Amazing comeback from the team that couldn’t score finally gets Cardiff City’s points tally moving again.

Surely, if and when Cardiff City ended their club record run of eight successive league losses it would be through a scrappy, low scoring draw or, if they were lucky, a ground out 1-0 win with a suitably scruffy goal deciding it?

What they were never going to do was, having not scored in over nine hours of play, play like drains for an hour in going 3-0 down and then score three times in five minutes to come back to draw after a close, but correct, offside call ruled out what could have been a winner. However, that’s precisely what happened and the world suddenly seems a better and brighter place after City gained a point which feels very much like three.

All of this surely helps the cause of caretaker boss Steve Morison the coach of the highly successful Under 23 side if he is looking to become our new manager, but it must be said that although there were what I thought were encouraging signs as the match went on which I’ll come to later, in many ways, it was the same old, same old from City at Stoke, themselves on a losing run of four games, today with things reaching the awful stage where their fans were ironically “oleing” them when they completed a successful pass shortly before the fight back began.

The Stoke fans were predictably merciless as their side strolled into their big lead without really having to exert themselves too much, but to hear your own support taking the piss out of you must have had our players wondering just how much worse was it possible for this nightmare to become.

None of this is to criticise those who went to the game. Honestly, I think they deserve medals for still having the faith to endure what, apparently, was a particularly slow journey up on a route that is notoriously bad when you consider the fare they’ve had to put up with and, with the target of their ire in the last few weeks having now left, the team, rather than the caretaker boss, were always going to be targeted in the event of things continued to go wrong.

Go wrong they certainly did as Morison reverted to the three man central defence by opting for the 3-4-3/3-4-2-1 that the Under 23s have used all season. The omission of Aden Flint came as a surprise to me as Sean Morrison and Curtis Nelson returned to accompany Mark McGuinness, while Ryan Giles moved to the left wing back position that it had been assumed he was going to occupy at the start of the season, with Perry Ng on the right.

With Marlon Pack suspended and Sam Bowen and Joe Ralls missing through injury, City would have been grateful that Leandro Bacuna had recovered from the injury which forced him off at Swansea to play alongside Will Vaulks as we were very much down to the bare bones in midfield.

It was up front where Morison’s selection drew on the youngsters he was used to working with as Keiron Evans started for the first with Rubin Colwill as the pair to play on the flanks behind Keiffer Moore.

City’s start was quite an encouraging one, but for now, I want to talk about how we conceded in the ninth minute from what seemed to me to be the first time Stoke put a cross into our penalty area. This time, I wouldn’t be too critical of our central defenders because it was a good quality ball in from the right by Ben Wilmott that Jacob Brown just got in front of McGuinness to nod in from ten yards with Alex Smithies helpless.

No, it was another familiar problem this season that stood out for me as opposition players were allowed far too much room in the areas just outside our penalty box as Vaulks and Bacuna (who may have been a bit rusty about what his duties were in what is his best position as it’s been so long since he played there) got nowhere near their men.

Seven minutes later, Brown was able to find room between our defenders much too easily and burst forward before cutting back a pass to Stephen Fletcher who was able to take a touch before scoring from that twenty to twenty five yard range where we’ve conceded so many goals this season. Once again, the lack of closing down on the player in possession was conspicuous, but luck was against City as it seemed like a shot Smithies would have dealt with pretty comfortably until a deflection off McGuinness took the ball beyond him and in.

Stoke were dominant for the rest of the first half as City struggled in familiar fashion to, first, get possession and then retain it. It was not as if the home side were laying siege on our goal, but for most of the time it was embarrassingly comfortable for them to maintain their dominance.

Two behind at the break, City needed a strong start to the second half, but instead presented the hosts with a third goal within half a minute when Vaulks wanted too much time on the ball and we were in trouble as soon as he was robbed. Once again, it was Brown who fed Fletcher who coolly lobbed Smithies from the edge of the penalty area.

I was going to say that Smithies made some good saves to keep City in it, but that would be wrong – to all intents and purposes, they were out of it already.

