A good result, but a performance which emphasises the need for realism when it comes to expectations.

CoymayIt seems to me that in the early weeks of every season during the past ten years or more, whoever has been Cardiff City manager at the time has told everyone that there is no point in looking at the league table until a certain time in the future when it is able to tell a more accurate story as to how things will end up in early May.

As to when that time is, well some of those managers tell us it’s when we’ve played ten games and for others it’s twelve, but the reason why we tend to hear this line trotted out so often must surely be that, in most years anyway, it’s something that’s been widely proven to be correct.

Speaking for myself, the time of the domestic season’s second international break always strikes me as a moment when you can start to draw a few conclusions – so, where does yesterday’s 1-1 draw with league leaders Brighton leave us at the time when we are told that drawing some conclusions about how the campaign will work out is allowable?

Using last season as an example, as we looked forward to Wales facing Bosnia and Cyprus in consecutive home matches in October 2014, the Championship table, certainly at the top of it, wasn’t too different from how it looked after forty six matches.

For example, two current Premier League teams topped the table with Norwich on twenty one points, which was one more than Watford. Beaten Play Off finalists Middlesbrough were fifth, but, reflecting what turned out to be a very congested promotion race, were also on twenty points, while the other Play Off teams (Ipswich and Brentford) were sixth and tenth respectively.

At the bottom, Bolton and Fulham pulled themselves clear of the relegation places, but the writing was already on the wall for Blackpool in twenty third, while fellow current League One sides Wigan and Millwall were twenty first and sixteenth respectively.

If you added up the total yardage for Joe Mason's goals this season, it probably wouldn't reach forty, but this one, which put us ahead after only five minutes yesterday was his fifth in ten Championship matches - there are encouraging signs that, after all of money spent iin recent years, we have a

If you added up the total yardage for Joe Mason’s goals this season, it probably wouldn’t reach forty, but this one, which put us ahead after only five minutes yesterday was his fifth in ten Championship matches – there are encouraging signs that, after all of money spent in recent years, we have a “fox in the box” type striker who cost us less than 200k.*

There were anomalies – the League’s only two unbeaten sides Forest and Charlton were both in the top six within one and two points respectively of Norwich, but would soon begin the slide which would designate them as epitomising “mid table mediocrity throughout the second half of the campaign – eventual Champions Bournemouth found themselves down in eleventh spot on fifteen points.

As for us, we were in fourteenth place, with four points less than we have now despite the fact that we had played eleven matches rather than the ten the current team have had. We may have managed to climb three places by the end of the season, but the dye which saw us spend the last two months of the campaign competing with Forest, Charlton and the likes of Birmingham, Sheffield Wednesday, Leeds and Reading in a meaningless mini league where the prize was to see who came tenth had been cast.

With yesterday’s result leaving us in eighth place, six points behind Brighton, but only a couple behind sixth placed Burnley, the all round picture is, undeniably, a better one than it was twelve months ago. However, rather than have me go on about why even a fine result like yesterday’s still raises questions as to whether this squad is really good enough to maintain, and slightly improve, it’s position over the coming seven months, I’ll leave that to manager Russell Slade.

I believe Slade did a very good job of summing up things in his post match press conference yesterday where he said;-

“We were not great at times, we were loose with the ball and nowhere near our best”.

“We had a good start but didn’t back it up. We got ourselves too deep, we weren’t pressing high enough and when we did win the ball back we were too eager and got the ball turned over again.”.

“It was a open game in the second-half but they had 20 shots to our six and had superiority in possession.”

What I have to say here is that two of those comments were followed by praise for the way we still managed to become the first team to take points off Brighton at the Amex Stadium this season, despite us not having played that well.

Our manager also said;-

“We wouldn’t have eked out that result last season. That’s the progress of the team, the spirit and togetherness of this group got us that result.”

That seems a reasonable and correct statement to me .

Now, there are still issues which concern me about Russell Slade. For a start, I mention quite often on here that the impression is often given that providing encouragement to our younger players by showing them that there is a route into the first team for them is something that our manager regards as low priority.

Also, his insistence on playing 4-4-2 (albeit with some variations from what is seen as the traditional method of playing that system) every week does not impress me and, up to now at least, his record when it comes to new signings can only be described as mixed. The one fairly sizable fee Slade has paid, for current Preston loanee Eoin Doyle, only adding to a suspicion that he won’t be the best if he is ever given the chance to spend the sort of money our last two managers were on new recruits.

However, it would be churlish not to acknowledge that, if our season can be called a success at this early stage, an awful lot of the credit for that has to go the manager. He clearly has a squad who want to play for him and, as I’ve mentioned before, even if his critics carry on insisting that the improvement in the quality of our football and results since February is solely down to Paul Trollope’s arrival, then they at least have to credit Slade for being open minded enough to allow his Head Coach to change what was there before.

I think it’s fair to say that that what we’ve seen so far in 15/16 has at least shown that Vincent Tan’s choice of manager a year ago has not been quite the disaster that very many supporters spent most of last season believing it to be – I certainly fell into that category at times!

