After we were taken apart by Norwich a week ago, I think any City fan asked what they’d be disappointed with from the two upcoming home matches would be lying if they replied that four points wouldn’t be good enough.
Yes, I know Blackburn and Stoke were among the four most out of form sides in the Championship along with bottom of the league Rotherham, but the fact of the matter is that we were the other one in that quartet.
Blackburn and Stoke would have been approaching their visit to Cardiff thinking “they always lose at home, we can definitely get three points there”, yet neither of them did.
The fact that Tuesdays grim goalless draw could actually be spun as some sort of step forward only goes to show how bad things had got, but a draw to follow on from three scoreless home games all lost by two goals or more did inch us a bit closer to that fifty point mark which, almost certainly, equals safety.
Yet, even if you accept that a draw on Tuesday did ease the pressure somewhat, I would say that it made three points today an essential. When I say that, I don’t mean that defeat would have made us relegation favourites or anything like that, more I don’t believe that another draw or worse would have led to any easing up on the feeling of negativity that had taken hold over the last month or so.
As it is, I feel today’s 2-1 win over a Stoke team that now drop into the bottom three after wins for five sides (and I’m not including us there!) that could definitely be thought of as relegation candidates should mean a less fraught week coming up for Erol Bulut, his players and the Tan/Dalman and Choo axis to endure. The win and the performance in gaining it was not convincing (I don’t just mean in terms of margin of victory there) enough to persuade many fans, myself included, that it’s all systems go from now – a defeat and a limp performance at Ashton Gate in the Severnside derby next weekend and it will probably feel as if Cardiff 2 Stoke 1 never happened.
That’s not really fair mind. Having watched the high quality Leeds v Leicester game last night, today’s match was distinctly ordinary by comparison, but, then again, you’re hardly comparing like with like are you – I’d say that this season, more than any other, has brought home what a huge, and unfair, advantage teams receiving parachute payments have when compared to the rest of the division – I say that as a fan of a team which has twice benefited from them.
Today’s game was no classic then, but it was better than Tuesday was and, although some who had not watched us at home in late December and January may have trouble believing this, Tuesday was better than what had been on offer in the previous three games at Cardiff City Stadium.
In fact, in the first half today it felt like it would have been quite a watchable game for a neutral as the goal scored within just five minutes had the effect of opening things up and, when it came to City anyway, there was a rare feeling that our forward players may be better than their markers.
Erol Bulut reverted to a back four after finishing with a back six on Tuesday as our wingers were used more as full backs. Perry Ng came in for the unlucky Mahlon Romeo, who I thought had maybe his best game of the season so far against Blackburn and Jamilu Collins made way for Josh Wilson-Esbrand, while Joe Ralls was back in place of Ryan Wintle alongside Manolis Siopis.
The front four were the ones who fired blanks against Blackburn, but here, apart from Rubin Colwill who was a little way below his recent standards, they all offered an improvement on midweek.
In Kion Etete’s case mind, I didn’t think there was too much difference between what he did in the two games apart from the small matter of him ending his five month wait for a goal today.
There was no surprise in the goal coming from a set piece of course – this time it was a corner gained courtesy of a well struck Colwill shot from twenty five yards which got a half block that ensured the ball landed on top of the net.
Ralls took the corner towards the near post where it was flicked on, I think by Dimitrios Goutas, to Etete whose header from ten yards found the corner of the net. It wasn’t quite as straightforward as that makes it sound mind as Josh Bowler could be credited with an assist without touching the ball.
Bowler was stood no more than two yards off the line and his presence served to distract goalkeeper Daniel Iversen. Bowler did not get a touch on the ball, but with him being that close to the line, offside had to be a consideration.
Back in October, City were beaten 1-0 by Blackburn at Ewood Park and I thought they were robbed after referee Bobby Madley ruled out a goal by Goutas as he decided that Karlan Grant was offside and interfering with play despite him making no contact with the ball. I would say that Bowler interfered with play more today than Grant did a few months back with the question this time being was Bowler in an offside position? The pictures I’ve seen of the goal do not prove this conclusively either way.
So, having, maybe, got lucky, City, to their credit, went chasing a second goal and Bowler, enjoying having a makeshift left back in Jordan Thompson marking him, cut in to set up a decent shooting opportunity for Colwill from fifteen yards, but the resultant half hit left footer that Iversen saved easily was a disappointment from a player of Colwill’s capabilities.
City were having things their own way with the visitors looking every inch genuine relegation candidates, when, from nowhere, it really should have been 1-1 as Niall Ennis found himself in glorious isolation some twelve yards out, but dragged his shot wastefully across goal.
