Better from Cardiff, but their limitations are still plain to see.

Well, the good news is that I’d say Cardiff City played as well as they’ve done in weeks in their 2-2 home draw with Plymouth Argyle – in fact, I’d rate it as our best showing since we had the better of a goalless draw at Stoke in November.

The not so good news though is that a Plymouth team which has the sixth best goal scoring record in the division to go with the fourth worst defensive record came here to take us on in a game of attacking football which provided opportunities for us to show what we’ve got when it comes to creative and entertaining football. The truth was though, that, for much of the time, a visiting team that has spent fairly modestly on younger players looked better equipped in those departments than us with our collection of more established names – albeit they are either cheap signings or here on loan.

Plymouth still haven’t won an away game this season, but I have a sneaking suspicion that their camp are thinking that today represented the closest they’ve come so far to getting those elusive three points on their travels.

One of the reasons I say that is that, like virtually every side we play in this league, Plymouth made the task of keeping the ball under control on the pristine pitch in unseasonably good conditions  look the simple job that it should be for Championship standard footballers. Sadly, as is normal with City, the next misplaced pass, poor first touch, shoddy piece of ball control or mad option taken never seemed far away.

Why should this be? My view is that we are still paying for a preference for the physical over the technical – I say that while accepting that to target creativity and technical quality to the exclusion of things like physique and power is a recipe for problems. For years we chose the opposite approach for seasons on end at a time when the British game was clearly changing with the technical and creative side of football being favoured over what I’ll call virtues traditionally associated with the British (English) game.

You get the impression that the decision makers at the club now want to move on to what has become the norm in the domestic game and place more emphasis on passing the ball correctly. After all, for the last three season, at least, there have been attempts at changing the way we play made, only for an acceptance that we still aren’t good enough technically to operate on a level footing with most of our divisional rivals to eventually be recognised and therefore we end up reverting to the type of game which characterised us through the 2010s.

As Plymouth took control of the game after going 1-0 up, I found myself wondering what the club website commentary would be making of it all. I get to hear more of their commentaries these days and, recently, I have been struck by how often they get excited because, for a second or two, it looks like City are in business only for the opportunity to disappear as quickly as it had surfaced.

Sometimes the opportunity is lost because a player miscontrols the ball, but much more often it seems to me that the pass which should be creating a chance for us lacks quality. You get used to  hearing things from the commentators like it was an awkward ball to control and they’re right in coming to that conclusion, but, too often, the point is that it shouldn’t have been an awkward ball to control at all because the pass being attempted is a simple one – or at least it should be for Championship footballers.

Having said all of that, I I feel I’m being a bit cruel in concentrating on City’s technical shortcomings today because, as I mentioned at the start, I thought we played quite well against Plymouth in what was one of our most entertaining matches of the season – especially since the opening weeks of the campaign.

Indeed, during our best spell of the game in the minutes after we’d turned our 1-0 deficit into a 2-1 lead, I’d say we put together one of our best passing movements of the season, even if it did all end in pretty scruffy fashion as Ryan Wintle’s misfit shot was diverted a yard wide by Yakou Meite.

The frustration comes from the fact that on a day when we attacked with more quality than we normally do, we did not have the best of times defensively.

City have been good at the back for much of this campaign, but we conceded two poor goals today. Perry Ng and Dimitrios Goutas did not cover themselves in glory with Sheffield Wednesday’s goal on Saturday and they were part of a right side of our back four that was opened up too easily on eighteen minutes as Morgan Whittaker easily knocked in Ben Waine’s cross from six yards out.

In the minutes which followed this goal, Plymouth looked bankers for a first away win as they cashed in on City being wide open to cross field passes to their left flank and we slipped into the pointless way of playing out from the back which does us far more harm than good – you know, the type of football which goes forward, sideways, back, back, back.

At 1-0 down with our home record in recent weeks becoming as bad as it was in the last three seasons, it was hard to see how City could find a way back into the match until Plymouth helped us out by showing why their goals against record is so bad.

Jamilu Collins’ pass down the left was over hit and Karlan Grant had given up chasing it – it should have been easily dealt with, but visiting midfielder Matt Butcher got his angles all wrong and rolled his back pass from about twenty five yards out wide of goalkeeper Conor Hazard

What followed evoked memories of Jason Bowen’s classic own goal in an FA Cup tie against Crewe twenty three years ago where goalkeeper Mark Walton sprinted after a backpass that was always just out of his reach and ended up finishing a narrow loser to the ball in the race to see which one would hit the back of the net first. Hazard was always close to the ball, but never close enough and it had crossed the line before his frantic and unsuccessful attempt to prevent the goal.