However, if our manager can continue to keep us in or around the top six for the next few months, then Mr Tan has a few big decisions to make as the January transfer window looms.

For all of the encouraging signs provided by our start to the season, recent games have offered some evidence that the time is approaching where Russell Slade may have to consider the team changes that he has, largely, been reluctant to make so far. Although having Peter Whittingham going through a run of improved form like he is now has to be beneficial to any Cardiff team, there are individuals whose performance levels have dropped from the standards they set for themselves earlier in the season.

To name names, Sean Morrison was not at his best again yesterday, Anthony Pilkington (who I’d normally have as one of the first names on my team sheet) followed up a quietish display against Charlton last week with a poor one at Brighton and, with no goals in his last five appearances, Kenwyne Jones is showing signs of drifting into the exasperating listlessness we see from him from time to time.

The South Wales Echo reported during the week that there was no fee involved in the Idriss Saadi signing and, if that is true, then City’s summer spending was very, very low by the standards of this division – something that tends to serve as a reminder that we are still largely relying on the players who helped make last season such a miserable experience.

By and large, improvements in attitude and fitness levels should mean that most players will not drop to typical 2014/15 performance levels too often. However, it’s also true to say that even if the mind and body is willing, it won’t be enough if the basic talent that marks a footballer out as someone who can perform consistently well at the top end of the Championship isn’t there and  I’m not sure it is in all of the players who have been regular starters this season.

Having someone like Bruno Manga in the squad should mean that there is no problem with making a change at centreback as long as he stays fit and you’d like to think that we have the options in wide areas to handle a change there as well, but, up front? I’m not sure we have.

There are those in the local media who talk about Kenwyne Jones as being the best target man type striker in the Championship. For me, he can be, but they are only a quarter, or maybe a third, right in that opinion. I say that because, based on what I’ve seen of the player at this level since we got relegated, there are only about ten to fifteen league matches a season where the Kenwyne they talk about turns up, whereas there are at least as many where the player who did little to stem the tide of play towards the City goal yesterday puts in an appearance – it also has to be said that in the year this manager, who favours playing two up front, has been here, there has been no sign whatsoever of anyone being able to combine with Kenwyne to form even a decent quality strike partnership at this level.

My fear is that the season could end up like one of those we had during Dave Jones’ early days where Play Off bids stalled because of insufficient strength in depth in some areas of the pitch. Even if “Premier League Kenwyne” was there for nearly all of our remaining matches, it seems to me that normal wear and tear would see Russell Slade eventually having to rely on players he doesn’t appear to rate or trust.

Russell Slade acknowledges the City support at the end of yesterday's game - I would say his stock among fans is as high as it's ever been in the past year.*

Russell Slade acknowledges the City support at the end of yesterday’s game – I would say his stock among fans is as high now as it’s ever been in the past year.*

Back in those Dave Jones days I talked about, it was Peter Ridsdale who was responsible for allocating the finances. Although there was one notorious time when he wasn’t, Ridsdale was usually ready (occasionally too ready!) to splash what cash we had during January and it shouldn’t be forgotten that we were able to sign Whittingham in January during these years for a very good price, with the signing of Ricky Scimeca in the same window being another very good piece of business.

However, the fact that, for every Whittingham and Scimeca, there tended to be two or three Iwan Redans, Warren Feeneys or Guylain Ndumbu-Nsungus tends to emphasise the restrictions Dave Jones had to operate under, whereas it could be that money would be no object come January under the current ownership.

I say this while also believing that Vincent Tan can hardly be blamed if, having made so much money available to the club in the form of loans over the last six years or so, he decided to continue with what appears to be the current policy of having to bring in transfer receipts before anything can be spent on new players.

My view is that a continuation of that policy, justified that it may be on one level, has to mean that Mr Tan would have to accept that any chance we have of playing Premier League football next season would be dramatically reduced.

Yes, there are those previously mentioned doubts about whether Russell Slade would be one of those managers who is able to spend significant sums in the transfer market well (there are plenty who can’t), but the view I’m coming around to is that, in recent months, he has earned the right to be able to do so in January.

It wouldn’t have to be a fortune and I’d say we’d only need two or three more players, but, hopefully, Vincent Tan is going to be faced with a decision soon as to whether the priority for this season is more of what appears to be a policy of repaying some of those loans or regaining a place in the league where his chances of getting more of that money back would be much improved.

*photos courtesy of http://www.walesonline.co.uk/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Down in the dugout, Out on the pitch, Up in the Boardroom and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to A good result, but a performance which emphasises the need for realism when it comes to expectations.

  1. (1) Why does Alex Revell not get a game?
    (2) When Russell Slade read the Observer’s Book on Football Management, had someone removed the pages on defending from the front?