Strangely, Stoke seemed to take heart from this as they began to take a bigger share of possession and their wingers Manhoef and Junho began to cause problems
If Stoke’s big chance came against the run of play, the same could be said for City’s second goal. Just as with Bowler in the opening goal, City had a player who played a prominent part in the creation of the second goal while barely touching the ball. Colwill’s harrying caused Stoke to lose the ball around the halfway line and from there Siopis fed Ralls who played Grant in. Running in the inside left channel, the winger took the ball outside central defender Ben Willmott and shot powerfully into the opposite corner of the net, although his cause may have been helped by Iversen appearing to slip as he prepared to dive.
Grant was playing with a lot of confidence and he opened up the Stoke defence again to set up a chance for Ralls which was foiled by a desperate block, but it seemed that the West Brom loanee was injured in this move and he would eventually be withdrawn early in the second half – City’s attacking potency, such as it was, was greatly reduced with Grant’s departure.
Another goal before half time and City could have been on for only their second score of more than four goals in a game in more than a decade (thanks for that Eric!), but it was the visitors who got the game’s third one and after that it became a different match with City spending the majority of the second period more concerned with preserving their narrow lead than looking to add to it..
Ng needlessly fouled Junho leading to a free kick twenty yards out and Lewis Baker’s shot drew a good full length save from Ethan Horvarth, but the keeper was unlucky to see Junho react quickest to tap in from six yards.
The second half became a holding operation for City and, although the match stats suggest Stoke were unlucky not to get a draw (the visitors had more efforts at goal, more on target ones and more corners), it was good to see three of our January signings playing leading parts in our win. Apart from a tendency to find touch somewhere close to the dug outs in the second half, I thought Horvarth had a good game as he twice saved well from Ennis and foiled sub Josh Laurent, Wilson-Esbrand was up against a decent opponent, but handled the situation well while also putting over a lovely second half cross which was just crying out to be turned in and generally looking pretty effective going forward and Nat Phillips was, for the second consecutive match, probably our best player.
Predictably for this manager, his substitutions tended to be defensive ones and, once again, I found myself wondering why he names Joel Colwill and Cian Ashford in the squad when he clearly has no intention of using them?
City remain in fourteenth place and the good results for the likes of QPR, Sheffield Wednesday and Millwall means that they’ve not really moved further away from the relegation zone, but, with forty four points, you’d like to think that two wins from our last dozen matches will keep us up.
There was an entertaining preface to the Stoke match when the under 18s took on league leaders Bristol City at Leckwith at lunchtime. Goals by Will Spiers and Ronan Kpakio put us 2-0 with six minutes left only for the visitors to level things up with four minutes to got. Then, a minute into added time, Trey George came up with the winning goal to keep hopes of participating in the end of season Play Offs alive.
Having watched the full 90, I reckon Stoke were unlucky not to go home with a point.
I have been reading the Stoke Sentinel and their fans are in open revolt. The 151 comments here, could easily be our lot unless Bulut abandons Bulutball…
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/cardiff-stoke-city-live-stream-9119734#comments-wrapper
As for yesterday, I want to hear no nonsense from Bulut telling me the Colarado usurper he helicoptered in, is better with his feet than Jak. On the evidence of his unerring ability to find touch yesterday, I’d say he is not even in the same class.
Finally Paul, congrats on rising from the dead in record time…!! We MAYAns would have missed you more than words can say.
DW
I remember our former manager Dave Jones emphasising that at the Business end of the season, results are more important than performances. That’s possibly why Blackburn fans were more upbeat about their teams mostly dreary performance in Tuesdays 0-0 draw, whereas most Stoke City fans I’ve read were scathing about their teams upbeat, attacking performance in their defeat to us. Stoke possibly deserved a point based on more possession, shots, shots on target and corners than us, but trailed us 2-1 on the most important stat of goals scored.
I saw another stat earlier this week that said every side below us in the Championship had changed manager at least once so far this season, yet they still all remain below us.
Millwall have just made a second change, re-appointing Neil Harris to replace Joe Edwards who was only appointed in November. The reason they do so is for the famed ‘managerial bounce’, which Millwall achieved with a surprise 2-1 win at Southampton yesterday, despite only having 19% possession, 1 corner to Southamptons 13, and around half the number of shots.
Steven Schumacher, who Stoke lured from Plymouth in December started his Stoke rein with 3 wins followed by 2 draws, but Stoke are currently in a run of 6 defeats from their last 7 league games. In his post-match interview, a downbeat Schumacher gave credit to Cardiff for their second half defending, while being critical of his side not taking their chances early second half, plus the great chance that was pulled wide in the first half.
By the end of the game, Stoke had three out and out strikers on the pitch plus top scorer Vidigal, but it was Cardiff who were winning the vast majority of balls played into our box.
Talking of surprises, it was a delightful one to see us take a lead after just 5 minutes of the game. Goutas would have seen that most of our corners and free-kicks against Blackburn failed to beat the first or second defender, so decided to run to the near post to meet Ralls first corner, rather than to stay in his usual central position where he would have been again unused. A great flick on from Goutas was met by header from Etete, and a well-deserved goal, following the battering he’s been taking recently from defenders and some fans.
