Cardiff City’s eleven match unbeaten run under Mick McCarthy came to an end in very unfortunate circumstances today as Watford scored a soft goal in the fourth minute of added time at end of the match to snatch a 2-1 win as the weird stat which says that two goals or below from us in a home game means that we do not win – in fact, as this eighth Cardiff City Stadium defeat of the season suggests, we usually lose.
City went into the game with a home win over Derby that was even more convincing than the 4-0 winning margin suggests sandwiched by draws in away matches at Middlesbrough and Huddersfield where luck was on our side.
Now, when a run of six straight wins comes to an end with a draw at the home of a Play Off rival, it’s a bit harsh to be critical of the performance, but we were poor at the Riverside Stadium and not much better last Friday at Huddersfield where a missed penalty enabled us to extend our unbeaten run for a while longer.
So, the momentum of February was showing signs of stalling in March before today and, although I thought we played better than we had done in our last two away games, the indication that we have hit the buffers to some extent grew stronger as we now find ourselves seven points from the top six with two matches to be played before the final international break of the season.
For all of the hurt of losing through a preventable very late goal, I thought Watford’s win was just about deserved. About ten minutes after the coverage of the match on the club website had finished today, they showed a highlights package that was notable for how much of the action took place in our penalty area – when such a notoriously biased source’s highlights reel is so weighted in the other side’s favour, it does tend to tell a story!
Although there was the ever present threat from set pieces from City which led to second half efforts being hooked over the bar by Keiffer Moore and Aden Flint, in truth, Watford seemed to have most difficulty in dealing with long, high balls forward in the first half especially as central defenders and keeper got themselves in a pickle on a few occasions and needed a bit of luck at times to survive.
However, it was noticeable that the City back three, with their distinct height advantage over their opponents were also less commanding than usual when the ball was played high in their direction, so I think it’s probably fair to say that the gusty wind which blew throughout was more of a factor at times than the pictures, which often showed, bright, sunny conditions, suggested.
City were also dangerous for a short while during a positive, purposeful start which saw Josh Murphy and Harry Wilson getting more possession in promising areas than in any other game I can remember, but it didn’t last and from about the fifteen minute mark onwards, the game was like so many under Neil Harris’ management as we struggled to get our game changers into the match.
Murphy especially was prominent for that short while though as a slip by visiting centre back William Troost Ekong allowed him a clear run in on goal which he wasted with a poor touch as he closed in on keeper Daniel Bachmann. Murphy was much more impressive seconds later though when receiving the ball in a similar position, this time he opted to cross low for Moore who would have had a tap in if the ball had reached him, but Francisco Sierralta in trying to intercept turned the cross into his own net from six yards out.
Watford’s away record this season features plenty of draws and goals scored and conceded at a rate of less than one a game, so there was a feeling before kick off that goals would be at a premium and I definitely felt that, if we were to get the three points, it would be by rediscovering the lost art of the 1-0 or 2-1 home win.
Unfortunately, any chance of a victory through the first of those options disappeared within about a minute and a half of our goal as Watford showed their attacking teeth for the first time by working the ball into our penalty area to create a chance which we looked to have snuffed out until the ball broke to captain Nathaniel Chalobah who worked the space for himself in a crowded penalty area to shoot low past Dillon Phillips from about fifteen yards out.
Jason Perry on the club website and Mick McCarthy after the match were disappointed that Chalobah was allowed to get his shot away and that is the sort of attitude you’d expect from ex players, but, as a fan, I always tend towards praising the scorer when a goal is as expertly taken as this one was – even when it’s against my team.
Watford, with Will Hughes an increasingly influential figure while playing in a manner which you’d never see from a member of our current team, were the better side for the rest of the first half as Joao Pedro’s overhead kick was well struck, but flew straight at Phillips and then Ismailia Sarr’s shot got a slight deflection which made Phillips’ sprawling save to turn the ball for a corner all the more impressive.
