said to be somewhat ambiguous, it soon became clear that the Langston corporation had agreed and signed up to a renegotiation of the loan note debt dating back to autumn 2004. The original £24 million debt had already been amended once in 2006/07 with an agreement that it would be automatically reduced by £9 million once naming rights had been signed for the new stadium, but, although precise details of the new arrangement have not been released, it has been mentioned by Peter Ridsdale that it involves the club paying off a portion of the debt (believed to be £83,000) every month from January 2010 with an additional agreement in place that the debt could be increased by £1 million per year if City default on the arrangement.

Messageboard rumour has it that the outstanding £15 million debt has been negotiated down to £10 million with an additional payment due if the club were to win promotion to the Premiership, but it is perhaps the fact that the agreement makes any further court action very unlikely, unless either party does not stick to the terms of the new contract, which is perhaps the main immediate benefit for the club.

Peter Ridsdale gave his upbeat take on the situation in this interview with the BBC with two things striking me about what he said. Firstly, speaking as someone who has been very critical of the man in the past four years or so, it is only right that the part Sam Hammam played in his role as Langston’s representative in all of this should be acknowledged. I was always confident that Langston would sign up to the new terms, but was of the opinion that we would see the usual brinkmanship which would have us minutes from everything crashing down all around us before agreement was reached – that hasn’t happened and so I feel it is right to offer Sam Hammam thanks for this and for the shot in the arm that he provided for Cardiff City nearly ten years ago at a time when the club really needed it.

The second, very intriguing, thing about what Peter Ridsdale said was the reference to the ongoing due diligence procedure regarding new investment from Malaysia. With Dato Chan Tien Ghee (TG) already on board, this adds weight to the widely held belief that there is still major investment to come with it looking increasingly likely that billionaire Vincent Tan is going to play a part in any future cash injection into the club – if this is true, then, on the face of it, it is marvellous news for the club and it’s supporters as it could mean that the whole outlook and standing of Cardiff City is about to change very much for the better.

There is still the need for caution though of course – does any future investment mean that all we are doing in effect is swapping one debt for another? It has to be a possibility I suppose, but with the rumour mill saying that any investment is likely to come in the form of acquiring shares in the club, then, hopefully, that will not be the case.

If there is really going to be major new investment from Malaysia then I think it is worth remembering what Peter Ridsdale was saying when the news of TG’s interest first broke – that is that there is tremendous interest in British football and, in particular, the Premiership in Asia and, if they could get a team to the top flight, then there must be serious money making opportunities from that part of the world for those who market a club in the right way. Now I realise I am getting ahead of myself somewhat here, but, if the club did get to the Premiership under Malaysian ownership and they presented Cardiff City to their fellow country men and women as “our club”, then I don’t think we in the UK can really appreciate the potential income that might entail – I have a suspicion that is how any new investor in the club from the Far East would see the situation anyway.

It also needs to be remembered that, despite Peter Ridsdale’s assurances that everything is fine, we still have a court date with the taxman arranged for 3 February and until official confirmation is given by HRMC that the winding up order for non payment of taxes has been withdrawn, it is not really worth getting too excited about what the future might hold because, at the moment, there is still a possibility, no matter how slight it may be, that we will not have one!

Posted in Up in the Boardroom | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Langston loan note debt agreement signed.

October 1970 and was this Ninian Park’s greatest ever goal?

CoymayThe first thing to say is that if you don’t want to read me rabbiting on about some game played nearly forty years ago, you can have a look at the goal referred to in the title at 5.20 in this excellent video which also features the other two goals City scored that afternoon. However, although I am obviously biased, I would say that it is well worth reading on because, apart from that goal, the game with Middlesbrough on 3 October 1970 is one of the most remarkable City matches I have seen.

Before going on to the match itself, it’s worth taking a little time to set up the background to the game in question. City had been promotion candidates in the two previous seasons only to come up short on both occasions and manager Jimmy Scoular sought to rectify that by bringing in a couple of new players in the summer of 1970. One of those signings was Ian Gibson who remains my favourite City player to this day – Gibson was signed from Coventry for £35,000 and immediately started to make an impact for us in the middle of the park but, unfortunately, the other new player was not turning out to be such a success.

picfparsonsGoalkeeper Frank Parsons had been signed from Crystal Palace for £15,000 to replace Fred Davies who had left to join AFC Bournemouth and he went straight into the team for the opening day match at Leicester. City gained a great 1-0 win that day over the team that were eventually to go up as Champions and Parsons had a fine game – indeed, if you only ever watched City play away from home at that time, then you may well have thought he was a great keeper, but I’m afraid that at Ninian Park he was having a rough time of it with errors on his part costing us victories over Sheffield United and Norwich.

Parsons’ mistakes went some way to explaining why City had only won one of their four home games so far that season, but, with three wins already on the road, they were well established near the top of the league going into the game against a Middlesbrough side who had started the campaign in uninspiring fashion with eight points from their first nine matches (it was two points for a win back then).

It was the visitors who were fastest out of the blocks though and Parsons was helpless when the dangerous John Hickton (he was to score twenty five league goals that season) glanced a near post header into the corner of the net midway through the first half but the goal only served to bring the best out of the City team in general and Peter King in particular.

picpking2Peter King had been signed from Worcester City (his home town club) in 1960 at the age of seventeen and was the only player still at the club who had played First Division football for them. King had played in more than half of the first team games during the 61/62 relegation season and had established himself as a very important member of the team for the rest of the decade.

