Has he forgotten what it’s like to be a fan?

Unfortunately, the fall out from the booing that was heard at Saturday’s game continues as Dave Jones made his feelings about the atmosphere at the Blackpool match clear in both his pre match press conference for this evening’s FA Cup clash at Bristol City and in this interview with Sky Sports.

Having listened to what he has to say, it seems to me that after starting off expressing sentiments which sound quite reasonable and understanding, Dave Jones goes wrong when he starts talking about the “awful atmosphere” all through the Blackpool game because he shows that he appears to have no understanding of what being a Cardiff City fan feels like for many at the moment.

Our manager has often said that he has a cold and unemotional approach to his profession. For example, you don’t get any sentimental stuff from him before City games against one of his former sides – his approach is that the three points is the priority. Given that he is a professional earning his living from the game, an attitude like that is right in so many ways – okay, the “just another game” approach to recent matches with Swansea have shown some of the limitations to such a philosophy, but, overall, there are many ways where making decisions from a detached point of view has to be better than letting the heart rule the head.

However, one thing the unemotional approach Dave Jones favours does do is make it very hard for him to form any sort of bond with supporters of the club he is employed by. The recent fiftieth anniversary of Bill Shankly’s appointment as Liverpool manager bought to mind a member of Dave Jones’ profession who, by leading a team out of the level we are now in to become one of the great powers in the land, established himself as a far more successful manager than our manager has been up to now. Yet Shankly was also able to identify fully with the Liverpool supporters – Dave Jones is incapable of, or more likely, unwilling to do anything that comes remotely close to forming the sort of bond that Shankly had with the Koppites at Anfield.

Mention of Liverpool serves as a reminder that Dave Jones is or was an Everton fan. Perhaps he might be able to understand a little how many City fans currently feel if he imagined how he would react if he went to watch a game at Goodison Park as a supporter under the following circumstances;-

1. News had emerged in the lead up to the game that Everton had been served with a winding up order by the tax man for debts that the club Chairman, for whom the difference between his public pronouncements and what actually happens means that he must be either a liar, incompetent or a mixture of both, was telling everyone had been paid months earlier.

2. About 60% of the club’s support had committed to buying a season ticket over the Christmas period for the following campaign in a time of national recession and had been promised that proceeds would go on buying players during the January transfer window to aid Everton’s bid for Champions League qualification only to learn that the money may have to go on clearing the debts that the Chairman said had been settled.

3. Talk of the Champions League brings back memories of Everton’s pitiful failure to qualify for the competition in the previous season when they, with four games to play, blew an advantage of eight points and a +18 goal difference to rivals who only had three matches left.

4. In their previous two matches fourth placed Everton had lost at home to the team then bottom of the table and then threw away a 4 goal interval lead to draw 4-4 at the side who had dropped to bottom place following the previous round of results.

How would Dave Jones and the rest of the Everton support have felt in a case like that? Perhaps the atmosphere may have been “awful” throughout the game under those circumstances and, perhaps, a few (and the word “few” needs to be emphasised) of those present might have started booing the team during and after the game if it had seen their team hanging on for a draw for most of the second half? How would people react if the very well paid Everton manager, who makes a virtue of his emotional detachment from the club, criticised those supporters for their negativity?

Of course, Everton are not a very good example to compare with Cardiff really. After all, if you are an Evertonian you support a club that has enjoyed virtually uninterrupted top flight football since they joined the Football League over one hundred and twenty years ago. On the other hand, I am pretty sure no Cardiff City fan under the age of fifty has watched their club play the equivalent of Premiership football (they would have to have had their nappy changed at half time if they had) and they have also had to get used to a never ending stream of good players being sold as highly paid club officials always tell them that the proceeds will go towards servicing the debt which still gets larger and larger.

I look at my club with the passion that our manager doesn’t have and so, maybe, I am a letting my bias show here, but, having seen sides such as Leyton Orient, Northampton, Carlisle,  Luton, Oxford and Swindon all play top flight football since we last did as well as having to watch teams such as Stoke, Burnley and Hull on Match of the Day every week, I honestly feel that we have to be serious contenders for the title of the biggest under achievers in the Football League. In terms of lack of success when it comes to league status relative to catchment area, I can only think of Preston and Plymouth to rival us and, at least, Preston have had a few Championship play off campaigns to raise expectations lately while Plymouth have always got a geographical disadvantage when it comes to recruiting good players.

Not unreasonably, Dave Jones, only ever talks in terms of the last four and a half years at Cardiff because that is all he knows, so maybe he doesn’t realise that long term supporters have had forty years and more of disappointment and anti climax when it comes to following this club. Perhaps that is why there is a tendency for us to go a bit over the top when the side shows promise (like they did against tonight’s opponents back in August) and why a few months later everyone seems to be in the depths of despair but five decades of false promises from a variety of chancers tends to to do that to you.

A couple of years ago at another time when supporters were disgruntled an under pressure Dave Jones rubbished criticism he was getting by saying that it was from people who hadn’t played the game professionally. Well, in the current circumstances, I can’t help thinking that the boot is on the other foot to some extent here because our manager is getting involved in something that he doesn’t fully understand – even if he was one once, he has now forgotten what it is like to be a fan.

Posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch | Tagged | 4 Comments

To boo or not to boo?

When both managers mention it in their post match press conference and every report I have read on the game so far refers to it, then I suppose the main issue to emerge from yesterday’s game is the treatment some Cardiff City dished out to their team during and after the match. Based on what I have seen so far, no one is saying that the boos were justified – with views ranging from bafflement as to why they were heard to the downright critical with this Sunday Telegraph report being a typical example.

Although I wouldn’t swear to this on a bible, I am pretty sure that I have never booed a Cardiff City team or player, it’s just not in my nature to do so. However, I find it impossible to argue with anyone who says “I paid my money so I am free to dish the stick out” and when that money also includes the price of a season ticket which they understood was going to be used to bring in the sort of new player(s) that we desperately needed yesterday, then I am not going to call anyone who did boo a moron.

In saying that though, I think the booers got it wrong yesterday when they turned on the players as those more deserving of criticism on the day escaped virtually scot free. Now that might sound hypocritical coming from someone who was very scathing about the players last summer and after the Peterborough game but what really annoys me about this team is the lack of character they show at times – although many of them didn’t play well, I didn’t see much evidence of us bottling it against Blackpool.

No, when you consider that a virus had swept through the camp during the week (and as Dave Jones made reference to this in his pre match press conference on Friday, I don’t believe that the virus only existed in his mind as a way to excuse another poor performance) and that we had a central midfield which consisted of one player carrying a double fracture and another who is playing on with injuries which make him a shadow of the player he can be, then I think the booers aim was off yesterday.

In the days leading up to the game, there were appeals from some for supporters to lay off our Chairman during the game and I have to say that those appeals seemed to work. Many people were annoyed and frustrated before a ball was kicked yesterday, but what was it that put them in that mood? Okay, the last two results combined with the collapse at Peterborough got them angry, but with all that had happened after the News of the World story appeared on 3 January, they seemed like light years away – when you consider that the first concerted criticism of the money men didn’t come until the dying minutes and, even then, it didn’t last long, I can’t help thinking that the real villains of the piece got off pretty lightly yesterday.

As for the game itself, as soon as I heard the team and, in particular the name of Josh Magennis, I wasn’t expecting much from the match. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that we are nowhere near as good a team when Jay Bothroyd is missing or off his game and I thought replacing him with a raw, young lad who did little in his brief loan spell at Grimsby would weaken us considerably.

Given this, there had to be questions asked as to why Dave Jones went with Magennis in the first place, but it has to be admitted that this current City team seem to need a big target man to play off and, with Etuhu absent again, Magennis was our only option. In the event, Magennis was doing a good job in proving me wrong when he got his injury, he was unsettling the Blackpool defence, was unlucky not to score and had provided a chance that you can’t help thinking Ross McCormack would have scored last season – I don’t think it was a coincidence either that Blackpool’s resurgence in the game can be almost directly traced to the moment Magennis left the pitch after making a very encouraging contribution.

What happened next provided another talking point as forgotten man Warren Feeney came on to replace Magennis. Now I am not a Feeney fan because I have seen hardly anything from him to suggest that he can do a job for us at this level, but I thought he worked very hard having been given what was a pretty thankless task – particularly when, in another surprising move, Dave Jones withdrew McCormack to the wing as City went with a 4-5-1 formation in the second half.

Finally, those calling for the introduction of Michael Chopra got their wish when he came on with about a quarter of an hour left, but the decision to remove McCormack prompted more boos from the disgruntled crowd and, certainly on the face of it, it seemed a strange choice. While the decision was explained to a large degree with the news that McCormack was one of those still suffering with the virus, I think it still showed that Dave Jones thinks that Ross McCormack and Michael Chopra just do not work in combination and, to be fair to our manager, I can come up with very little evidence to suggest they do (I suppose, in true chicken and egg style, they first need to be given that chance to prove they can!).

Chopra’s introduction made little difference though to the pattern of the second half which saw the familiar sight of our central midfield coming off second best to a visiting outfit in which Charlie Adam looked exactly the sort of operator we need in the middle of the park – but with the thing that nobody dares name now in place, strengthening in that area of the pitch is not going to be happening soon is it.

Just a couple of other things before I finish, with a few minutes to go I mentioned that it says everything you need to know about a game when your keeper ends up as your man of the match, David Marshall has to be the best of our summer signings surely – as for the outfield players, I thought Kevin McNaughton stood head and shoulders above the rest.

Lastly, why was our goal in the second half disallowed? Listening to Dave Jones after the game, it turns out that his view of the incident was exactly the same as mine in that Rachubka had clearly already lost the ball before any contact was made with him. Okay, it would have been a case of daylight robbery if we had won, but, not for the first time referee Ward ruled incorrectly in favour of the visitors – his fussy performance was one of many factors that helped to make yesterday’s match such a frustrating one.

Posted in Out on the pitch | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on To boo or not to boo?