With Pedro also flicking just over from eight yards out, Watford could feel a bit hard done by to still be level at the break with their often slick passing only emphasising our shortcomings in that area – I usually agree with what Jason Perry says when he is commentating on one of our games, but when he commented during one of the periods where Watford were particularly on top, that we needed to start passing the ball better to break up our opponent’s control, I couldn’t help but blurt out “but, we can’t do that, haven’t you been watching us for the last six months?” – in truth I could have said five years!
To City’s credit, Watford, and Hughes, were unable to move the ball about as effectively after the break, but still, the bulk of the best chances were theirs. Sarr had a header saved by Phillips and blazed wide from six yards when he should at least have got his effort on target and rather like in their previous two draws, this became a game where you were hoping City would get in with their point intact rather than wishing for, or expecting, a winning goal.
It was definitely looking like we could do that and make it to a dozen unbeaten when Sarr got the better of Perry Ng, who had switched to the left as part of a rearrangement when Curtis Nelson went off with a calf injury (Ciaron Brown moved into central defence and Tom Sang was introduced at right wing back), and was brought down right on the corner of the penalty area.
Now, I’ve seen comments to the effect that we didn’t have enough men in our wall for Adam Masina’s free kick, but, for me, what happened next was a goalkeeping error pure and simple by someone who had been faultless before now since he came on at Ashton Gate to replace Alex Smithies nearly two months ago.
Masina’s shot was certainly well hit, but it didn’t have much else to make you think it was going to be a match winner and it wouldn’t have been if Dillon Phillips had stayed on his feet as it would have been headed straight towards him, but, instead, he went to ground and waved a hand at the ball as it flew over and past him. There was an assumption at first from the commentators that there had been a deflection on the shot, but the first replay knocked that on the head – it was an odd one, maybe a combination of that problematic gusty wind and the modern balls tendency to “wobble” in the air did for Phillips?
So, Watford have three points which may prove vital to their top two hopes come May, not the one they looked like getting. I think that they are probably the team most likely to accompany Norwich into the Premier League automatically, but I hope they don’t and I hope they don’t make it up through the Play Offs either because I find the modern version of the club a hard one to like with their never ending turnover of players and managers.
Watford boss Xisco Munoz, who appears to be doing a very good job and has his team playing better football than his predecessor Vladimir Ivic, spoke of the need for “humility” after the game which was a bit rich when you consider the antics of him and his bench when the winning goal went in and of some of his team when the final whistle was blown. Also, for all that Munoz has done to get Watford playing in the last few months, you know that two or three defeats as the pressure mounts in the spring may well see their trigger happy owners act again – City are a far from perfect example of how a modern day club should operate, but, for all of their time in the Premier League since 2015, I wouldn’t want to be a Watford fan these days.
Just a quick word about Academy. This statement, which was issued by the club overnight suggests that the issue of bullying of youngsters didn’t begin and end with the Craig Bellamy issue which caused the club a lot of bad publicity a year or two ago and, although I cannot go into detail because I would be breaking a confidence, it ties in with a few things I’ve heard since the Bellamy issue – let’s hope the club inquiry is a proper and complete one and not a whitewash.
There is no suggestion that matters under review happened at any particular age group at the moment and the Under 18s were, seemingly, unaffected as they got back to winning ways at Leckwith this lunchtime after a couple of defeats by beating Colchester 5-0 with goals from Taz Mayembe, James Carole, Rhys Schwank, Ryan Kavanagh (pen) and Taylor Jones.
Finally, some words about a couple of books. Firstly, regular Feedback column contributor Anthony Mor O’Brien has published a novel recently – in Anthony’s words,
“The story is about Stanley Sharp (*”Sharp by name and sharp by nature!”) who, with his friend, come out of the Army just after VE Day. They experience several escapades usually involving the quick mind of Stanley at various venues they reach by motor car with petrol from a government storage facility they have discovered.
Stanley briefly meets a WREN named Gloria Munday in London and some time later encounters her again in her home town of Pontypridd. Various adventures in other parts of South Wales occur (Including Tiger Bay) and are generally historically accurate.”
