On 24 January 2012 Cardiff City beat Crystal Palace in the Semi Finals of the League Cup to secure their second appearance in a national Cup Final in four years. After Tom Heaton’s heroics in the penalty shoot out, Malky Mackay and his team were given a rapturous ovation by the ecstatic crowd, but there were two others on the lap of honour who City supporters were eager to give credit to – Chairman Dato Chan Tien Ghee (TG) and Tan Sri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun (Vincent Tan), the club’s largest shareholder and, effectively, it’s owner, were applauded just as much as manager and players were that night.
Nearly fifteen months later on 16 April 2013, City secured promotion to the Premiership with a 0-0 draw against Charlton and once again, Malky Mackay and the playing squad basked in the applause of around 25,000 Cardiff fans. Vincent Tan was there on the pitch as well and the reception he got from many supporters (almost certainly a fair sized majority) was probably as euphoric as it had been a year and a quarter earlier, but it could not be denied that, amongst significant numbers present, his reception was, to put it diplomatically, mixed. Less than a fortnight later at the Club’s Awards night, Mr Tan gave a speech which was occasionally interrupted by disparaging comments and singing from some of those present.
What had happened in such a relatively short time to change peoples perceptions of the man whose financial input in 2010 had, arguably, saved the club? Well, although there are those who are now far more critical of Vincent Tan’s general handling of the club and there are a few who have problems coming to terms with his role in Malaysian politics, the simple truth in most cases is that Mr Tan’s standing has dropped because he changed the team’s kit and badge just under a year ago as part of his “re-branding” of the club.
I’ve seen and heard at least three interviews that Vincent Tan gave in the aftermath of the Charlton game and they all begin with him repeating “lucky red” over the interviewer as they tried to question him. Doing this once would probably be understandable in the excitement of the situation he found himself in, but three times sounds almost defensive to me – it’s as if he is having to justify the decision to himself. Anyway, leaving my amateur psychologist bit to one side for now, what it does do is offer evidence that the re-branding is an issue which is still featuring very prominently in the thoughts of so many involved with the club at every level.
That’s the thing, I’ve done one of these end of season pieces for two of the three previous seasons when the onus was on the club’s finances. Last season I didn’t do one because the re-branding furore overshadowed all else and the truth is it has continued to dominate off field proceedings for the past twelve months. In saying that, the accounts for the year ending 31/5/12 showed the club’s debt getting very close to £100 million (it may well have passed that figure during the season). but the fact that around a quarter of that figure is still owed to the Langston Corporation offers a reminder that Vincent Tan has not yet delivered on the majority of the “benefits” which were originally supposed to accompany the change of kit and badge.
You’ll certainly not get any complaints from me about the level of investment in the team over the past year – Vincent Tan has delivered on his promise there and the notion of increasing the capacity at Cardiff City Stadium going into a second consecutive season in the Premiership seems a more sensible one to me than adding almost 10,000 seats straight away. However, although Sam Hammam’s presence at the Bolton game suggested that a resolution of the Langston debt may be on it’s way, it’s worth remembering that those of us who attended those two meetings with club representatives when the re-branding story first broke over a year ago were being told that one was “imminent” back then!
Similarly, the promised training ground, which, presumably, would be a club asset which would help bring the debt down a bit seems some way off yet and, although I cannot speak for others, I would be surprised if I was the only “reluctant red” who currently feels that their decision to give the club the “benefit of the doubt” last summer hasn’t been justified. Now, I think it has to be admitted that for an awful lot of the 20,000 plus people who turn up to watch the team play at Cardiff City Stadium every fortnight, the re-branding has become something of a non issue – they are happy that Vincent Tan has delivered the goods in terms of investment in the team and promotion, but ask them what colour they’d prefer us to play in and I’d guarantee virtually all of them would say blue.
As others such as Gethin Jenkins, Doug Lee, Alan Whiteley and TG have left the club, so Vincent Tan has become more hands on and us supporters for whom he was previously something of a remote figure who would turn up at two or three matches a season have got to find out more about him. The last three months have seen him appearing in the media and in front of fans and, speaking for myself, each time he has it has confirmed an impression that they he doesn’t really”get” British football and the British football fan (actually I think the word “British” could be dropped in both instances there).