  2. MIKE HOPE says:

    My only quarrel with your assessment is your optimistic hope of ten to fifteen premier league standard performances from Kenwynne.Apart from his set piece defending in the near post area his good performances are becoming collectors items.I think that his supporters in the media especially Blakeys bootroom have been seeing the Emperors clothes for some time now.On the subject of our younger players as you are one of the few supporters to watch him regularly do you think that Declan John is ready for a place on the bench as cover for both full back and wing positions?

  3. Russell says:

    Would disagree on his signings :
    The two full backs look decent and have sparked Fabio into life.
    Doyle was worth a punt considering his lower league goal scoring record , has suffered from Masons form.
    Revell is a hard worker that could add value from the bench ,however we have Sammy now.
    Sammy was a good loan signing .
    O’keefe not a great signing.
    Kennedy looked a great skilful signing ,something has gone wrong I think internally I think ??

    Comparing this with previous manager signings I don’t think he’s not performed so badly,for a relatively lesser connected mangers , we have seen in the past.

  4. The other Bob Wilson says:

    As always, thanks for the comments. Anthony, it appears that Ameobi, rather than Revell, is the alternative to Jones doesn’t it. I don’t believe we have enough forwards in our first team squad for it to happen, but Revell would probably be best served by going somewhere on loan – I reckon there would be Championship clubs prepared to sign him. As for defending from the front, Revell is probably the best we have at that, but I suppose when it comes to defending, Jones is very effective (possibly most effective these days) at defending free kicks and corners.
    Mike, I tend to agree that I might have been a bit generous about Kenwyne – I always go back to how much we are paying him and U don’t believe the odd very good performance here and there justifies it.
    With regard to Declan John, the easy answer to your question is yes, but, to be fair to our manager, it should be qualified by the fact that Declan was injured for the first few weeks of the season. Since he has regained fitness, I would say he is the member of the Under 21 team who has done most to merit a call up to the senior squad, but, there is so little evidence out there under this manager that performances at Under 21 level earn you a promotion to the first team squad.
    Russell, my opinion on Russell Slade’s signings is influenced a lot by the fact that he so rarely picks them in the starting eleven for the first team. There is always one of Peltier or Malone in there, but no one else gets much of a look in. You are right that he’s never had the chance to spend the sort of money that Malky and Ole did and so I’d say it’s not fair really to compare his record with theirs, but one of the things which I thought might work out well for us when Slade was appointed was that his knowledge of the lower divisions might see us pick up some cheap, excellent value for money signings – it’s just not happened so far.

  5. The other Bob Wilson says:

    I mentioned on the City messageboard I use that I would start putting the replies when I post my blog pieces on there into the Feedback section on here, so here they are for people to read/ignore/answer if they want to.

    From “insider”;

    “You didn’t go to the game then Bob.
    I think Moore deserves a mention he made 3 excellent saves and should keep his place after the international break.”

    From “poc”;

    “it was a lucky point yesterday , mind you it didnt help playing the first 63 minutes with ten men”

    From “Vimana”;

    “Indeed, January’s window will be interesting.
    It is difficult to work out what VT’s current plan is.”

    From “Lawnmower”;

    “I actually thought Morrison did well yesterday and that Pilkington was good v Charlton.

    However I would agree that it is a worry that Kenwyne seems to be falling out of for

    Ameobi offered a lot more and after he came on we actually looked like we might be able to nick all 3 points, although Brighton were much the better side.”

    From “Tuerto”;

    “Bob, I wasn’t at yesterdays game, although listened on the radio. It seems that Slade has reiterated my feelings on yesterdays performance in the comments you used in your excellent blog piece. I’m not anti Slade, he has turned my opinion on him by settling the squad and seemingly getting players do what they are capable of.

    I was at the Hull game, and for what seemed to be a lot of possession on our part, we rarely troubled Hull, even in advanced positions, it seemed like the Hull defence and Bruce almost new what Slade and the players were likely to do, and they dealt with any threat with ease. Hull created two opportunities and scored from them, it was the it looked like we were trying to break a rock with a Toffee hammer and when it was Hull’s turn, they brought out the industrial concrete breaker,used it to it’s capacity, then packed it away and continued with their business. In short, Slade and the players were all too predictable in advanced areas and were snuffed out by an experienced manager and better players.

    Another thing I am concerned with is the changing of Jones with Ameobi, and the insistence to lob the ball into channels for Ameobi to chase. It’s very primitive, predictable and I don’t think the way Ameobi plays lends himself to that style, he lacks stamina. I see Ameobi as a player who can drop into midfield and maybe turn players and set up a passage of play, I have my reservations about Ameobi, but throwing long balls over the top of opposing fullbacks in the hope that Ameobi will create something is crude in the extreme, and certainly not playing to his strenghs.”

    From “DubaiDai”
    “Unfortunately Jones offers virtually nothing and Mason is in desperate need to play alongside a good striker.

    This is a key position which will stop us from gaining a league position much above 10-12 (once everything settles down).

    Unfortunately the defence will not be able to keep many clean sheets going forward and our inability to punish teams may cause us grief.

    Could Idriss come good ?
    I won’t hold my breath….”

Comments are closed.