With their lead having been lost in such comical fashion, Plymouth’s confidence shrank and half time arrived with the teams evenly matched, but it was City who took charge with the second half barely two minutes old.

As usual, Rubin Colwill divides opinions among the fanbase, but, the Hull game apart, I think he’s been playing well since he’s been in the starting eleven. That said, his cross when he was worked into space following a short corner routine was sloppy and much too low, but he got lucky as a defender’s block flew out to Grant who cracked home first time from nearly twenty five yards out for one of City’s best goals of the season.

Besides Meite’s close miss that I mentioned earlier, Mark McGuinness headed a corner a yard wide and someone with better attacking instincts than Collins might have made Plymouth pay after a lovely pass by Colwill had played the full back into space well inside the penalty area during City’s period of dominance.

Plymouth had rotated their starting eleven and were therefore able to bring on three of their “big guns” when City were playing well. The substitutions changed the flow of the game, but many City fans were arguing that the replacement of Colwill and Kion Etete, having one of his good days as attack leader, played just as big a part in the transformation in the last quarter of the match..

Besides introducing Josh Bowler and Ollie Tanner on to the wings, Meite moved to centre forward and Grant to number ten, but the attacking impetus City had was lost until the closing minute or two and Argyle soon equalised as Whittaker’s fierce snapshot from the corner of the penalty area was denied by a fine Alnwick save. However, the keeper was left to fume at the lack of help he got from his defenders as the visitors’ top scorer reacted first to score at the second attempt.

Plymouth wasted a great chance when Wintle did well to block a close range shot, but the ball fell to one of the three big guns I mentioned earlier as Bali Mumba smacked a shot from no more than four yards out against the bar.

There were a few more hair raising moments for City, but they roused themselves in the last two or three minutes as Grant was close to heading a winner from a cross by another sub, Callum Robinson and Tanner put over two good crosses. The first of these saw Wintle denied by a desperate Hazard and then the midfielder, showing impressive stamina late on in the game, challenged for a header – the ball clearly was put out for a corner off a defender, but referee Andy Davies, whose frequent mistakes tended to cancel each other out, gave a goal kick and City had lost their last chance of winning a game where a point apiece was probably a fair outcome, notwithstanding my earlier comments about our fairly obvious limitations.

This entry was posted in Out on the pitch and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Better from Cardiff, but their limitations are still plain to see.

  1. Dai Woosnam says:

    Before saying what I want to say about yesterday’s Plymouth game, I would like to say something about Russell Martin.

    And it is this…
    … there was a time about 15 months ago, when I watched the respective managerial press conferences at Cardiff and Swansea, and felt immensely envious of the Swans for their choice of boss.

    And I was immediately struck by how bizarre such a feeling was, given that his pass/pass/pass brand of football was anathema to me and used to send me to sleep. But somehow I could not help having that feeling: there was something immensely appealing about the bloke. It was not just his burning intellect and his almost Renaissance Man interest in The Arts that marked him out from our ‘Moro’: I was also drawn to his engaging persona and powers of self-expression… neither being strong suits of Steve.

    And I went so far ad to say in print that I genuinely felt that Russell Martin was destined for managerial greatness within 5 years… that he would be snapped up by a ‘top top’ team.

    And I still think it. And this latest profile just reinforces my thinking…

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67787725

    And just in case you think that ‘Russell Martin’ is an odd preamble to us discussing the Plymouth game, Morgan Whittaker our nemesis yesterday, will tell you that Russell showed no great perspicacity when it came to him.

    After all, he had been Steve Cooper’s £700K steal of a capture from Derby… with most of us thinking at the time that this could be the bargain to beat them all. Derby fans were up in arms that Steve had used his ‘England under 17’ contacts to pull Morgan to South Wales (he was not managed by Steve, as he was in the age group below… but they knew one another as Mike Marsh was his coach, and Mike was now Steve’s assistant at Swansea).

    These days, Morgan has really come good, and will soon I predict be heading for the EPL… though not methinks with Argyle. You can see why Glasgow Rangers came sniffing just before he signed for The Pilgrims after that successful loan spell.

    Having watched the full 90 yesterday, Whitaker was the compelling reason we failed to register 3 points. But not the only one.

    Like you say Paul, we were a bit tentative again, and lacking speculative shooting… though Grant looks like he is becoming the exception to the rule. Great goal from him.