Yet, right from the start, this had been a game where City looked like they could cause the Stoke backline problems if they just had a bit more belief in themselves. There has been much said about the lack of pace in City’s squad, but I don’t know if it was that Stoke’s defence was spectacularly slow, but we seemed to have the legs on them throughout with even Moore at times giving his marker a yard or two and managing to beat him to a through pass.

With Colwill a creative influence on the left, City were in the game as an attacking force if only we could find the passes to give him and Moore especially the opportunity to show their ability to cause problems.

It was a shame therefore when, after just five minutes Colwill, made a mess of a marvelous opportunity when two home defenders collided to allow what had looked like an innocuous ball forward to reach him in glorious isolation on the left. Colwill ran in towards goal and probably made the right decision to try to find Evans who would have had a tap in rather than shoot himself, but he played his pass behind his young team mate and a glorious chance to end City’s first half goal drought had gone.

There was one another real opportunity for that first forty minute goal though as Colwill cleverly slid Moore through around the forty minute mark, but last season’s twenty goal striker never looked convincing as he elected to shoot rather than try to find Evans and home keeper Joe Bursik was able to save.

Once Stoke were three up, City’s objectives seemed twofold, keep the score down and, at long last, score a goal. As for the latter, you had to think there was no chance of that happening after Bacuna’s free kick from twenty two yards deflected off the wall and onto the post, but, instead, it was the prelude for an absolutely incredible spell of football which left City fans incredulous and Stoke supporters furious.

When it came a minute after Bacuna’s effort, City’s long awaited goal was courtesy of a goalkeeping blunder – Colwill’s shot from the corner of the penalty area was well struck and bounced slightly awkwardly in front of Bursik, but he really should have found a way to keep it out – instead it burst through him and bounced into the roof of the net.

I watched this thinking that at least City now had something slightly positive to take out of the game, but with Stoke retaining possession and pushing forward, there seemed no reason to expect any more than that until Josh Tymon over hit a backwards pass meant for Jordan Thompson and Moore broke down the right before delivering a well timed and weighted pass through to sub Mark Harris who beat Bursik with a fine first time finish from around fifteen yards.

Harris, on for Evans, has struggled in the last few games to make an impact after coming off the bench, but here he looked the mobile and strong nuisance for defenders he had been on quite a few occasions last season – he may well have played his way into the starting line up for Wednesday’s visit of QPR.

Within another minute or so, City were, incredibly, level following a good period of possession that included a fine cross field pass by Bacuna and eventually the ball reached Giles, who, growing into his role, broke past Stoke right wing back Tommy Smith and crossed low where a slight deflection off a defender took the ball into Moore’s path and he tapped in from no more than five yards.

Okay, the first two goals owed a lot to opposition mistakes, but the second one was beautifully taken and the third was well constructed and they both showed what can be achieved with a little bit more confidence in the camp – the three goals also put to bed that embarrassing stat about only scoring two goals that weren’t headers.

Understandably after that, City were more concerned with holding on to their first point in nine games than chasing the win, but only a close offside decision denied Harris a second goal after a quick counter attack gave Giles the chance to put in another good early cross.

Stoke had their attacking moments after that and former Wales centreback James Chester did City a big favour in added time when he not only blocked a goal bound shot, but also did it from an offside position.

So, City get a desperately needed point in the most unexpected circumstances, there’s still weaknesses in many areas of the team and so many of the faults that have blighted the season were still there today, but, for now, it’s great to have taken a point from a game – there were times over the past month when I truly couldn’t see where it was going to come from.

By complete contrast, the Under 18s are steamrollering teams at the moment. Fresh from scoring nine goals in winning their last two matches, they thrashed Ipswich 6-1 this morning at Leckwith with the goals coming from Morgan Wigley, two from James Crole (one a penalty), Rhys Schwann, Rubin’s brother Joel Colwill and Isaac Jefferies who scored within minutes of coming on as a sub following a long term injury.