The book is called EPONYMOUS SHARP ESCAPADES and can be bought at
Also, the fiftieth anniversary of City’s 1-0 win over Real Madrid on 10 March 1971 passed on Wednesday, so here’s a further reminder of my book Real Madrid and all that which is a review of both that match and the 1970/71 season in which I’m afraid another home defeat by Watford played a major part! Real Madrid and all that can be ordered from;-
Paul,
Thank you for mentioning my most recent book but, more importantly, thank you very much (Uberdanke Blogmeister) for the years of well written, highly informative and incisive messages and responses which characterise the MAYA blog both from yourself and the other contributors. Differing points of view are accepted without in any way descending into the vicious and often violent behaviour which is for some reason known as “woke”.
That is why I can happily put forward a theory which might explain why our goalkeeper flapped at the ball which gave Watford their victory. If I remember correctly — and there is no guarantee of that — I noticed a bald patch of no grass on the goal line. Given the weather conditions it is not impossible that the patch turned into a slippery trap and the keeper’s feet might have skidded as he went for the ball. If I’m shot down in flames by this theory I know it will be challenged — but as always in a civilised manner.
Watford’s passing ability was incredibly good, something beyond Cardiff’s ability, as Paul points out, but I’d also like to mention Chaloba’s bit of skill in scoring. It reminded me of of Puskas scoring against England in 1953 when Billy Wright was left sitting on his arse. It was an eye-opener for British football and hopefully the way in which Watford played would give us the momentum to discover other players with the same commitment to skill.
Thought you might like to hear from a Watford fan, the way we see things. I have to agree about the number of managers we have churned through – I won’t try to defend that. But most players are given contracts between 4 – 5 years, and there is far more stability than it might seem. The only real turnover is in managers.
The owners have invested in the team and the facilities, and I guess they think they could put my mum in charge, as long as squad quality is there. It was a big statement to hold onto Sarr for this season.
Fair report by the way. Your keeper will bounce back from that. Good luck for the rest of the season.
Thanks again, Paul for your report. It amazes me how, particularly after defeats and the emotions being somewhat ropey, you get your online offering up so quickly when I can’t even think of putting finger to keyboard until a little of the pain has subsided. In those circumstances to write without rancour is commendable.
Again, City went 3412 whilst Watford chose the old-fashioned 433 formation. I say old-fashioned as it was Sir Alf Ramsey’s wingless wonders that made the shape de rigueur at the 1966 World Cup. There the similarities ended though, as Watford utilised two wingers (Sema / left & Sarr / right) which prevented our wing-backs getting forward, a necessity for the sweeper system to be properly functional. Like Brentford, the visitor’s full-backs also pushed on making it a 2 v 1 on our wing-backs. With our three at the back against Watford’s one central attacker (Pedro) we also had little from our spare man coming forward, sadly. Add to that, Hughes, playing just in front of the Watford back-four, who controlled much of the first half; and the three, mentioned earlier who could have made an impact for City in the middle third of the pitch but didn’t, and Watford were composed for much of the game. It was crying out for City to change the shape. This we had to wait for until half-time when Murphy joined with Wilson behind Moore as we went 3421.
Strange then that our most impressive part of the game was in the first 15 mins when Murphy caused problems every time he ran at the Watford defence. Allied to this the visitor’s two centre-backs and goalkeeper had an almost morbid dread of having to try to deal with any ball coming at them from a height of more than 6 ft. It was panic stations for those opening minutes. We could have got more than the one goal we did early on.
Our goal had all the hallmarks of beautiful wing play. Murphy had drifted out wide, ran at Watford’s defence, turned them, put in a lovely ball into the 6 yd box and a retreating defender, mindful of Moore lurking behind him, sliced the ball into his own net. So disappointing then that within 90 secs it was 1-1. City failed to get a foot in to halt the play on the edge of our penalty area and Chalobah hooked the ball home. That was it until the final moments of the game when a mistimed tackle, a wrongly constructed wall and a bad choice from Phillips gave Watford all three points. I must say that the scenes that followed the winner left a bit of a taste in the mouth for me.