Erol Bulut has been asking his players to show more aggression, and that was certainly evident from Colwill and Siopis in the build-up to our second. A great run and shot by Grant, which beat the keeper for pace, as well as being at a more difficult height than his similar chance against Blackburn, which was saved by the keepers legs.
I said I thought the Blackburn draw was a positive stepping stone after our recent poor home form, and I think the Stoke win can give us confidence to believe we can get a draw away to the wurzels next Saturday. After all although the win didn’t move us any higher i n the league, it means we’re now only beneath Brizzle on Goal Difference.
Thanks Paul.
Great to get much needed home wins and three points, but didn’t we make hard work of it?
Off to a great start with real threat going forward and Grant looking dangerous every time he had the ball. Good link up play all round without too much of aimless passing around sideways and backwards.
Solid at the back and Siopsis buzzed around with real energy after a few blips in recent weeks.
Great to see the crowd really get behind the team for final push to get us over the line. Felt like some real togetherness at the end of the match – long overdue after a few difficult weeks.
Roll on next week and hope we can pull off another away win at Ashton Gate?
Thanks all for your replies. Dai, I agree about Stoke deserving something from a game which they started as if they were on course for a 5-0 thrashing, but, as I mentioned in my piece, I think, given what sort of team we are and the run we’d been on, the home win when it came was always going to be like that – most of our wins when we’re in better form tend to be similar to Saturday’s – I suppose when you’ve only scored more than two in a league game on two occasions, your victories must be of the tight, ground out variety when they come.
To be fair to Horvarth, I thought he did well on Saturday, his errant kicking apart, and, as Turner was on the bench, I presume Alnwick was still injured anyway – can’t help thinking that the shirt is Horvarth’s to lose from now on though.
Blue Bayou, that possession stat for Millwall in Neil Harris’ first game back reminded me of the match which was thought to have played a big part in him leaving them for the first time. Millwall were beaten 4-0 by Fulham in 2019 in a match where they only had 16 per cent possession. I can remember going on Millwall boards when we appointed him and that game was referred to fairly often as the moment when someone, who is a club legend I suppose, lost much of the fanbase – they were glad to be rid of him at the time and I saw a few references to the football having become unwatchable under Harris.
That’s how I’ve been feeling lately about City, especially at home, under Erol Bulut and so I need more convincing than you that Saturday’s win was more than just a temporary blip in the sequence that has seen Bulut and his team “found out” by the rest of the division – a derby fixture on Saturday against opponents that have got into the habit of beating good sides and losing to struggling ones (wins over Middlesbrough and Southampton followed by losses to QPR and Sheffield Wednesday in their last four matches) offers the chance for City to prove me wrong.
Huw, I believe Grant’s injury affected us badly on Saturday because, when you think about it, we did very little as an attacking force after he went off – I don’t think Grant has done badly for us and those West Brom fans who said he was lazy clearly know nothing about the game, but I’ve spent most of the season wondering why West Brom paid £15 million for him.
However, on Saturday, I thought there were a few signs as to why he once commanded such a fee, he looked more confident than usual and, although I’m still not sure what went on with the keeper for the second goal, I must say Grant took it really well – maybe the game would have panned out exactly the same way if he stayed on, but, on the form he showed in the first half an hour, we might have been able to go on to get the big home win that I think is beyond us?
The biggest robbery since the Crown Jewels were stolen’ Posted on January 26, 2010 by The other Bob Wilson
I read your post on our away trip to Ashton Gate Boxing day 1972 – I was just 13 years of ago and it was my first away trip without parental supervision, I went with friends on a football special. What an introduction to away travel with City fans. I still have not forgotten Bobby Gould and his role in our defeat that day. We lost at Ashton Gate the next season too (73/74) and if I remember rightly Earnie Hunt played for the Robins that day. Another frustrating trip with Brizzle getting a late winner in the 90th minute.
I wasn’t a big fan of Bobby Gould before that day BBIF, but that so called penalty finished me off as far as he was concerned. We’d been beaten by a very late goal at Ashton Gate in 70/71 as well and my most positive memory of trips to that ground around that time was the Boxing Day game in 1974 during the season we got relegated. It was an awful game between two poos sides (eve though the wurzels got promoted that season), but, even so early in Bristol’s long spell of domination in the fixture, it felt like we’d turned a corner after a boring 0-0 draw, it would still be another thirty six years before we won at Ashton Gate though!
TOBW – Yes the Boxing Day game was a pretty poor game. I remember policing was very tight because of problems earlier in the season after the League Cup game in Auguust 1974 when over 100 City fans walking back to the station were arrested (police just arrested every City fan in the street). Most were found guilty by the local magistrates but had their convictions over turned on appeal.