As for my local Rhondda valley sides, Blaenrhondda AFC drew 4-4 at FC Cwmaman and, for the second successive weekend, Ton Pentre and Treherbert Boys and Girls club didn’t play.

I should mention as well that I’ve took a small quantity of my book Real Madrid and all that down to the Supporters’ Trust office on Friday and they can be bought at games for a slightly discounted price of £8.99 – the Trust office is situated close to Gate 5.

It’s the time of year again when I ask readers of Mauve and Yellow Army to make a contribution towards its running costs. Before I go into detail about this, I should, once again, offer my sincere thanks to all of you who have helped ensure the future of the blog over the past three years through a mixture of monthly payments via Patreon, monthly Standing Orders into my bank account and once a year payments via bank transfer, PayPal, cheque and cash.

The first time I made this request for assistance, it was prompted by a need for funds to pay for three yearly web hosting costs which, frankly, I was in no position to meet following my move of house a few months earlier. However, I’m pleased to say that, this time around, the web hosting bill was settled back in June with none of the problems there were back in 2018.

Therefore, any monies received this year will go towards other running costs and, although it’s too early yet to make any formal commitments despite so many of the pandemic restrictions in Wales being lifted recently, I am minded to do another review of a season from the past book to follow on from “Real Madrid and all that” which looked back on the 1970/71 campaign. At the moment 1975/76, the first promotion season I experienced, looks to be favourite for the book treatment, which would mean a lot more trips back and forth to Cardiff than my finances have become used to over the past year and a half – hopefully, the majority of them will not have to be made via Radyr Cheyne!

As always, the blog will still be free to read for anyone who chooses not to make a donation towards its running costs and, apart from the one in the top right hand corner which is to do with Google Ads, you will never have to bother about installing an ad blocker to read this site because there will never be any.

Finally, as mentioned earlier, donations can be made through Patreon, PayPal, by bank transfer, cheque, Standing Order/Direct Debit and cash, e-mail me at paul.evans8153@hotmail.com for further payment details.

This entry was posted in Cardiff City Books, Down in the dugout, Football in the Rhondda valleys., Out on the pitch, The kids. and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Amazing comeback from the team that couldn’t score finally gets Cardiff City’s points tally moving again.

  1. Simon says:

    Hey Paul,

    I stress I haven’t seen any of the match but listened to the commentary on my iPhone yesterday and it really did give everyone a much-need lift. I have to confess to feeling very down about the season but yesterday reminded me just how beautifully unpredictable football can be and why I love the game so much.

    Being a Cardiff City supporter is summed up with games like yesterday. It’s a rollercoaster of support and not the merry-go-round of obscene money clubs higher up the football league.

    But, I’m going to be the miserable one for a moment and focus on those 29 goals shipped with a GD of -14.

    For a while, I’ve been critical of Sean Morrison’s captaincy and this season he’s been a shadow of the player and captain of season’s ago (even though I’d have stripped him of the captaincy after our relegation – but I’m a ruthless so-and-so). Our mid-field is another bone of contention and oh for a Gunnarsson-type player of old. We’ve never really replaced him in my view and we miss that type of player terribly.

    For now though, I’m happy to bask in the cliches and enjoy the feeling and excitement of our team fightback. And it’s that last point I want to finish on. Even though we’re critical of individuals it mustn’t be forgotten that the ‘team’ won a point yesterday after being 0-3. They could have crumbled. Was that the caretaker-manager? I hope so. We’ll have to wait and see.

    Best wishes

  2. DJ says:

    I thought yesterday’s starting line-up was close to being our best on paper with probably Harris in for Evans and something needed (three managers now have tried and failed to work it out) with our CM options. We’ll be a much better side if we can ever get Morrison and Neslon back into the standards they’ve usually demonstrated here – the two players looking most out of sorts from this highly competitive category – but Flint definitely has a role coming off the bench when work inside each box becomes far more important than what’s happening outside these areas.

    Regarding Harris, yesterday was the game to demonstrate what sort of player he is at the moment and where he needs more development. Excellent work rate, speed and a good finisher but something still missing from rest of his game which meant he got caught offside when he had clear sight on the last man – we look so much better when he’s on song but there’s an extra step for him to take still to become a good Championship player.