There are exceptions to every rule of course, but getting a team promoted doesn’t mean that it’s supporters are going to wholeheartedly embrace a change of kit and badge that has been foisted upon it on what looks like a whim. By the same token, “Scarfgate” on the night of the Brighton game was not the ringing endorsement of his re-brand that Vincent Tan claimed it to be.
In fact, my opinion is that it was a mistake on the club’s part because it led to a concentrating of people’s minds on the subject. Since that night, there have been more blue shirts and scarves being worn at games (particularly away from home), more blue related songs and even the occasional anti red one (I’ve still not heard a single pro red song yet). Furthermore, a supporters’ organisation has consulted it’s members and as a result it is now urging Vincent Tan “to seriously consider returning the first team home kit to blue at the earliest opportunity with red becoming the away kit” . Ideally, the voting sample in the Supporters’ Trust poll would have been a bigger one, but the “strong support” for a return to a blue home kit should not be ignored.
In the absence of any meaningful indications of financial rewards that the re-branding has brought the club so far, it increasingly looks as if the change to red was, indeed, just a whim on Mr Tan’s part – it certainly sounded like it was in his speech at the Player of the Year do a fortnight ago. If that’s really the case, then, for what it’s worth Mr Tan I believe it was the funding you provided for Malky Mackay which was responsible for our promotion, not our “lucky red” kit – you are the person who should be getting the praise of all City fans, not just a proportion of them and I’m sure you would be if it wasn’t for the change of kit and badge.
One year on and the re-branding controversy is not going to go away, it could do and everyone could share in the euphoria of promotion simply by Vincent Tan doing what the Trust have asked him to do – will it happen? No, I don’t think it will in the short term, but I’ve thought all along that we’ll be back playing in blue some time in the next four years – I’m prepared to donate £100 to charity if we are still in red then, but, after “Scarfgate”, I’m more confident than I was that I won’t have to do that.
by The other Bob Wilson
On Friday I added a footnote to my previous piece on here about yesterday’s Development League Level 2 Final with Charlton praising the club for deciding not to charge an entrance fee for the match. That still applies, it was a very good thing for them to do, but it has to be said that, having made the decision, they then went about implementing it in a manner which would have made Fred Karno’s Circus look like a model of efficiency!
With all that has happened to Cardiff City since 16 April (incredible to think that it is now almost a month since promotion was confirmed), you would have thought that those responsible for the entrance procedures for a Cup Final involving a team which had just been promoted to the Premiership would have made arrangements which included the probability that a good sized crowd would turn up – especially when you consider that it was the last chance for supporters to see their team perform for a few months.
Not at Cardiff though I’m afraid, what we got was, presumably, the same system that applied for other home Development team games this season whereby the crowd goes in through one entrance where each person is, first, given a ticket for the game by one of two people sat at a table and that ticket then has to be scanned (there’s only one scanner available at this entrance) before you are allowed to go into the Stadium. So, it would appear that the club were expecting the same sized crowd as they have got for the Development team league matches this year (an entrance fee was charged for these games) - in my experience we are talking about something like two to four hundred. Instead of that there was a queue trailing from near the ticket office all the way back to the Family Stand and it was only with about five minutes to kick off that a decision was made to open another gate to help deal with demand.
Even when this happened, the queue I was in still stretched back well past the main entrance and it only started moving quickly when the decision was made to stop issuing and scanning tickets and just let everyone in – this, surely, meant that the announced crowd of two thousand five hundred and something was either just the number of tickets scanned or complete guess work. So it was that I finally got into the ground at about ten past three (it would have been at least ten minutes later if they had kept on issuing and scanning tickets), but a look at the scoreboard, which showed 0-0, at least told me I had not missed anything significant – trouble was, when I looked at it again about five minutes later it was showing City 0 Charlton 1 which only confirmed a growing suspicion the club were using less staff at this game than they did for “normal” Development team matches!
Sorry it’s taken so long to get around to what happened in the game, but City really do make it hard for themselves at times and yesterday was a further reminder that, while the club makes giant strides on the pitch, they are, in many ways, still the same ramshackle outfit they’ve always been off it. Anyway, it turned out that the scoreboard was, eventually, correct – Charlton had scored in the first minute, but City were doing virtually all of the attacking in the time since I’d arrived and their pressure was rewarded when a corner by captain Joe Ralls was headed down and Filip Kiss crashed the ball home from close range.