Perhaps it was the versatility which saw him play in central midfield, on either wing and up front at various times during his City career that caused it, but I have always thought of King as something of an unsung hero in the City teams of that era. It could also be that, such was his ability and consistency, his good level of performance was taken a little bit for granted by supporters (I think I was guilty of doing that at times).

When City supporters of a certain age have discussions regarding the best players they have seen at the club, King’s name rarely comes up in my experience and yet I think it is true to say that however the team were playing, you could almost always be guaranteed a good performance from Peter King.

It was King’s persistence that first made an impression that afternoon as he managed to put over a cross from the bye line which resulted in a pretty straightforward headed equaliser for Brian Clark shortly after Hickton’s opener, but it was early in the second half when King was instrumental in putting City into what should have been a winning position.

Firstly, having already played a part in the build up to the goal, King showed great awareness to roll the ball into the path of Bobby Woodruff who crashed a right foot shot into the net from twenty five yards. Woodruff’s goal was a cracker which should have the adjective “memorable” attached to it, but the truth is that, because of what happened a few minutes later, it barely gets remembered now by City fans old enough to have seen it.

The pictures from the video link are a better testimony to Peter King’s superb volley than anything I could ever come out with so all I’ll say about it is that I can still remember the thump I heard as King hit his shot (it can also be heard on the video). I was stood in the boy’s enclosure behind the goal that would shortly see King’s shot fly past the startled Willie Whigham in the visitor’s goal and I can honestly say that I have not heard a louder impact of boot hitting ball before or since that moment – in a way, it was a bit like getting a second or two’s prior knowledge that something very special was about to happen.

Having conceded two wonder goals within less than five minutes, there shouldn’t really have been any way back into the game for Middlesbrough, but, almost immediately, they were awarded a soft penalty for a foul by Don Murray on Hugh McIlmoyle only for Frank Parsons to not only save but also hold on to Hickton’s spot kick.

pic1970-71

It really was a fine save by Parsons and, for a short while at least, there was the hope that it might signal a change in his City career, but, perhaps aided by some City complacency, the visitors kept on plugging away and they got a goal back when central defender Willie Maddren’s weakly hit shot following a corner slipped through Parson’s fingers and into the net.

Parson’s howler meant the momentum had shifted completely and City now faced the prospect of hanging on to their lead for a quarter of an hour or so. However, with a such a shaky keeper behind them, that was always going to be an uphill task for City and Parsons boobed again when he couldn’t hold on to Derek Downing’s shot and the ball dropped to Joe Laidlaw who was able to tap in the equaliser from no more than a yard out.

Although it had not been as bad a blunder as the one for Maddren’s goal, Parsons’ confidence must have been shot to pieces by now and there was an inevitability about what happened next as the unmarked McIlmoyle headed in the winner from inside the six yard box with Parsons stood rooted to his line.

Middlesbrough’s unlikely win was the catalyst for a promotion challenge from them which only floundered through too many drawn matches in the run in while City reacted impressively by winning five and drawing two of their next seven matches, all of which meant that they stood at the top of the division a week after the controversial sale of John Toshack to Liverpool for £110,000.

As for the two main players in the drama that afternoon, Peter King went on turning in good quality performances for the rest of the 70/71 season. However, as the team declined in the next couple of years, so did King’s contribution as an Achilles tendon injury caused him to miss more and more matches before he decided to call it a day in 1974 at the age of just thirty one, but not before he had scored the best goal I have ever seen in a City game. Who can tell whether it is was really Ninian Park’s finest goal or not, but I’d be very grateful if someone could show me a better one.

It was no happy ending either for Frank Parsons, he was dropped in favour of Jim Eadie for the next game and, although Jimmy Scoular showed faith in him to the extent that he was given his chance early on in the next two seasons, Parsons was still a disaster waiting to happen. For example, I can remember watching him give poor performances at Orient, where we lost 4-1, in 71/72 and Swindon when we were beaten 3-0 (with all of the goals coming in the first half) the following season before his unhappy stay at Ninian Park was ended with moves to Fulham and then Reading – he made little impact at either club before dropping into non league football with Wokingham.

When people debate why we missed out on promotion in 70/71 they tend to put it down to one of four things – selling Toshack, not replacing him quickly enough, losing to Watford or losing to Sheffield United. However, although it sounds a bit brutal, the truth is that Frank Parsons’ blunders cost us a total of four points (one of them to the team who pipped us for second place) early on in a season where we ended up missing promotion to the top flight by three points – if signing Ian Gibson was a master stroke from Jimmy Scoular, I’m afraid that history shows that bringing in Frank Parsons was a serious error on his behalf.

3 October 1971

Cardiff City 3 Middlesbrough 4

City Parsons; Carver, Murray, Harris, Bell; Gibson, Sutton, Woodruff (1), King (1); Clark (1), Toshack; sub (not used) Bird

Boro Whigham; Maddren (1), Gates, Spraggon, Jones; Downing, Laidlaw (1), Smith, McMordie; Hickton (1), McIlmoyle (1); sub (not used) Mills

HT 1-1

Att. 21,072

Posted in Memories, 1963 - 2023 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on October 1970 and was this Ninian Park’s greatest ever goal?