Watford were probably more deserving of a win than City but overall I felt a draw was just about right despite the shots on target tally being 1-5. The visitors got out of jail and we were mugged. For too long in this one I felt we were pleased to be holding the opposition at 1-1, and lacked true conviction to go on and win it. With a 25,000 plus crowd behind us at the CCS the outcome quite possibly would have been different. To broaden the issue, to have lost eight games out of 18 at home this season, even allowing for no fans being present, is criminal.
Whenever a Mr Stroud officiates a City game there is a deep intake of breath from this City fan. That said, overall I though his performance was pretty good apart from what was happening in the Watford penalty area. On 22 mins Flint’s shirt was clearly pulled; on 41 mins Moore was bundled over and on 38 mins the City live stream mentioned two City players having their shirts pulled in the box. Nothing was given for any of these incidents.
Brown, I thought, could be pleased with his 90 mins of defensive action; Ralls & Vaulks for reasons mentioned earlier were left trying to shore things up in the middle; Moore had to chase too many hopeful 40 yd thumps up-field whilst Sang played well following his introduction.
Again, this was another one of those games where a team with a bit of movement and pace caused us problems. We must address this situation this summer if we ever want to be a team with anything more than just a desire of progression towards the PL. This week it’s on to Stoke (h) and Swansea (a). By Saturday night we’ll know whether the Play-Offs 2020-21 is still a mathematical possibility, however remote that may be.
Home: 18 … 7 … 3 … 8 … 32-21 … +11 … 24
Away: 18 … 8 … 6 … 4 … 22-16 … + 6 … 30
Total: 36 … 15 … 9 … 12 … 54-37 … +17 … 54
Thanks everyone for your replies. Anthony, that’s a great analogy about the Puskas goal, but I fear that Chalobah’s effort on Saturday will not have the seismic effect on City that the Hungarian one did on England. We’ve had plenty of examples of a more skilful and, I believe enjoyable, approach exposing the limitations in the way we play down the years (the biggest one in my opinion being the latest embarrassment by Swansea in the last south Wales derby in December) and none of them have had an effect on our methods – I’m coming around to thinking that there is a Cardiff “way” according to those with the power to influence these sort of things by hiring and firing managers and we’ve been watching it since Russell Slade was appointed apart from the brief dalliance of a different “Cardiff way” which was totally forgotten about as soon as Paul Trollope was sacked.
As for your explanation of Dillon Phillips horror moment, it’s as plausible as anything I can think of.
Steve, I’ve always found it preferable to write my match reaction pieces as soon as possible after the game because otherwise, I tend to forget things I meant to say – usually, it means I can finish it off ready for publishing first thing the following morning, but, since my move to the top of the Rhondda Valley, I found that I was not going to bed until about 3 am back in the days when I was attending home night games!
As for the referee, I remember thinking he’d had a decent game, but your comments about the fouls Watford got away with proves how conditioned I’ve become to the multitude of penalty offences that are ignored these days because all of the grappling which goes on at every corner, free kick or throw that is delivered into the area is, seemingly considered acceptable. I say that knowing that City are as prone to it as most, but Sean Morrison, in particular, is a magnet for these type of offences and yet I think I’m probably being a bit over optimistic when I say that about two to three per cent of them are penalised.
One other thing, thanks for mentioning Ciaron Brown – I’m not sure he’ll make an effective attacking wing back, but I thought he was one of our better players on Saturday and I should have mentioned him more in my piece, he didn’t let anyone down on his first league start for us.
Lastly, a welcome to Mike and a particular thank you from me for the civilised way you responded to my criticisms of your club. You do surprise me though with your your remark about the long contracts most of your players are on. Maybe it’s me, but I’m constantly taken aback when I look at your side after not particularly paying attention to it for a period of weeks because it always seems to have changed so much. For example, if you’d have asked me to name your likely back four before Saturday, I might have come up with Troost Ekong, but I’d never have thought of the other three because, although I knew of Masina, I didn’t think he was playing much lately, while Femenia is a new name to me (although he shouldn’t be having played more than a hundred times for you!), as is Sierralta.