    A special word for Bacuna too: plenty have made it clear he’s not their favourite player but 90 minutes when manager wasn’t sure midweek whether he’s be available at all shows a lot of character and want to do well for this side. He and Vaulks deserve more love from the fans even if their performances don’t yet fully merit it.

    Amazing how the order of the goals can change how one feels about a game, but we should probably also say that Stoke City fans were so angry because they had lost three league games on the bounce, four games on the bounce if you include League Cup, and only won three league games in ten before letting their lead yesterday slip. They were a good side for us to play yesterday to bring fans back on side and bring confidence back but there’s still a lot to fix to turn our results around more permanently. However, we’ve got a mix of some good young players and some older heads who haven’t really started so the right manager has tools to work with.

  3. Royalewithcheese says:

    Dead cat bounce or a genuine revival?

    Surely too soon for our new temporary manager to have done any chest-thumping. Preferring mouth-to-mouth? With all except Flint whom he’s ‘never fancied’.

    Anyway, there seems to have been a show of heart yesterday, so, fair play, Morison got something started. Can’t say whether we played like a corpse first half because I’d been resting in peace myself in front of the cricket, an occasional check on the footie convincing me I’d made the right choice. (I bet I wasn’t the only one!) Till three shocks in six minutes woke me up. If we’d got a fourth, I think my resurrection would have made Lancet.

    So I’ll be heading to City Stadium on Wednesday with renewed vigour and QPR will be wondering if they’ve caught us at the wrong time.

    Bob, you stated elsewhere today that we can recall Ryan Wintle from Blackpool in January. I’d thought his season-long loan meant he couldn’t be. With Rubin Colwill and a hopefully fit again Joe Ralls we might even acquire a degree of midfield fluidity.

    But a lot can happen between now and then. Ten matches and another new manager for example.

  4. The other Bob Wilson says:

    Thanks everyone for your replies. Simon, when a team ends a losing run of eight games, the caretaker manager whose first match it is should be given his fair share of credit if the side end their run of defeats, especially under circumstances like Saturday’s. I’d say the evidence as to how much credit Steve Morison should get is mixed though – certainly, the early stages of the second half offered no evidence of Morison having got an improvement from his side during the interval, it was more the introduction of Mark Harris which did trick for me.
    Of course, it was Morison who made the change so that Harris was able to be so influential. DJ is right when he says this was a good time to play Stoke given their recent struggles and I think it’s pretty obvious that a degree of complacency on the home team’s part was instrumental in allowing us to get our point. However, Stoke had only conceded five home goals in seven matches before Saturday and so you have to feel they would have let in far more than that based on the evidence of Saturday when it seemed to me we always had an edge over their defence when it came to pace. So, I’m prepared to credit Morison and and the coaching staff for coming up with a method which enabled us to exploit weaknesses in the home side – we played far more to feet going forward and Keiffer benefited from us playing more to his strengths with runners closer to him than treating him as just a big lump who can win headers.
    Royale,I came very close to switching over to the cricket on Saturday on a few occasions, but stuck with City – as for your first question, again, the evidence is mixed. The scoreline sums it up really – it tells you that, defensively (in terms of the back three and midfield support), we were as bad as ever and it was desperation stuff at times at the back after we’d got back to 3-3, so there wasn’t much to make you think, the good things happening further forward were rubbing off on those at the back. However, even when it was looking as bad as it did at any time during the game, I always thought we could cause Stoke problems if we could get players such as Colwill, Moore and Giles (and later Harris) on the ball.
    In answer to your second question about Wintle, I definitely read somewhere that we have a recall clause on his loan deal – here you go, this story from August appears to confirm that is the case;-

    https://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/sport/football/blackpool-fc/blackpool-poised-to-confirm-the-signing-of-cardiff-city-midfielder-and-ex-crewe-man-on-season-long-loan-3363435

Comments are closed.