At 1-1 with just under twenty minutes played, it looked like we were on course for an excellent game between two evenly matched sides who had proved themselves the best in the country at this level, but, sadly from a City perspective, this did not turn out to be the case and the brutal truth is that I cannot remember them creating a worthwhile scoring opportunity after that. I don’t want to be too critical here, but it seemed to me that the team were set up wrongly to get the best out of what they had. Now, I say that in the fairly certain knowledge that the system we used was the same one which enabled us to finish the league season so strongly that we were only pipped on goal difference for the title by Charlton and it was the one which enabled us to gain that noteworthy win at Leicester in the Semi Final, but it just didn’t look right to me yesterday.
I spent a fair amount of time last year, and some of this season, saying that we didn’t have the players capable of turning 4-5-1 into an effective 4-3-3 when attacking, but yesterday it seemed to me we had that situation in reverse – we had a 4-3-3 which hardly ever became a 4-5-1 when we were defending or when the opposition had possession. Furthermore, by employing Etien Velikonja quite wide on the right we were giving him less opportunity to show what I reckon is the strongest part of his game, his finishing ability, and he did little to stop the Charlton left back getting forward as often as he could to give his keeper an unmarked target to aim for well up the pitch when clearing. The situation on our right when it came to attacking was not helped by what looked an odd decision to use Josh Yorwerth, not Deji Oshilaja, at right back – Yorwerth didn’t do badly in defensive situations in a position I’ve never seen him play in before, but, with one exception, his crossing when attacking did not trouble the Charlton defence.
It was a bit better on the left where Declan John and Kadeem Harris combined well at times in attack in the first half in particular and, although the latter lost possession plenty of times, he also had his occasional successes when running at opponents – John, like Yorwerth on the right, was left isolated and given little protection by the player in front of him when Charlton attacked though. All of this combined to leave our midfield three of Ralls, Kiss and Theo Wharton to try and cope with Charlton’s four (which often became five when their full backs pushed forward without being, effectively, tracked by a member of our front three). The strange thing was though, that although our trio were being outgunned as a unit during the second half especially, I thought that individually they might well have been our most effective outfield players – there aren’t many better passers of the ball at the club than Ralls and he offered proof of that yesterday, Kiss went about his business effectively and, like Ralls, would be a member of many Championship club’s first team, while Wharton was dogged and determined in his defensive work and also showed some delightful, skillful touches in tight areas.

Elliot Parish in action for Wycombe during his loan spell there earlier in the season – some fine saves yesterday, but couldn’t prevent a defeat by an impressive Charlton outfit.
It would appear that City put an awful lot into the game at Leicester and some of their players looked a bit “leggy” as the game went on (e.g. Rhys Healey) – strange therefore that we didn’t see a City substitution until the last ten minutes of extra time, by which time, the game was as good as over. So, it seems to me that City could have been more effective opponents for Charlton, but, to be honest, I’d say that result wouldn’t have been too different however we’d deployed our players, because Charlton were simply better than us on the day and the 3-1 scoreline didn’t flatter them at all.
With their first team not finishing too far away from the Play Off’s, their Under 21′s winning a national competition and their Under 18′s winning their league, Charlton look an impressive and well run club at the moment. With the talent they have coming through, I think we can expect them to make a real challenge for a Premiership place in the not too distant future. In particular, their attacking duo Michael Smith and Joe Piggott, well supported by first team regular Callum Harriott, caused us plenty of problems with all three of them looking fine footballers in the making.
I mentioned about our midfield three being our best outfield players, but City’s man of the match for me was keeper Elliot Parish – the game wouldn’t have gone into extra time without his contribution and the second half save he made from Piggott was a superb effort.
So, a disappointment on the playing side to finish 2012/13 after all of the celebrations of the last few weeks, but Kevin Cooper and his side deserve plenty of credit for their efforts this season. They’ve playing winning, entertaining football, and I believe the objective behind this new league has been achieved already in a few cases at Cardiff because the games of some of our players in the 19 to 21 age range have developed a lot more than they would have by playing a series of friendly matches like they did last season.
by The other Bob Wilson