    But gee, I was very impressed with Plymouth… not just the players, but their travelling support too. Loved their repeated singing of ‘God Save The King’…!! That will teach us not to sing our Welsh national anthem on occasions other than international matches.

    Gee, when I was a boy, I used to dream of a friendly match between the Wales Xl and a Bluebirds Xl captained by Scot Danny Malloy… and earnestly pray for the City to stuff them…!! (Although of course always cheering Wales on in actual internationals.)

    And mentioning the Argyle: I made a special trip to Home Park in October 2022 to see the newly unveiled statue of the first black English footballer to be picked to play in an international, Jack Leslie. Alas he was shamefully deselected from the team, on the grounds of his colour.

    And while I was with the small crowd (it not being a match-day) surrounding the statue, serendipity decreed that the man standing next to me was the club’s head groundsman. What a real gent he is.

    We talked about Ian Holloway, Neil Warnock, and alas Emiliano Sala (I had to explain that the true facts were far more nuanced than the tabloid newspapers had presented them)… and then we came to the subject of ‘supporters’.

    And here he reminded me that Argyle were not just the team of Plymouth city and the far west of Devon, but were the league team representing CORNWALL.

    Apparently supporters club buses come from as far as Penzance… and that is quite some schlep.

    But as usual, I am DAI-gressing. Let me end by saying how right you were re those two good Tanner crosses at the death… and also the indifferent performance by the referee. Incidentally, I note that the 30 year old Samuel Barrott who I thought a pretty good referee in our victory in Sheffield, was yesterday trusted with the top of the table clash at Portman Road.

    And mentioning the excellent Ipswich side… when you consider that last season Plymouth pipped them for the Division 1 title, well, it was no surprise that they were so darn good yesterday.

    TTFN,
    Dai.

  2. Huw perry says:

    Hi Paul,
    Apologies for late posting – too busy travelling yesterday.
    The match was better than I anticipated. Cocktail of Boxing Day, big crowd and playing a perceived smaller club usually ends in massive disappointment following a rubbish City performance! However, I was entertained for the most part and have to give credit to Plymouth too. They came to play and attack and definitely one of the better teams we have seen down here this season. They brought large numbers and created a good atmosphere. Thanks also to Dai for the additional Plymouth comments.
    As for our performance – already been said by you and others as we were leaving the match. Why take Rubin off being the main query? Especially as the game was only going to open up more in the last 20 mins – conditions where he usually thrives.
    However, accept the fact that the manager has to navigate his way through a crazy schedule and needs to balance game time for his most influential players. That said, thought we were looking good to win and , sadly, our subs didn’t add much to the proceedings this time.
    Good to see Grant playing well. He definitely looks more confident compared to a few weeks ago. And agree the Ralls/ Wintle combo worked well.
    As you say though Paul, I always feel we are just one misplaced pass or sloppy error from being taken advantage of. We seem especially vulnerable now to raking cross field balls and opposition midfielders strolling through us at will.
    Hopefully we can get something out of the next 2 games and hang on for the January reinforcements!

  3. Dai Woosnam says:

    Paul,
    Apols for two typos in my last to you. Although I got ‘Whittaker’ right first time round, I dropped a T in my further mention… presumably because Oscar-winning ‘Forest Whitaker’ was working overtime in my subconscious.
    Oh… and I was remiss in not mentioning Rubin Colwill. Huw quite rightly questions Bulut’s hauling him off… after all, he was not injured, and was showing some fleetness of foot and an ability to glide past opponents… albeit if taking on one too many sometimes. I reckoned it one of his better performances.
    DW

  4. The other Bob Wilson says:

    Thanks Dai and Huw for the replies. Dai, I agree with you about Plymouth but have a few reservations about Russell Martin who I think is too one eyed in his footballing outlook – I think Southampton are the best team we’ve played so far, but, although their recent record suggests differently, I’m not convinced about them defensively.
    Agree with you about Colwill, but I’m going to give our manager some credit for admitting, well near as damnit admitting, that he was wrong to take Rubin off.
    Huw, you make a good point about the game opening up more in the closing minutes (this was also helped by Plymouth continuing to try and win the game rather than settling for a point) and the argument about Colwill is brought into sharper perspective by the withdrawal of another one of our more inventive players, Ralls. As you say though, an enjoyable game overall, especially compared to the likes of Millwall, Birmingham and Hull, another point tonight would be fine as far as I’m concerned, but I can’t see that happening – another home loss beckons I think.

Comments are closed.